後進者技術獲取模式之研究─以LED與太陽能產業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：23

、訪客IP：3.12.34.192

姓名

郭晉廷(Chin-ting Kuo) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

後進者技術獲取模式之研究─以LED與太陽能產業為例
(Latecomer’s Technology Acquisition Mode Research:An Empirical Analysis of Solar and LED Industry)

相關論文

★ 證券公司財務比率與股價關係之探討—以三家證券公司為例	★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究
★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例	★ 主管與部屬交換關係品質、心理賦能對員工工作滿足之影響─內外控人格干擾效果之探討
★ 轉換型領導、團隊凝聚力、信任與組織公民行為之相關研究－以研發人員為例	★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析
★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析－以資料包絡分析方法分析	★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展
★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討	★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例
★ 跨國企業之供應商評選與管理–以A公司為例	★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例--
★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究	★ 新產品開發流程及績效評估 – 以某電感製造廠M公司為例
★ 製造業閒置資產轉售平台製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例	★ 主管與部屬交換關係對員工工作績效與組織公民行為之影響—以員工心理賦能為中介效果

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

本文以後進者理論的觀點探討後進者的技術獲取模式，後進者在技術上孤立於世界先進技術，故欲進行追趕策略，選擇適當的技術獲取模式與先進者進行技術獲取，在技術上與全球先進技術聯結，並累積資源以期有機會能進入先進者之列。過去有許多研究探討影響技術獲取模式選擇的影響因子，其中証實廠商所擁有的資源與能力以及外部環境會影響技術獲取模式的選擇，本研究從後進者的觀點，根據後進者審視本身資源並以提供先進者互補性資源以進行技術獲取的決策特性，提出從「技術能力」、「市場能力」與「環境風險」探討後進者廠商對於技術獲取模式決策中整合程度高低的影響。
本研究以LED產業與太陽能產業為例，利用美國商標暨專利局資料庫(USPTO)與SDC Platinum資料庫查詢得到1990至2009年內LED產業與太陽能產業持有關鍵技術的先進者與後進者的合作資料，LED產業205筆、太陽能產業82筆，以多元邏輯迴歸進行統計分析。研究結果發現，在技術能力構面：若後進者廠商具有研發能力、製造互補能力，且與先進者存在技術相似性，則越傾向與後進者進行高整合程度的技術獲取模式；若後進者具有創新能力，則傾向低整合程度的技術獲取模式。在市場能力構面：後進者若具有行銷利益，則越傾向高整合程度的技術獲取模式。在環境風險構面：後進者與先進者之間若存在文化差異，則傾向低整合程度的技術獲取模式；後進者與先進者雙方合作的國家若存在法律制度風險則傾向高整合程度的技術獲取模式。

摘要(英)

Technology has become one of the important factors affecting the competitive advantages of the high-tech firms. The Latecomers are the firms isolated from the main stream technologies and lack of technology resources, they implement “Catch-up” strategy by playing the role as technology recipients, acquiring technologies from the first-movers, and expect to join the leading-edge technology group. This research is at the Latecomers’ standpoint, to investigate how Latecomers’ technological abilities, marketing abilities and the environmental risks influence the options of the Latecomers’ external knowledge acquisition.
This paper studied the incidents of the technology acquisition in the LED and Solar industries from 1990 to 2009. Two databases, the strategic alliance of SDC Platinum and the patent database of USPTO (United States Patent and Trademark Office) were used in this study. Multiple Logistic Regression was used to test the hypothesis. The analysis in this study found that the Latecomer’s technology abilities, marketing abilities and the environmental risks really influenced the choice of technology acquisition mode made by Latecomers.

關鍵字(中)

★ 追趕策略
★ 技術獲取
★ 後進者

關鍵字(英)

★ Technology acquisition
★ Latecomer
★ Catch-up Strategy

論文目次

中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iii
目錄 iv
表目錄 vi
圖目錄 vi
第一章導論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究問題與目的 3
第二章文獻探討 5
第一節技術獲取模式 5
第二節技術獲取模式的影響因素 9
第三節後進者追趕策略 15
第三章研究方法 20
第一節研究架構 20
第二節研究假設 22
第三節操作定義 28
第四節資料來源與分析方法 33
第四章資料分析與結果 36
第一節研究樣本分析 36
第二節 LED產業研究結果 37
第三節太陽能產業研究結果 46
第五章結論與建議 54
第一節研究結論 54
第二節管理意涵 58
第三節研究限制與後續建議 60
參考文獻 61

