博碩士論文 954403017 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:10 、訪客IP:3.128.205.62
姓名 韓揚銘(Yang-ming Han)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 資訊管理學系
論文名稱 泛用型商業智慧系統的持續使用因素探討
(A Study on the Determinants of Continuance Usage of Pervasive BIS)
相關論文
★ 製藥業的成本會計評估研究─ 一個ABC成本制度的應用★ 一個保險業的資料採擷應用--業務員的薪酬制度分析
★ 農漁產品電子化交易中分類分級管理之研究★ 應用類神經網路建構壽險核保決策支援之研究
★ 企業導入ERP之關鍵成功因素-個案研究★ 體外診斷醫療器材滿足CE及GMP驗證要求之個案研
★ 企業資訊系統委外研究-以個案銀行為例★ DRAM月平均價格變動分析
★ 定期航運產業運價及運送時間對經營績效影響之研究-以某外商海運公司在台灣經營為例★ 以交通儲值卡作為電子支付工具的營運模式及可行性分析
★ 軟體公司能力成熟度評估★ 加速台灣海關的通關便捷化-提升行動化服務的解決方案
★ 以均勻度係數為預測晶圓良率指標之可行性分析-以國內某DRAM廠為例★ 某公司資訊部門變革失敗之探討
★ 資訊部門導入ITIL 管理機制之現況分析─ 以企業導入ITIL 服務支援為例★ 導入WCO SAFE 優質企業之可行性分析–以A航空公司為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 在現今大數據的經濟環境裡,企業逐漸採用了商業智慧系統 (Business Intelligence System, BIS) 提供企業內部及外部資訊給不同工作層級的人員,藉此來協助面對不同的工作決策情境。然而,資訊部門為了讓泛用化 (pervasive) 的BIS變得更被妥善運用,因此要如何讓泛用型BIS持續被使用則成為實務上重要的挑戰。

本研究目的即為建立一模型來解釋泛用型BIS持續使用行為。除了基於Bhattacherjee及Limayem的模型外,本研究額外從心理賦權(Psychological Empowerment) 及因果歸因理論 (Causal Attribution Theory) 來透過內在動機的角度進行研究和探討。因此,本研究最後以兩階段的模式收集到133位樣本,其結果支持 Bhattacherjee的基礎模型外,對於「習慣」也呈現了對泛用型BIS的持續使用有直接效果和調節效果之影響。並且,本研究也從結果顯示了「心理賦權」對持續使用意圖有直接影響,而「因果歸因」於持續使用意圖和持續使用行為間則呈現「純調節」(Pure Moderator) 的效果。這些結果更為清楚闡述泛用型商業智慧系統持續使用意圖和持續使用行為之關係。藉由上述調查結果,本研究提出管理意涵及實務建議將供給研究人員、系統開發人員、及相關管理者進行參考和討論。
摘要(英) To cope with the huge data flow in today’s uncertain economic environment, many organizations have adopted pervasive business intelligence systems (BIS) to provide internal and external information to stakeholders at all working levels for their decision-making scenarios. However, the continued pervasive usage of BIS has become a practical challenge. The aim of this study is to build a model to explain the pervasive BIS user’s continued usage. In addition to Bhattacherjee’s original continued usage model and Limayem et al.’s model, we also include the concept of empowerment and causal attribution theory through individual intrinsic task motivation in the pervasive BIS context.

The model was empirically tested using data from 133 respondents obtained from a two-stage questionnaire process asking questions designed to illuminate the situation of continued voluntary pervasive usage of BIS. The results support Bhattacherjee’s original continuance usage model and demonstrate that habit has a direct effect on pervasive BIS usage and acts as a moderator between continuance intention and usage. We also found that psychological empowerment has a direct effect on continuance intention and that causal attribution acts as a pure moderator between pervasive continuance BIS intention and continued usage behavior. This result clarifies the relationship between pervasive BIS continuance intention and continuance usage. Following by our survey, important theoretical and practical implications of these finding are discussed for researchers, system developers and managers.
