碳排成本對於生產決策與利潤的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：6

、訪客IP：3.147.140.129

姓名

鄧宇均(Yu-Chun Teng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

碳排成本對於生產決策與利潤的影響
(The impact of carbon emission costs on production decisions and profits)

相關論文

★ 台灣與大陸在ERP專案管理、專案成員向心力與離心力的不同之處	★ ERP專案成員離心力與向心力對代理問題之影響
★ 事業策略、人力資源管理與組織績效之實證研究	★ 商用飛機維修成本控制之研究-以某國籍航空公司為例
★ ERP系統更換關鍵成功因素研究-以Oracle系統導入為例	★ 中小企業自行開發ERP 系統關鍵成功因素研究- 以高科技產業為例
★ 文化創意產業產品策略選擇之影響因素-以國片為例	★ 專案管理風險對ERP專案成功之影響
★ 品質機能展開與多準則決策於設備開發應用	★ ERP導入品質因素對IFRS轉換專案之影響
★ ERP投資金額對服務品質及導入後IT治理目標之分析	★ ERP 導入問題對專案的影響
★ IFRS轉換對員工退休金計畫影響	★ IFRS轉換對企業績效評估的影響
★ IFRS轉換問題對IFRS效益的影響	★ ERP環境下企業集團自行編製合併報表能力對XBRL資訊透明度之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

目前，面對全球暖化擴大，極端氣候與環境破壞威脅人類生命安全，儼然減碳已是各國際間要相互合作的議題，而透過課徵碳稅來降低溫室氣體是有效減緩環境問題的其中一種方法。政府對於碳稅政策的擬定，可以透過制定排放總量管制或碳排放量上下限，但可能會增加額外監控成本並提高政策實施複雜度，此外，若是對企業提供免稅碳排放額度，企業可以於超出之碳排放數量外再支付碳稅，此制度減少碳稅成本也增加企業購買意願，但政府對企業徵收的稅收就會減少，也降低政府推動其他減稅工具的能力，所以碳排放制定攸關於企業與政府之間成本與利潤的拉鋸戰。本研究提出八種碳稅及碳權函數的可能組合之綠色作業成本法(Activity-Based Costing, ABC)模型，並在模型間進行相互比較以檢視其差異，並針對單一變數進行單期與多期敏感性分析。研究結果指出，利潤及產品組合會因為不同的碳稅及碳權組合而產生巨大差異，企業若是目標獲得利潤最大化，通常有免稅額度並有碳權交易成本之模型能獲得更多利潤；政府則是想要減少碳排放量，則會偏好無碳權交易之模型。本研究亦針對公司在面臨未來政策頒布時，以及政府在制定相關政策時的建議及處理方法。

摘要(英)

At present, in the face of the expansion of global warming, extreme climate and environmental damage threaten the safety of human life, it seems that carbon reduction is an international issue. Reducing greenhouse gases by imposing carbon taxes is one of the ways to effectively mitigate environmental problems. The government can formulate a carbon tax policy through the establishment of a total emission control or upper and lower carbon emission limits, but it may increase additional monitoring costs and increase the complexity of policy implementation. In addition, if companies provide free emission credits, they will at most paying for additional carbon emissions permits, reducing the cost of carbon taxes, and increasing willingness to buy, but the government will levy less taxes on enterprises and reduce the government′s ability to promote other tax reduction tools. This study proposes eight types of possible combinations of carbon tax and carbon weighting functions ABC models, and compares the models to each other to examine the differences, and performs single-period and multi-period sensitivity analysis. The results of the study indicate that profits and product mix will vary greatly due to different carbon tax and carbon rights combinations. If a company aims to maximize profits, a model with tax-exempt quotas and carbon rights transaction costs can generally achieve more profits; If the government aims to reduce carbon emissions, it will prefer a model without carbon rights trading. This study also addresses the company’s recommendations and treatments when it faces future policy promulgation, and the government formulates relevant policies.

