博碩士論文 110450030 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:22 、訪客IP:3.145.36.171
姓名 曾前仁(Chien-Jen Tseng)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 高階主管企管碩士班
論文名稱 僕人式領導對建言行為之影響─探討基本需求滿足及組織認同的中介效果
相關論文
★ 溝通與領導課程訓練成效之分析★ 母國企業直線主管領導風格與國際 人力資源管理措施對外派人員績效之影響
★ 豐田管理模式之人才培育對品質與成本之影響-以某汽車公司為例★ 360 度回饋系統對企業主管行為改變意圖的影響-以跨國飲料 SC 公司為例
★ 兩岸研發人員職能發展應用研究-以M公司為例★ 企業併購過程中的人力資源角色
★ 組織變革成功個案分析 - John P. Kotter 領導變革八大步驟之觀點★ 社群網站經營模式分析-以『BB-BOX』網站為例
★ 觸控IC經營策略之個案研究-以A公司為例★ 科技研發單位實施接班人計畫之探討─以國內某科技研發單位為例
★ 面對數位匯流,傳統媒體代理商應對策略探討─以安吉斯集團偉視捷媒體公司為例★ 台灣光電產業選擇產品認證外包廠商的決定因素─以發光二極體照明產品為例
★ 團隊激勵獎金與團隊績效關連性之研究★ 晶圓代工業關鍵成功因素的探討—以台積公司為例
★ 員工潛能與績效對員工晉升的影響--以營造建築業為例★ 建構整合性智慧健康照護網絡─以中壢天晟醫院醫療小管家為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 僕人式領導於近年領導管理學術領域已有眾多實證研究,對於組織績效提升、保持創新、適應高度不確定性新常態競爭環境,皆能帶來效用。僕人式領導透過滿足基本需求和建立組織認同,是否可以影響部屬的建言行為?當領導者關注並滿足部屬的基本需求時,部屬會感到快樂和滿足,進而表現出更積極的建言行為。如何創造一個開放的環境,鼓勵部屬自由表達想法和建議,讓部屬感到被重視和尊重,是本研究探討的核心。此外,領導者關注部屬的個人發展和成長,並提供支持和資源,這表達了對部屬的重視和關心,激勵部屬積極參與並提供建言。領導者賦予部屬自主權,讓他們參與決策和解決問題,激發參與感和責任感,進而促使部屬提供建言。最後,建立組織認同感使部屬認同組織的價值觀和目標,感到自己是組織的一部分,並相信自己的努力對組織的成功至關重要,進而激勵部屬提供建言。本研究在了解僕人式領導如何透過基本需求滿足及組織認同來影響部屬建言行為,僕人式領導是否影響部屬在基本需求滿足及組織認同的建言行為表現,以及高低顯著的關聯性。
本研究以主管及部屬的配對進行兩階段的問卷調查,對台灣企業發放紙本或電子線上問卷,共回收了243份有效配對問卷,根據相關分析及迴歸分析的結果發現:研究結果發現:
一:僕人式領導與建言行為有正向的關聯性。
二:員工基本需求滿足在僕人式領導與建言行為間具有中介效果。
三:組織認同在僕人式領導與建言行為間具有中介效果。
摘要(英) In recent years, there have been many empirical studies on servant leadership in the academic field of leadership management, and they can all be effective in improving organizational performance, maintaining innovation, and adapting to the highly uncertain new normal competitive environment. Can servant leadership affect subordinates′ voice behavior by meeting basic needs and establishing organizational identity? When leaders pay attention to and meet the basic needs of subordinates, subordinates will feel happy and satisfied, and then show more positive voice behaviors. How to create an open environment, encourage subordinates to freely express ideas and suggestions, and make subordinates feel valued and respected is the core of this study. In addition, the leader pays attention to the personal development and growth of subordinates, and provides support and resources, which expresses the importance and concern for subordinates, motivates subordinates to actively participate and provide advice. Leaders give subordinates autonomy, let them participate in decision-making and problem-solving, stimulate a sense of participation and responsibility, and then prompt subordinates to provide advice. Finally, establishing a sense of organizational identity enables subordinates to identify with the values and goals of the organization, feel that they are part of the organization, and believe that their efforts are crucial to the success of the organization, thereby motivating subordinates to provide advice. This research is to understand how servant leadership affects subordinates′ voice behavior through basic needs satisfaction and organizational identification, whether servant leadership affects subordinates′ voice behavior performance in basic needs satisfaction and organizational identification, and whether there is a significant correlation between them.
