博碩士論文 984210002 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:21 、訪客IP:3.139.86.128
姓名 林明威(Ming-Wei Lin)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 會計研究所
論文名稱 商業模式決策模擬教學系統之設計-以Inception教學系統為例
(A Design of Business Model and Decision Making Simulation System: A Case of Study of the Inception System)
相關論文
★ 大陸台商中小企業價值網絡分析與策略選擇---以C公司為例★ 內部控制與盈餘組成份子評價
★ 分析師預測與會計異常現象★ 家族企業與盈餘管理
★ 工作經驗與團隊溝通時間對於商業模擬遊戲學習成效之影響-以ShelviDream為例★ 在2008年金融海嘯及台灣觀光旅遊政策開放下國際觀光旅館之因應對策-以晶華酒店為例
★ 連接器產業導入IFRS之因應對策-以宏致電子為例★ 主機板產業導入IFRS 之因應對策-以映泰公司為例
★ 我國企業導入IFRS的執行成效與政府政策目標之比較-以個案公司為例★ 商業模式數位模擬系統開發與經驗傳承之研究 -以「2013 ABC決策模擬系統專題」為例
★ 商業模式數位模擬系統開發與經驗傳承之研究 -以「2013 Inception 決策模擬系統專題」為例★ 成功事業模式和失敗事業模式之比較-以「2015事業模式與決策模擬競賽」研究所參賽學生為例
★ 成功事業模式和失敗事業模式之比較 -以「2015事業模式與決策模擬競賽」 大學部參賽學生為例★ 成功事業模式和失敗事業模式之比較 -以「2015事業模式與決策模擬競賽」EMBA參賽學生為例
★ 以8十事業模式架構分析日月光收購矽品之綜合效益★ 以8十事業模式架構分析台積電前進中國的策略佈局
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 經營模擬系統教學方法廣泛的應用於歐美各個商學院之中早已盛行好幾年。過去研究指出經營模擬系統的教學方法所能產生的學習效果是傳統教學法所無法獲得的。本研究的目的在於探討在商業管理相關課程中應用一套以商業模式為架構的經營管理模擬系統在知識、技能、及態度面是否能提升學習成效。
  系統是由國立中央大學鄭漢鐔教授與林熙禎教授聯合指導的專題小組負責開發製作,它以一個全方位的商業模式作為系統設計的基本架構,結合電腦科技與網際網路等技術建構一個全新的經營模擬系統。系統完成測試後於中央大學管理學院研究所及EMBA課程中應用,並在一家大陸台商的高階主管培訓課程中使用。在課程中學生分組扮演企業高階主管的角色,在一個由七個競爭對手組成的市場中負責經營一家公司。
  最後本研究運用問卷調查收集資料並分分析學生的學習成效。資料分析結果發現,本經營模擬系統對於使用者在知識、技能、及態度三個構面的學習成效確實達到正面的提升。另外,經營模擬系統設計上和學員之間的互動也都能得以快速提升學習者間自我學習成效。最後,本模擬系統的使用者介面還需要加強改進,本研究提出未來系統設計的改善建議。
摘要(英) The use of simulations as a pedagogical tool in management education has become popular across business school both in USA and in Europe. Previous studies have shown that the use of management simulation system in teaching could produce the learning effects which the traditional teaching method cannot provide. The purpose of this study is to investigate the effectiveness of learning by using a management simulation system designed for the purpose of improving the cognitive, skills and the attitude of executive managers.
  The simulation system was developed by a team of students under the instruction of professors Hann-Tarn Jeng and Shi-Jen Lin of National Central University. The system was designed based on the concept of business model. In order to test the learning effectiveness of the simulation system, the Inception System was conducted in graduate management-related classes, an EMBA class, and an executive training program of an industrial firm in Shanghai. For each simulation, the students were divided into groups and act as a top management team. Each team was responsible for running a manufacturing company in a market of 7 competitors.