關鍵字(中) ★ 持續使用
★ 賦權
★ 因果歸因理論
★ 習慣
★ 泛用型商業智慧系統
關鍵字(英) ★ Continued usage
★ Empowerment
★ Causal Attribution Theory
★ Habit
★ Pervasive BIS
論文目次 中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
Content iv
Figures vii
Tables viii
1.Introduction 1
1.1.Research Background and Motivation 1
1.2.Overview of this Study 5
2.Literature Review 6
2.1.Pervasive BIS 6
2.2.IS Continuance Model – On the Conscious Side 11
2.3.IS Continuance Model – On the Unconscious Side 15
2.4.Empowerment 19
2.5.Attribution Theory – Causal Attribution 24
3.Research Model and Hypotheses 28
3.1.Overview of the Research Model 28
3.2.Research Hypotheses 31
4.Research Methodology 40
4.1.Data Collection 40
4.2.Instrument Development 42
4.3.Method of Data Analysis 45
5.Data Analysis 46
5.1.Descriptive Statistics 46
5.2.Measurement Model 52
5.3.Structural Model 59
6.Discussion 63
6.1.Satisfaction, Continuance Intention and Usage 65
6.2.Effect of Habit on Pervasive Continuance Usage 66
6.3.Psychological Empowerment and Pervasive Continuance Usage 69
6.4.Causal Attribution and Pervasive Continuance Usage 70
7.Implications and Conclusions 71
7.1.Theoretical Implications 71
7.2.Managerial Implications 74
7.3.Conclusion 77
7.4.Limitations and Suggestions 78
References 80
Appendix 93
A1. Questionnaire – First Stage 93
A2. Questionnaire – Second Stage 96
A3. Outer Model Loadings and Cross Loadings 97
參考文獻 1. Aarts, H. and Dijksterhuis, A., 2000, “The automatic activation of goal-directed behaviour: The case of travel habit,” Journal of Environmental Psychology, Vol. 20 No. 1, pp. 75-82.
2. Aarts, H., Paulussen, T. and Schaalma, H., 1997, “Physical exercise habit: on the conceptualization and formation of habitual health behaviours,” Health Education Research, Vol. 12 No. 3, pp. 363-374.
3. Aarts, H., Verplanken, B. and Knippenberg, A., 1998, “Predicting behavior from actions in the past: Repeated decision making or a matter of habit?” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 28 No. 15, pp. 1355-1374.
4. Abdelrazek, F., Skytt, B., Aly, M., El‐Sabour, M. A., Ibrahim, N. and Engström, M., 2010, “Leadership and management skills of first‐line managers of elderly care and their work environment,” Journal of Nursing Management, Vol. 18 No. 6, pp. 736-745.
5. Ajzen, I., 1991, “The theory of planned behavior,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 50 No. 2, pp. 179-211.
6. Amoako-Gyampah, K. and Salam, A. F., 2004, “An extension of the technology acceptance model in an ERP implementation environment,” Information & Management, Vol. 41 No. 6, pp. 731-745.
7. Anderson, J. C. and Gerbing, D. W., 1988, “Structural equation modeling in practice: A review and recommended two-step approach,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 103 No. 3, pp. 411-423.
8. Bacharach, S. B., Bamberger, P., Conley, S. C. and Bauer, S., 1990, “The dimensionality of decision participation in educational organizations: The value of a multi-domain evaluative approach,” Educational Administration Quarterly, Vol. 26 No. 2, pp. 126-167.
9. Bargh, J. A., Gollwitzer, P. M., Lee-Chai, A., Barndollar, K. and Trötschel, R., 2001, “The automated will: nonconscious activation and pursuit of behavioral goals,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 81 No. 6, pp. 1014-1027.
10. Barner, R., 1994, “Enablement: the key to empowerment,” Training & Development, Vol. 48 No. 6, pp. 33-36.
11. Barnes, S. J., 2011, “Understanding use continuance in virtual worlds: Empirical test of a research model,” Information & Management, Vol. 48 No. 8, pp. 313-319.
