360度評量受評者工作目標明確性知覺因素之探討

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：46

、訪客IP：3.145.81.252

姓名

陳彥儒(Yen-ju Chen) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

360度評量受評者工作目標明確性知覺因素之探討
(The Study of Factors of Ratees' Goal understanding in 360 Degree Feedback Evaluation)

相關論文

★ 組織精簡與員工態度探討 - 以A公司人力重整計劃為例。	★ 訓練成效評估及影響訓練移轉之因素探討----一項時間管理訓練之研究
★ 主管領導風格、業務員工作習慣及專業證照對組織承諾與工作績效之相關研究	★ 研發專業人員職能需求之研究-以某研究機構為例
★ 人力資本、創新資本與組織財務績效關聯性之研究	★ 企業人力資源跨部門服務HR人員之角色、工作任務及所需職能之研究
★ 新進保全人員訓練成效之評估	★ 人力資源專業人員職能之研究－一項追蹤性的研究
★ 影響企業實施接班人計劃的成功因素	★ 主管管理能力、工作動機與工作績效之關聯性探討─以A公司為例
★ 影響安全氣候因子之探討-以汽車製造業為例	★ 台電公司不同世代員工工作價值觀差異及對激勵措施偏好之研究
★ 不同的激勵措施對員工工作滿足及工作投入之影響性分析	★ 工作價值觀、工作滿足對組織承諾之影響(以A通訊公司研發人員為例)
★ 薪資公平知覺與組織承諾關係之探討－以內外控人格特質為干擾變項	★ 改善活動訓練成效評量之研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本研究以六家個案公司當中擔任360度評量受評者角色的366位主管進行問卷調查。研究結果發現，360度評量的成功因素：「整體保密認知」、「評量溝通認知」、「回饋面談認知」與「評量來源能力認知」，均透過「受評者接受性知覺」的中介效果而非干擾效果，對於「工作目標明確性知覺」產生影響。最後根據研究結果，提出實施360度評量的相關建議。

摘要(英)

The study surveyed 366 managers as the ratees of 360 degree feedback evaluation in 6 companies. The key factors to ratees’ perception of validity- perceptions of confidentiality, understanding, interview feedback, and abilities of raters in 360 degree feedback- affect goal understanding through the mediating effect but not moderating effect of ratees’’ perceived acceptance. This study also suggest something important about carrying out 360 degree feedback evaluation.

關鍵字(中)

★ 工作目標明確性知覺
★ 360度評量
★ 受評者接受性知覺

關鍵字(英)

★ 360 degree feedback evaluation
★ ratees' perceived acceptance
★ goal understanding.

論文目次

目　錄 i
表目錄 ii
圖目錄 ii
第一章序論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 3
第二章文獻探討 4
第一節 360度評量制度的意義與功能 4
第二節受評者態度之影響因素探討 7
第三節受評者接受性知覺之中介效果 11
第三章研究方法 13
第一節研究架構 13
第二節研究對象 15
第三節研究流程 17
第四節研究工具 18
第五節統計分析方法 21
第四章研究結果 22
第一節因素分析 22
第二節信度分析 28
第三節敘述性統計分析 29
第四節相關分析 31
第五節受評者接受性知覺之迴歸分析 32
第六節中介效果分析 34
第五章研究結論與討論 39
第一節研究結論 39
第二節管理實務意涵與應用 44
第三節研究限制 46
第四節研究建議 47
參考文獻 48
附錄本研究問卷 53