  After finishing 24 rounds of decision making simulation, we conducted a questionnaire survey to collect students’ learning data. The result of the qualitative and quantitative showed that the simulation system can help learners enhance their knowledge of business models, the capability of decision-making and strategy execution, and the teamwork experience. However, the system has some shortcomings in user interfaces. Finally, this research pointed out some directions for further study
關鍵字(中) ★ 經營模擬系統
★ 商業模式
關鍵字(英) ★ Management Simulation System
★ Business Model
論文目次 摘要............................i
ABSTRACT.......................ii
致謝............................iii
圖目錄..........................vi
表目錄..........................vii
一、緒論........................1
1-1研究背景與動機................1
1-2研究目的.....................2
1-3研究方法.....................3
1-4研究架構.....................3
二、文獻探討.....................5
2-1商業模式.....................5
2-2經營模擬系統簡史...............6
2-2-1經營模擬系統定義.............7
2-2-2經驗學習理論................8
2-2-3經營模擬系統學習設計架構......10
2-2-4經營模擬系統之學習成效........14
三、研究設計.....................16
3-1經營模擬系統設計...............16
3-1-1經營模擬系統開發資源與流程.....24
3-1-2系統架構....................26
3-1-2經營模擬系統競賽流程與介面.....30
3-2假說發展......................33
3-3 變數衡量.....................36
3-4 問卷設計.....................37
3-5 問卷資料分析方法...............40
四、實驗方法......................42
4-1 實驗流程設計..................42
4-2 實驗對象.....................43
4-3實驗結果......................43
五、研究結論與貢獻.................54
5-1研究結論......................54
5-2研究貢獻......................55
5-3未來研究建議...................55
參考文獻.........................57
附錄一 問卷調查表..................67
參考文獻 中文部分
[1]陳徹,SPSS統計分析,碁峰資訊股份有限公司,台北市,91年7月。
[2]楊世瑩,SPSS統計分析實務,旗標出版股份有限公司,台北市,民國94年4月。
[3]吳明隆,SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務,五南出版社,台北市,民國98年。
[4]吳明隆,SPSS統計應用學習實務:問卷分析與應用統計,知城數位科技股份有限公司,民國95年。
[5]吳明隆,SPSS操作與應用—多變量分析實務,五南出版社,台北市,民國97年9月。
[6]M. Johnson & S.Wunker,Seizing the White Space: Business Model Innovation for Growth and Renewal, 林麗冠譯,白地策略,天下文化出版,台北市,民國99年。
英文部分
[7]Alessi, S. M. and Trollip, S. R. , “Computer-based instruction: Methodsnand development”, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1985.
[8]Argyris, C. and Schon, D., “Organizational Learning: A Theory and Action Perspective”, Addison-Wesley, Reading, MA, 1987.
[9]Angelides, C. M., Siemer, J., “Evaluation Intelligent Tutoring with Gaming-Simulations, “Proceedings of the Winter Simulation Conference,1995.
[10]Agarwal, R. and Prasad, J., ”Are individual differences germane to the acceptance of new information technologies?”, Decision Sciences, Vol.30 No. 5, pp.557-82,1999.
[11]A. Osterwalder & Y.Pigneur, John Wiley & Sons,” Business Model Generation”, 2010.
[12]Bredemeier, M., & Greenblat, C.. “The educational effectiveness of simulation games.” Simulation & Games, 12, 307-332,1981.
[13]Bergin, R.S. and Prusko, G.F., “System thinking: the learning laboratory”, Healthcare Forum Journal, Vol. 1, pp.32-6,1990.
[14]Bell B. S., Kanar A. M., and Kozlowski S. W. J. ”Current issues and future directions in simulation-based training in North America, “ The international Journal of Human Resource Management, Vol. 19, No.8,pp.1416-1434,2008.
[15]Caillois, R.. “Man, play, and games.” New York: Free Press, 1961.
[16]Carlssin, B., Keene, P., and Martin, J. B., “R&D Organizations as Learning Systems, “Sloan Management Review Spring, 1976.
[17]Csikszentmihalyi, M.. “Flow: The psychology of optimal performance.” New York: Cambridge University Press, 1990.
[18]Curry, B. and Moutinho, L., “Using computer simulation in management education”, Management Education and Development, Vol.23 No. 3, pp.155-67,1992.
[19]Cordova, D. I., & Lepper, M. R.. “Intrinsic motivation and the process of learning: Beneficial effects of contextualization, personalization, and choice.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, pp.715-730, 1996.
[20]Day, H. I.. “Curiosity and the interested explorer. Performance and Instruction,” 21, pp.19-22 ,1982.
[21]Driskell, J. E., & Dwyer, D.. “Microcomputer videogame based training. “Educational Technology, 24(2), pp.11-16 ,1984.
