人力資源專業人員之專業職能、工作動機與個人績效之關係探討

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：16

、訪客IP：3.145.36.171

姓名

彭慧純(Hui-Chun Peng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所在職專班

論文名稱

人力資源專業人員之專業職能、工作動機與個人績效之關係探討
(The Relationship Between Human Resource Competencies, Work Motivation, and Individual Job Peformance)

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究主要探討人力資源專業人員之專業職能與工作動機對其個人工作績效的影響。本研究以人力資源專業職能，包含：企業經營管理知識、功能性人力資源管理、策略性人力資源管理、溝通與協商、診斷與輔導、自我發展等，以及工作動機包含：內、外在動機為主要的影響因素，探討其對工作績效的影響，並且分別以專業職能和工作動機當作調節變項，探討其交互作用與工作績效的關係。
研究方法以配對問卷調查方式蒐集樣本資料，以台灣地區人力資源專業人員為對象，採網路及紙本問卷併行發放，由人力資源專業人員回答工作動機、專業職能、及人口統計資料等題項，由人力資源專業人員之直屬主管回答工作績效之題項；資料配對以統計方法進行相關與迴歸分析。
研究結果顯示，人力資源專業職能對人力資源人員的工作績效具正向影響，其中「自我發展」能力及「企業經營管理知識」影響工作績效最大。工作動機對人力資源人員的工作績效具正向影響，其中「內在工作動機」對人力資源人員之工作績效具正向影響，而外在工作動機對工作績效則無顯著影響。整體而言，專業職能影響工作績效較工作動機之影響為大。專業職能與工作動機之交互作用對工作績效的影響僅部份存在。
因此，企業經營管理知識及自我發展、內在工作動機等強調自我效能的特質為影響人力資源專業人員之重要因素，企業除了應召募此類具績優潛質的人力資源人才外，亦應增加其企業經營管理、策略性人資等知識，並以更彈性的工作設計及具挑戰性的任務，以提升其工作績效。

摘要(英)

The major purpose of this study is to understand the effect of Human Resource Professional Competencies and Work Motivation to Individual Job Performance. The human resource professional competencies include business knowledge, functional human resource expertise, strategic human resource expertise, communication & negotiation, human resource diagnosis & counseling, and self-development, and the work motivation includes intrinsic motivation and extrinsic motivation. It is not only to understand the effects from these factors but also to know the interaction no matter the competencies or the motivation to be as the moderator of the relationship between the other and job performance.
The methodology of this study is to survey around the human resource professionals in Taiwan. The questionnaire is spread by both on-line survey system and paper sheets. It is divided into two parts: one is designed for human resource professionals to self-assess their competencies and work motivations, and the other is for their supervisors to rate their job performance. Finally, we analyze the data by linear regression statistics.
The results of this study indicate that professional competencies correlate positively with job performance, especially the “self-development” and “business knowledge” correlate highly positively. The work motivation also correlates positively with job performance, and the intrinsic motivation correlates highly positively. However, there is no correlation between extrinsic motivation and job performance. Generally speaking, the professional competencies affect the job performance more than work motivation. The interaction between professional competencies and work motivation to job performance exist partially.
Therefore, business knowledge, self-development, and intrinsic motivation are important factor for human resource professionals’ job performance. It is recommended to recruit talents with such specialties, and to provide training to increase their business knowledge and strategic human resource expertise. Besides, a flexible job design and challenging tasks can also promote their job performance.

關鍵字(中)

★ 工作動機
★ 人力資源專業職能
★ 人力資源專業人員
★ 工作績效

關鍵字(英)

★ human resource competency
★ job performance
★ work motivation
★ human resource professional

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
謝誌 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vi
表目錄 vii
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究動機 1
第二節研究目的 3
第二章文獻探討 5
第一節人力資源專業職能的定義及其與績效的關係 5
第二節工作動機的定義及其與工作績效的關係 9
第三節職能、工作動機的調節效果 11
第三章研究方法 14
第一節研究架構 14
第二節研究對象與施測方式 15
第三節研究工具 15
第四章研究結果 19
第一節敘述性統計分析與各變項相關分析 19
第二節人力資源專業職能與工作績效的關係 22
第三節人力資源專業人員之工作動機對工作績效的影響 23
第四節人力資源專業職能與工作動機對個人績效的影響比較 24
第五節人力資源專業職能、工作動機與個人績效之交互作用關係 25
第五章結論與討論建議 36
第一節研究結論與討論 36
第二節管理意涵 39
第三節研究限制與未來研究建議 40
參考文獻 41
附錄一 46
1 工作動機量表 46
2 人力資源專業職能量表 47
3 工作績效量表 48