參考文獻

（一）中文部分
王欣婉，2008，360度評量影響受評者工作目標設定行為因素之探討─結果正確性知覺的干擾或中介效果檢驗，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
沈富鈞，2007，實施多源評量成功因素、受評者接受度知覺與受評者自我才能
發展意圖關聯性之研究，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
邱皓政，2000，「量化研究與統計分析」，台北：五南圖書出版。
劉麗華，2001，主管管理才能評量 360度回饋對受評者態度之影響，國立中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文。
（二）英文部分
Antonioni, D. 1994. “The effects of feedback accountability on upward appraisal ratings,” Personnel Psychology, Vol. 47(2), 349-357.
Antonioni, D. 1996. “Designing an effective 360-degree appraisal feedback process,” Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 25(3), 24-29.
Ashford, S.J. 1986. “Feedback-seeking as an individual adaptation: a resource perspective,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 29, 465-487.
Bracken, D.W, (1994). “Straight talk about multirater feedback,” Training and Development, 44-51.
Bernardin, H.J, Dahmus, S.A, Redmon, G. 1993. “Attitudes of first-linesupervisors toward subordinate appraisals,” Human Resource Management,
Vol: 32(2-3), 315-324.
Bohl, D.L. 1996. “Minisurvey: 360-degree appraisal yield superior results, survey shows,” Compensation and Benefit Review, Vol. 28(5), 16-20.
Dalton, M.A. 1998. Best practices: Five rationales for using 360-degree feedback in organizations. In W. Tornow & M. London (Eds.), Maximizing the value of 360-degree feedback: A process for successful individual and organizational development, 59–77, SF: Jossey-Bass.
Dalton, M.A. 1997. When the purpose of using multi-rater feedback is behavior change. In D. Bracken et al.(Ed.), Should 360-degree feedback be used only for developmental purposes?, Greensboro, NC: Center for Creative Leadership.
David W. Bracken, Carol. W .Timmereck, John W. Fleenor, & Lynn Summers. 2001. “360 Feedback from another angle,” Human Resource Management, Vol. 40(1), 3-20.
Erez, M., & Zidon, I. 1984. “Effect of goal acceptance on the relationship of goal difficulty to performance,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 69, 69-78.
Erez, M. 1977. “Feedback: A necessary condition for the goal setting-performance relationship,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol: 62, 624-627.
Funderburg, S.A., & Levy, P.E. 1997.“ The Influence of Individual and Contextual Variables on 360-Degree Feedback System Attitudes,“ Group & Orgnization Management, Vol.22(2) 210-235.
Garavan, N.T, Morley, M, Flynn, M. 1997. “360 degree feedback：its role in employee development,” Journal of Management Development, Vol.16(2), 134-147.
Gorsuch, R.L. 1983. Factor analysis, Hillsdale. NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Hackman, J. R., & Oldham, C. R. 1976. “Motivation through the design of work: Test of a theory,” Organizational Behavior and Human Performance,
Vol. 16, 250-279.
Hazucha, J.F., Hezlett, S.A., & Schneider, R.J. 1993. “The impact of 360-degree feedback on management skills development,” Human Resource Management, Vol.32, 325-351.
Hedge, J.W, Kavanagh, M.J. 1988. “Improving the accuracy of performance evaluations: comparison of three methods of performance appraiser training,” Journal of Applied Psychology, Vol. 73(1), 68-74.
Hedge, J.w, Teachout, M.S, (2000). Exploring the concept of acceptability as a criterion for evaluating performance measures, Group & Organization Management, 25(1):22-44.
Ilgen, D. R., Fisher, C. D., & Taylor, M. S. 1979. “Consequences of individual feedback on behavior in organizations,” Journal of Applied Psychology,
Vol. 64, 349–371.
Kim, J. S. 1984. “Effect of behavior plus outcome goal setting and feedback on employee satisfaction and performance,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol. 27, 139-149.
Kleiman, L. S. 2009. Human Resource Management: A Managerial Tool for Competitive Advantage, Cengage Learning.
Kopelman, R. E. 1986. Managing productivity in organizations: A practical, people-oriented perspective, NY: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
London, M., & Beaty, W. R. 1993. “360-degree feedback as a competitive advantage,” Human Resource Management, Vol. 32, 353-372.
Landy, F.J, Barnes, J, Murphy, K.R. 1978. “Correlates of perceived fairness and accuracy of performance appraisal,” Journal of Applied Psychology,
Vol. 63(6), 751-754.
Latham, G. 2002. “The reciprocal effects of science on practice: insights from the practice and science of goal setting,” Canadian Psychology, Vol. 42, 1–11.
Leanne A, David W, Cheri O, Chet R, & Karin M. J. 2005. “Self-Other Agreement: Comparing its Relationship with Performance in the U.S. and Europe,” International Journal Of Selection and Assessment, Vol. 13(1), 25-40.
Locke, E. A., & Latham, G. P. 1990. A theory of goal setting and task performance. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
Locke, E. A., Cartledge, N., & Koeppel, J. 1968. “Motivational effects of knowledge of results: A goal-setting phenomenon?” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 70, 474-485.
Locke, E. A., Shaw, K. N., Saari, L. M., & Latham, G. P. 1981. “Goal setting and task performance: 1969-1980,” Psychological Bulletin, Vol. 90, 125-152.
London, M. & Smither, J.W. 1995. “Can multi-source feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishment, self-evaluations, and performance-related outcomes?- Theory-based applications and directions for research,” Personnel Psychology, Vol. 48(4), 803-839.
London M., & Wohlers, A.J. 1991. “Agreement between subordinate and self-ratings in upward feedback,” Personnel Psychology, Vol. 44, 375–390.
Mento, A. J., Steel, R. P., & Karren, R. J. 1987. “A meta-analytic study of the effects of goal setting on task performance,” Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, Vol. 39, 52-83.
Moses, J., Hollenbeck, G. P., & Sorcher, M. 1993. “Other people’s expectations,” Human Resource Management, Vol. 32, 283-297.
Muchinsky, P. M. 1997. Psychology applied to work, Pacific Grove, CA: Brooks.
Ryan, A.M, Brutus, S, Greguras, G.J, Hakel, M.D. 2000. “Receptivity to assessment-based feedback for management development,” The journal of Management Development, Vol. 19(3/4), 252-276.
Tornow, W.W. 1993. “Perception or reality：Is multi-perceptive measurement a mean or an end?” Human Resource Management, Vol. 32(2&3), 223-229.
Waldman, D. A., Atwater. L. E., Antonioni. D. 1998. “Has 360 degree feedback gone amok?” Academy of Management Executive, Vol. 12(2), pp86-94.
Yammarino, F. & Atwater, L.E. 1993. “Understanding self-perception accuracy: implications for human resources management,” Human Resource Management, Vol. 32, 231-249.
Yammarino, F. & Atwater, L.E. 1997. “Do managers see themselves as others see them? Implications of self-other rating a agreement for human resource management,” Organizational Dynamics, Vol. 25(4), 35-44.
Yukl, G, Lepsinger, R. 1995. “How to get the most out of 360-degree feedback,” Training, Vol. 32(12), 45-50.

指導教授

林文政(Wen-jeng Lin)

審核日期

2010-6-2

推文