[22]Dennis,JR, and Kansky,RJ.”Instructional computing:An action guide for educators.” ,1984.
[23]Davis, F., “perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technology”, MIS Quarterly, Vol.13 No. 3, pp.319-40, 1989.
[24]Devine, D.J., “Effects of cognitive ability, task knowledge, information sharing, and conflict on group decision-making effectiveness”, Small Group Research, Vol. 30 No. 5, pp.608-34,1999.
[25]Elliot, A. J.,&Harackiewicz, J. M.. “Goal setting, achievement orientation, and intrinsic motivation: A mediational analysis.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 66, pp.968-980,1994.
[26]Faria, A.J., “Business simulation games: current usage levels- an update”, Simulation and Gaming: An International Journal, Vol. 29 No.3, pp. 295-309,1998.
[27]Flynn, A.E. and Klein, J.D., ”The influence of discussion groups in a case-based learning environment” , Educational Technology, Research and Development, Vol. 49 No. 3, pp.71-87, 2001.
[28]Faria A. J. & Wellington W. J.”A Survey of Simulation Game Users, Former-Users, and Never-Users,”Simulation & Gaming,2004.
[29]Faria A. J., Hutchinson D., and Wellington W.J.”Developing in Business Gaming, A review of past 40 years, “ Simulation & Gaming, Dec. 2008.
[30]Guetzkpw, H. and Gyr. J., “An analysis of conflict in decision-making groups”, Human Relations, Vol.7, pp.367-81,1954.
[31]Gagne,R.M..”Learning outcomes and their effects:Useful cate-gories of human performance.” American Psychologist, 39,377-385,1984.
[32]Graham, A.K., Morecraft, J.D.W., Senge, P.M. and Sterman, J.D.,”Model-supportes case studies in management education “, European Journal of the Operational Research, Vol.59, pp.151-66,1992.
[33]Gosenpud, J., & Miesing, P.. “The relative influence of several factors on simulation performance.” Simulation & Gaming, 23, pp.311-325, 1992.
[34]Gopher, D.,Weil, M.,&Bareket, T.. “Transfer of skill from a computer game trainer to flight.” Human Factors, 36, pp.387-405, 1994.
[35]Garris, R., Ahlers, R. & Driskell, J.E., “Game, motivation, and learning: A research and practice model.”, Simulation & Gaming, 33(4), pp.441-467, 2002
[36]Hannafin, R. D.,&Sullivan, H. J.. “Preferences and learner control over amount of instruction.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 88, 162-173 ,1996.
[37]Henry Adobor,Alireza Daneshfar, “Management simulations: determining their effectiveness,” Journal of Management Development 2006.
[38]Hereford, J., &Winn,W.. “Non-speech sound in human-computer interaction: A review and design guidelines.” Journal of Educational Computing Research, 11, pp.211-233,1994.
[39]Johnson, D. and Johnson, R., “Learning together and alone: cooperation, competition and individualization,” Englewood Cliffs, NJ:Prentice-Hall, 1975.
[40]Jacobs, R.,&Baum, M.. “Simulation and games in training and development. “ Simulation & Games, 8,pp.385-394,1987.
[41]Jehn, K.A., “A multi method examination of the benefit and detriments of intra group conflict “, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 40 No.2, pp.256-82, 1995.
[42]Jonassen, D.H.,Peck,K.L., & Wilson, B.G.,”Learning with technology,” A constructivist perspective, Pretice Hall, 1999.
[43]Jehn, K.A., Northcraft, G.B. and Neal, M.A.,”Why differences make a difference: a field study of diversity, conflict, and performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.44 No.2, pp.238-51, 1999.
[44]Jehn, K.A. and Mannix, E.A., “The dynamic nature of conflict: a longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance”, Academy of Management Journal, Vol.44 No.2, pp. 238-51, 2001.
[45]Kibee, J. M., Graft, C. J., & Nanus, B., “Management Games,”New York: Reinhold, 1961.
[46]Kaiser, H.F., “An Index of Factorial Simplicity,” Psychometrika, 39, pp.31-36,1974.
[47]Kolb, D.A., Rubin, I.M., and McIntyre, J.M., “Organizational Psychology : a book of readings,”Prentice-Hall, 1974.
[48]Kinzie, M., Sullivan, H., & Berdel, R.. “Learner control and achievement in science computerassisted instruction.” Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(3), pp.299-303 ,1988.
