博碩士論文 110421030 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:18 、訪客IP:18.190.217.76
姓名 張詠晴(Yung-Ching Chang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 產品標籤對消費者購買意願、推薦意願、喜好程度與願付價格之影響: 瑕疵原因、惜物觀念、促銷幅度大小的干擾效果
相關論文
★ 網頁背景圖片對消費者產品偏好的影響★ 組合商品的定價模式對消費者的滿意度與價值知覺
★ KTV消費型態與消費者類型之關聯★ 蘋果沉浸度研究
★ 女性業務人員的配飾、妝容、上衣對業務職能特質知覺之影響★ 男性業務人員服飾配件對職能特質知覺之影響
★ 個人辦公桌擺設對員工工作投入與專業職能知覺之影響★ 飯店房間內擺設對消費者知覺與金錢價值之影響 --- 以人格特質為干擾變數
★ 療癒著色本對情緒轉換與風險偏好的影響★ 名片設計對業務人員的職能特質與工作績效之知覺影響
★ 美語補習班的創新服務★ 台灣工具機製造商之策略構面、組織構面及財務績效之關係研究:五大廠商之個案分析
★ 服務花朵的創新與競爭優勢:以五家牙科診所的個案分析★ 反向策略之廣告效果研究
★ 不同性刺激形式所引發的性幻想程度對廣告效果之影響★ 情緒在消費者決策行為中的影響
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 截至2022年,全球人口數達到80億人,隨著人口的增加,糧食問題日益受到重視,許多食物受到丟棄的原因為該食物外表具瑕疵,如形狀扭曲、輕微劃傷等,並非是食物腐敗等影響消費者健康之品質問題。
本研究共分為四個實驗,欲探討自變數:產品標籤 (有/無),及四個干擾變數:瑕疵原因 (不可抗力之因素/可抗力之因素);惜物觀念(珍惜及有資源/資源是用來服務我們的);促銷幅度小 (加量25%/折扣20%);促銷幅度大 (加量150%/折扣60%),對應變數:購買意願、推薦意願、喜好程度與願付價格之影響。研究結果如下:
一、產品標籤對四個應變數具顯著效果。
二、產品標籤和不同瑕疵原因對四個應變數產生雙因子交互作用。
三、產品標籤和不同惜物觀念對四個應變數產生雙因子交互作用。
四、產品標籤和促銷幅度小對三個應變數產生雙因子交互作用。
五、產品標籤和促銷幅度大對三個應變數產生雙因子交互作用。
摘要(英) As of 2022, the global population has reached 8 billion people, and with the population growth, the issue of food scarcity has become increasingly prominent. Many foods are discarded due to aesthetic imperfections such as misshapenness or minor blemishes, rather than quality issues affecting consumer health.
This study comprises four experiments aimed at investigating the effects of the independent variable : product labeling (present / absent), and four moderator variables : the reason for the imperfection (uncontrollable factors / controllable factors), thriftiness mindset (treasure / waste), discount frequency (25% increase / 20% discount), and major promotion (150% increase / 60% discount) on the dependent variables : purchase intention, recommendation intention, preference, and willingness to pay. The results are as follows:
1.Product labeling has a significant effect on the four dependent variables.
2.Product labeling interacts with different reasons for imperfection, influencing four dependent variables.
3.Product labeling interacts with different thriftiness mindsets, affecting four dependent variables.
4.Product labeling interacts with minor promotions, influencing three dependent variables.
5.Product labeling interacts with major promotions, affecting three dependent variables.
關鍵字(中) ★ 醜食
★ 標籤
★ 瑕疵原因
★ 惜物觀念
★ 促銷幅度
★ 購買意願
★ 推薦意願
★ 喜好程度
★ 願付價格
關鍵字(英) ★ imperfect food
★ labeling
★ reason for imperfection
★ thriftiness mindset
★ discount frequency
★ purchase intention
★ recommendation intention
★ preference
★ willingness to pay
論文目次 摘要 i
Abstract ii
目錄 iii
表目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 2
第三節 研究問題 3
第四節 研究流程 4
第二章 文獻探討5
第一節 消費者購買意願與喜好程度 5
第二節 口碑推薦意願 6
第三節 願付價格 6
第四節 外觀瑕疵 7
第五節 標籤效用 7
第六節 瑕疵原因 8
第七節 惜物觀念 9
第八節 促銷方式 11
第三章 研究方法 14
第一節 研究架構 14
第二節 變數的操作性定義 16
第三節 前測實驗與結果 20
第四節 研究方法與研究對象 23
第四章 資料分析與假說驗證 24
第一節 實驗一之資料分析 24
第二節 實驗二之資料分析 38
第二節 實驗三之資料分析 52
第二節 實驗四之資料分析 62
第五章 研究結論與建議 72
第一節 研究假說驗證之彙整 72
第二節 研究結論 75
第三節 研究貢獻 78
第四節 研究限制 80
第五節 未來研究建議 81
參考文獻 82
附錄一 前測一 86
附錄二 前測二 90
附錄三 前測三 92
附錄四 實驗一正式問卷 95
附錄五 實驗二正式問卷 104
附錄六 實驗三正式問卷 114
附錄七 實驗四正式問卷 122
參考文獻 一. 中文文獻
1. 許士軍,⟪管理學⟫,東華書局,1987。
2. 王澤鑑,⟪民法概要⟫,四版,自刊,2010。
3. David Hume著,⟪人性論⟫,石碧球譯,北京:九州出版,2007。
4. Schultz & Robinson著,⟪實用促銷手冊⟫,莊麗卿譯,台北:遠流,1992。
二. 英文文獻
1. Arndt, J. (1967). “Role of Product-Related Conversations in the Diffusion of a New Product,” Journal of Marketing Research, 4(3), 291-295.