參考文獻

1. 林文政 (2001). 台灣製造業人力資源專業職能之研究, 中山管理評論, 9(4), 621-654.(TSSCI)
2. 房美玉 (2002). 台灣半導體產業之組織文化對於內外工作動機與工作績效及工作滿意度間關連性的影響, 管理評論, 21(3), 69-96.
3. 廖良文, 盧建中, 費吳琛 (2005), 政府公務單位與國軍單位人力資源專業人員職能模型之比較研究, 2005年第三屆『管理思維與實務』學術研討會論文集, II-72-87.
4. 李欣宜 (2003), 人力資源專業職能對人力資源專業人員與人力資源部門績效的影響, 國立中央大學, 碩士論文
5. Ambrose, M. L., & Kulik, C. T. (1999). Old friends, new faces: Motivation research in the 1990s. Journal of Management, 25(3), 231-292.
6. Beltrán-Martín, I., Roca-Puig, V., Escrig-Tena, A., & Bou-Llusar, J. C. (2008). Human resource flexibility as a mediating variable between high performance work systems and performance. Journal of Management, 34(5), 1009-1044.
7. Bénabou, R., & Tirole, J. (2003). Intrinsic and extrinsic motivation. Review of Economic Studies, 70(244), 489-520.
8. Burgoyne, J. (1989). Creating the managerial portfolio: Building on competency approaches to management development. Management Learning, 20(1), 56-61.
9. Carvalho Filho, M. K., & Yuzawa, M. (2001). The effect of social influences and general metacognitive knowledge on metamemory judgments. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 26(4), 571-587.
10. Catano, V. M., Darr, W., & Campbell, C. A. (2007). Performance appraisal of behavior-based competencies: A reliable and valid procedure. Personnel Psychology, 60(1), 201-230.
11. Chung, K. H. (1968). Developing a comprehensive model of motivation and performance. Academy of Management Journal, 11(1), 63-73.
12. Combs, J., Yongmei, L., Hall, A., & Ketchen, D. (2006). How much do high-performance work practices matter? A meta-analysis of their effects on organizational performance. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 501-528.
13. Dysvik, A., & Kuvaas, B. (2008). The relationship between perceived training opportunities, work motivation and employee outcomes. International Journal of Training & Development, 12(3), 138-157.
14. Edward, E. L., III, & Michael, M. (2003). Current performance management practices. WorldatWork Journal, 12(2), 49.
15. Fleishman, E. A. (1958). A relationship between incentive motivation and ability level in psychomotor performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology, 56(1), 78-81.
16. Goronzy, F. (1968). Developing a comprehensive model of motivation and performance: A methodological comment. Academy of Management Journal, 11(3), 341-342.
17. Hagan, C. M., Konopaske, R., Bernardin, H. J., & Tyler, C. L. (2006). Predicting assessment center performance with 360-degree, top-down, and customer-based competency assessments. Human Resource Management, 45(3), 357-390.
18. Hawkins, J., & Dulewicz, V. (2007). The relationship between performance as a leader and emotional intelligence, intellectual and managerial competences. Journal of General Management, 33(2), 57-78.
19. Hitt, M. A., & Ireland, R. D. (1986). Relationships among corporate level distinctive competencies, diversification strategy, corporate structure and performance. Journal of Management Studies, 23(4), 401-416.
20. Kanfer, R., Wolf, M. B., Kantrowitz, T. M., & Ackerman, P. L. (2010). Ability and trait complex predictors of academic and job performance: A person–situation approach. Applied Psychology: An International Review, 59(1), 40-69.
21. King, A. W., & Zeithaml, C. P. (2001). Competencies and firm performance: Examining the causal ambiguity paradox. Strategic Management Journal, 22(1), 75.
22. Kehoe, R. R., & Wright, P. M. (2010). The impact of high performance human resource practices on employees' attitudes and behaviors. Journal of Management.
23. Kipnis, D. (1962). A noncognitive correlate of performance among lower aptitude men. Journal of Applied Psychology, 46(1), 76-80.
24. Kopelman, R. E., & Thompson, P. H. (1976). Boundary conditions for expectancy theory predictions of work motivation and job performance. Academy of Management Journal, 19(2), 237-258.
25. Lawler III, E. E. (1966). Ability as a moderator of the relationship between job attitudes and job performance. Personnel Psychology, 19(2), 153-164.
26. Lawler III, E. E. (2005). From human resource management to organizational effectiveness. Human Resource Management, 44(2), 165.
27. Levenson, A. R., Van der Stede, W. A., & Cohen, S. G. (2006). Measuring the relationship between managerial competencies and performance. Journal of Management, 32(3), 360-380.