[49]Kramer, R.M., “Trust and distrust in orpanizations of the use of three learning methods”, Journal of Management Development, Vol.21 Nos 9/10, pp.655-65,1999.
[50]Klassen, K. J.,and Willoughby, K.A.,”In-Class Simulation Games:Assessing Student Learning,”Journal of Information Technology Education, Vol.2,pp.1-13, 2003.
[51]Lepper, M. R., & Chabay, R..” Intrinsic motivation and instruction: Conflicting views on the role of motivational processes in computer-based education.” Educational Psychologist, 20(4), 217-230, 1985.
[52]Lepper, M. R.. “Microcomputers in education—Motivational and social issues. “ American Psychologist, 40, pp.1-18, 1985.
[53]Lave & Wenger,.” Situated Learning: Legitimate Peripheral Participation (Learning in Doing: Social, Cognitive and Computational Perspectives) “, 1991.
[54]Lepper, M. R., Woolverton, M., Mumme, D. L., & Gurtner, J..” Motivational techniques of expert human tutors: Lessons for the design of computer based tutors. In S. P. Lajoie&S. J. Derry (Eds.), Computers as cognitive tools” (pp. 75-105). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1993.
[55]Loewenstein, G.. “The psychology of curiosity: A review and reinterpretation. “ Psychological Bulletin, 116, pp.75-98, 1994.
[56]Lane, D.C., “On the resurgence of management simulation and games”, Journal of the Operational Research Society., Vol. 46 No. 5,pp. 569-98, 1995.
[57]Lieberman, D. A..” Interactive video games for health promotion: Effects on knowledge, self-efficacy, social support, and health. “ In R. Street&W. Gold (Eds.), Health promotion and interactive technology: Theoretical applications and future directions (pp. 103-120). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum , 1997.
[58]Malone, T.W.. “What makes things fun to learn? A study of intrinsically motivating computer games.” Palo Alto, CA: Xerox, 1980.
[59]Malone, T. W..” What makes computer games fun? Byte,” 6(12), 258-277 , 1981.
[60]Mcgrath, J.E., “Group: Interaction and Performance, Prentice-Hall,” Englewood Cliffs, NJ, 1984.
[61]Malone, T.W.,&Lepper, M. R.. “Making learning fun:Ataxonomy of intrinsic motivations for learning.” In R. E. Snow&M. J. Farr (Eds.), Aptitude, learning, and instruction: Vol. 3. Conative and affective process analyses (pp. 223-253). Hillsdale, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum, 1987.
[62]Mckenna, R. J., “Business computerized simulation: The Australian experience, “Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 22, No. 1, pp.26-32, 1991.
[63]McKeachie, W.,”Teaching tips:Strategies, research, and theory for college and university teachers,”Lexington, MA:D.C. Health and Company, 1994.
[64]Mizuta, H., Yamagata, Y., “Transaction Cycle of Agents and Web-Based Gaming Simulation for International Emissions Trading,”Proceeding of the 2002 Winter Simulation Conference, 2002.
[65]Martins, L.L. and Kellermanns, F.W., “A model of business school students’ acceptance of a web-based course management system”, Academy of Management Learning and Gaming, Vol.3 No.1, pp.7-26, 2004.
[66]Mark W. Johnson , Clayton M. Christensen and Henning Kagermann”Reiventing your Business Model”,Harvard Busines Review(2008)
[67]Priem, R. and Price, K., “Process and outcome expectations for the dialectical inquiry, devil’s advocacy, and consensus techniques of strategic decision making”, Group and Organization Studies, Vol. 16 No.2, pp.206-25,1991.
[68]Parker, L. E., & Lepper, M. R.. “Effects of fantasy context on children’s learning and motivation:Making learning more fun.” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 62, pp.625-633,1992.
[69]Prensky M., “Digital game-based learning”. New York:Paragon House.Reinventing Your Business Model, 2007.
[70]Reigeluth, C.,&Schwartz, E..” An instructional theory for the design of computer-based simulations. “Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16(1), 1-10,1989.
[71]Rieber, L. P.. “Animation, incidental learning, and continuing motivation. “ Journal of Educational Psychology, 83, 318-328, 1991.
