以設計機器人作為自己替身展現學習成果的情境學習系統

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：11

、訪客IP：18.223.213.54

姓名

李怡靜(Yi-Jing Li) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

以設計機器人作為自己替身展現學習成果的情境學習系統
(A situational learning system that uses design a robot as a double to show learning outcomes)

相關論文

★ 學習馬賽克-以教科書內容置入平板之合作式情境學習遊樂場	★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 以參考手冊為模式的電子書設計
★ 為使用知識而設計的電子書- 將紙本書籍以及電子書提供社群共建的機制	★ 高互動低資源損耗之課堂學習系統設計與實際教學環境導入接受度探討
★ 依學生偏好及學習狀態建構之學習輔助者與知識協尋系統	★ 網路資訊與學習系統之中文全文探勘工具
★ 支援使用者觀點之線上分析系統	★ 由網站行為歷程以貝式學習建立學習者模式之引導系統
★ 網路合作學習系統與小組互動觀察工具	★ 依作品集評量方式並支援學習狀況分析與監控之網路學習系統
★ 網路學習歷程之知識探索：學習效能評鑑之工具	★ 網路學習系統之手機端學習輔助系統
★ 以網站行為的歷程建立具時間性學習者模式	★ 行動學習資訊系統-學生端網路學習伺服器與個人數位助理端之學習系統
★ 應用貝式學習及決策樹之群組溝通網路監控系統	★ 以網路群組作品及活動依角色分析之群組合作監控系統

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

情境學習可以為學習者帶來許多益處，但在教室中建立情境學習的環境會因為學校是一個群體而產生觀眾，例如老師或是同學。而上台演出和觀眾的參與往往會引起學生焦慮，從得知消息、準備練習至真正上台期間都會不斷的發生，可能會因此減緩學習成效或造成演出失誤。再者，情境式學習通常需要學生直接進入情境裡練習，較難以實際察覺自己的學習狀況，想要進而改善或達到反思學習是較為困難的。因此，本研究使用了替身的概念解決上述在實際學習中可能發生的問題，並選用機器人替身而非真人替身，藉此避免受到同儕友誼互動關係的因素干擾。

　　最終，本研究在情境學習系統中建立了一個可由使用者自行設計與製作機器人替身演員，在學習的過渡期提供學生幫助，展現學習成果。除了達到情境學習的目的之外，也讓學習者能專注於學習而不必擔心要親自上台或直接面對觀眾產生的焦慮感及不確定性。並能藉由旁觀者的角度了解自己的學習狀況進行反思學習，同時，學習者也會為了讓同儕看到自己優秀的面貌而持續精進自己。

　　本研究亦與桃園某大學教師合作，研究結果顯示使用本系統的學生學習成果優於傳統情境學習的方式。學生認為製作機器人替身是有趣的，並且會因為機器人用自己的聲音表演而更認真練習。另外，替身能讓學生透過第三人稱視角了解實際的學習情況也是很重要的因素。整體而言，本系統增加了學生的學習興趣、學習強度及學習成效。

摘要(英)

Situational learning can bring many benefits to learners. However, the school is a group, setting up a situational learning environment in the classroom will have audiences, such as teachers or classmates. On stage performances and audience participation often arouse students′ anxiety, which will continuously happen from the time they learn the news, prepare to practice, and actually take the stage, which may slow down their learning or cause performance errors. Furthermore, situational learning usually requires students to directly enter the situation to practice, and it is more difficult to actually perceive their learning status, improve or achieve reflective learning. This study uses the concept of double to solve the above-mentioned problems that may occur in actual learning. In addition, this study uses robot double instead of real person double to avoid interference from peer interactions.

Finally, this study has established a robot double actor that can be designed and produced by users in the situational learning system, and provides students with help during the transition period of learning to show the learning results. In addition to achieving the purpose of situational learning, it also let learners to focus on learning without worrying about the anxiety and uncertainty of going on stage or directly facing the audience. Learners can understand their own learning situation from the perspective of the bystander and conduct reflective learning. At the same time, learners will continue to practice and keep improving themselves in order to let their peers see their outstanding side.