參考文獻

中文部分：
1. 于卓民、喬友慶，「影響台商國際合資股權策略因素之研究—三種理論觀點之整合性架構」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫，編號NSC92-2416-H-004-046，國立政治大學企業管理學系，民92年。
2. 方世杰，「企業技術交易模式影響因素之研究」，台大商研所未出版博士論文，1996。
3. 司徒達賢、賴士葆、洪鉛財，「技術取得策略影響因素分析」，1994 產業科技研究發展管理實務案例暨論文研討會，經濟部技術處，7-8頁，1994年。
4. 光電科技工業協進會，「2009 LED市場與產業技術發展年鑑」，初版，台北：光電科技工業協進會出版，2009年。
5. 朱文儀、黃延聰，「國際策略聯盟中廠商間知識移轉與廠商能力發展」，台灣管理學刊，第2 卷第1 期，105-124頁，2002年8月。
6. 李勇達，「技術取得方式的策略訂定」，清華大學工業工程研究所未出版之碩士論文，民85年。
7. 李靜芳，「以購併方式取得技術之策略決策與尋找檢視」，元智大學管理研究所八十八年度未出版碩士論文，民89年。
8. 林明杰，「技術能力與技術引進績效相關之研究」，國立政治大學企管研究所未出版博士論文，1996。
9. 財團法人光電科技工業協進會，「2009年太陽光電市場與產業技術發展年鑑，PIDA」，2009年6月。
10. 張森林，「國際技術移轉績效影響因素探討─以電子業、化學業為例」，台大商研所未出版碩士論文，1991年。
11. 陳安琳、李文智、林宗源，「新上市公司股票之發行折價—代理成本與公司控制之研究」，中國財務學刊第6 卷， 1-23頁，1999年。
12. 陳忠仁、呂鴻德，「文化差異對跨國技術移轉績效影響之研究--以在台外資企業為例」，商管科技季刊，第二卷第一期，民90年。
13. 陳松柏，「以交易成本理論探討我國廠商技術取得方式之研究:以高科技產業之實證」，管理與資訊學報，第6期，43-72頁，民90年。
14. 陳家聲，「影響國際企業技術移轉之關鍵因素」，行政院國家科學委員會專題研究計畫，編號NSC91-2416-H-002-045，國立臺灣大學工商管理學系，民91年。
15. 曾信超、王文賢，「研究機構技術移轉之探討-以工研院為例」，促進產業升級學術研討會論文集，中山大學，1993。
16. 蔡明田、廖曜生、林彥廷，「高科技產業技術取得策略之研究」，中華管理評論，第三卷第二期，1～15頁，2000年5月。
17. 賴士葆，「企業技術引進方式與其績效間相關之研究」，政大企研所，1990年。
18. 賴榮仁，「美、日在台企業管理技術移轉之研究」，政大企研未出版博士論文，1986。
英文部分：
1. Agarwal, S. and S. Ramaswami, “Choice of Foreign market Entry Mode: Impact of Ownership, Location and Internalization factor”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol 23, No.1, pp. 1-27, 1992.
2. Agarwal, Sanjeev and Sridhar Ramaswami , "Choice of Foreign Market Entry Mode: Impact of Ownership, Loca-tion and Internalization Factors," Journal of International Business Studies, 23 (1st Quarter), 1-27, 1992.
3. Anand, J. and Delios, A., “Absolute and Relative Resources as Determinants of International Acquisitions”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol23, pp. 119-134, 1992.
4. Atuahene-Gima, K., “Inward technology licensing as an alternative to internal R&D: A conceptual framework”, Journal of Product Innovation Management Vol9(2), pp. 156-167, June 1992.
5. Bailey, W. J. , Masson, R. and Raeside R.,“Choosing Successful Technology Development Partners：A Best-Practice Model, ”International Journal Of Technology Management, 15(1/2), pp.124-138, 1998.
6. Baranson, J., “Transfer of technological knowledge by international corporations to developing economies”, American Economic Review, Vol56, pp. 259-67, 1966.
7. Barney, J.B., Baysinger, B., "The organization of Schumpeterian innovation", in Lawless, M.W., Gomez-Mejia, L. (Eds),Strategic Management in High Technology Firms, JAI Press Inc., Stamford, CT, pp.3-14, 1990.
8. Baum JAC, Calabrese T, Silverman BS., “Don’t go it alone: alliance network composition and startups’ performance in Canadian biotechnology”, Strategic Management Journal, March Special Issue 21: pp. 267–294, 2000.
9. Bresman, H., Birkinshaw, J., & Nobel, R., “Knowledge transfer in international acquisitions”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol30 (3), pp. 439–462, 1999.
10. Brockhoff, K., “R&D cooperation between firms-A per-ceived transaction cost perspective”, Management Science, Vol38, pp. 514-524, 1992.
11. Brouthers, K.D.,” Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance”, J. Int. Bus. Stud. 33, pp. 203–221, 2002.
12. Brouthers, Keith D., “Institutional, Cultural and Transaction Cost Influences on Entry Mode Choice and Performance”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol 33, No.2, pp.203-221, 2002.
13. Burgelman, R.A., “Designs for corporate entrepreneurship in established firms”, California Management Review, (Spring), pp. 154–167, 1984.
14. Chen H, Hu M, Shieh J., The wealth effect of international joint ventures: the case of U.S. investment in China. Financial Management 20(4): 31–41, 1991.
