台灣電子產業技術來源與創新能力 ─ 以上市電子公司為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：28

、訪客IP：3.14.6.194

姓名

徐志偉(Jhih-Wei Syu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

產業經濟研究所

論文名稱

台灣電子產業技術來源與創新能力 ─ 以上市電子公司為例
(The Technology Sources and Innovation in Taiwan's Electronics Industry─ A Case Study of Electronic Companies)

相關論文

★ 期間利差與經濟衰退之預測模型-理性預期假設之驗證	★ 台灣、美國總經月數據與台股股價指數之關聯性
★ 台灣資訊電子產業異質性及利潤率之探討	★ 中小企業案件逾期放款之預測
★ 台灣半導體產業經營效率分析－三階段資料包絡分析法之應用	★ 台灣車輛產業經濟附加價值之研究－兼論影響信通交通器材公司經濟附加價值之因素
★ 外人直接投資與研發活動之關聯性-台灣電子相關產業之實證研究	★ 消費性信用貸款授信評量模式之研究
★ 二順位房貸產品風險預警分析	★ 新產品商業化流程之個案研究–以美商3M公司為例
★ 高淨值客戶風險屬性與共同基金投資報酬率之實證研究	★ 台灣加權指數與指數股票型基金風險值之歷史模擬法分析
★ 國際油價、匯率與利率之動態關聯—VECM與VECM-GARCH之應用	★ 主流記憶體之二十年價格模式研究與驗證
★ 以DEA模型分析桃園郵局之營運績效	★ 奢侈稅實施對都會地區房價之衝擊反應分析

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本文章所探討的研究對象是於台灣證券交易所上市的電子廠商，並採用自2000年至2008年為觀察年間。使用「台灣經濟新報(TEJ)」的財務統計資料，連結廠商於「美國專利暨商標局(USPTO)」申請核准的專利權，建構相關的資料，以分析台灣電子廠商在R&D及授權費用對於自身技術及創新能力的影響。
本研究的實證模型主要是參考Johnson D. K. N. (2002) 加以修改，使用Fixed effect與Random effect分別進行估計，探討不同變數對於廠商技術提升與創新能力的影響。而經由實證結果顯示，隨著廠商在R&D費用投入及授權費用的增加，廠商的科學創新能力隨之上升，同時也提高專利取得的機率。除此之外，本研究於實證模型中也加入了R&D的外溢、廠商大小、廠商資本、R&D的落後期及不同類別廠商的虛擬變數，以觀察其它因素對於廠商在技術提昇及創新能力上的影響。

摘要(英)

This study uses the patents acquired from 2000 to 2008 in the Taiwan Stock Exchange-listed company as the raw data. The patents are approved by "United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO)" standard. We combine the "Taiwan Economic Journal (TEJ)" financial statistical information with "United States Patent & Trademark Office (USPTO)" to construct the data base that employed in this research. The purpose of this study is to analyze the effect of electronics manufacturers’ R&D and licensing expenses on technology and innovation capability in Taiwan.
The empirical model is based mainly on Johnson D. K. N. (2002) with modification that meets the needs of this article. We estimate the data under Random effect and Fixed effect to examine the effects of different variables on the firms’ improving technology and innovation ability. The empirical analysis shows that firms’ increasing investment in R&D expenditure and licensing fees not only leads to increasing technology and innovation, but also bring a positive influence on patent application. In addition, this study also use several variables such as the R&D spillovers, firm size, firms capital, R&D lag and the different types of firms’ dummy variables to observe their impact on the upgrade of technology skills and innovative ability in Taiwan.

關鍵字(中)

★ 專利
★ R&
★ D
★ 授權
★ 技術與創新

關鍵字(英)

★ Licensing
★ R&
★ D
★ Patent
★ Innovation
★ Technology

論文目次

中文摘..................................I
Abstract..................................II
謝辭..................................III
目錄..................................i
表目錄..................................iii
圖目錄..................................iv
第一章緒論..................................1
1-1 研究背景及動機..................................1
1-2 研究目的..................................2
1-3 本文架構..................................3
第二章文獻回顧..................................5
2-1 技術來源與創新能力..................................6
2-2 技術自主能力..................................7
2-3 技術授權..................................9
2-4 專利行為、引證數與知識外溢..................................10
第三章實證模型與方法..................................13
3-1 實證模型..................................13
3-2 研發存量設定..................................15
3-3 R&D的外溢效果..................................16
第四章資料來源與變數說明..................................19
4-1 資料來源與說明..................................19
4-2 變數說明與統計分析..................................24
第五章實證結果與分析..................................29
5-1 Poisson分配下的實證結果..................................29
5-2 Poisson分配下固定效果(Fixed effect)的實證結果....................36
5-3 Poisson分配下隨機效果(Random effect)的實證結果....................38
第六章結論..................................40
6-1 結論..................................40
6-2 研究限制與未來展望..................................42
參考文獻..................................43
附錄..................................46

