https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/100972 在培養跨領域領袖人才，整合法律政治、經濟管理、環境科技、公共倫理等探討全球永續發展議題、 Search the Channel s https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/simple-search https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/102459 title: 氣候變遷調適與人類移動：對COP21與《巴黎協定》的反思 abstract: 摘要： 本文關注的是，氣候變遷引起的人類移動現象，在《聯合國氣候變化綱要公約》的架構下是以什麼樣的視角處理？它與傳統所認知的遷徙模式有什麼樣的不同之處？從《氣候變化綱要公約》第21 屆締約方大會協商過程，與會末通過的《巴黎協定》兩個時間點檢視：面對潛在的氣候環境風險，選擇移動究竟是減少災難衝擊的手段，還是長期氣候調適策略的選項之一？本文對於氣候變遷與人類移動提出初步的研究結果，期待台灣未來的氣候調適政策能開始納入思考及討論。 出版者： 台灣: 東吳大學張佛泉人權研究中心 出版日期： 2016-06-01 出處： 台灣人權學刊, 2016-06, Vol.3 (3), p.27-41 資源來源： 華藝CEPS中文電子期刊服務 識別號： ISSN: 2224-6622 <br> https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/102458 title: Conflicting Climate Change Frames in a Global Field of Media Discourse abstract: 摘要： Reducing global emissions will require a global cosmopolitan culture built from detailed attention to conflicting national climate change frames (interpretations) in media discourse. The authors analyze the global field of media climate change discourse using 17 diverse cases and 131 frames. They find four main conflicting dimensions of difference: validity of climate science, scale of ecological risk, scale of climate politics, and support for mitigation policy. These dimensions yield four clusters of cases producing a fractured global field. Positive values on the dimensions show modest association with emissions reductions. Data-mining media research is needed to determine trends in this global field 出版者： Los Angeles, CA: SAGE Publications 出版日期： 2016 出處： Socius : sociological research for a dynamic world, 2016, Vol.2 (1), p.1-17 資源來源： Sage Journals GOLD Open Access 2024 版權： The Author(s) 2016 識別號： ISSN: 2378-0231 識別號： EISSN: 2378-0231 識別號： DOI: 10.1177/2378023116670660 <br> https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/102457 title: Comparing the EU and China wind energy policies abstract: 摘要： This paper examines the driving forces of the EU and China’s wind energy poli- cies change as well as critical problems in practice. Germany is used as a major case study representing the EU. However, this paper emphasizes less on Germany and more on China’s wind energy policy changes. This is because China’s wind energy policy appears to be less mature than that of Germany, and that the former seems to be changing more often than the latter. A contribution of this paper is that the data on China’s wind energy policy is mainly collected from interviews with Chinese central government officials, state-owned enterprises, and scholars. By comparing Germany and China’s wind energy policies, this paper uses a set of analytical factors. They are institutional framework, policy objectives, national government intervention, market and advanced technology. This paper concludes that it is not possible for both countries neglect concerns of both energy security and climate change in wind energy policy-making. Even though Germany is advanced than China in wind power development, both countries seem to face a common future problem in expanding grid connection for off- grid wind. For both counties, grid connection plays a crucial role in ensuring stable wind energy supply for the future. 出版者： Milan: Transition Academia Press 出版日期： 2014 出處： Transition studies review, 2014, Vol.21 (1), p.63 版權： Copyright Transition Academia Press 2014 識別號： ISSN: 1614-4015 識別號： EISSN: 1614-4015 識別號： DOI: 10.14665/1614-4007-21-1-005 <br>