12. Baron, R. A. and Richardson, D. R., 1996, Human aggression, Springer.
13. Bergeron, F., Raymond, L., Rivard, S. and Gara, M. F., 1995, “Determinants of EIS use: Testing a behavioral model,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 131-146.
14. Bhattacherjee, A., 2001a, “Understanding information systems continuance: An expectation-confirmation model,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25 No. 3, pp. 351-370.
15. Bhattacherjee, A., 2001b, “An empirical analysis of the antecedents of electronic commerce service continuance,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 32 No. 2, pp. 201-214.
16. Biernacki, P. and Waldorf, D., 1981, “Snowball sampling: Problems and techniques of chain referral sampling,” Sociological Methods & Research, Vol. 10 No. 2, pp. 141-163.
17. Biron, M. and Bamberger, P. A., 2011, “More than lip service: linking the intensity of empowerment initiatives to individual well-being and performance,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 258-278.
18. Blanchard, K., Carlos, J. P. and Randolph, A., 2001, Empowerment takes more than a minute, Berrett-Koehler Publishers.
19. Caserio, C., 2011. “Relationships between ERP and Business Intelligence: An empirical research on two different upgrade approaches,” Information Technology and Innovation Trends in Organizations. Springer, pp. 363-370.
20. Chang, L. M., Chang, S. I., Ho, C. T., Yen, D. C. and Chiang, M. C., 2011, “Effects of IS characteristics on e-business success factors of small-and medium-sized enterprises,” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 27 No. 6, pp. 2129-2140.
21. Charng, H. W., Piliavin, J. A. and Callero, P. L., 1988, “Role identity and reasoned action in the prediction of repeated behavior,” Social Psychology Quarterly, Vol. 51 No. 4, pp. 303-317.
22. Check, J. W. and Schutt, R. K., 2011. “Survey Research,” Research Methods in Education. Sage Publications, pp. 159-185.
23. Chin, W. W., 1998. “The partial least squares approach for structural equation modeling,” in Modern Methods for Business Research. Lawrence Erlbaum, Mahwah, NJ.
24. Chin, W. W., 2010. “How to write up and report PLS analyses,” Handbook of partial least squares. Springer, pp. 655-690.
25. Chin, W. W., Marcolin, B. L. and Newsted, P. R., 2003, “A partial least squares latent variable modeling approach for measuring interaction effects: Results from a Monte Carlo simulation study and an electronic-mail emotion/adoption study,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 189-217.
26. Chin, W. W. and Newsted, P. R., 1999, “Structural equation modeling analysis with small samples using partial least squares,” Statistical Strategies for Small Sample Research, Vol. 1 No. 1, pp. 307-341.
27. Conger, J. A. and Kanungo, R. N., 1988, “The empowerment process: Integrating theory and practice,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 13 No. 3, pp. 471-482.
28. Davis, F. D., 1989, “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. No., pp. 319-340.
29. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P. and Warshaw, P. R., 1989, “User acceptance of computer technology: a comparison of two theoretical models,” Management Science, Vol. 35 No. 8, pp. 982-1003.
30. Dixon, A. L., Spiro, R. L. and Jamil, M., 2001, “Successful and unsuccessful sales calls: Measuring salesperson attributions and behavioral intentions,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 65 No. 3, pp. 64-78.
31. Downing, C. E., 1999, “System usage behavior as a proxy for user satisfaction: an empirical investigation,” Information & Management, Vol. 35 No. 4, pp. 203-216.
32. Drucker, P. F., 1988, “The coming of the new organization,” Harvard Business Review, Vol. 66 No., pp. 45-53.
33. Elbashir, M. Z., Collier, P. A. and Davern, M. J., 2008, “Measuring the effects of business intelligence systems: The relationship between business process and organizational performance,” International Journal of Accounting Information Systems, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 135-153.
34. Esposito, V. V., Chin, W. W., Henseler, J. and Wang, H., 2010, Handbook of partial least squares: Concepts, methods and applications.
