<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/" xmlns:rdf="http://www.w3.org/1999/02/22-rdf-syntax-ns#" xmlns:taxo="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/taxonomy/" version="2.0">
  <channel>
    <title>DSpace collection: 期刊論文</title>
    <link>https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/356</link>
    <description />
    <textInput>
      <title>The collection's search engine</title>
      <description>Search the Channel</description>
      <name>s</name>
      <link>https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/simple-search</link>
    </textInput>
    <item>
      <title>What comes with technological convenience? Exploring the behaviors and performances of learning with computer-mediated dictionaries</title>
      <link>https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/50313</link>
      <description>title: What comes with technological convenience? Exploring the behaviors and performances of learning with computer-mediated dictionaries abstract: As technology develops, the prevalence of conventional book dictionaries has slowly declined due to advancements in computer-mediated aids, such as online type-in dictionaries and program-installed pop-up aids. The goal of this study was to examine how technology &amp;quot;may&amp;quot; have changed the long-standing pedagogical practice of book dictionary usage by identifying the learning processes associated with various dictionaries and verifying how these processes are related to learning. Cognitive load theory was applied to generate predictions about learning performance and, therefore, to determine the nature of these processes. Information contained in each dictionary was specifically controlled, and thus we focused on the effect of the learning process alone. In the experiment, students first read a simulated online text in one of four conditions: pop-up, type-in, book dictionaries or no aid. They were later tested for reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. Results indicated that all dictionaries enhanced vocabulary learning but not comprehension. Close examination revealed that vocabulary-learning efficiency was significantly higher for the pop-up dictionary than the other two aids. In addition, a complex relationship existed between reading comprehension and vocabulary learning. This study has important implications for future dictionary design and pedagogical advice regarding dictionary usage. (C) 2010 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
&lt;br&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:17:19 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Use of peer feedback to enhance elementary students' writing through blogging</title>
      <link>https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/50312</link>
      <description>title: Use of peer feedback to enhance elementary students' writing through blogging</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:17:18 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>The design and implementation of a meaningful learning-based evaluation method for ubiquitous learning</title>
      <link>https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/50311</link>
      <description>title: The design and implementation of a meaningful learning-based evaluation method for ubiquitous learning abstract: If ubiquitous learning (u-learning) is to be effectively developed and feasibly applied to education, it is necessary to evaluate its effectiveness. Yet to achieve a sound evaluation, a particular paradigm must be employed to fit the problem domain. Toward this end, the authors of this study have adopted a meaningful learning paradigm. Meaningful learning is often regarded as the ultimate learning status for a learner, regardless of the learning environment. Interestingly, several characteristics of u-learning are also linked to attributes of meaningful learning. For example, both u-learning and meaningful learning emphasize the authentic and active of the learning activity. Therefore, it is important to investigate the applicability of a meaningful learning paradigm for evaluating the efficacy of u-learning. The method proposed here evaluates u-learning along both macro and micro aspects, and in an effort to make u-learning more sustainable. By employing a case study, we demonstrate the feasibility of our approach by showing the advantages and disadvantages that are common to both u-learning and meaningful learning. Moreover, we also provide suggestions for instructors and designers so that they can promote the quality of u-learning. (C) 2011 Elsevier Ltd. All rights reserved.
&lt;br&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:17:16 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
    <item>
      <title>Technology enabled active learning (TEAL) in introductory physics: Impact on genders and achievement levels</title>
      <link>https://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw/handle/987654321/50310</link>
      <description>title: Technology enabled active learning (TEAL) in introductory physics: Impact on genders and achievement levels abstract: This study explored the impact of Technology Enabled Active Learning (TEAL) on students learning general physics, focusing on differences between genders and among various achievement levels. A quasi-experimental investigation was conducted on two semesters of courses offered in 2008. Data sources consisted of pre-tests, post-tests, self-report surveys, class observations, and interview data. The test results indicate that the learning gain achieved by the experimental group was 11% higher than that achieved by the control group in the first semester, though the margin decreased to 1% in the second semester. In the situation of the low achievement level, there was no difference found in the learning gain achieved by the two groups in the second semester. The qualitative data revealed that student academic performances were disclosed to be associated with the following factors: the instructors' teaching styles and instructional skills, the students' prior knowledge, their study habits, and the cohort atmosphere. That is, implementation of the innovative tool alone might not be sufficient to significantly improve student performance. Nonetheless, the interactive, collaborative instructional approach seemed to appeal to females more than it did to males, disclosing the potential of TEAL in narrowing the learning gap between genders.
&lt;br&gt;</description>
      <pubDate>Tue, 27 Mar 2012 09:17:15 GMT</pubDate>
    </item>
  </channel>
</rss>