15. Chen, Y., Puttitanun, T.,” Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries”, Journal of Development Economics Vol 78, pp. 474–493, 2005.
16. Cho, D.H. and Yu, P.I., “Influential factors in the choice of technology acquisition mode: an empirical analysis of small and medium size firms in Korean telecommunication industry”, Technovation Vol 20, 2, pp. 691-704, 2000.
17. Chuang, C. M., Chang, T. L., “Factors influencing technology acquisition decisions of recipient pharmaceutical firms in Taiwan”, American Asian Review, 11, pp. 88-111, 1993.
18. Cohen, W. M. and Levinthal, D. A., “Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation”, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, pp. 128-152, 1990.
19. Danila, N., “ Strategic Evaluation and Selection of R&D Projects”, R&D Management, Vol 19(1), 1989.
20. Davidson,W. H. and D. G. McFetridge, “Key characteristics in the choice of international technology transfer mode”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol16, (2), pp. 5–21, 1985.
21. Delios, A. and Paul W. Beamish, “Ownership Strategy of Japanese Firms: Transactional, Institutional, and Experience Influences”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 20, pp. 915-933, 1999.
22. Delios, A., and Witold Henisz, “Japanese Firms’ Investment Strategies in Emerging Economies,” Academy of Management Journal, Vol 43, No.3, pp. 305-323, 2000.
23. Dyer, J. H., “Effective interfirm collaboration: How firms minimize transaction costs and maximize transaction value”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol18, pp. 553-556, 1997.
24. Farok J. Contractor, “Technology acquisition choices for newly industrializing countries: The case of Taiwan”, The International Executive, Vol 35 Issue 5,Page 385–412, Feb 2007.
25. Finkelstein, S. & Haleblian, J., “Understanding acquisition performance: The role of transfer effects”, Organization Science, Vol 13(1), pp. 36–47, 2002.
26. Ford, D., “Develop Your Technology Strategy”, Long Range Planning, Vol 21(5), 1988.
27. Frank T. Rothaermel and Warren Boeker, “Old Technology Meets New Technology: Complementarities, Similarities, and Alliance Formation”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol 29, pp. 47–77, 2008.
28. Friar, J. and M. Horwitch, “The emergence of tech-nology strategy: A new dimension of strategic man-agement”, in M. Horwitch (ed.), Technology in the Moderni Corporation, Pergamon Press, New York, pp. 50-85, 1986.
29. Gatignon, H. and E. Anderson, “The Multinational Corporation Degree of Control over Subsidiaries: An Empirical Test of a Transaction Cost Explanation”, Journal of Law, Economics and Organization, Vol 17, pp.847-867, 1988.
30. Granstrand, O., Bohlin, E., Oskarsson, C. & Niklas Sjoberg, (1992), “External Technology Acquisition in Large Multi-Technology Corporations”, R&D Management, 22(2), pp.112-115, 1992.
31. Gulati, R., T. Khanna and N. Nohria, ”Unilateral commitments and the importance of process in alliances”, Sloan Management Review, Vol35(3), pp. 61-70, 1994.
32. Hagedoorn, J.,“Research Notes And Communications A Note On International Market Leaders And Networks Of Strategic Technology Partnering, “ Strategic Management Jounal, 16, pp.241-250, 1995.
33. Hagedoorn, J.,“Understanding The Rationale Of Strategic Technology Partnering： Interorganizational Modes Of Cooperation And Sectoral Differences,” Strategic Management Journal, 14, pp.371-385, 1993.
34. Haleblian, J. & Finkelstein, S., “The influence of organizational acquisition experience on acquisition performance: A behavioral learning perspective”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol 44(1), pp. 29–56, 1999.
35. Hamel, G., “Competition for competence in inter-partner learning within international strategic alliances”, Strategic Management Journal, 12: 83-103, 1991.