關鍵字(中)

★ 作業成本法
★ 碳稅
★ 碳權
★ 碳定價
★ 數學規劃

關鍵字(英)

★ Activity-Based Costing
★ carbon tax
★ carbon right
★ carbon pricing
★ mathematical programming

論文目次

目錄
中文摘要 ii
英文摘要 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vii
符號說明 viii
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究背景與動機 1
1-2 研究目的與貢獻 2
1-3 研究結構 4
二、文獻探討 5
2-1 全球相關氣候政策簡介 5
2-2 關於綠色鋁製產業 7
2-3 綠色作業成本制和限制理論在其他產業應用 8
三、研究設計：作業成本制的綠色生產規劃模型 9
3-1 典型鋁製輪圈產業生產過程 9
3-2 研究假設 10
3-3 模型A：基本生產規劃模型 11
3-4 模型B：無免稅額的增額累進稅率碳稅函數 16
3-5 模型C：有免稅額增額累進稅率碳稅函數 22
3-6 模型D：無免稅額的全額累進稅率碳稅函數 27
3-7 模型E：有免稅額的全額累進稅率碳稅函數 32
四、研究設計：多期生產決策模式 37
4-1 模型A之多期模式 38
4-2 模型B之多期模式 40
4-3 模型C的多期模式 43
4-4 模型D的多期模式 46
4-5 模型E的多期模式 50
五、研究結果 53
5-1 範例數據 54
5-2 數據分析 54
5-3 敏感性分析 74
5-4 總結 79
六、結論與建議 81
參考文獻 83