35. Fishbein and Ajzen, 1975, Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA.
36. Folkes, V. S., 1988, “Recent attribution research in consumer behavior: A review and new directions,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 548-565.
37. Folkes, V. S., Koletsky, S. and Graham, J. L., 1987, “A field study of causal inferences and consumer reaction: the view from the airport,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. No., pp. 534-539.
38. Fornell, C. and Larcker, D. F., 1981, “Evaluating structural equation models with unobservable variables and measurement error,” Journal of marketing research, Vol. 18 No. 1, pp. 39-50.
39. Gartner, 2013. “Gartner Says Business Intelligence and Analytics Need to Scale Up to Support Explosive Growth in Data Sources,” available at: http://www.gartner.com/newsroom/id/2313915 (accessed 7/23 2014).
40. Guariglia, A. and Rossi, M., 2002, “Consumption, habit formation, and precautionary saving: evidence from the British Household Panel Survey,” Oxford Economic Papers, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 1-19.
41. Guinea, A. O. D. and Markus, M. L., 2009, “Why break the habit of a lifetime? Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 433-444.
42. Hair, J. F., Hult, G. T., Ringle, C. and Sarstedt, M., 2013, A Primer on Partial Least Squares Structural Equation Modeling (PLS-SEM), SAGE publications, Inc.
43. Heider, F., 1958, The psychology of interpersonal relations, Psychology Press, Hillsdale, NJ.
44. Hempel, P. S., Zhang, Z. X. and Han, Y., 2012, “Team Empowerment and the Organizational Context Decentralization and the Contrasting Effects of Formalization,” Journal of Management, Vol. 38 No. 2, pp. 475-501.
45. Henseler, J., 2010, “On the convergence of the partial least squares path modeling algorithm,” Computational Statistics, Vol. 25 No. 1, pp. 107-120.
46. Hewstone, M. E., Stroebe, W. E. and Stephenson, G. M. E., 1996, Introduction to social psychology: A European perspective, Blackwell Publishing, Oxford.
47. Hochwälder, J., 2007, “The psychosocial work environment and burnout among Swedish registered and assistant nurses: The main, mediating, and moderating role of empowerment,” Nursing & Health Sciences, Vol. 9 No. 3, pp. 205-211.
48. Howell, J. M. and Avolio, B. J., 1993, “Transformational leadership, transactional leadership, locus of control, and support for innovation: Key predictors of consolidated-business-unit performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 78 No. 6, pp. 891.
49. Hunton, J. E. and Beeler, J. D., 1997, “Effects of user participation in systems development: a longitudinal field experiment,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 359-388.
50. IDC, 2008, “Improving Organizational Decision-Making Through Pervasive Business Intelligence: The Five Key Factors That Lead to Business Intelligence Diffusion,” IDC Multiclient Study, Vol. 214958 No.
51. IDC, 2013. “IDC Forecasts Business Analytics Software Market to Continue on Its Strong Growth Trajectory Through 2017 ” available at: http://www.idc.com/getdoc.jsp?containerId=prUS24194613 (accessed 07/23 2014).
52. Iivari, J., 2005, “An empirical test of the DeLone-McLean model of information system success,” ACM Sigmis Database, Vol. 36 No. 2, pp. 8-27.
53. James, W., 2011, The principles of psychology, Digireads. com Publishing.
54. James, Y. L. T. H., S. J. and Tam, K. Y., 2006, “The effects of post-adoption beliefs on the expectation-confirmation model for information technology continuance,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies, Vol. 64 No. 9, pp. 799-810.
55. Jasperson, J. S., Carter, P. E. and Zmud, R. W., 2005, “A comprehensive conceptualization of post-adoptive behaviors associated with information technology enabled work systems,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 29 No. 3, pp. 525-557.
56. Jones, E. E. and Davis, K. E., 1965, “From acts to dispositions the attribution process in person perception,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 2 No., pp. 219-266.
