博碩士論文 104429011 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:16 、訪客IP:3.139.55.72
姓名 曾亭瑋(Tseng-ting-wei)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 經濟學系
論文名稱 台韓產業出口競爭力實證分析
(Industry export competitiveness: Taiwan and south Korea)
相關論文
★ 消費財富效果不對稱分析: 馬可夫轉換共同趨勢模型之應用★ 股票市場報酬與波動性外溢效果分析
★ 中國大陸勞動合同法與企業所得稅法對台商的衝擊與因應★ 結構FAVAR模型與台灣貨幣政策分析
★ 通貨膨脹率預測:考慮結構變動之動態因子模型應用★ 匯率因子與市場基要之預測表現
★ 台灣大小公司報酬與流動性之實證研究★ 台灣外匯暨股票市場流動性與景氣循環關係之探討
★ 台灣經濟成長率之混合頻率預測-MIDAS迴歸應用★ 油價對匯率預測能力之分析
★ 重新驗證遠期匯率不偏性假說: Bonferroni Q 檢定之應用★ 台灣期貨市場處份效果之研究
★ 寡占廠商成本歧異下之最適產業與貿易政策★ The Macroeconomic Effects of Foreign Direct Investment
★ 平行輸入、仿冒與服務品質★ 經濟成長、消費者信心與銀行風險
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 近年來台灣出口佔GDP的仍佔有相當的比重,對外貿易儼然成為台灣經濟成長的主要動能,許多政策制定者也以此為由致力於制定拓展國際貿易與促進出口競爭力(Export competitiveness)等相關政策。然在各國積極調整產業政策與各貿易對手激烈的競爭下,台灣出口動能(Export kinetic energy)也發生趨緩的現象。

在此環境下,提升出口競爭力成為各國刻不容緩的議題。許多實證研究指出出口競爭力係由許多因素所構成,其不僅限於一國生產要素與產業型態,同時也與競爭貿易對手、市場脈動與國際經濟關係密不可分,基於上述所提,本文以世界銀行(World Integrated Trade Soulutions)中的出口產品作為分析,並搭配國際標準產業分類((International Standard Industrial Classification of All Economic Activities, Rev.4,ISIC第四版)所分類出的製造業作為產業端之資料,再參照中華民國行業標準分類所區分「中類別製造業」,據此作為跨國比較基準,以避不同行業分類標準的差異造成比較偏誤,以便更為精準地瞭解我國出口產業與主要貿易國家之消長變化。將台灣主要前15大主要出口國家分作六大主要出口市場、並以在出口在全球市場搶得一席之地且與台灣在主要出口產業型態、主要出口市場各方面重疊的南韓作為比較競爭對手,藉此分析產業層級的出口競爭力。

本文首先檢視台韓國際貿易市場消長和出口產業結構發展現況,更研析台韓2015年各出口市場競爭環境變化,其次蒐集文獻歸納出口競爭力的相關決定因素,我們將出口競爭力基於以下變數作為基準,包含總體變數:名目匯率、實質有效匯率、出口物價指數及產業變數:工業生產指數、勞動生產率與單位勞動力成本的出口競爭力,並使用Panel data Model方法來衡量台灣出口市場其潛在的變化因素,我們的實證分析結果表明,觀察總體變數,實質匯率和出口物價皆影響出口表現,而在產業變數,主要以工業生產指數為主,勞動相關變數在歐美市場並不顯著、在其他市場有則對成本、效率影響有所不同。分析各個產業,總體變數是以實質匯率影響最為重要;產業變數仍是以工業生產指數最為重要。
摘要(英)
The study of export performance, especially to countries with foreign trade is the major source of economic growth. Based on Taiwan exports have played an increasingly important role in Taiwan’s economic growth and likely to decline. This study attempts to evaluate Taiwan export performance during the 2008-2015 periods, the competition between Taiwan and South Korea in the ASEAN, China, U.S., Japan and EU export markets. Through analyzing the changing pattern of export structure and competitiveness, the main find from this paper are as follows.

