博碩士論文 974201065 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:26 、訪客IP:3.140.185.170
姓名 張祐認(You-Jen Chang)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 我國承銷商承銷IPO案件之績效評估
(The Performance Evaluation of IPO underwriting for Underwriters in Taiwan)
相關論文
★ 從生態共生觀點發展組織合作模式★ 影響產業垂直分工因素之探討
★ 發展台籍專業管家的人力派遣模式★ 影響軍事機關審計品質之關鍵性因素及其相對效率衡量
★ 台灣光碟片設備供應商競爭策略分析★ 國防科技研發機構組織向心力之研究
★ 衡量半導體零組件通路商之相對經營績效★ 衡量半導體晶圓代工廠商生產單位之營運績效
★ 商業銀行營運型態與組織調整對分行營運效率的影響★ 發展行動條碼為基礎的隨傳隨用視訊平台之應用
★ 飛機引擎定子零件維修之訂價調整方式★ 國際化、創新活動與公司績效:台灣上市公司董事會結構論析
★ 探討網際網路事件達成關鍵多數之影響因素★ 生態循環農業產銷策略個案研究
★ 探討以政策規範高耗能產業參與再生能源開發之綜效-以太陽光電發電系統為例★ 適地性服務(LBS)之顧客體驗整合性設計—以中華電信行動導遊為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 公開發行股票乃企業走向資本市場必經之路,依據現行法規規定,凡欲公開發行股票之公司皆需歷經承銷商輔導及推薦之過程,隨著企業對資金需求日益擴張,各家承銷商間競爭愈趨激烈,各發行公司對於承銷商之選擇也越來越多元,本研究係站在首次公開發行公司角度對承銷商承銷IPO案件之效率進行探討,並將分析過程分為是否考量技術經驗因子兩種模式分別進行分析,以了解IPO案件於此兩種模式下之承銷效率於不同承銷商、產業類別以及承銷年度三個分類內之分布狀況,並個別檢視此三個分類中各IPO案件承銷效率是否具有顯著差異,最後探討可能影響承銷效率之原因為何。本研究係針對2006年至2009年間上市櫃之IPO案件共選取163個DMU進行資料包絡分析以得出各IPO承銷案之相對效率,並利用K-W檢定各分類間是否存在顯著差異,接下來使用Tobit迴歸模式探討影響效率表現因素為何。實證結果顯示,無論是否考量技術經驗因子,各承銷商間以及各IPO承銷年度間之承銷效率皆具有顯著差異,但各IPO所屬產業間並無存在顯著差異;在影響效率值因素之分析結果發現,未考量技術經驗因子下,發行公司風險程度高低與承銷商是否加入金控和效率值呈顯著正相關,而在考量技術經驗因子後,則是協辦承銷商家數以及是否加入金控和效率值呈現顯著正相關。
摘要(英) IPO is a direct way for corporate to capital market. Based on the regulation, corporate should be gone through the process of conseling and recommending by underwriter. Due to the highly capital demand to corporate, the competition is much more fierce between underwriters. From the IPO corporate point of view, this paper is focus on the underwriting IPO efficiency of underwriters. We take technology-experience factor into consideration or not in order to find out the distribution of underwriting efficiency from three categories including different underwriters, industry categories and underwriting years, respectively. Furthermore, we examine the significantly difference of the underwriting efficiency in these three categories.
First, we take 163 DMUs into DEA approach which are the IPOs issuing between 2006 and 2009, and find out the relative efficiency of each IPO case. Second, we use K-W test to examine the significantly differences between each category. Finally, we use Tobit regression model to investigate which factor can effect the performance of efficiency.
Our empirical results show that whether the technology-experience factor take into consideration or not, underwriting efficiency of each underwrite and IPO underwriting year is significantly difference. But it’s not significant in each industry. Furthermore, under the condition of not taking the technology-experience factor, there is positive correlation between the risk level of issuing company and underwriting efficiency, and also is positive between the participation in financial holding corporation or not and underwriting efficiency. In addition, under the condition of taking the technology-experience factor, the number of co-underwriters and the participation in financial holding corporation or not is positive correlation with underwriting efficiency.