57. Jones, E. E. and Harris, V. A., 1967, “The attribution of attitudes,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 3 No. 1, pp. 1-24.
58. Jones, E. E. and Nisbett, R. E., 1971, The actor and the observer: Divergent perceptions of the causes of behavior, General Learning Press Morristown, NJ.
59. Joshi, K. and Pant, S., 2008, “Development of a framework to assess and guide IT investments: An analysis based on a discretionary–mandatory classification,” International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 28 No. 3, pp. 181-193.
60. Kanter, R. M., 1993, Men and Women of the Corporation, Basic Books, New York.
61. Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W. and Chervany, N. L., 1999, “Information technology adoption across time: a cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 23 No. 2, pp. 183-213.
62. Karsten, R., 2002, “An analysis of IS professional and end user causal attributions for user-system outcomes,” Journal of Organizational and End User Computing, Vol. 14 No. 4, pp. 51-73.
63. Kehoe, C., Pitkow, J. and Rogers, J., 1998, GVU’s Ninth WWW User Survey Report, Office of Technology Licensing, Georgia Tech Research Corporation, Atlanta.
64. Kim, S. S. and Malhotra, N. K., 2005, “A longitudinal model of continued IS use: An integrative view of four mechanisms underlying postadoption phenomena,” Management Science, Vol. 51 No. 5, pp. 741-755.
65. Kiron, D., Shockley, R., Kruschwitz, N., Finch, G. and Haydock, M., 2011, “Analytics: The widening divide,” MIT Sloan Management Review, Vol. Nov No., pp. 1-20.
66. Knol, J. and Van Linge, R., 2009, “Innovative behaviour: The effect of structural and psychological empowerment on nurses,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 359-370.
67. Kuo, Y. F., Wu, C. M. and Deng, W. J., 2009, “The relationships among service quality, perceived value, customer satisfaction, and post-purchase intention in mobile value-added services,” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 25 No. 4, pp. 887-896.
68. Kuokkanen, L. and Leino‐Kilpi, H., 2000, “Power and empowerment in nursing: three theoretical approaches,” Journal of Advanced Nursing, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 235-241.
69. Laschinger, H. K., Finegan, J., Shamian, J. and Wilk, P., 2001, “Impact of structural and psychological empowerment on job strain in nursing work settings: expanding Kanter′s model,” Journal of Nursing Administration, Vol. 31 No. 5, pp. 260-272.
70. Laschinger, H. K., Sabiston, J. A. and Kutszcher, L., 1997, “Empowerment and staff nurse decision involvement in nursing work environments: testing Kanter′s theory of structural power in organizations.,” Research in Nursing Health, Vol. 20 No. 4, pp. 341-352.
71. Lee, J. and Wei, F., 2011, “The mediating effect of psychological empowerment on the relationship between participative goal setting and team outcomes–a study in China,” The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 22 No. 02, pp. 279-295.
72. Legris, P., Ingham, J. and Collerette, P., 2003, “Why do people use information technology? A critical review of the technology acceptance model,” Information & Management, Vol. 40 No. 3, pp. 191-204.
73. Li, M., 2011, “Online government advisory service innovation through Intelligent Support Systems,” Information & Management, Vol. 48 No. 1, pp. 27-36.
74. Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G. and Cheung, C. M. K., 2007, “How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 705-737.
75. Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G. and Chin, W. W. 2001. Intention does not always matter: the contingent role of habit on IT usage behavior. Proceedings of the 9th European Conference on Information Systems. Bled, Slovenia.
76. Lindbladh, E. and Lyttkens, C. H., 2002, “Habit versus choice: the process of decision-making in health-related behaviour,” Social Science & Medicine, Vol. 55 No. 3, pp. 451-465.
77. Manojlovich, M., 2005, “Predictors of professional nursing practice behaviors in hospital settings,” Nursing Research, Vol. 54 No. 1, pp. 41-47.
78. Markarian, J., Brobst, S. and Bedell, J., 2008, “Critical Success Factors Deploying Pervasive BI (Joint white paper),” Informatica, Teradata, MicroStrategy, USA. viewed, Vol. 10 No.