[72]Randel, J., Morris, B.,Wetzel, C., & Whitehill, B.”. The effectiveness of games for educational purposes: A review of recent research.” Simulation & Gaming, 23, pp.261-276, 1992.
[73]Ricci, K., Salas, E.,&Cannon-Bowers, J. A.. “Do computer-based games facilitate knowledge acquisition and retention?” Military Psychology, 8(4), 295-307, 1996.
[74]Reese C. & Wells T.”Traching academic discussion skills with a card games, “Simulation & Gaming, Vol.38, No.4, pp.546-555, 2007.
[75]Quinn C. and Connor M. L., “Engaging learning:designing e-learning simulation games.” San Francisco: Pfeiffer, 2005.
[76]Staw, B.M., Sandelands, L.E. and Dutton, J.E., “Threat-rigidity effects in organizational behavior a multilevel analysis “, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol. 26 No.4, pp.304-31, 1981.
[77]Sherrell, D.L. and Burns, A.C., “An empirical test of microcomputer simulation as an alternative for the teaching of a marketing topic”, in Walker B.J. et al. (eds), Educators Conference Proceedings, American Marketing Association, Chicago, IL, pp. 122-6, 1982.
[78]Suchmon, L. “A.. Plans and situated actions: The problem of human-machine communications.” Cambridge, UK: Cambridge University Press, 1987.
[79]Schloss, P.,Wisniewski, L.,&Cartwright, G.. “The differential effect of learner control and feedback in college students’ performance on CAI modules.” Journal of Educational Computing Research, 4(2), pp.141-150, 1988.
[80]Surber, J.,&Leeder, J.. “The effect of graphic feedback on student motivation. “ Journal of Computer- Based Instruction, 15(1), 14-17, 1988.
[81]Steinberg, E.. “Cognition and learner control: A literature review.” Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 16(4), pp.117-121, 1989.
[82]Simons, K. L..” New technologies in simulation games.” Systems Dynamics Review, 9, 135-152,1993.
[83]Simon, HA.. .” Observations on the sciences of science learning.” Paper presented at the, 1996.
[84]Terrell, D.. “Strategies of computer-based instructional design: A review of guidelines and empirical research.” Alexandria, VA: U.S. Army Research Institute for the Behavioral and Social Sciences, 1990.
[85]Thurman, R.. “Instructional simulation from a cognitive psychology viewpoint. “ Educational Technology Research & Development, 41(4), pp.75-89, 1993.
[86]Thompson, A.A and Stappenbeck, GJ.,” The Business Strategy Game, 4th ed., “ Irwin, Chicago, IL , 1997.
[87]Thomas, R., Cahill, J., & Santilli, L.. “Using an interactive computer game to increase skill and selfefficacy regarding safer sex negotiation: Field test results.” Health Education & Behavior, 24, pp.71-86 , 1997.
[88]Tompson, G.H. and Dass, P.”Improving students’self-efficacy in stratrgic management: the relative impact of cases and simulations”, Simulation and Gaming, Vol. 31 No.1, pp 22-41, 2000.
[89]Tan K. H. & Muyldermans L., Sithole J., , “Using Management Simulation And Gaming In Classroom Teaching: Survey Of UK Business Schools, “in Sagset Yearbook , 2005.
[90]Venkatesh, V. and Davis, F., “A theoretical extension of the technology adoption model: four longitudinal field studies”, Management Science, Vol. 46 No.2, pp.186-204, 2000.
[91]White, B. Y.. “Designing computer games to help physics students understanding “ Newton’s laws of motion. Cognition & Instruction, 1, pp.69-108, 1984.
[92]Wood, L. E., & Stewart, P. W..” Improvement of practical reasoning skills with a computer game.” Journal of Computer-Based Instruction, 14, pp.49-53, 1987.
[93]Wishart, J.. “Cognitive factors related to user involvement with computers and their effects upon learning from an educational computer game.” Computers in Education, 15, pp.145-150, 1990.
[94]Whitehall, B., & McDonald, B..” Improving learning persistence of military personnel by enhancing motivation in a technical training program.” Simulation & Gaming, 24, pp.294-313, 1993.
[95]Willy C. Kriz,” Creating Effective Learning Environments and Learning Organizations through Gaming Simulation Design,” Simulation & Gaming, Vol. 34, pp. 495-511, December 2003.
指導教授 鄭漢鐔(Hann-Tarn Jeng) 審核日期 2011-7-23
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明