參考文獻

1. 行政院環境保護署(2018)，2018年中華民國國家溫室氣體排放清冊報告。台北：行政院環境保護署。
2. 黃正忠，林泉興，&葉怡秀(2019)，循環經濟下的外部成本內部化-碳與水。會計研究月刊，(403)，88-95。
3. Alley, R., Berntsen, T., Bindoff, N. L., Chen, Z., Chidthaisong, A., Friedlingstein, P., ... & Hoskins, B. (2007). Climate change 2007: The physical science basis. Contribution of Working Group I to the Fourth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change. Summary for Policymakers. IPCC Secretariat, Geneva, Switzerland. 21p.
4. Aluminum Association. (2011). Aluminum: The element of sustainability. A North American Aluminum Industry Sustainability Report, 33.
5. Ascione, A. (2015). What Is the Difference Between Hastelloy and Incoloy ?. Continental Steel & Tube Company, 17.
6. Battisti, D. S., & Naylor, R. L. (2009). Historical warnings of future food insecurity with unprecedented seasonal heat. Science, 323(5911), 240-244.
7. Bethencourt, M., Botana, F. J., Cano, M. J., & Marcos, M. (2004). Advanced generation of green conversion coatings for aluminium alloys. Applied Surface Science, 238(1-4), 278–281.
8. Cao, P., Toyabe, S., Kurashima, S., Okada, M., & Akazawa, K. (2006). A modified method of activity-based costing for objectively reducing cost drivers in hospitals. Methods of information in medicine, 45(04), 462-469.
9. Carmona, R., Fehr, M., Hinz, J., & Porchet, A. (2010). Market design for emission trading schemes. Siam Review, 52(3), 403-452.
10. Das, S. K., Green, J. A. S., & Kaufman, J. G. (2007). The development of recycle-friendly automotive aluminum alloys. Jom, 59(11), 47-51.
11. Deschamps, A., Martin, G., Dendievel, R., & Van Landeghem, H. P. (2017). Lighter structures for transports: The role of innovation in metallurgy. Comptes Rendus Physique, 18(7-8), 445-452.
12. Dwivedi, S. P., Sharma, S., & Mishra, R. K. (2016). Characterization of waste eggshells and CaCO 3 reinforced AA2014 green metal matrix composites: a green approach in the synthesis of composites. International Journal of Precision Engineering and Manufacturing, 17(10), 1383-1393.
13. Elsayed, A., Ravindran, C., & Murty, B. S. (2011). Effect of aluminum-titanium-boron based grain refiners on AZ91E magnesium alloy grain size and microstructure. International Journal of Metalcasting, 5(2), 29-41.
14. Francis, J. A., & Vavrus, S. J. (2012). Evidence linking Arctic amplification to extreme weather in mid-latitudes. Geophysical Research Letters, 39(6), 1–6.
15. Hick, S. (2000). Morals maketh the money. Australian CPA, 70(4), 72-72.
16. Holmen, J. S. (1995). ABC vs. TOC: it′s a matter of time. Strategic Finance, 76(7), 37.
17. Ic, Y. T., Saraloğlu Güler, E., Cabbaroğlu, C., Dilan Yüksel, E., & Maide Sağlam, H. (2018). Optimisation of cutting parameters for minimizing carbon emission and maximising cutting quality in turning process. International Journal of Production Research, 56(11), 4035-4055.
18. Kaplan, R. S. (1989). Management accounting for advanced technological environments. Science, 245(4920), 819-823.
19. Kara, M., Syri, S., Lehtilä, A., Helynen, S., Kekkonen, V., Ruska, M., & Forsström, J. (2008). The impacts of EU CO2 emissions trading on electricity markets and electricity consumers in Finland. Energy Economics, 30(2), 193-211.
20. Kee, R., & Schmidt, C. (2000). A comparative analysis of utilizing activity-based costing and the theory of constraints for making product-mix decisions. International journal of production economics, 63(1), 1-17.
21. Lee, K. C., Tsai, W. H., Yang, C. H., & Lin, Y. Z. (2018). An MCDM approach for selecting green aviation fleet program management strategies under multi-resource limitations. Journal of Air Transport Management, 68, 76-85.
22. Lin, B. Y. J., Chao, T. H., Yao, Y., Tu, S. M., Wu, C. C., Chern, J. Y., ... & Shaw, K. Y. (2007). How can activity-based costing methodology be performed as a powerful tool to calculate costs and secure appropriate patient care?. Journal of medical systems, 31(2), 85-90.
23. Malmi, T. (1999). Activity-based costing diffusion across organizations: an exploratory empirical analysis of Finnish firms. Accounting, organizations and society, 24(8), 649-672.
24. Ramstein, C., Dominioni, G., Ettehad, S., Lam, L., Quant, M., Zhang, J., ... & Merusi, C. (2019). State and Trends of Carbon Pricing 2019. The World Bank.
25. Rand, G. K. (2000). Critical chain: the theory of constraints applied to project management. International Journal of Project Management, 18(3), 173–177.
26. Shapiro, J. (2006). Modeling the supply chain. Nelson Education.
27. Stanton, M., Masters, I., Bhattacharya, R., Dargue, I., Aylmore, R., & Williams, G. (2010). Modelling and validation of springback in aluminium U-Profiles. International Journal of Material Forming, 3(1), 163-166.
28. Tang, S., Wang, D., & Ding, F. Y. (2012). A new process-based cost estimation and pricing model considering the influences of indirect consumption relationships and quality factors. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 63(4), 985-993.