36. Hansen, John A., 1992, “Innovation, Firm Size, and Firm Age”, Small Business Economics, Vol4(1), pp. 37–44, 1992.
37. Haour, G.,“Stretching the Knowledge -Base of the Enterprise Through Contract Research,” R&D Management, Vol22(2), pp.177-182, 1992.
38. Harrigan, K. R., “Joint Ventures and Competitive Strategy”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol9(2), pp.141-158, 1988.
39. Hayden, E., “Technology Transfer to East Europe: U.S. Corporate Experience”, New York: Praeger, 1976.
40. Helfat, C.E., "Know-how and asset complementary and dynamic capability accumulation: The case of R&D", Strategic Management Journal, Vol18(5), pp.339-360, 1997.
41. Hennart, J.-F.,”The Transaction Costs Theory of Joint Ventures”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 9, No.4, pp.361-374, 1988.
42. Hill, C. W. L., P. Hwang and W. Kim, “An Eclectic Theory of the Choice of International Entry Mode”, Strategic Management Journal, 11(2), pp. 117-128, 1990.
43. Hitt, M. A., M. T. Dacin, E. Levitas, J.-L. Arregle, A. Borza. Partner selection in emerging and developed market contexts: Resource-baseda nd organizationalle arningp erspectives. Acad. Management J. 43 449-467, 2000.
44. Hobday, Michael, “East Asian latecomer firms: learning the technology of electronics”, World Development, Vol23, no. 7, pp. 1171-93, July 1995.
45. Hongwu Ouyang, “Resources, absorptive capacity, and technology sourcing”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol41, Number 1-2 , pp: 183 – 202, 2008.
46. John Hagedoorn and Geert Duysters, “External Sources of Innovative Capabilities: The Preference for Strategic allicances or Mergers and Acquisition”, Journal of Management Studies Vol 39(2), March 2002.
47. Jones GK, Lanctot A, Teegen HJ., “Determinants and performance impacts of external technology acquisition”, Journal of Business Venturing 16: 255-283, 2000.
48. Kale, P., Singh, H., & Perlmutter, H., “Learning and protection of proprietary assets in strategic alliances: Building relational capital”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol21(3), pp. 217–237, 2000.
49. Kapferer, J-N., Strategic Brand Management, Kogan Page, London.
50. Karen Ruckman, “Externally Sourcing Research through Acquisition: Should it Supplement or Substitute for Internal Research?”, Industry and Innovation, Vol. 15, No. 6, pp. 627–645, December 2008.
Katila R, Ahuja G. Something old, something new: a longitudinal study of search behavior and new product introductions. Academy of Management Journal, Vol45, pp.1183–1194, 2002.
51. Katrak, H., “Developing countries’ imports of technology, in-house technological capabilities and efforts: an analysis of the Indian experience”, Journal of Development Economics Vol53, pp. 67–83, 1997.
52. Kim, W. C. and P. Hwang, “Global Strategy and Multinationals’ Entry Mode Choice”, Journal of International Business Studies, Vol 23, pp.29-53, 1992.
53. Klaus Brockhoff, “R&D Cooperation between firms-a perceived transaction cost perspective”, Management Science, Vol. 38, No. 4, April 1992.
54. Kobrin, F.E. and A. Speare, "Out-Migration and Ethnic Communities." International Migration Review, Vol17, pp. 425-44, 1983.
55. Kogut, B. & Zander, U., “Knowledge of the firm, combinative capabilities, and the replication of technology”, Organization Science, Vol3(3), pp. 383–397, 1992.
56. Kuen-Hung Tsai and Jiann-Chyuan Wang, “External technology acquisition and firm performance: A longitudinal study”, Journal of Business Venturing, Volume 23, Issue 1, Pages 91-112, January 2008.
57. Kurokawa, S., “Make-or-buy decisions in R&D: small technology based firms in the United States and Japan”, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, Vol44 (2), pp. 124–134, 1997.