79. Maynard, M. T., Mathieu, J. E., Gilson, L. L., O’boyle, E. H. and Cigularov, K. P., 2013, “Drivers and outcomes of team psychological empowerment A meta-analytic review and model test,” Organizational Psychology Review, Vol. 3 No. 2, pp. 101-137.
80. Miller, D. T. and Ross, M., 1975, “Self-serving biases in the attribution of causality: Fact or fiction?,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 82 No. 2, pp. 213.
81. Mittal, B., 1988, “Achieving Higher Seat Belt Usage: The Role of Habit in Bridging the Attitude‐Behavior Gap1,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 18 No. 12, pp. 993-1016.
82. Mittereder, D., 2005. “Pervasive Business Intelligence Enhancing Key Performance Indicators,” available at: http://www.information-management.com/issues/20050401/1023894-1.html (accessed 12/01 2011).
83. Mone, M. A. and Baker, D. D., 1992, “A social-cognitive, attributional model of personal goals: An empirical evaluation,” Motivation and Emotion, Vol. 16 No. 4, pp. 297-321.
84. Nelson, R. R., Todd, P. A. and Wixom, B. H., 2005, “Antecedents of information and system quality: an empirical examination within the context of data warehousing,” Journal of Management Information Systems, Vol. 21 No. 4, pp. 199-235.
85. Nikbin, D., Ismail, I. and Marimuthu, M., 2012, “The impact of causal attributions on customer satisfaction and switching intention: Empirical evidence from the airline industry,” Journal of Air Transport Management, Vol. 25 No., pp. 37-39.
86. Oliver, R. L., 1980, “A cognitive model of the antecedents and consequences of satisfaction decisions,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. No., pp. 460-469.
87. Orbell, S., Blair, C., Sherlock, K. and Conner, M., 2001, “The theory of planned behavior and ecstasy use: Roles for habit and perceived control over taking versus obtaining substances,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 31 No. 1, pp. 31-47.
88. Ortiz De, G. A. and Markus, M. L., 2009, “Why break the habit of a lifetime? Rethinking the roles of intention, habit, and emotion in continuing information technology use,” Management Information Systems Quarterly, Vol. 33 No. 3, pp. 3.
89. Ouellette, J. A. and Wood, W., 1998, “Habit and intention in everyday life: the multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 124 No. 1, pp. 54.
90. Patrick, A. and Laschinger, H. K., 2006, “The effect of structural empowerment and perceived organizational support on middle level nurse managers’ role satisfaction,” Journal of nursing management, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 13-22.
91. Patrick, A. and Laschinger, H. K. S., 2006, “The effect of structural empowerment and perceived organizational support on middle level nurse managers’ role satisfaction,” Journal of Nursing Management, Vol. 14 No. 1, pp. 13-22.
92. Pieterse, A. N., Van Knippenberg, D., Schippers, M. and Stam, D., 2010, “Transformational and transactional leadership and innovative behavior: The moderating role of psychological empowerment,” Journal of Organizational Behavior, Vol. 31 No. 4, pp. 609-623.
93. Podsakoff, P. M., Mackenzie, S. B., Lee, J.-Y. and Podsakoff, N. P., 2003, “Common method biases in behavioral research: a critical review of the literature and recommended remedies,” Journal of applied psychology, Vol. 88 No. 5, pp. 879.
94. Podsakoff, P. M. and Organ, D. W., 1986, “Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects,” Journal of Management, Vol. 12 No. 4, pp. 531-544.
95. Poon, P. S., Hui, M. K. and Au, K., 2004, “Attributions on dissatisfying service encounters: a cross-cultural comparison between Canadian and PRC consumers,” European Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38 No. 11/12, pp. 1527-1540.
96. Popovič, A., Coelho, P. and Jaklič, J., 2010, “The impact of business intelligence system maturity on information quality,” Information Research, Vol. 14 No. 4.
