博碩士論文 107426025 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:13 、訪客IP:3.145.15.153
姓名 廖恬櫻(Tien-Ying Liao)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 工業管理研究所
論文名稱 人口密度對於賣家決策之影響
(The Impact of Density of Population on Seller’s Decision)
相關論文
★ 二階段作業研究模式於立體化設施規劃應用之探討–以半導體製造廠X及Y公司為例★ 推行TPM活動以改善設備總合效率並提昇 企業競爭力...以U公司桃園工廠為例
★ 資訊系統整合業者行銷通路策略之研究★ 以決策樹法歸納關鍵製程暨以群集法識別關鍵路徑
★ 關鍵績效指標(KPI)之建立與推行 - 在造紙業★ 應用實驗計劃法- 提昇IC載板錫球斷面品質最佳化之研究
★ 如何從歷史鑽孔Cp值導出新設計規則進而達到兼顧品質與降低生產成本目標★ 產品資料管理系統建立及導入-以半導體IC封裝廠C公司為例
★ 企業由設計代工轉型為自有品牌之營運管理★ 運用六標準差步驟與FMEA於塑膠射出成型之冷料改善研究(以S公司為例)
★ 台灣地區輪胎產業經營績效之研究★ 以方法時間衡量法訂定OLED面板蒸鍍有機材料更換作業之時間標準
★ 利用六標準差管理提升生產效率-以A公司塗料充填流程改善為例★ 依流程相似度對目標群組做群集分析- 以航空發動機維修廠之自修工件為例
★ 設計鏈績效衡量指標建立 —以電動巴士產業A公司為例★ 應用資料探勘尋找影響太陽能模組製程良率之因子研究
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 當一個市場有利可圖時,會吸引一些商店加入,而當新進商店進入市場之後
會考慮到既有廠商的位置進而選擇他的位置。然而,在現實生活中,賣家會傾向於到繁華的都市開設商店,而不會選擇到人煙稀少的鄉下。
在過去研究當中, Hotelling模型是在說只有兩個廠商在一個線性的市場上,位置的選擇是整個模型探討的重點。但是我們認為在這個模型上的假設有一些不合理的地方,第一,在現實生活當中線性市場是不可能存在的,第二,人口密度也不可能為均勻分配,意思是消費者並不會均勻的分佈在一線性街道上。
因此本研究將去除在過去研究中消費者均勻分布在一線性街道上的假設,擴展Hotelling線性模型並增加人口密度的概念來討論不同案例,第一,我們假設只有商店A要進入市場。第二,我們假設商店A已經在市場中,而商店B是進入市場的新參與者,並且探討消費者的效用以及人口密度分配的不同對賣家的決策與自身利潤的影響。
最後我們的研究目的就是希望能幫助店家找尋能獲得最大利潤的商品價錢以及商店位置。希望增加人口密度概念的Hotelling線性模型,能更貼近現實,這正是這篇研究所著重的部分。
摘要(英) When a market is profitable, it will attract some stores to join, so after a new store enters the market, he will consider the location of the existing store and then choose the best location. However, in real life, sellers tend to open stores in bustling cities rather than sparsely populated countryside.
In the past research, the Hotelling model is saying that there are the two sellers are in a linear market, and the choice of location is the focus of the whole model discussion. However, we think that the model is incompatible. First, linear markets cannot exist in real life, and second, population density cannot be uniformly distributed.
Therefore, we will remove the assumption that consumers are uniformly distributed on a linear street in the previous research, we will expand the Hotelling linear model and add the concept of population density to discuss different cases in this study. First, we assume that only store A wants to enter the market. Second, we assume that store B is already in the market and store A is a new player in the market, and explore the impact of consumer utility and population density distribution on sellers′ decisions and their own profits.
Finally, the purpose of our research is to help the sellers find the price of products and location of the store in order to get the most profit. It is hoped that the Hotelling linear model of adding the population density concept will be closer to reality, which is the focus of this research.
