合作搜尋對於學生解決資訊問題的影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：153

、訪客IP：3.137.177.255

姓名

王羣仁(Chun-Jen Wang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊工程學系

論文名稱

合作搜尋對於學生解決資訊問題的影響
(Collaborative search and its influence on students’ information problem solving)

相關論文

★ 應用智慧分類法提升文章發佈效率於一企業之知識分享平台	★ 家庭智能管控之研究與實作
★ 開放式監控影像管理系統之搜尋機制設計及驗證	★ 資料探勘應用於呆滯料預警機制之建立
★ 探討問題解決模式下的學習行為分析	★ 資訊系統與電子簽核流程之總管理資訊系統
★ 製造執行系統應用於半導體機台停機通知分析處理	★ Apple Pay支付於iOS平台上之研究與實作
★ 應用集群分析探究學習模式對學習成效之影響	★ 應用序列探勘分析影片瀏覽模式對學習成效的影響
★ 一個以服務品質為基礎的網際服務選擇最佳化方法	★ 維基百科知識推薦系統對於使用e-Portfolio的學習者滿意度調查
★ 學生的學習動機、網路自我效能與系統滿意度之探討-以e-Portfolio為例	★ 藉由在第二人生內使用自動對話代理人來改善英文學習成效
★ 合作式資訊搜尋對於學生個人網路搜尋能力與策略之影響	★ 數位註記對學習者在線上學習環境中反思等級之影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

當學生在進行網路搜尋工作時，他們經常缺乏對解決其資訊問題適當的搜尋技巧和資料判斷能力，因此，如何協助學生們處理他們的網路搜尋工作，對資訊教學者而言一直是一項重要的研究議題。合作搜尋是近來被提出一種新的研究概念，希望透過人與人之間的合作活動來解決學生的網路資訊問題。其提供一個分享式的網路搜尋環境，讓學生們可以共同處理他們的搜尋工作，並透過在活動過程中的相互引導與相互學習，最終得以提升學生們的資料搜尋能力。
本研究發展了一套合作搜尋系統，並研究此一系統對於學生在解決其網路資訊問題時所產生的影響。實驗對象是一所位於台灣北部大學的學生。我們觀察了他們在日常的課堂活動中利用網路搜尋來解決其網路資訊問題的過程，並比較了在利用合作搜尋系統前後，對學生們搜尋行為所產生的差異性。
從實驗結果中我們發現合作搜尋系統似乎可以幫助學生們改善他們團體內部的資料搜尋流程、並促進他們的搜尋成果和降低在瀏覽搜尋結果時的負擔。許多參與實驗的學生指出利用合作搜尋系統便於他們管理及分享其在蒐尋過程中的資訊發現，並讓他們的搜尋過程更簡單且易於達成。在分析學生在網路搜尋過程中的歷史記錄後，我們也發現在合作搜尋的環境下，學生的搜尋技巧和資料判斷能力均有所提升，並有助於對資訊問題的解決。

摘要(英)

Earlier studies had shown that many students lack adequate search skills and evaluate information in an improper way when they solve information problems in the Internet. Therefore, how to develop an assistant method to help students in their web search activity becomes an emergent issue. Collaborative Search is a new idea that uses group collaboration to do this assistant job. It provides a sharing space in the Internet and allows people to solve their search problem together. Students can learn from each other and guide less experienced members through their searches. Their search ability can also be improved by exchange knowledge in those social activities.
This study developed a Collaborative Search system and reported a case study of its influence on college students when they search in the Internet. The data was collected from a college school activity that students process Web search to solve their information problems in groups. The difference of search behaviors and process after involving the Collaborative Search is compared.
Results showed that the proposed mechanism could benefit students’ group search processes, improve their search outcomes and reduce difficulty in information retrieval. Many students mentioned that their information process become easier and it is simple to maintain their information finding with collaboration. A measurement of students’ search histories also indicated that search skills and evaluation abilities of students were improved with a collaborative environment.

關鍵字(中)

★ 合作學習
★ 網路搜尋
★ 資訊問題解決活動
★ 合作資料檢索
★ 合作搜尋

關鍵字(英)

★ Collaborative information retrieval
★ Collaborative search
★ Information Problem Solving
★ Web Search
★ Collaborative Learning