97. Rainer Jr, R. K. and Watson, H. J., 1995, “What does it take for successful executive information systems?,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 14 No. 2, pp. 147-156.
98. Roca, J. C., Chiu, C.-M. and Martínez, F. J., 2006, “Understanding e-learning continuance intention: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model,” International Journal of human-computer studies, Vol. 64 No. 8, pp. 683-696.
99. Ross, L., 1977, “The intuitive psychologist and his shortcomings: Distortions in the attribution process,” Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 10 No., pp. 173-220.
100. Rozell, E. J. and Gardner Iii, W. L., 2000, “Cognitive, motivation, and affective processes associated with computer-related performance: a path analysis,” Computers in Human Behavior, Vol. 16 No. 2, pp. 199-222.
101. Russell, D., 1982, “The Causal Dimension Scale: A measure of how individuals perceive causes,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 42 No. 6, pp. 1137-1145.
102. Saba, A., Moneta, E., Nardo, N. and Sinesio, F., 1998, “Attitudes, habit, sensory and liking expectation as determinants of the consumption of milk,” Food Quality and Preference, Vol. 9 No. 1-2, pp. 31-41.
103. Saba, A., Vassallo, M. and Turrini, A., 2000, “The role of attitudes, intentions and habit in predicting actual consumption of fat containing foods in Italy,” European Journal of Clinical Nutrition, Vol. 54 No. 7, pp. 540-545.
104. Segars, A. H. and Grover, V., 1998, “Strategic information systems planning success: an investigation of the construct and its measurement,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 22 No. 2, pp. 139-163.
105. Sharma, S., Durand, R. M. and Gur-Arie, O., 1981, “Identification and analysis of moderator variables,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18 No. 3, pp. 291-300.
106. Spreitzer, G. M., 1995, “Psychological empowerment in the workplace: Dimensions, measurement, and validation,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 38 No. 5, pp. 1442-1465.
107. Spreitzer, G. M. and Doneson, D., 2005, Musings on the past and future of employee empowerment, Sage, Thousand Oaks.
108. Swanson, E. M., 1988, Information System Implementation: Bridging the Gap between Design and Utilization, Iriwon, Homewood, IL.
109. Taylor, S. and Todd, P. A., 1995, “Understanding information technology usage: a test of competing models,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 6 No. 2, pp. 144-176.
110. Thomas, K. W. and Velthouse, B. A., 1990, “Cognitive elements of empowerment: An” interpretive” model of intrinsic task motivation,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15 No. 4, pp. 666-681.
111. Tomlinson, E. C. and Mryer, R. C., 2009, “The role of causal attribution dimensions in trust repair,” Academy of Management Review, Vol. 34 No. 1, pp. 85-104.
112. Tsiros, M., Mittal, V. and Ross Jr, W. T., 2004, “The role of attributions in customer satisfaction: a reexamination,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 31 No. 2, pp. 476-483.
113. Tuorila, H. and Pangborn, R. M., 1988, “Prediction of reported consumption of selected fat-containing foods,” Appetite, Vol. 11 No. 2, pp. 81-95.
114. Turel, O. and Serenko, A., 2006, “Satisfaction with mobile services in Canada: An empirical investigation,” Telecommunications Policy, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp. 314-331.
115. Vázquez-Casielles, R., Del Río-Lanza, A. B. and Díaz-Martín, A. M., 2007, “Quality of past performance: Impact on consumers’ responses to service failure,” Marketing Letters, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 249-264.
116. Venkatesh, V., 2000, “Determinants of perceived ease of use: Integrating control, intrinsic motivation, and emotion into the technology acceptance model,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 11 No. 4, pp. 342-365.
117. Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G. and Ackerman, P. L., 2000, “A longitudinal field investigation of gender differences in individual technology adoption decision-making processes,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 83 No. 1, pp. 33-60.
118. Verplanken, B., Aarts, H. and Van Knippenberg, A., 1997, “Habit, information acquisition, and the process of making travel mode choices,” European Journal of Social Psychology, Vol. 27 No. 5, pp. 539-560.