58. Lane PJ, Lubatkin M., “Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol19(5): 461-477, 1998.
59. Lin, C., Liu, A.C.P., Hsu, M.L. and Wu, J.C., “Pursuing excellence in firm core knowledge through intelligent group decision support system”, Industrial Management & Data Systems, Vol. 108 No. 3, pp. 277-96, 2008.
60. Lowe, J & Tayor, P., “R&D and Technology Purchase through License Agreement: Complementary Strategy and Complementary Assets”, R&D Management, Vol 28, No. 14, pp.263-278, 1998.
61. Lowe, J. and Taylor, P., “R&D and technology purchase through licence agreements: complementary strategies and complementary assets”, R&D Management, Vol28, pp. 263–78, 1998.
62. Makhija, M. V. and U. Ganesh, "The Relationship Between Control and Partner Learning in Learning-Related Joint Ven-tures", Organization Science, Vol8, 6, pp. 508-525, 1997.
63. Makino, S., & Delios, A. Local knowledge transfer and performance: Implications for alliance forma-tion in Asia. Journal of International Business Studies, 27: 905-927, 1996.
64. March JG., “Decisions in Organizations”, Blackwell, New York, 1988.
65. Mathews, J.A. and D.S. Cho., “Combinative Capabilities and Organizational Learning by Latecomer Firms: The Case of the Korean Semiconductor Industry”, Journal of World Business 34(2), pp. 139–156, 1999.
66. Milgrom, P. and Roberts, J., ”Economics, Organization and Management”, Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice-Hall, 1992.
67. Mohr, J. and R. Spekman, “Characteristics of partnership success: Partnership, attributes, communication behavior, and conflict resolution techniques”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol15, pp. 135–152, 1994.
68. Moon, C.L., “Technological capacity as a determinant of governance form in international strategic combinations”, Journal of High Technology Management Research 9 (1), pp. 35–53, 1998.
69. Mowery, D.C., “The changing structure of the U.S. national innovation system: implications for international conflict and cooperation in R&D policy”, Research Policy 27 (1998), pp. 639–654, 1998.
70. Mowery, D.C., Oxley, J.E., & Silverman, B.S., “Strategic alliances and interfirm knowledge transfer”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol17, pp. 77–91, 1996.
71. Nelson RR and Winter SG, An Evolutionary Theory of Economic Change, Belknap Press of Harvard University: Cambridge, MA, 1982.
72. Noori, H., “Managing the dynamics of new technology: Issues in manufacturing management”, Prentice Hall, Engelwood Cliffs, New Jersey, 1990.
73. Odagiri, H. and Hase, T., “Are mergers and acquisitions going to be popular in Japan? An empirical study”, International Journal of Industrial Organization, Vol 7, pp. 49-73, 1989.
74. Ouchi, W.G., “Markets, Bureaucracies, and Clans”, Administrative Science Quarterly, Vol25, No. 1 pp. 129-141, 1980.
75. Ove Granstrand, Erik Bohlin, Christer Oskarsson and Niklas Sjöberg , “External technology acquisition in large multi-technology corporations”, R&D Management Volume 22 Issue 2, Pages111-134, May 2007.
76. Parkhe, A., “Interfirm Diversity, Organizational Learning, and Longevity In Global Strategic Alliance,” Journal of International Business Studies, 22(4), pp. 579-601, 1991.
77. Porter, M.E(1985)., Competive Addvantage, Prentic-Hall.
78. R.H Vernon, V.A Williams and W.F D'Arcy, Grainsize reduction and foliation development in a deformed granitoid batholith, Tectonophysics 92 (1983), pp. 123–145.
79. R.H Vernon, V.A Williams and W.F D'Arcy, Grainsize reduction and foliation development in a deformed granitoid batholith, Tectonophysics 92, pp. 123–145, 1983.
80. Roberts, E.B. & Berry, C.A., “Entering new businesses: Selecting strategies for success”, Sloan Management Review, Vol26 (3), pp. 3–17, 1985.