關鍵字(中) ★ 承銷商
★ IPO
★ 資料包絡分析法
★ Tobit迴歸
關鍵字(英) ★ Tobit regression
★ DEA
★ IPO
★ Underwriter
論文目次 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 3
第三節 論文架構及研究流程 4
第二章 文獻回顧 6
第一節 IPO之效率表現 6
第二節 資料包絡分析與證券商經營績效 12
第三章 研究設計 17
第一節 研究架構 17
第二節 IPO承銷效率衡量方法 18
第三節 研究對象及資料來源 23
第四章 實證結果分析 24
第一節 樣本資料敘述 24
第二節 IPO承銷效率分析 29
第三節 影響IPO承銷效率之因素 47
第五章 結論與建議 51
第一節 研究結論 51
第二節 研究限制與建議 52
參考文獻 54
附錄 60
附錄一、資料包絡分析法之理論模型演進及其架構 60
附錄二、 各IPO案件詳細承銷資料 69
附錄三、 加入及未加入技術經驗因子之效率值 74
附錄四、 按承銷商分類承銷效率之K-W檢定結果 79
附錄五、 按產業別分類承銷效率之K-W檢定結果 80
附錄六、 按不同承銷年度分類承銷效率之K-W檢定結果 81
參考文獻 一、中文部份
1. 王玫晴(2006),綜合證券商效率因素分析,國立高雄第一科技大學金融營運
研究所未出版之碩士論文。
2. 王意婷(2001),台灣商業銀行建立經營績效評估模型之研究,國立台北大
學統計學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
3. 光心立(2007),詢價圈購之資訊內涵對承銷價格之影響,國立政治大學財務
管理研究所未出版之碩士論文。
4. 何怡瑩(2002),IPOs長期績效表現之實證研究,國立中央大學企業管理研
究所未出版之碩士論文。
5. 吳娟娟(2002),財務績效指標之重要性分析研究--以台灣化學工業上市公司
為例,中原大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
6. 杜珮宜(2004),台灣地區銀行合併效率之分析—三階段DEA模型之應用,國
立中央大學產業經濟研究所未出版之碩士論文。
7. 林基煌(1998),「我國證券商經營績效之研究」,證券金融第58 期,pp.1
-24。
8. 胡德中、馬黛(2003),承銷配售機制之決定及其對IPO折價之影響:競價拍
賣、詢價圈購與公開申購,財務金融學刊,第11卷第1期,1-40。
9. 軒鳳儀(2006),承銷團對定價決策之探討,南台科技大學會計資訊研究所未
出版之碩士論文。
10. 張俊杰(2007),證券業之經營績效-多階段資料包絡分析法之應用,東吳大
學會計學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
11. 黃家誠(2002),證券商併購之效率分析資料包絡分析法,東吳大學經濟學研
究所未出版之碩士論文。
12. 黃翔園(2000),台灣地區網路券商經營績效之實證研究-以資料包絡分析
法,朝陽科技大學財務金融研究所碩士論文。
13. 黃筠娟(2005),金融控股公司財務面之績效評估-三階段資料包絡分析(DEA)
之應用,東吳大學經濟學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
14. 萬桐君、李月華(2007),證券商分支機構經營效率評估-DEA 方法之應用,
經營管理論叢 Vol.3, No.1, pp.63-80。
15. 劉雲霞(1996),台灣證券商經營狀況之探討:資料包絡分析法的運用,國立
政治大學會計研究所未出版之碩士論文。
16. 魏恆祥(1997),台灣地區新上市股票承銷價格低估及其影響因素之實證研究
,淡江大學管理科學研究所未出版之碩士論文。
二、英文部分
1. Akerlof, G. A., (1970), ”The Market for Lemons Quality Uncertainty and The Market Mechanism”, Quarterly Journal of Economics, Vol 84, pp. 488-500.
2. Allen, F. and G. R. Faulhaber, (1989), “Signaling by Underpricing in The IPO Market”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 23, pp.303-323.
3. Banker, R. D., Charnes, A. and Cooper, W. W., (1984), “Some Models for Estimating Technical and Scale Inefficiencies in Data Envelopment Analysis”, Management Science, Vol 30, pp.1078-1092.
4. Baron, D. P., (1982), ”A Model of The Demand for Investment Bank Advising and Distribution Services for New Issues”, Journal of
Finance, Vol 31, pp.955-976
5. Bauer, P. W., A. N. Berger, G. D. Ferrier and D. B. Humphrey, (1998), “Consistency Conditions for Regulatory Analysis of Financial Institutions: A Comparison of Frontier Efficiency Methods”, Journal of Economics and Business, Vol 50, pp.85-114.
6. Benveniste, L. M. and P. A. Spindt, (1989), “How Investment Bankers Determine The Offer Price and Allocation of New Issues”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 24, pp.213-232.
7. Benveniste, L. M. and P. A. W. J. Wilhelm, (1990), “A Comparative Analysis of IPO Proceeds under Alternative Regulatory Environment”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 28, pp.173-207.
8. Benveniste, L. M. and W. Y. Busaba, (1997), “Bookbuilding vs. Fixed Price: An Analysis of Competing Strategies for Marketing IPOs”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol 32, pp.383-403.
9. Berger, A. N. and D. B. Humphrey, (1991), “The Dominance of Inefficiencies over Scale and Product Mix Economies in Banking”, Journal of Monetary Economics, Vol 28, pp.117-139.