First, in overall variables, the real effective exchange rate has a clear, statistically significant effect on Taiwan’s export performance. Exchange rates are expressed as a comparison of the currencies of two countries. When a fall in a country’s exchange rate will lower export prices and raise import cost, that probably increasing the value of its exports and lower the amount cost on imports. In particular, Taiwan is a small country that is vulnerable to international fluctuations.

Second, some kinds of industrial variables, such that export price index, industrial productivity, unit labor cost, could improve Taiwan’s export. Especially, Taiwan is dominated by manufacturing, so the variables which are related to manufacturing need to pay more attention. The export price indexes are used to help measure inflation in products that are traded globally. Another one is unit labor costs show how much output an economy receives relative to wages, or labor cost per unit of output. A rise in labor costs higher than the rise in labor productivity may be a threat to an export’s competitiveness.

Last, the export competitors also impact on each other. When a country′s overall variables and industrial variables change, other countries will be affected. As our study demonstrates, South Korea’s export is more significantly affected by Taiwan’s industrial variables.

According to all finding of this research, facing the international trend and the industrial structural accelerated, we should promote the program of Taiwan’s businessmen return to Taiwan in order to improve domestic industrial structure and finding the best ways to cope with international volatility, aiming to design the trade, economic strategy and product market expansion to upgrade the Taiwan’s export competitiveness and the steady economic growth.
關鍵字(中) ★ 出口競爭力
★ 製造業
★ 台灣
★ 南韓
關鍵字(英) ★ Export competitiveness
★ Industry
★ Taiwan
★ Korea
論文目次
目錄
1.緒論 …………………………………………………… 01
2 台韓出口結構與競爭環境變化 ……………………… 03
2.1 台韓出口市場現況 ………………………………… 03
2.2 研析台灣競爭市場產業層級競爭力趨勢…………… 13
2.3 研析南韓競爭市場產業層級競爭力趨勢…………… 17
3 文獻回顧………………………………………………… 41
3.1 總體變數對出口競爭力的影響 …………………… 41
3.2 產業層級變數對出口競爭力的影響………………… 42
4 資料與研究方法 ……………………………………… 44
4.1 資料來源與處理……………………………………… 44
4.2 模型架構 …………………………………………… 45
4.3 變數說明 …………………………………………… 48
5 實證結果 ……………………………………………… 56
6 結論 …………………………………………………… 69
參考文獻 ………………………………………………… 71
參考文獻
中文部分:

林顯明(2016),「臺灣出口衰退與產業競爭力下滑的政治經濟分析」,台灣新社會智庫。

邱俊榮(2006),「台韓經濟發展消長比較分析」,台灣經濟研究院。

徐之強

國家發展委員會,(2014),「 台灣在中國大陸進口市占率驟降之簡析」,國家發展委員會網站。

張建一、龔明鑫、呂曜志(2013),「我國對美歐市場出口現況與競爭力再造之研究」,財團法人台灣經濟研究院,行政院經建會委託計畫。

顧瑩華、史惠慈(2010),「歐盟-韓國 FTA 對我國經濟及產業之影響評估」,中華經濟研究院,行政院經建會委託計畫。

英文部分:
Alessandro Colognia, Matteo Manera (2008) "Oil prices, inflation and interest rates in a structural cointegrated VAR model for the G-7 countries.", Energy Economics Volume 30, Issue 3, 856–888

Andreas Savvides (1992) "Investment Slowdown in Developing Countries During the 1980s: Debt Overhang or Foreign Capital Inflows? ", Kyklos Volume 45, Issue 3

Arnold Zellner (1962) "An Efficient Method of Estimating Seemingly Unrelated Regressions and Tests for Aggregation Bias", Journal of the American Statistical Association Volume 57, 1962 - Issue 298

Athanasoglou, P. P., Backinezos, C., Georgiou, E. A. (2010). "Export performance, competitiveness and commodity composition", Working Paper, br. 114, Bank of Greece

Atkeson, Andrew and Ariel Burstein (2010) "Innovation, Firm Dynamics and International Trade", Journal of Political Economy, 118(3), 433-484

Baldwin, R. and J. Harrigan (2011)、 "Zeros, Quality and Space: Trade Theory and Trade Evidence.", NBER Working.