In this study, a two-stage questionnaire survey was carried out by pairing supervisors and subordinates. Paper or electronic online questionnaires were distributed to Taiwanese companies. A total of 243 valid paired questionnaires were recovered. According to the results of correlation analysis and regression analysis: the research results found that:
One: Servant leadership is positively correlated with voice behavior.
Two: The satisfaction of basic needs of employees has a mediating effect between servant leadership and voice behavior.
Three: Organizational identification has a mediating effect between servant leadership and voice behavior.
關鍵字(中) ★ 僕人式領導
★ 基本需求滿足
★ 組織認同
★ 建言行為
關鍵字(英) ★ servant leadership
★ basic needs satisfaction
★ organizational identity
★ organizational identity
論文目次 第一章 緒論 1
1-1 研究背景及動機 1
1-2 研究目的 3
第二章 文獻探討 4
2-1 僕人式領導 4
2-2 基本需求滿足 5
2-3 組織認同 10
2-4 建言行為 11
2-5 僕人式領導與建言行為的關聯性 13
2-6 員工基本需求滿足的中介效果 14
2-7 組織認同的中介效果 16
第三章 研究方法 18
3-1 研究架構 18
3-2 研究樣本與資料蒐集程序 18
3-3 研究變項衡量 20
3-3-1 僕人式領導量表 20
3-3-2 基本需求滿足量表 21
3-3-3 組織認同量表 21
3-3-4 建言行為量表 22
3-3-5 控制變項 22
3-4 資料分析與統計方法 22
第四章 統計分析 24
4-1資料來源與樣本特性 24
4-2信度與效度分析 24
4-2-1信度分析 24
4-2-2驗證性因素分析 25
4-2-3收斂效度與區辨效度分析 26
4-3 相關分析 28
4-4 迴歸分析 29
第五章 研究與建議 32
5-1 研究結果與發現 32
5-2 管理意涵 33
5-3 研究限制與未來建議 34
參考文獻 35
附錄 49
參考文獻 中文文獻︰
杜佩蘭、曾榮豐、黃英忠、施瑞峰(2009)。領導行爲。組織學習與組織認同關係之
研究。管理實務與理論研究,3(1),45-67。
吳清山(2005)。學校行政研究: School Administration。高等教育文化事業有限公
司。
林天祐(2005)。優質學校教育指標:學生學習。校園營造與資源統整。第 42-51頁。
臺北市: 臺北市教師研習中心,2 (0),1。
林守紀、周麗芳、任金剛、曾春榮(2017)。員工建言行為︰回顧與未來。人力資
源管理學報,17(1),1-33。
林惠彥、陸洛、吳珮瑀、吳婉瑜(2012)。快樂的員工更有生產力嗎? 組織支持與工作
態度之雙重影響。中華心理學刊,54(4),451-469。
林思伶(2004)。析論僕人式/服務領導 (Servant–Leadership) 的概念發展與研究。
高雄師大學報,(16),39-57。
林家五、熊欣華、黃國隆(2006)。認同對決策嵌陷行為的影響: 個體與群體層次的分
析。台灣管理學刊,6(1),157-180。
徐瑋伶(2003)。工作動機研究之回顧與前瞻。應用心理研究,(19),89-113。
許順旺、林顯邦、張姮燕(2011)。國際觀光旅館客房部門員工壓力源及組織認同與績
效表現之相關研究: 以調適行為為干擾變項。人力資源管理學報,11(1),1-25。
溫金豐、張菡琤(2007)。三明治課程的實習情境對實習生專業承諾之影響-以國際觀光旅館業為例。人力資源管理學報,7(2),49-70。
廖國鋒、梁文彥(2011)。知覺外部聲望對組織認同與組織公民行為關聯性之跨層次研
究。輔仁民生學誌,17(1),39-63。
蘇建名(2009)。僕人領導與工作滿意度之研究—以臺北縣政府警察局為例。
蘇美如、黃英哲(2009)。國小體育教師支持和學生體育課參與動機歷程之關係-
應用自我決定理論。臺灣運動心理學報,(14),33-50。
劉秀枝(2011)。私立幼兒園教師職場幸福感與工作滿意度之關係研究。幼兒教保研
究,(6),87-115。
鄭伯壎(2004)。華人文化與組織領導:由現象描述到理論驗證。本土心理學研究,
(22),195-251。
英文文獻︰
Adams, N. L. T. D. R., Little, T. D., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory.