2. Anderson, E. (1998). “Customer Satisfaction and Word of Mouth.” Journal of Service Research, 1, 5-17.
3. Aschemann-Witzel, Jessica, Ana Gimenez, and Gaston Ares (2018), “Consumer In- Store Choice of Suboptimal Food to Avoid Food Waste: The Role of Food Category, Communication and Perception of Quality Dimensions,” Food Quality and Preference, 68, 29-39.
4. Arul, Mishra, and Mishra, H. (2011). “The Influence of Price Discount versus Bonus Pack on the Preference for Virtue and Vice foods.” Journal of Marketing
Research, 48(1), 196-206.
5. Brown, J. J. and Reingen, P.H. (1987). “Social Ties and Word-of-Mouth Referral Behavior.” Journal of Consumer Research, 14, 350-362.
6. Barber, N., Kuo, P. J., Bishop, M., and Goodman Jr, R. (2012). “Measuring Psychographics to Assess Purchase Intention and Willingness to Pay.” Journal of consumer marketing, 29(4), 280-292.
7. Barlas, A., Stamboulis, Y., and Vleioras, A. (2020). “The Role of User Engagement in Electronic Word-of-Mouth and Online Performance.” Organizacja i Zarządzanie: kwartalnik naukowy, 5-22.
8. Berkowitz, Eric N., and John R. Walton (1980). “Contextual Influences on Consumer Price Responses: An Experimental Analysis.” Journal of Marketing Research, 17, 349-358.
9. Blattberg, R. C., and Neslin, S. A. (1990). “Sales Promotion: The Long and the Short of It.” Marketing Letters, 1, 81-97.
10. Bellhouse A., Malcolm B., Griffith Garry, R., and Dunshea Frank. (2010). “Australian Consumers′ Willingness to Pay and Willingness to Purchase a Hypothetical Lower Cholesterol Pork Product.”Australasian Agribusiness Review, 18, 32.
11. Becerril-Castrillejo, I., & Muñoz-Gallego, P. A. (2022). “Influence of Habitual Level of Consumption on Willingness to Pay: A Satiation, Sensitization, and Habituation Approach.” International Journal of Hospitality Management, 103, 103210.
12. Briesch, R. A., Chintagunta, P. K., and Matzkin, R. L. (2002). “Semiparametric Estimation of Brand Choice Behavior.” Journal of the American Statistical Association, 97(460), 973-982.
13. Dodds, W. B., Monroe, K. B., and Grewal, D. (1991). “Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyers’ Product Evaluations.” Journal of Marketing Research, 28(3), 61.
14. Davis, S., Inman, J. J., and McAlister, L. (1992). “Promotion Has a Negative Effect on Brand Evaluations—or Does it? Additional Disconfirming Evidence.” Journal of Marketing Research, 29(1), 143–148.
15. De Hooge, I., Oostindjer, M., Aschemann-Witzel, J.; Normann, A., Mueller Loose, S., and Almli, V. L. (2017). “This Apple Is Too Ugly for Me! Consumer Preferences for Suboptimal Food Products in the Supermarket and at Home.” Food Quality and Preference, 56, 80–92.
16. Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). “Belief, Attitude, Intention, and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research.” Reading, MA: Addison-Wesley.
17. Fry, Joseph N. and Gordon H.Mcdougall (1974). “Consumer Appraisal of Retail Price Advertisement.” Journal of Marketing, 38, 64-74.
18. FAO (1981). “Food Loss Prevention in Perishable Crops.” FAO Agricultural Service Bulletin, no.43, FAO Statistics Division.
19. Grunert, Klaus G. (2007). “How Consumers Perceive Food Quality. In Understanding Consumers of Food Products, Lynn J. Frewer & Hans Van Trijp. (Eds.),” Cambridge, UK: British Welding Research Association, 181–199.