29. Tsai, W. H. (2018). Carbon Taxes and Carbon Right Costs Analysis for the Tire Industry. Energies, 11(8), 2121.
30. Tsai, W. H. (2018). Green production planning and control for the textile industry by using mathematical programming and industry 4.0 techniques. Energies, 11(8), 2072.
31. Tsai, W. H., & Hung, S. J. (2009). Treatment and recycling system optimisation with activity-based costing in WEEE reverse logistics management: an environmental supply chain perspective. International journal of production research, 47(19), 5391-5420.
32. Tsai, W. H., & Jhong, S. Y. (2018). Carbon Emissions Cost Analysis with Activity-Based Costing. Sustainability, 10(8), 2872.
33. Tsai, W. H., & Jhong, S. Y. (2019). Production decision model with carbon tax for the knitted footwear industry under activity-based costing. Journal of cleaner production, 207, 1150-1162.
34. Tsai, W. H., & Lai, S. Y. (2018). Green production planning and control model with ABC under industry 4.0 for the paper industry. Sustainability, 10(8), 2932.
35. Tsai, W. H., & Lu, Y. H. (2018). A framework of production planning and control with carbon tax under industry 4.0. Sustainability, 10(9), 3221.
36. Tsai, W. H., Chang, J. C., Hsieh, C. L., Tsaur, T. S., & Wang, C. W. (2016). Sustainability concept in decision-making: Carbon tax consideration for joint product mix decision. Sustainability, 8(12), 1232.
37. Tsai, W. H., Chen, H. C., Leu, J. D., Chang, Y. C., & Lin, T. W. (2013). A product-mix decision model using green manufacturing technologies under activity-based costing. Journal of cleaner production, 57, 178-187.
38. Tsai, W. H., Chu, P. Y., & Lee, H. L. (2019). Green Activity-Based Costing Production Planning and Scenario Analysis for the Aluminum-Alloy Wheel Industry under Industry 4.0. Sustainability, 11(3), 756.
39. Tsai, W. H., Lan, S. H., & Huang, C. T. (2019). Activity-Based Standard Costing Product-Mix Decision in the Future Digital Era: Green Recycling Steel-Scrap Material for Steel Industry. Sustainability, 11(3), 899.
40. Tsai, W. H., Lee, K. C., Liu, J. Y., Lin, H. L., Chou, Y. W., & Lin, S. J. (2012). A mixed activity-based costing decision model for green airline fleet planning under the constraints of the European Union Emissions Trading Scheme. Energy, 39(1), 218-226.
41. Tsai, W. H., Lin, S. J., Lee, Y. F., Chang, Y. C., & Hsu, J. L. (2013). Construction method selection for green building projects to improve environmental sustainability by using an MCDM approach. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 56(10), 1487-1510.
42. Tsai, W. H., Lin, S. J., Liu, J. Y., Lin, W. R., & Lee, K. C. (2011). Incorporating life cycle assessments into building project decision-making: An energy consumption and CO2 emission perspective. Energy, 36(5), 3022-3029.
43. Tsai, W. H., Lin, T. W., & Chou, W. C. (2010). Integrating activity-based costing and environmental cost accounting systems: a case study. International Journal of Business and Systems Research, 4(2), 186-208.
44. Tsai, W. H., Shen, Y. S., Lee, P. L., Chen, H. C., Kuo, L., & Huang, C. C. (2012). Integrating information about the cost of carbon through activity-based costing. Journal of Cleaner Production, 36, 102-111.
45. Tsai, W. H., Tsaur, T. S., Chou, Y. W., Liu, J. Y., Hsu, J. L., & Hsieh, C. L. (2015). Integrating the activity-based costing system and life-cycle assessment into green decision-making. International Journal of Production Research, 53(2), 451-465.
46. Tsai, W. H., Yang, C. H., Chang, J. C., & Lee, H. L. (2014). An activity-based costing decision model for life cycle assessment in green building projects. European Journal of Operational Research, 238(2), 607-619.
47. Tsai, W. H., Yang, C. H., Huang, C. T., & Wu, Y. Y. (2017). The impact of the carbon tax policy on green building strategy. Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 60(8), 1412-1438.
48. UNFCCC, V. (2015). Adoption of the Paris Agreement. I: proposal by the president (Draft Decision). United Nations Office, Geneva (Switzerland).
49. Vinnikov, K. Y., Robock, A., Stouffer, R. J., Walsh, J. E., Parkinson, C. L., Cavalieri, D. J., ... & Zakharov, V. F. (1999). Global warming and Northern Hemisphere sea ice extent. Science, 286(5446), 1934-1937.
50. Wang, N., Yamaguchi, T., & Nishio, K. (2013). Interfacial microstructure and strength of aluminum alloys/steel spot welded joints. JOURNAL OF THE JAPAN INSTITUTE OF METALS AND MATERIALS, 77(7), 259-267.
51. Williams, H. P. (2013). Model building in mathematical programming. John Wiley & Sons.
52. Yılmaz, T. G., Tüfekçi, M., & Karpat, F. (2017). A study of lightweight door hinges of commercial vehicles using aluminum instead of steel for sustainable transportation. Sustainability, 9(10), 1661.
53. Zhang, R., Zhang, L., Xiao, Y., & Kaku, I. (2012). The activity-based aggregate production planning with capacity expansion in manufacturing systems. Computers & Industrial Engineering, 62(2), 491-503.

指導教授

蔡文賢(Wen-Hsien Tsai)

審核日期

2020-7-8

推文