81. S.W. Hung and R.H. Tang, “Factors affecting the choice of technology acquisition mode: An empirical analysis of the electronic firms of Japan, Korea and Taiwan”, Technovation (2007) 10.1016/j.technovation.2007.10.005.
82. Shan, W. 'An empirical analysis of organizational strategies by entrepreneurial high-technology firms', Strategic Management Journal, Vol11, pp. 129-139, 1990.
83. Shenkar O., Li J. T., “Skill possession and search among prospective partners in international cooperative ventures”, Organization Science, Vol10 (2), pp.134-143, 1999.
84. Song, X.M.; Montoya-weiss, M.M. & Schmidt, J.B., "Antecedents and consequences of cross-function cooperation: A comparison of R&D, manufacturing, and marketing perspectives", Journal of Innovation Management, pp.35-47, 14, 1997.
85. Steensma, H. K., “Acquiring technological compe-tencies through inter-organizational collaboration: An organizational learning perspective”, Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, Vol12, pp. 267-286, 1996.
86. Stiglitz, J.E., “Markets, market failures, and development”, The American Economic Review Vol79, pp. 197– 203, 1989.
87. Stinchcombe AL., “Social structure in organizations”, Handbook of Organizations, March JG (ed.). Rand McNally: Chicago, IL; pp. 142–193, 1965.
88. Strassman, W. P., “Technological Change and Economic Development: The Manufacturing Experience of Mexico and Puerto Rico”, Ithaca: Cornell University Press, 1968.
89. Teece, D.J., “Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy”, Research Policy 15, pp. 285-305, 1986.
90. Tidd, J. and Trewhella, M. J.(1997), "Organizaional And Technological Antecedents For Knowledge Acquisition And Learning," R&D Management, 27(4), pp.359-375.
91. Tsang, E.W.K., Choice of international technology transfer mode: a resource-based view. Management International Review 37 (2), pp. 151–168, 1997.
92. Tyler, B.B.,“Evaluating Technological Collaborative Opportunities：A Cognitive Modeling Perspective”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol16, pp.43-70, 1995.
93. UNCTAD, “La Transferencia Inversa de Tecnología: Dimensiones, Efectos Económicos y Cues- tiones de Política”, Doc. TD/B/C.G/7, Ginebra, 1975.
94. Veugelers, R.,” Internal R&D expenditures and external technology sourcing”, Research Policy , Vol 26 (3), pp. 303–315, 1997.
95. Villalonga, B. & McGahan, A.M., “Does the value generated by acquisitions, alliances and divestitures differ?” Working paper, Cambridge, MA: Harvard Business School, 2003.
96. Walter G. Park, “International patent protection: 1960–2005”, Research Policy Vol 37, pp. 761–766, 2008.
97. Wigglesworth, D., Is OD basically Anglo-Saxon? In M. Marquardt (Ed.), Corporate cultures: International HRD perspectives. Alexandria, VA: ASTD Press, 1987.
98. Williamson, O.E., “Markets and Hierarchies, Analysis and Antitrust Implications”, New York: Free Prees, 1975.
99. Yang X., Taylor M., & Stoltenberg C., "Assessing the Effects of Structural and Project Characteristics on R&D Strategic Alliance Performance: A Unified Approach", The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 10(1), pp.105-121, 1999.
100. Yasuda, H., “Formation of strategic alliances in high-technology industries: comparative study of the resource-based theory and the transaction-cost theory”, Technovation 25 (7), pp. 763-770, 2005.
101. Yli-Renko, H., Autio, E., & Sapienza, H.J., “Social capital, knowledge acquisition, and knowledge exploitation in young technology-based firms”, Strategic Management Journal, Vol22(6–7), pp. 587–613, 2001.
102. Yoshikawa, T., “Technology development and acquisition strategy”, International Journal of Technology Management, Vol25, pp. 666–674, 2003.

指導教授

洪秀婉、陳春希
(Shiu-wan Hung、Chun-hsi Chen)

審核日期

2010-7-8

推文