Development of Self-Determination Through the Life-Course, 55 (1), 47–54.
Ashforth, B. E., & Mael, F. (1989). Social identity theory and the organization. Academy of
management review, 14(1), 20-39.
Ashford, S. J., Sutcliffe, K. M., & Christianson, M. K. (2009). Speaking up and speaking out:
The leadership dynamics of voice in organizations. Voice and silence in
organizations, 175, 202.
Autin, K. L., Duffy, R. D., Blustein, D. L., Gensmer, N. P., Douglass, R. P., England, J. W., &
Allan, B. A. (2019). The development and initial validation of need satisfaction scales within the psychology of working theory. Journal of Counseling Psychology, 66(2), 195.
Avery, G. C., & Bergsteiner, H. (2011). Sustainable leadership practices for enhancing
business resilience and performance. Strategy & Leadership, 39(3), 5-15.
Baard, P. P., Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2004). Intrinsic need satisfaction: a motivational
basis of performance and weil‐being in two work settings 1. Journal of applied social
psychology, 34(10), 2045-2068.
Bandura, A. (1986). The explanatory and predictive scope of self-efficacy theory. Journal of
social and clinical psychology, 4(3), 359-373.
Barbuto Jr, J. E., & Wheeler, D. W. (2006). Scale development and construct clarification of
servant leadership. Group & organization management, 31(3), 300-326.
Baumeister, R. F., & Leary, M. R. (1995). The need to belong: desire for interpersonal
attachments as a fundamental human motivation. Psychological bulletin, 117(3), 497.
Bonett, D. G. (1980). Significance tests and goodness of fit in the analysis of covariance
structures. Psychological bulletin, 88(3), 588-606.
Biddle, S., Wang, C. J., Kavussanu, M., & Spray, C. (2003). Correlates of achievement goal
orientations in physical activity: A systematic review of research. european Journal of
sport science, 3(5), 1-20.
Chiniara, M., & Bentein, K. (2016). Linking servant leadership to individual performance:
Differentiating the mediating role of autonomy, competence and relatedness need
satisfaction. The Leadership Quarterly, 27(1), 124-141.
Chughtai, A. A. (2016). Servant leadership and follower outcomes: Mediating effects of
organizational identification and psychological safety. The Journal of
psychology, 150(7), 866-880.
Deci, E. L., Olafsen, A. H., & Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-determination theory in work organizations: The state of a science. Annual review of organizational psychology and organizational behavior, 4, 19-43.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2002). Self-determination research: Reflections and future
directions. In E. L. Deci & R. M. Ryan (Eds.), Handbook of self-determination
research (pp. 431–441). University of Rochester Press.
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education:
The self-determination perspective. Educational psychologist, 26(3-4), 325-346.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (2000). The" what" and" why" of goal pursuits: Human needs and
the self-determination of behavior. Psychological inquiry, 11(4), 227-268.
Detert, J. R., & Burris, E. R. (2007). Leadership behavior and employee voice: Is the door
really open?. Academy of management journal, 50(4), 869-884.
Dutt, R., Singh, G., Singh, M., Sharma, M., Dalal, J., & Chandolia, R. K. (2017). Diagnosis of
subclinical endometritis in murrah buffaloes through cytobrush technique. Int J Curr
Microbiol Appl Sci, 6(11), 494-9.
Dutton, J. E., Dukerich, J. M., & Harquail, C. V. (1994). Organizational images and member
identification. Administrative science quarterly, 239-263.
Ehrhart, M. G. (2004). Leadership and procedural justice climate as antecedents of unit‐level
organizational citizenship behavior. Personnel psychology, 57(1), 61-94.
Fuller, C. W., Ekstrand, J., Junge, A., Andersen, T. E., Bahr, R., Dvorak, J., ... & Meeuwisse,
W. H. (2006). Consensus statement on injury definitions and data collection procedures
in studies of football (soccer) injuries. Scandinavian journal of medicine & science in
sports, 16(2), 83-92.
Gagné, M., & Deci, E. L. (2005). Self‐determination theory and work motivation. Journal of
Organizational behavior, 26(4), 331-362.