119. Verplanken, V. and Aarts, H., 1999, “Habit, attitude, and planned behaviour: is habit an empty construct or an interesting case of goal-directed automaticity?,” European Review of Social Psychology, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 101-134.
120. Wagner, J. I., Cummings, G., Smith, D. L., Olson, J., Anderson, L. and Warren, S., 2010, “The relationship between structural empowerment and psychological empowerment for nurses: a systematic review,” Journal of Nursing Management, Vol. 18 No. 4, pp. 448-462.
121. Warshaw, P. R. and Davis, F. D., 1984, “Self-understanding and the accuracy of behavioral expectations,” Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, Vol. 10 No. 1, pp. 111-118.
122. Warshaw, P. R. and Davis, F. D., 1985a, “The accuracy of behavioral intention versus behavioral expectation for predicting behavioral goals,” The Journal of psychology, Vol. 119 No. 6, pp. 599-602.
123. Warshaw, P. R. and Davis, F. D., 1985b, “Disentangling behavioral intention and behavioral expectation,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 21 No. 3, pp. 213-228.
124. Watkins, D. and Cheng, C., 1995, “The revised Causal Dimension Scale: a confirmatory factor analysis with Hong Kong students,” British Journal of Educational Psychology, Vol. 65 No. 2, pp. 249-252.
125. Watson, H. J. and Wixom, B. H., 2007, “The current state of business intelligence,” Computer, Vol. 40 No. 9, pp. 96-99.
126. Weiner, B., 1985, “An attributional theory of achievement motivation and emotion,” Psychological Review, Vol. 92 No. 4, pp. 548.
127. Weiner, B., 2001, “Intrapersonal and interpersonal theories of motivation from an attribution perspective,” Educational Psychology Review, Vol. 12 No. 1, pp. 1-14.
128. Weiner, B., Frieze, I., Kukla, A., Reed, L., Rest, S. and Rosenbaum, R. M. Perceiving the causes of success and failure. Preparation of this paper grew out of a workshop on attribution theory held at University of California, Los Angeles, Aug 1969., 1987. Lawrence Erlbaum Associates, Inc.
129. Weiner, B., Frieze, I., Kulka, A., Reed, L., Rest, S. and Rosenbaum, R. M., 1971. “Perceiving the causes of success and failure,” In: JONES, E. E. E., KANOUSE, D. E. E., KELLEY, H. H. E., NISBETT, R. E. E., VALINS, S. E. andWEINER, B. E. (eds.) Attribution: Perceiving the Causes of Behavior., General Learning Press, NJ, England, pp. 95-120.
130. Wetzels, M., Odekerken-Schroder, G. and Van Oppen, C., 2009, “Using PLS path modeling for assessing hierarchical construct models: Guidelines and empirical illustration,” MIS Quarterly, Vol. 33 No. 1, pp. 177.
131. Wixom, B. H. and Todd, P. A., 2005, “A theoretical integration of user satisfaction and technology acceptance,” Information Systems Research, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 85-102.
132. Wright, S. and Wright, A. M., 2002, “Information system assurance for enterprise resource planning systems: unique risk considerations,” Journal of Information Systems, Vol. 16 No. 1, pp. 99-113.
133. Youngberg, E., Olsen, D. and Hauser, K., 2009, “Determinants of professionally autonomous end user acceptance in an enterprise resource planning system environment,” International Journal of Information Management, Vol. 29 No. 2, pp. 138-144.
134. Zhao, L., Lu, Y., Zhang, L. and Chau, P. Y., 2012, “Assessing the effects of service quality and justice on customer satisfaction and the continuance intention of mobile value-added services: An empirical test of a multidimensional model,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 52 No. 3, pp. 645-656.
135. Zhou, T., 2013, “An empirical examination of continuance intention of mobile payment services,” Decision Support Systems, Vol. 54 No. 2, pp. 1085-1091.
指導教授 范錚強(C.K. Farn) 審核日期 2015-1-20
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明