10. Berger, A. N., (1993), “Distribution-Free Estimates of Efficiency in The U.S. Banking Industry and Tests of The Standard Distributional Assumptions”, Journal of Productivity Analysis, Vol 4, pp.261-292.
11. Booth, J. R. and L. Chua, (1996), “Ownership Dispersion, Costly Information and IPO Underpricing”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 41, pp.291-310.
12 Carter, R. and S. Manaster,(1990), “Initial Public Offerings and Underwriter Reputation”, The Journal of Finance , XLV., pp. 1045-1067.
13. Caves, D. W. and L. R. Christensen, (1980), “The Relative Efficiency of Public and Private Firms in A Competitive Environments : The Case of Canadian Railroads,” Journal of Political Economy, Vol 88, pp. 958-976.
14. Charnes, A., W. W. Cooper and E. Rhodes, (1978), “Measuring The Efficiency of Decision Making Units”, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol 2, pp.429-445.
15. Chowdhry, B. and V. Nanda, (1996), “Stabilization, Syndication and Pricing of IPOs”, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis, Vol.31, pp.25-42.
16. Demers, E. A. and P. Joos, (2007), “IPO Failure Risk”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 333-371.
17. Farrell, M. J., (1957), “The Measurement of Productive Efficiency”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, pp.253-281.
18. Farrell, M. J. and M. Fieldhouse , (1962), “Estimating Efficient Production Functions Under Increasing Returns to Scale”, Journal of the Royal Statistical Society, Series A, General 125, Part 2, pp. 252-267.
19. Greene, W. H., (1981), ”On Bias of The Ordinary Least Squares Estimator of The Tobit Model”, Econometrica, Vol 49, pp.505-513.
20. Hong, C. Y. and T. Ma , (1998), “The Issuer’s Decision of IPO Mechanism: Fixed Price versus Auction”, Unpublished.
21. Ibbotson, R. G. and J. J. Jaffe, (1975), “Hot Issue Markets”, Journal of Finance, Vol 30, pp. 1027-1042.
22. Jagannathan, R. and A. E. Sherman, (2006), “Why Do IPO Auctions Fail”, Unpublished.
23. Leland, H. and D. Pyle, (1977), “Information Asymmetrics, Financial Structure, and Financial Intermediation”, Journal of Finance, Vol 32, pp. 371-387.
24. Liu, X. and J. R. Ritter,(2009), “Local Underwriter Oligopolies and IPO Underpricing”, Unpublished.
25. Luo, D.and S. Yao, (2009), “World Financial Crisis and the Rise of Chinese Commercial Banks” , Unpublished.
26. McDonald, J. G. and A. K. Fisher, (1972), “New-Issue Stock Price Behavior”, Journal of Finance, Vol 27. pp. 100-102.
27. Ohlson, J. A., (1980), “Financial Ratio and The Probabilistic Prediction of Bankruptcy”, Journal of Accounting Research, Vol 18, pp. 109-131.
28. Pichler, P. and W. Wilhelm, (2001), “A Theory of The Syndicate: Form Follows Function”, Journal of Finance, Vol 56, pp. 2237-2264.
29. Reinganum, M.and B.Cornell , (1981), “Forward and Futures Prices: Evidence from The Foreign Exchange Markets”, Journal of Finance, Vol 36, pp.1035-1045.
30. Ritter, J.R., (1984), “The Hot Issue Market of 1980”, Journal of Business, Vol 57, pp.215-241.
31. Ritter, J. R., (1987), “The Cost of Going Public”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 19, pp.269-281.
32. Ritter, J. R., (1991), “The Long-Run Performance of Initial Public Offerings”, Journal of Finance, Vol 46, pp.1-27.
33. Ritter, J. R. and I. Welch, (2002), “A Review of IPO Activity, Pricing, and Allocations”, Journal of Finance, Vol 57, pp.1795-1828.
34. Rocholl, J (2004), “How does the Underwriter match Allocation and Demand in IPO Bookbuilding?”, Unpublished.
35. Rock, K., (1986), “Why New Issues Are Underpriced”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 15, pp.187-212.
36. Tinic, S.M. and K. C. Brown , W. V. Harlow, (1988), “Risk, Aversion, Uncertain Information, and Market Efficiency”, Journal of Financial Economics, Vol 22, pp.355-385.
37. Titman, S. and B. Trueman, (1986), “Information Quality and The Valuation of New Issues”, Journal of Accounting and Economics, Vol 8, pp.77-87.
38. Young, J. E. and J. K. Zaima, (1988), “The After Market Performance of Small Firm Initial Public Offerings”, Journal of Business Venturing Winter, pp.77-87.
指導教授 張東生(Dong-Shang Chang) 審核日期 2010-6-21
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明