Gillard, M., Tugend, J., Müntener, O., Manatschal, G., Karner, G. D., Autin, J., ... & Ulrich,
M. (2019). The role of serpentinization and magmatism in the formation of decoupling
interfaces at magma-poor rifted margins. Earth-Science Reviews, 196, 102882.
Gillet, N., Colombat, P., Michinov, E., Pronost, A. M., & Fouquereau, E. (2013). Procedural
justice, supervisor autonomy support, work satisfaction, organizational identification and
job performance: The mediating role of need satisfaction and perceived organizational
support. Journal of advanced nursing, 69(11), 2560-2571.
Grant, A. M. (2007). Relational job design and the motivation to make a prosocial
difference. Academy of management review, 32(2), 393-417.
Grant, A. M. (2008). Does intrinsic motivation fuel the prosocial fire? Motivational synergy in
predicting persistence, performance, and productivity. Journal of applied
psychology, 93(1), 48.
Grant, A. M., & Mayer, D. M. (2009). Good soldiers and good actors: prosocial and
impression management motives as interactive predictors of affiliative citizenship
behaviors. Journal of applied psychology, 94(4), 900.
Griffith, D. A. (2007). Spatial structure and spatial interaction: 25 years later. Review of
Regional Studies, 37(1), 28-38.
Greguras, G. J., & Diefendorff, J. M. (2009). Different fits satisfy different needs: linking
person-environment fit to employee commitment and performance using self-
determination theory. Journal of applied psychology, 94(2), 465.
Guay, F., Vallerand, R. J., & Blanchard, C. (2000). On the assessment of situational intrinsic
and extrinsic motivation: The Situational Motivation Scale (SIMS). Motivation and
emotion, 24, 175-213.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2009). Análise
multivariada de dados. Bookman editora.
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (1998). Multivariate
data analysis (Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 207-219).
Hair, J. F., Black, W. C., Babin, B. J., Anderson, R. E., & Tatham, R. L. (2010). Multivariate
data analysis (7. Baskı). Pearson. Hallahan, TA, Faff, RW, McKenzie, MD (2004). An
empirical investigation of personal financial risk tolerance. Financial Services Review-
Greenwıch, 13(1), 57-78.
Hogg, M. A., & Terry, D. I. (2000). Social identity and self-categorization processes in
organizational contexts. Academy of management review, 25(1), 121-140.
Hu, L. T., & Bentler, P. M. (1999). Cutoff criteria for fit indexes in covariance structure
analysis: Conventional criteria versus new alternatives. Structural equation modeling: a
multidisciplinary journal, 6(1), 1-55.
Hu, J., & Liden, R. C. (2011). Antecedents of team potency and team effectiveness: An
examination of goal and process clarity and servant leadership. Journal of Applied
psychology, 96(4), 851.
Huang, X., Van de Vliert, E., & Van der Vegt, G. (2005). Breaking the silence culture:
Stimulation of participation and employee opinion withholding cross-
nationally. Management and Organization Review, 1(3), 459-482.
Humphrey, S. E., Nahrgang, J. D., & Morgeson, F. P. (2007). Integrating motivational, social,
and contextual work design features: a meta-analytic summary and theoretical extension
of the work design literature. Journal of applied psychology, 92(5), 1332.
Hunter, M. D. (2001). Insect population dynamics meets ecosystem ecology: effects of
herbivory on soil nutrient dynamics. Agricultural and Forest Entomology, 3(2), 77-84.
Hunter, E. M., Neubert, M. J., Perry, S. J., Witt, L. A., Penney, L. M., & Weinberger, E.
(2013). Servant leaders inspire servant followers: Antecedents and outcomes for
employees and the organization. The Leadership Quarterly, 24(2), 316-331.
Ishaq, E., Bashir, S., & Khan, A. K. (2021). Paradoxical leader behaviors: Leader personality
and follower outcomes. Applied Psychology, 70(1), 342-357.
Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator–mediator variable distinction in social psychological
research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. Journal of personality and
social psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Kline, R. B., & Santor, D. A. (1999). Principles & practice of structural equation
modelling. Canadian Psychology, 40(4), 381.
Lanaj, K., Johnson, R. E., & Lee, S. M. (2016). Benefits of transformational behaviors for
leaders: A daily investigation of leader behaviors and need fulfillment. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 101(2), 237.
Laub, M., Berg, S., & Midgren, B. (2004). Home mechanical ventilation in Sweden—
inequalities within a homogenous health care system. Respiratory medicine, 98(1), 38-
42.