This study cooperated with teachers and examined at a university in Taoyuan City and conducted an experiment. The experimental results show that the students using this research system are better than traditional learning methods learning effect. The students think that it is fun to make a robot double, and they will practice more seriously because the robot performs with its own voice. In addition, it is also a very important factor for students to be able to understand their own learning through the third-person perspective. On the whole, this system increases students′ learning interest, learning intensity and learning effect.

關鍵字(中)

★ 情境學習
★ 替身
★ 替身機器人
★ 教育機器人
★ 反思學習

關鍵字(英)

★ Situational learning
★ Double
★ Double Robots
★ Educational Robotics
★ Reflective learning

論文目次

摘要 V
ABSTRACT VI
誌謝 VII
目錄 VIII
圖目錄 XI
表目錄 XIV
一、緒論 1
1-1.研究背景 1
1-2.研究問題 3
1-3.研究目標 4
二、相關研究 5
2-1.情境學習 5
2-2.具身體現融入的情境學習 6
2-3.替身 7
2-4.機器人替身的可行性 8
2-5.機器人與情境學習 8
2-6.小結 10
三、學習模式 11
3-1.課程教學與系統講解 11
3-2.劇本創作 11
3-3.劇本練習 11
3-4.正式演出與成果發表 12
四、系統設計與實作 13
4-1.系統設計 13
4-1-1.系統架構 13
4-1-2.開發環境 14
4-2.系統實作 15
4-2-1.機器人台詞實作 15
4-2-2.機器人面部表情與動作 18
4-2-3.機器人個性實作與展現 20
4-2-4.因應疫情製作 APP 互動 23
五、實驗設計 25
5-1.實驗假設 25
5-2.實驗對象 25
5-3.實驗教材設計 26
5-4.實驗環境設計 26
5-5.實驗流程 29
5-6.實驗操作 29
5-7.實驗評斷工具 30
5-7-1.前測和後測試卷 30
5-7-2.問卷量表 30
六、實驗結果分析與討論 31
6-1.前後測試卷測驗結果與討論 31
6-1-1.Randomness and Independent Sampling 31
6-1-2.Normality 32
6-1-3.Homogeneity of Regression 32
6-1-4.Homogeneity of Variances 32
6-1-5.單因子共變數分析(Analysis of Covariance, ANCOVA) 33
6-2.問卷結果與討論 34
6-2-1.問卷信度分析 34
6-2-2.問卷結果描述 34
七、結論與未來研究 42
7-1.結論 42
7-2.未來研究 43
7-2-1.語調技術 43
7-2-2.動態情緒的互動 43
7-2-3.應用在不同領域 43
八、參考文獻 44
附錄一、教材劇本 48
附錄二、前測試卷 53
附錄三、後測試卷 54
附錄四、實驗組問卷 55
附錄五、對照組問卷 56
附錄六、論文關鍵字(英文版) 57
附錄七、圖表英文對照 58