28. Locke, E. A., Mento, A. J., & Katcher, B. L. (1978). The interaction of ability and motivation in performance: An exploration of the meaning of moderators. Personnel Psychology, 31(2), 269-280.
29. Long, C., & Vickers-Koch, M. (1995). Using core capabilities to create competitive advantage. Organizational Dynamics, 24(1), 6-22.
30. Martone, D. (2003), A guide to developing a competency-based performance-management system. Employment Relations Today, 30: 23–32
31. McClean, E. J. (2009). High commitment hr practices, employee effort, and firm performance. Academy of Management Annual Meeting Proceedings, 1-6.
32. McClelland, D. C. (1974). "Testing for competence rather than for 'intelligence' ": Reply. American Psychologist, 29(1), 59-59.
33. Mei, I. C., Andrew, R. J. D., & David, R. M. (2005). Towards a multidimensional competency-based managerial performance framework: A hybrid approach. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 20(5/6), 380.
34. Offermann, L. R., Bailey, J. R., Vasilopoulos, N. L., Seal, C., & Sass, M. (2004). The relative contributions of emotional competence and cognitive ability to individual and team performance. Human Performance, 17(2), 219-243.
35. Porter, L., & Lawler, E. (1968). What job attitudes tell about motivation. Harvard Business Review, 46(1), 118-126
36. Prendergast, C. (2008). Intrinsic motivation and incentives. American Economic Review, 98(2), 201-205.
37. Richard, P. J., Devinney, T. M., Yip, G. S., & Johnson, G. (2009). Measuring organizational performance: Towards methodological best practice. Journal of Management, 35(3), 718-804.
38. Scapinello, K. F. (1989). Enhancing differences in the achievement attributions of high- and low-motivation groups. Journal of Social Psychology, 129(3), 357.
39. Schrepp, M. (1997). A generalization of knowledge space theory to problems with more than two answer alternatives. Journal of Mathematical Psychology, 41(3), 237-243.
40. Scudder, J. N., & Guinan, P. J. (1989). Communication competencies as discriminators of superiors' ratings of employee performance. Journal of Business Communication, 26(3), 217-229.
41. Snape, E., & Redman, T. (2010). HRM practices, organizational citizenship behaviour, and performance: A multi-level analysis. Journal of Management Studies, 47(7), 1219-1247.
42. Spencer, L. M., & Spencer, P. S. M. (1993). Competence at work models for superior performance, 魏梅金譯, 才能評鑑法－建立卓越績效的模式, 商周出版, 台北, 2002　
43. Swanson, H. L. (1990). Influence of metacognitive knowledge and aptitude on problem solving. Journal of Educational Psychology, 82(2), 306-314.
44. Ulrich, D., Brockbank, W., Yeung, A. K., & Lake, D. G. (1995). Human resource competencies: An empirical assessment. Human Resource Management, 34(4), 473.
45. Van Knippenberg, D. (2000). Work motivation and performance: A social identity perspective. Applied Psychology An International Review, 49, 357-371.
46. Van Veldhoven, M. (2005). Financial performance and the long-term link with hr practices, work climate and job stress. Human Resource Management Journal, 15(4), 30-53.
47. Weaver, Adam D., et al. (2003). The effects of ability- and effort-based praise on task persistence and task performance. The Behavior Analyst Today 4(4), 361-368.
48. Weiner, M. J. (1980). The effect of incentive and control over outcomes upon intrinsic motivation and performance. Journal of Social Psychology, 112(2), 347.
49. Williams, D. C. (1976). Effects of aptitude, diligence, and performance on the attribution of motivation and ability. Journal of Social Psychology, 98(1), 97.
50. Williams, L. J., & Anderson, S. E. (1991). Job satisfaction and organizational commitment as predictors of organizational citizenship and in-role behaviors. Journal of Management, 17(3), 601.
51. Wright, P. M., Kacmar, K. M., McMahan, G. C., & Deleeuw, K. (1995). P=f(M ×A): Cognitive ability as a moderator of the relationship between personality and job performance. Journal of Management, 21(6), 1129-1139.
52. Wright, P. M., McMahan, G. C., McCormick, B., & Sherman, W. S. (1998). Strategy, core competence, and HR involvement as determinants of HR effectiveness and refinery performance. Human Resource Management, 37(1), 17.

指導教授

林文政(Wen-Jeng Lin)

審核日期

2011-7-16

推文