論文目次

摘要 (Chinese Abstract)‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐i
English Abstract‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐----------ii
Table of Contents‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐---------iii
List of Figures‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐-----------v
List of Tables‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐------------vi
1.Introduction‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐------------1
2.Literature review‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐-------4
2.1Information Problem Solving‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐------4
2.2Collaborative Search‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐------6
2.2.1Implicit collaboration‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐----6
2.2.2Explicit collaboration‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐----8
2.3 Research questions‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐-----9
3.System development and application‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐------10
4.Methodology‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐---------------------------------‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐------14
4.1Participants and setting‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐-‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐-----14
4.2Prior Study‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐------‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐-----15
4.2.1The education and information background of students‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐--15
4.2.2The web search skills and collaborative search experience‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐--------------‐‐----16
4.3Instruments and procedures‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐-----18
4.4Student observations, interviews and questionnaire‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐--‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐-----20
4.5Design of the study and data analysis‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐-----21
4.5.1Analysis of student interviews, observations and system log‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐-‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐----21
4.5.2Analysis of student report and search results‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐---22
5.Results and discussions‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐-----‐‐‐‐------24
5.1The influence on students’ search process in information problem solving‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐---------24
5.1.1Positive effects of collaborative search‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐----‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐---24
5.1.2Negative Effects of Collaborative Search‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐---‐‐‐‐‐‐‐---28
5.2The influence on students’ outcomes of information problem solving‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐--‐‐‐‐‐---------------29
5.3Use collaborative search to reduce the burden with information retrieval‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐---‐‐---------32
6.Conclusions and suggestions‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐-----------------------------------‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐------35
References‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐----------------‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐39
APPENDIX‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐------------------‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐44
I.A Summarized coding form used for the analysis of final search activity‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐‐------44