Leroy, H., Anseel, F., Gardner, W. L., & Sels, L. (2015). Authentic leadership, authentic
followership, basic need satisfaction, and work role performance: A cross-level
study. Journal of management, 41(6), 1677-1697.
Lian, H., Ferris, D. L., & Brown, D. J. (2012). Does taking the good with the bad make things
worse? How abusive supervision and leader–member exchange interact to impact need
satisfaction and organizational deviance. Organizational behavior and human decision
processes, 117(1), 41-52.
Liang, H. L., & Yeh, T. K. (2020). The effects of employee voice on workplace bullying and
job satisfaction: The mediating role of leader–member exchange. Management
Decision, 58(3), 569-582.
Liden, R. C., Wayne, S. J., Zhao, H., & Henderson, D. (2008). Servant leadership:
Development of a multidimensional measure and multi-level assessment. The leadership
quarterly, 19(2), 161-177.
Mael, F., & Ashforth, B. E. (1992). Alumni and their alma mater: A partial test of the
reformulated model of organizational identification. Journal of organizational
Behavior, 13(2), 103-123.
Mahsud, R., Yukl, G., & Prussia, G. (2010). Leader empathy, ethical leadership, and relations‐
oriented behaviors as antecedents of leader‐member exchange quality. Journal of
Managerial Psychology, 25(6), 561-577.
Mayer, R. E. (2010). Applying the science of learning to medical education. Medical
education, 44(6), 543-549.
Miller, V. D., Allen, M., Casey, M. K., & Johnson, J. R. (2000). Reconsidering the
organizational identification questionnaire. Management communication
quarterly, 13(4), 626-658.
Morrison, E. W. (2011). Employee voice behavior: Integration and directions for future
research. Academy of Management annals, 5(1), 373-412.
Morrison, E. W. (2014). Employee voice and silence. Annu. Rev. Organ. Psychol. Organ.
Behav., 1(1), 173-197.
Nunnally, J. C., & Bernstein, I. H. (1978). The role of university in the development of
entrepreneurial vocations: A Spanish study. Psychometric theory, 387-405.
Patterson, K. A. (2003). Servant leadership: A theoretical model. Regent University.
Rousseau, D. M., Sitkin, S. B., Burt, R. S., & Camerer, C. (1998). Not so different after all: A
cross-discipline view of trust. Academy of management review, 23(3), 393-404.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2000). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivations: Classic definitions and
new directions. Contemporary educational psychology, 25(1), 54-67.
Ryan, R. M., & Deci, E. L. (2002). Overview of self-determination theory: An organismic
dialectical perspective. Handbook of self-determination research, 2, 3-33.
Ryan, R. M. (2017). Self-Determination Theory: Basic Psychological Needs in Motivation,
Development, and Wellness. The Guilford Press A Division of Guilford Publications, Inc.
New York.
Ryan, B. C., & Vandenbergh, J. G. (2002). Intrauterine position effects. Neuroscience &
Biobehavioral Reviews, 26(6), 665-678.
Schaubroeck, J., Lam, S. S., & Peng, A. C. (2011). Cognition-based and affect-based trust as
mediators of leader behavior influences on team performance. Journal of applied
psychology, 96(4), 863.
Schunk, D. H. (1989). Social cognitive theory and self-regulated learning. Self-regulated
learning and academic achievement: Theory, research, and practice, 83-110.
Sendjaya, S., Sarros, J. C., & Santora, J. C. (2008). Defining and measuring servant leadership behaviour in organizations. Journal of Management studies, 45(2), 402-424.
Sheldon, K. M., & Elliot, A. J. (1999). Goal striving, need satisfaction, and longitudinal well-
being: the self-concordance model. Journal of personality and social psychology, 76(3),
482.
Sheldon, I. M., Owens, S. E., & Turner, M. L. (2017). Innate immunity and the sensing of
infection, damage and danger in the female genital tract. Journal of reproductive
immunology, 119, 67-73.
Sheldon, I. M., & Owens, S. E. (2018). Postpartum uterine infection and endometritis in dairy
cattle. Animal Reproduction (AR), 14(3), 622-629.
Spears, L. C. (2010). Character and servant leadership: Ten characteristics of effective, caring
leaders. The journal of virtues & leadership, 1(1), 25-30.
Tajfel, H. (1959). Quantitative judgement in social perception. British journal of
psychology, 50(1), 16-29.