參考文獻

ALV國際美國村. (1992). Retrieved from https://www.kidscamp.com.tw/index.asp
王映之. (2007). 以教育戲劇教學法建構藝術與人文課程之行動研究. 新竹縣教育研究集刊, 147+149-185.
捉刀. (2021, 04). Retrieved from https://w.wiki/3dqm
情境學習理論. (2017, 03 07). Retrieved from https://wiki.mbalib.com/wiki/%E6%83%85%E5%A2%83%E5%AD%A6%E4%B9%A0%E7%90%86%E8%AE%BA
梁承謙. (2012). 從教師學習運用「戲劇教學法」作為教育工具的學習經歷看教師需要的外間專業支援. Paper presented at the 第六屆兩岸四地「學校改進與夥伴協作」學術研討會.
陳菁惠. (2000). 情境學習 Situated Learning. https://terms.naer.edu.tw/detail/1309687/
替身. (2020, 12). Retrieved from https://w.wiki/3dqm
程遠沛. (2015, 09 21). 英語情境教室領頭推行浸潤式教學. Retrieved from https://www.gvm.com.tw/article/20905
楊志偉. (2014, 03). 「幾可亂真、熱血沸騰」的臨床實境高擬真情境模擬. Retrieved from https://epaper.ntuh.gov.tw/health/201403/special_3_2.html
Aggarwal, R., Black, S. A., Hance, J., Darzi, A., & Cheshire, N. (2006). Virtual reality simulation training can improve inexperienced surgeons′ endovascular skills. European journal of vascular endovascular surgery, 31(6), 588-593.
Al Hakim, V. G., Yang, S. H., Tsai, T. H., Lo, W. H., Wang, J. H., Hsu, T. C., & Chen, G. D. (2020). Interactive Robot as Classroom Learning Host to Enhance Audience Participation in Digital Learning Theater. Paper presented at the 2020 IEEE 20th International Conference on Advanced Learning Technologies (ICALT).
Alfadil, M. (2020). Effectiveness of virtual reality game in foreign language vocabulary acquisition. Computers & Education, 153, 103893.
Alford, J. G., Jacob, L., & Dietz, P. (2013). Animatronics workshop: A theater+ engineering collaboration at a high school. IEEE computer graphics applications, 33(6), 9-13.
Ayres, J. (1986). Perceptions of speaking ability: An explanation for stage fright. Communication education, 35(3), 275-287.
Behnke, R. R., & Sawyer, C. R. (1999). Milestones of anticipatory public speaking anxiety. Communication education, 48(2), 165-172.
Boccanfuso, L., & O’Kane, J. M. (2011). CHARLIE: An adaptive robot design with hand and face tracking for use in autism therapy. International Journal of Social Robotics, 3(4), 337-347.
Boyd, E. M., & Fales, A. W. (1983). Reflective learning: Key to learning from experience. Journal of humanistic psychology, 23(2), 99-117.
Brockbank, A. (2006). Facilitating reflective learning through mentoring and coaching. Kogan Page Publishers.
Brown, J. S., Collins, A., & Duguid, P. (1989). Situated cognition and the culture of learning. Educational researcher, 18(1), 32-42.
Chen, G. D., Hsu, T. C., & Liyanawatta, M. (2018). Designing and implementing a robot in a digital theater for audience involved drama-based learning. Paper presented at the International Conference on Innovative Technologies and Learning.
Chen, H. R., & Lin, Y. S. (2016). An examination of digital game-based situated learning applied to Chinese language poetry education. Technology, Pedagogy Educational researcher, 25(2), 171-186.
Chu, H. C., Hwang, G. J., Tsai, C. C., & Tseng, J. C. (2010). A two-tier test approach to developing location-aware mobile learning systems for natural science courses. Computers & Education, 55(4), 1618-1627.
Cohen, J. (1992). Statistical power analysis. Current directions in psychological science, 1(3), 98-101.
Costa, A. L., & Kallick, B. (2000). Discovering and exploring habits of mind. Explorations in Teacher Education, 36.
Dawson, K., & Lee, B. K. (2018). Drama-based pedagogy: Activating learning across the curriculum: Intellect Books.
Dede, C. (2009). Immersive interfaces for engagement and learning. science, 323(5910), 66-69.
Galante, A., & Thomson, R. I. (2017). The effectiveness of drama as an instructional approach for the development of second language oral fluency, comprehensibility, and accentedness. Tesol Quarterly, 51(1), 115-142.
George, D. (2011). SPSS for windows step by step: A simple study guide and reference, 17.0 update, 10/e: Pearson Education India.
Giasiranis, S., & Sofos, L. (2016). Production and evaluation of educational material using augmented reality for teaching the module of “representation of the information on computers” in junior high school. Creative Education, 7(9), 1270-1291.