Chow, P. C. Y. (1987) "Causality between export growth and industrial development: Empirical evidence from the NICs." Journal of Development Economics, 26, 55–63.

Eslava, Marcela, John Haltiwanger and Adriana Kugler(2011) "Trade Reforms and Market Selection:Evidence from Manufacturing Plants in Columbia", NBER Working Paper 14935

Gotur, Padma (1985) "Effects of Exchange Rate Volatility on Trade:Some Further Evidence.",International Monetary Funds Staff Papers,32, 475-512.
Hallak, J. C., and J. Sivadasan (2008) "Productivity, Quality and Exporting Behavior under Minimum Quality Requirements", University of Michigan Working Paper.

Harvie, C. and Lee, H.-H (2003) "Export-led industrialisation and growth: Korea’s economic miracle, 1962–1989", Australian Economic History Review, 43(3):256–86.

Jerry G. Thursby and Marie C. (1987)"Bilateral Trade Flows, the Linder Hypothesis, and Exchange Risk.",The Review of Economics and Statistics Vol. 69, No. 3,488-495

Johnson, R. (2008) "Trade and prices with heterogeneous firms. Mimeo", University of California at Berkeley.
Jorgenson, D. W., and M. Kuroda (1990) "Productivity and International Competitiveness in Japan and the United States, 1960-1985", Productivity Growth in Japan and the United States (University of Chicago Press,Chicago).

Lewney, Richard, Jӧrg Claussen, Graham Hay, Evripidis Kyriakou, and Günther Vieweg, (2012) "The Cost Competitiveness of European Industry in the Globalisation Era: Empirical Evidence on the Basis of Relative Unit Labour Costs (ULC) at Sectoral Level ", Industrial Policy and Economic Reform Papers No. 15, April, Enterprise and Industry Directorate-General, European Commission

Maddala, G.S., Wu, S., (1999) "A comparative study of unit root tests with panel data and a new simple test.", Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61, 631–652.

Manova, K, Wei, S.-J. and Z. Zhang (2009) "Firm Exports and Multinational Activity under Credit Constraints." NBER Working Paper 16905.

Momaya, K., & Selby, K. (1998) "International competitiveness of the Canadian construction industry: a comparison with Japan and the United States." Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering, 25, 640–652

Murat Doğanlar(2002)"Estimating the impact of exchange rate volatility on exports: evidence from Asian countries.",Applied Economics Letters,13:859-863

Porter, Michael E. (1990) "The Competitive Advantage of Nations" New York: Free Press.
Pritamani, Mahesh D.; Shome, Dilip K. and Singal,Vijay(2005)

Rose, A.(2000). "One money, one market: Estimating the effect of common currencies on trade.",Economic Policy 30:7-45.

Sukar, A.-H. and S. Hassan (2001) "US exports and time-varying volatility of real exchange rate." , Global Finance Journal 12, 109-119

Swamy, P.A.V.B. (1970) "Efficient Inference in a Random Coefficient Regression Model." Econometrica 38:311-323

Van Ark, Bart, R. Inklaar, and Robert H. McGuckin. (2003) "Changing Gear: Productivity, IT and Service Industries: Europe and the United States." Paper presented to the Brookings Workshop on Services Industry Productivity,Washington.

Woo S. JungPeyton,J. Marshall (1985) "Exports, growth and causality in developing countries." , Journal of Development Economics Volume 18, Issue 1, 1-12

Wu, Harry X. and Keiko Ito, (2015) "Reconstructing China’s Supply-Use and Input-Output Tables in Time Series", RIETI Discussion Papers, E-004
指導教授 徐之強(Hsu-Chih-Chiang) 審核日期 2017-6-20
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明