參考文獻

1.Arora, A., M. Ceccagnoli & W. M., Cohen, 2008, “R&D and the patent premium,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 26 1153–1179.
2.Basant, R. & F. Brink, 1996, “The Effects Of R&D, Foreign Technology Purchase, And Domestic And International Spillovers On Productivity In Indian Firms, ” Review of Economics and Statistics, 78, 187-199.
3.Branstetter, L. & J. R. Chen, 2006, “The Impact of Technology Transfer and R&D on Productivity Growth in Taiwanese Industry: Microeconometric Analysis Using Plant and Firm-Level Data,” Journal of the Japanese and International Economies, 20, 177-192.
4.Cuneo, P. & J. Mairesse, 1984, “Productivity and R&D at the Firm Level in French Manufacturing, ” in Z. Griliches, ed., R&D, Patents, and Productivity, University of Chicago Press, Chicago, IL.
5.Garrick, B. & P. J. Gertler, 2009, “How firm capabilities affect who benefits from foreign technology,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol.90, 2,192-199.
6.Glass, A. J. & K. Saggi, 1998 ,” International technology transfer and the technology gap,” Journal of Development Economics, Vol. 55 ,369-398.
7.Griliches, Z., 1979, “Issues in Assessing the Contributions of Research and Development to Productivity Growth, ”Bell Journal of Economics, 10, 92-116.
8.Hall, B. H., A. Jaffe & M. Trajtenberg, 2000, “Market Value and Patent Citations : A First Look,” NBER.
9.Jaff, J. A., 1978, “Technology Opportunity and Spillovers of R&D: Evidence from Firms’ Patent, Profits, and Market Value,” American Economic Review, 76, 984-1001.
10.Johnson, D. K. N., 2002, “Learning by Licensing：R&D And Technology Licensing in Brazilian Invention,” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 11, 163-77.
11.Kathuria, V., 2001, “Foreign Firms, Technology Transfer and Knowledge Spillovers to Indian Manufacturing Firms: A Stochastic Frontier Analysis,” Applied Economics, 33, 625-42.
12.Kazuyuki, M., 2008, “Licensing or not licensing? An empirical analysis of the strategic use of patents by Japanese firms,” Research Policy, 37, 1548–1555.
13. Lakshmi, K. R., 1995, “ R & D spillover and productivity growth:Evidence from Indian private firms,” Journal of Development Economics,Vol. 48 1-23.
14. Madanmohan, T. R., U. Kumar & V. Kumar, 2004, “Import-led technological capability: a comparative analysis of Indian and Indonesian manufacturing firms,” Technovation, Vol. 24, 12 , 979-993.
15. Mairesse, J. & B. H. Hall, 1996, “Estimating the Productivity of Research and Development in France and United States Manufacturing Firms：An Exploration of Simultaneity Issues with GMM,” in Wagner K., and B. van Ark, eds., International Productivity Comparisons (Amsterdam, North-Holland), 285-315.
16. Maurseth, P. B. & B. Verspagen, 2002, “Knowledge Spillovers in Europe: A
Patent Citations Analysis,” The Scandinavian Journal of Economics, 104(4),
531 – 545.
17. Michele, C., 2005, ” Firms' productivity growth and R&D spillovers：An analysis of alternative technological proximity measures,” Economics of innovation and new technology, 14, 657-682.
18. Nakamura, K. & B. H. Odagiri, 2005, ” R&D Boundaries of the Firm An Estimation of the Double-Hurdle Model on Commissioned R&D, Joint R&D, and Licensing in Japan, ” Economics of Innovation and New Technology, 14, 583–615.
19. Perez, T., 1997, “Multinational Enterprises and Technological Spillovers: An Evolutionary Model,” Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 7, 169-192.
20. Vishwasrao, S., 2007, “Royalties vs. fees: How do firms pay for foreign technology? ,” International Journal of Industrial Organization, 25 ,741–759.
21. Yasuyuki, T., 2002,” Knowledge spillovers from foreign direct investment in R&D Evidence from Japanese firm-level data,” Journal of Asian Economics,
996–1013.
22.林慶龍，2004年7月「授權外溢與生產力-台灣上市資訊電子廠商之實證研究」，中央大學產業經濟研究所，碩士論文。

指導教授

陳忠榮(Jong-Rong Chen)

審核日期

2010-7-13

推文