Hashimoto, T., Hitramatsu, S., Tsuji, T., & Kobayashi, H. (2006). Development of the face robot SAYA for rich facial expressions. Paper presented at the 2006 SICE-ICASE International Joint Conference.
Herrington, J., & Oliver, R. (2000). An instructional design framework for authentic learning environments. Educational technology research and development, 48(3), 23-48.
Herrington, J., Parker, J., & Boase-Jelinek, D. (2014). Connected authentic learning: Reflection and intentional learning. Australian Journal of Education, 58(1), 23-35.
Hwang, G. J., Yang, L. H., & Wang, S.-Y. (2013). A concept map-embedded educational computer game for improving students′ learning performance in natural science courses. Computers & Education, 69, 121-130.
Kanda, T., Hirano, T., Eaton, D., & Ishiguro, H. (2004). Interactive robots as social partners and peer tutors for children: A field trial. Human–Computer Interaction, 19(1-2), 61-84.
Konok, V., Korcsok, B., Miklósi, Á., & Gácsi, M. (2018). Should we love robots?–The most liked qualities of companion dogs and how they can be implemented in social robots. Computers in Human Behavior, 80, 132-142.
Lan, Y. J., Kan, Y. H., Hsiao, I. Y., Yang, S. J., & Chang, K. E. (2013). Designing interaction tasks in Second Life for Chinese as a foreign language learners: A preliminary exploration. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology, 29(2).
Lombardi, M. M., & Oblinger, D. G. (2007). Authentic learning for the 21st century: An overview. Educause learning initiative, 1(2007), 1-12.
Lukosch, H., Kurapati, S., Groen, D., & Verbraeck, A. (2016). Microgames for situated learning: A case study in interdependent planning. Simulation Gaming, 47(3), 346-367.
MacIntyre, P. D., & Renée MacDonald, J. (1998). Public speaking anxiety: Perceived competence and audience congeniality. Communication education, 47(4), 359-365.
Marcia, K., Paul, h., & Kate, B. T. (2002). 心理劇入門手冊 (陳鏡如, Trans.): 心理出版社股份有限公司.
Mizumoto, T., Nakadai, K., Yoshida, T., Takeda, R., Otsuka, T., Takahashi, T., & Okuno, H. G. (2011). Design and implementation of selectable sound separation on the Texai telepresence system using HARK. Paper presented at the 2011 IEEE International Conference on Robotics and Automation.
Montgomery, J. R. (1993). Reflection, A meta-model for Learning, and a proposal to improve the quality of university teaching: ERIC Clearinghouse.
Park, S. J., Han, J. H., Kang, B. H., & Shin, K. C. (2011). Teaching assistant robot, ROBOSEM, in English class and practical issues for its diffusion. Paper presented at the Advanced Robotics and its Social Impacts.
Posner, G. J. (1989). Field experience: Methods of reflective teaching: Longman Publishing Group.
Salem, M., Kopp, S., Wachsmuth, I., Rohlfing, K., & Joublin, F. (2012). Generation and evaluation of communicative robot gesture. International Journal of Social Robotics, 4(2), 201-217.
Sarah, P. (2016, APRIL). Authentic learning: what, why and how? Retrieved from http://www.acel.org.au/acel/ACEL_docs/Publications/e-Teaching/2016/e-Teaching_2016_10.pdf
Wiecha, J., Heyden, R., Sternthal, E., & Merialdi, M. (2010). Learning in a virtual world: experience with using second life for medical education. Journal of medical Internet research, 12(1), e1337.
Wright, P. R. (2006). Drama education and development of self: Myth or reality? Social psychology of education, 9(1), 43-65.
Wu, W., Luo, Y., Huang, D., Huang, C., Peng, Y., & Chen, G. (2015). A Self-Observable Learning Cinema in the Classroom. Paper presented at the The 23rd International Conference on Computers in Education.
You, Z. J., Shen, C. Y., Chang, C. W., Liu, B. J., & Chen, G. D. (2006). A robot as a teaching assistant in an English class. Paper presented at the Sixth IEEE international conference on advanced learning technologies (ICALT′06).
Young, D. J. (1991). Creating a low-anxiety classroom environment: What does language anxiety research suggest? The modern language journal, 75(4), 426-439.

指導教授

陳國棟(Gwo-Dong Chen)

審核日期

2021-8-26

推文