關鍵字(中) ★ 消費者的效用與剩餘
★ Hotelling模型
★ 人口密度
關鍵字(英) ★ Consumer′s Utility and Surplus
★ Hotelling model
★ Density of Population
論文目次 中文摘要 I
Abstract II
Chapter 1. Introduction 1
1.1. Background and Motivation 1
1.2. Research objectives 3
Chapter 2. Literature Review 4
2.1. Consumer′s Utility and Surplus 4
2.2. Consumer’s behavior 5
2.3. Hotelling model 5
Chapter 3. Model 7
3.1. Hotelling Linear Model 8
3.2. Density of Population 9
Chapter 4. Numerical Example 14
4.1. Hotelling Linear Model Based on Population; one player 14
4.1.1. Case 1-Population density is uniformly distributed 14
4.1.2. Case 2-Population density is a symmetric unimodal distribution 15
4.1.3. Case 3-Population density is a positively skewed distribution 16
4.1.4. Case 4-Population density is a bimodal distribution 18
4.2. Hotelling Linear Model Based on Population; two players 19
4.2.1. Case 1-Population density is uniformly distributed 19
4.2.2. Case 2- Population density is a symmetric unimodal distribution 20
4.2.3. Case 3-Population density is a positively skewed distribution 21
4.2.4. Case 4-Population density is a bimodal distribution 23
Chapter 5. Sensitivity Analysis 25
5.1. The sensitivity analysis on customer’s utility for products, u 25
5.2. The sensitivity analysis on steepness of distributions 31
Chapter 5. Conclusion 36
Reference 38
參考文獻 1. Alfira, Elsya Dhana. 2018. “The Impact of Clustering and Product Variety on Seller’s Decision”. Research Thesis of Graduate Institute of Industrial Management, National Central University, Taiwan.
2. Balasubramanian, S., Raghunathan, R., & Mahajan, V. 2005. “Consumers in a Multichannel Environment: Product utility, Process utility, and Channel choice”. Journal of Interactive Marketing, Vol. 19, pp. 12-30.
3. Brenner, S. 2005. Hotelling games with three, four, and more players. Journal of Regional Science, Vol. 45, No. 4, pp. 851-864.
4. DaSilva, L. A. 2000. “Pricing For Qos-enabled Networks: A Survey”. IEEE, Vol. 3, pp. 2-8.
5. Eaton, B. C., & Lipsey, R. G. 1975. “The Principle of Minimum Differentiation Reconsidered: Some New Developments in the Theory of Spatial Competition”. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 42, pp. 27-49.
6. Heinsalu, S. 2020. “Greater search cost reduces prices”. Computer Science and Game Theory.
7. Hicks, J. R. 1945. “The Generalized Theory of Consumers’ Surplus”. The Review of Economic Studies, Vol. 13, pp. 68–74.
8. Hotelling, H. 1929. “Stability in Competition,” Economic Journal, Vol.39, pp.41-57.
9. Li, Youping. 2012. “On Transportation Cost and Product Differentiation in Hotelling’s Model”. Theoretical Economics Letters, Vol. 2. No. 1, pp. 75-78.
10. Marshall, A. 1890. Principles of Economics. Prometheus Books. ISBN 1573921408.
11. Noble, P. M., & Gruca, T. S. 1999. “Industrial pricing: Theory and managerial practice”. Marketing Science, Vol. 70, pp. 435-454.
12. Priem, R. L. 2007. “A consumer perspective on value creation”. Academy of Management Review, Vol. 32, pp. 219-235.
13. Ramya, N., & Ali, S. M. 2016. “Factors affecting consumer buying behavior”. International journal of applied research, Vol. 2, No. 10, pp. 76-80.
14. Sajeesh, S., & Raju, J. S. 2010. “Positioning and Pricing in a Variety Seeking Market”. Management Science, Vol. 56, No. 6, pp. 949-961.
15. Shi, Jian You. 2014. “Cluster Effect On the Stores Location”. Research Thesis of Graduate Institute of Industrial Management. National Central University, Taiwan.
16. Varian, H. R. 1980. “A model of sales”. The American economic review, Vol. 70, pp. 651-659.
17. Varian, H. R. 2014. Intermediate Microeconomics: A Modern Approach: Ninth International Student Edition. WW Norton & Company.
18. Veendorp, E. C. H., & Majeed, A. 1995. “Differentiation in a two-dimensional market”. Regional Science and Urban Economics, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 75-83.
19. Villas-Boas, J. M. 2009. “Product Variety and Endogenous Pricing with Evaluation Cost”. Management Science, Vol. 55, No. 8, pp. 1338-1346.
20. Xu Bing, Zhang Yang. 2017. “Complete sequential decision-making of location pricing for two manufacturers based on Hotelling model”. Journal of Shandong University, Vol.52, No. 6, pp. 1-9.
21. Yegorov, Y. 2009. “Socio-economic Influences of Population Density”. Chinese Business Review, Vol. 8, No. 7, pp. 1-12.
指導教授 曾富祥(Fu-Shiang Tseng) 審核日期 2020-8-20
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明