Tajfel, H., Turner, J. C., Austin, W. G., & Worchel, S. (1979). An integrative theory of
intergroup conflict. Organizational identity: A reader, 56(65), 9780203505984-16.
Takeuchi, R., Chen, Z., & Cheung, S. Y. (2012). Applying uncertainty management theory to
employee voice behavior: An integrative investigation. Personnel Psychology, 65(2),
283-323.
Turner, M. G. (1987). Spatial simulation of landscape changes in Georgia: a comparison of 3
transition models. Landscape Ecology, 1, 29-36.
Ullman, J. B., & Bentler, P. M. (2003). In Handbook of psychology: research methods in
psychology, Vol. 2. 607-634.
Uysal, A., Lee Lin, H., & Raymond Knee, C. (2010). The role of need satisfaction in self-
concealment and well-being. Personality and social psychology bulletin, 36(2), 187-199.
Vakola, M., & Bouradas, D. (2005). Antecedents and consequences of organisational silence:
an empirical investigation. Employee relations.
Vandewalle, D., Van Dyne, L., & Kostova, T. (1995). Psychological ownership: An empirical
examination of its consequences. Group & Organization Management, 20(2), 210-226.
Van Dick, R., Wagner, U., Stellmacher, J., Christ, O., & Tissington, P. A. (2005). To be (long)
or not to be (long): Social identification in organizational contexts. Genetic, social, and
general psychology monographs, 131(3), 189-218.
Van Dierendonck, D. (2011). Servant leadership: A review and synthesis. Journal of
management, 37(4), 1228-1261.
Van Dierendonck, D., Stam, D., Boersma, P., De Windt, N., & Alkema, J. (2014). Same
difference? Exploring the differential mechanisms linking servant leadership and
transformational leadership to follower outcomes. The Leadership Quarterly, 25(3), 544-
562.
Vandierendonck, A. (2017). A comparison of methods to combine speed and accuracy
measures of performance: A rejoinder on the binning procedure. Behavior research
methods, 49(2), 653-673.
Vansteenkiste, M., & Ryan, R. M. (2013). On psychological growth and vulnerability: basic
psychological need satisfaction and need frustration as a unifying principle. Journal of
psychotherapy integration, 23(3), 263.
Walumbwa, F. O., Hartnell, C. A., & Oke, A. (2010). Servant leadership, procedural justice
climate, service climate, employee attitudes, and organizational citizenship behavior: a
cross-level investigation. Journal of applied psychology, 95(3), 517.
Wang, N., Ostuni, E., Whitesides, G. M., & Ingber, D. E. (2002). Micropatterning tractional
forces in living cells. Cell motility and the cytoskeleton, 52(2), 97-106.
White, R. W. (1959). Motivation reconsidered: the concept of competence. Psychological
review, 66(5), 297.
Whiting, S. W., Maynes, T. D., Podsakoff, N. P., & Podsakoff, P. M. (2012). Effects of
message, source, and context on evaluations of employee voice behavior. Journal of
Applied Psychology, 97(1), 159.
Yukl, G., & Mahsud, R. (2010). Why flexible and adaptive leadership is essential. Consulting
Psychology Journal: practice and research, 62(2), 81.
Zhang, J., Lindsay, R., Schweiger, A., & Steele, M. (2013). The impact of an intense summer
cyclone on 2012 Arctic sea ice retreat. Geophysical Research Letters, 40(4), 720-726.
Zhang, X., Yuan, X., Shi, H., Wu, L., Qian, H., & Xu, W. (2015). Exosomes in cancer: small
particle, big player. Journal of hematology & oncology, 8(1), 1-13.
Zhang, X., Zhou, X., Lin, M., & Sun, J. (2018). Shufflenet: An extremely efficient
convolutional neural network for mobile devices. In Proceedings of the IEEE conference
on computer vision and pattern recognition (pp. 6848-6856).
Zhou, J., & George, J. M. (2001). When job dissatisfaction leads to creativity: Encouraging
the expression of voice. Academy of Management journal, 44(4), 682-696.
Zhou, Q., Mao, J. Y., Liu, X., & Ning, X. (2022). The impacts of distinct motives on
promotive and prohibitive voice: the differential moderating role of perceived voice
level. Journal of Business and Psychology, 37(3), 601-613.
指導教授 林文政 審核日期 2023-6-14
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明