參考文獻

Babin, L.M., Tricot, A., Mariné, C. (2009). Seeking and providing assistance while learning to use information systems. Computers & Education, 53, 1029-1039
Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Vermetten, Y. (2005). Information problem solving by experts and novices: Analysis of a complex cognitive skill. Computers in Human Behavior, 21, 487–508.
Brand-Gruwel, S., Wopereis, I., & Walraven, A. (2009). A descriptive model of information problem solving while using internet. Computers & Education, 53, 1207 -1217.
Browne, M. N., Freeman, K. E. & Williamson (2000). The importance of critical thinking for student use of the Internet. College Student Journal, 34 (3), 391-398.
Brusilovsky, P., Chavan, G., and Farzan, R. (2004, August). Social adaptive navigation support for open corpus electronic textbooks. Paper presented at the International Conference on Adaptive Hypermedia and Adaptive Web-Based Systems, the Netherlands, USA.
Chou, C., & Hsiao, M.C. (2000). Internet addiction, usage, gratification, and pleasure experience: the Taiwan college students’ case. Computers & Education, 35, 65-80.
Collaborative search engine. (2009, December 18). Wikipedia, Retrieved December 18, 2009, from the World Wide Web: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Collaborative_search_engine
Dewiyanti, S., Brand-Gruwel, S., Jochems, W., & Broers, N. J. (2007). Students’ experience with collaborative learning in asynchronous computer-supported collaborative learning environments. Computers in Human Behavior, 23(1), 496–514.
Druckman, D. (2005). Doing research: methods of inquiry for conflict analysis. Sage Publications.
Farzan, R. and Brusilovsky, P. (2005). Social navigation support in E-Learning: What are real footprints. IJCAI'05 Workshop on Intelligent Techniques for Web Personalization, pp. 49-56.
Fidel, R., Davies, R. K., Douglass, M. H., Holder, J. K., Hopkins, C. J., Kushner, E. J., et al. (1999). A visit to the information mall: Web searching behaviour of high school students. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 50(1), 24–37.
Freyne, J., Farzan, R., Brusilovsky, P. Smyth, B., Coyle, M. (2007). Collecting community wisdom: integrating social search & social navigation. Paper presented at the International Conference on Intelligent User Interfaces, Hawaii, USA.
Golovchinsky, G., Qvarfordt, P., & Pickens, J. (2009). Collaborative information seeking. Information Processing & Management, 44(2). 957-962
Hansen, P., Järvelin, K. (2005). Collaborative Information Retrieval in an information-intensive domain. Information Processing & Management, 41, 1101-1119
Hyldegård, J. (2006). Collaborative information behaviour - exploring Kuhlthau's Information Search Process Model in a group-based educational setting. Information Processing & Management, 42, 276 - 298.
Järvelin, K., & Kekäläinen J. (2002). Cumulated gain-based evaluation of IR techniques. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 20(4), 422–446.
Joachims, T., Granka, L., Pan, B., Hembrooke, H., Radlinski, P., & Gay, G. (2007). Evaluating the accuracy of implicit feedback from clicks and query reformulations in web search. ACM Transactions on Information Systems, 25(2), 1 - 26.
Komlodi, A., & Lutters, W. G. (2008). Collaborative use of individual search histories. Interacting with Computers, 20, 184-198
Koot, U., & Hoveijn, M. (2005). Google, de magische antwoordmachine. [Google, the magical answermachine] Pedagogiek in Praktijk, 11 (28), 18-22.
Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2005). The Web as an information resource in K-12 education: Strategies for supporting students in searching and processing information. Review of Education Research, 75(3), 323-346
Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2008a). Integrating critical Web skills and content knowledge: Development and evaluation of a 5th grade educational program. Computers in Human Behavior, 24, 666-692
Kuiper, E., Volman, M., & Terwel, J. (2008b). Students’ use of Web literacy skills and strategies: Searching, reading and evaluating Web information. Information Research, 13(3), p.351.
Kuiper, E., Volman, M., &Terwel, J. (2009). Developing Web literacy in collaborative inquiry activities. Computers & Education, 52, 668-680.
Lee, Y. J. (2005) VisSearch: A collaborative Web searching environment. Computers & Education, 44, 423 - 439
Lorenzen, M. (2001). The land of confusion? High school students and their use of the World Wide Web for research. Research Strategies, 18, 151–163.
Lorenzen, M. (2002). The land of confusion? – High school students and their use of the World Wide Web for research. Research strategies, 18 (2), 151-163.
Lubans, J. (1999, May). Students and the Internet. Available from Duke University Libraries Web site: www.lib.duke.edu/staff/orgnztn/lubans/docs/study3.htm (accessed may 2000).
MaKinster, J. G., Beghetto, R. A., & Plucker, J. A. (2002). Why can’t I find Newton’s third law? Case studies of students’use of the web as a science resource. Journal of Science Education and Technology, 11 (2), 155-172.
Metzger, M. J., Flanagin, A. J., & Zwarun, L. (2003). College student Web use, perceptions of information credibility, and verification behavior. Computers & Education, 41, 271–290.
Moraveji, N., Morris, M.R., Morris, D. (2010, April). Supporting the Social Transfer of Web Search Expertise. Paper presented at the Conference on Human Factors in Computing Systems, Atlanta, GA.
Morris, M. R., Horvitz, E. (2007, October). SearchTogether: An interface for Collaborative Web Search. Paper presented at the Symposium on User Interface Software and Technology, Newport, Rhode Island.
Pew Research Center (15 September, 2002). The Internet goes to college. how students are living in the future with today's technology. Available: www.pewinternet.org/reports/pdfs/PIP_College_Report.pdf (accessed January 2002).
Pritchard, A., & Cartwright, V. (2004). Transforming that they read: Helping eleven-year-olds engage with Internet information. Literacy, 38(1), 26–31.
Puustinen, M., Rouet, J.F. (2009). Learning with new technologies: Help seeking and information searching revisited. Computers & Education, 53, 1014-1019.
Reddy, M. C., Jansen, B. J.,& Krishnappa, R. (2008, October). The role of communication in collaborative information searching. Paper presented the Annual Meeting of ASIS&T, Columbus, Ohio.
Resnick, P., Iacovou, N., Suchak, M., Bergstrom, P. and Riedl, J. (1994). GroupLens: An Open Architecture for Collaborative Filtering of Netnews. Paper presented at the Conference on Computer Supported Coorperative Work, Chapel Hill, NC.
Schacter, J., Chung, G. K. W. K., & Dorr, A. (1998). Children’s Internet searching on complex problems: Performance and process analysis. Journal of the American Society for Information Science, 49(9), 840–849
Shackelford, J., Thompson, D.S., & James, M.B. (1999). Teaching strategy and assignment design: assessing the quality and validity of information via the Web, Social Science Computer Review, 17(2), 196-208.
Shenton, A. K., & Dixon, P. (2003). A comparison of youngsters’ use of CD-ROM and the Internet as information resources. Journal of the American Society for Information Science and Technology, 54(11), 1029–1049.
Teevan, J., Dumais, S. T., & Horvitz, E. (2005, July), Beyond the Commons: Investigating the Value of Personalizing Web Search. Paper presented at the Workshop on New Technologies for Personalized Information, Edinburgh, Scotland.
Walraven, A., Brand-Gruwel, S., & Boshuizen, H. P. A. (2009). How students evaluate information and sources when searching the World Wide Web for information. Computers & Education, 52, 234–246.
Wexelblat, A., & Maes, P. (1999). Footprints: History-rich tools for information foraging. Paper presented at the Conference on Human-Computer Interaction, Pittsburgh, PA.
Wu, M., Turpin, A.,& Zobel, J. (2008, January). An Investigation on a Community's Web Search Variability. Paper presented at the Thirty-First Australasian Computer Science Conference, New South Wales, Australia.
Yanbe, Y., Jatowt, A., Nakamura, S., & Tanaka, K. (2007, June). Can Social Bookmarking Enhance Search in the Web?. Paper presented at the Joint Conference on Digital Libraries, Vancouver, British Columbia.

指導教授

楊鎮華(Stephen Yang)

審核日期

2010-7-5

推文