20. Grewal, Lauren, Jillian Hmurovic, Cait Lamberton, and Rebecca Walker Reczek (2019). “The Self-Perception Connection: Why Consumers Devalue Unattractive Produce.” Journal of Marketing, 83(1), 89–107.
21. Griffin, A. M., and Langlois, J. H. (2006). “Stereotype Directionality and Attractiveness Stereotyping: Is Beauty Good or is Ugly Bad?” Social Cognition, 24(2), 187–206.
22. Gumber, G., & Rana, J. (2017). “Factors Influencing Willingness to Pay Price Premium for Organic Food in India.” International Journal of Emerging Research in Management and Technology, 6(2), 1-15.
23. Hunt, S. D., and Vitell, S. (1986). “A General Theory of Marketing Ethics.” Journal of Macromarketing, 6(1), 5-16.
24. Herr, P. M., Kardes, F. R., and Kim, J. (1991). “Effects of Word-Of-Mouth and Product Attribute Information on Persuasion: An Accessibility Diagnosticity Perspective.”Journal of Consumer Research, 17(4), 454-462.
25. Hoegg, J., Alba, J. W., and Dahl, D. W. (2010). “The Good, the Bad, and the Ugly: Influence of Aesthetics on Product Feature Judgments.” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 20(4), 419–430.
26. Kanazawa, S., and Still, M. C. (2017). “Is There Really a Beauty Premium or an Ugliness Penalty on Earnings?” Journal of Business and Psychology, 33, 249-262.
27. Kotler, P. (1991). Marketing Management. 7th Edition, Englewood Cliffs: Prentice- Hall.
28. Kotler, P., and Levy, S. J. (1969). “Broadening the Concept of Marketing.” Journal of Marketing, 33, 10–15.
29. Magnus Soderlund, Sara Rosengren. (2007). “Receiving Word-of-Mouth from the Service Customer: An Emotion-Based Effectiveness Assessment.” Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 14, 123–136.
30. Murphy, P. L. (2000). “The Commodifled Self in Consumer Culture: A Cross-Cultural Perspective.” The Journal of social psychology, 140(5), 636-647.
31. Marmorstein, H., Chen, H., Tsiros, M., and Rao, A. R. (2012). “When More is Less: The Impact of Base Value Neglect on Consumer Preferences for Bonus Packs over Price Discounts.” Journal of Marketing, 76(4), 64-77.
32. Norton, F. (1987). “The Coase Theorem and Suboptimization in Marketing Channels.” Marketing Science, 6(3), 268-285.
33. Packard, V. (1957). The hidden presuaders. New York: Pocket Books.
34. Reingen, P. H., and Kernan, J. B. (1986). “Analysis of Referral Networks in Marketing: Methods and Illustration.” Journal of Marketing Research, 23(4), 370– 378.
35. Richins, M. L. (1983). “Negative Word-of-Mouth by Dissatisfied Consumers: A Pilot Study.” Journal of Marketing, 47(1), 68–78.
36. Raghubir, P., and Corfman, K. (1999). “When Do Price Promotions Affect Pretrial Brand Evaluations?” Journal of Marketing research, 36(2), 211-222.
37. Siddhanth (Sid) Mookerjee, Yann Cornil, and JoAndrea Hoegg (2021). “From Waste to Taste: How “Ugly” Labels Can Increase Purchase of Unattractive Produce.” Journal of Marketing, 85(3), 62-77.
38. Simonson, I., and Drolet, A. (2004). “Anchoring Effects on Consumers′ Willingness- to-Pay and Willingness-to-Accept.” Journal of Consumer Research, 31(3), 681–690.
39. Stuart, T. (2009). Waste: Uncovering the Global Food Scandal. WW Norton & Company.
40. Smil, V. (2005). “Feeding the World: How Much More Rice Do We Need. In Rice is Life: Scientific Perspectives For The 21st Century, K. Toriyama, K.L Heong & B. Hardy (Eds.), ” 21-23.
41. Shimp, T. A. (1993). Promotion Management and Marketing Communications. Chicago, IL: Dryden Press.
42. Villegas, Beatriz, Inmaculada Carbonell, and Elvira Costell (2008). “Effects of Product Information and Consumer Attitudes on Responses to Milk and Soybean Vanilla Beverages.” Journal of the Science of Food and Agriculture, 88 (14), 2426-34.
43. Wilkie, W. L. (1990). Consumer Behavior. New York: John Wiley & Sons.
44. Wertenbroch, K., and Skiera, B. (2002). “Measuring Consumers′ Willingness to Pay
at the Point of Purchase.” Journal of marketing research, 39(2), 228-241.
45. Zeithaml, V. A. (1988). “Consumer Perceptions of Price, Quality, and Value: A
Means-End Model and Synthesis of Evidence.” Journal of Marketing, 52(3), 2-22.
指導教授 林建煌(Chien-Huang Lin) 審核日期 2024-5-31
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明