人格特質對薪資影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：121

、訪客IP：18.222.166.151

姓名

林恪亨(Ko - heng) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

經濟學系

論文名稱

人格特質對薪資影響
(The influence of Personality on wage)

相關論文

★ 男性婚姻溢酬的世代效果-以台灣為例	★ Segregation or Integration? A Theoretical Analysis of Education Reform
★ A Simple Two-way Matching Model with Knowledge and Social Skills	★ 職業球員合約年的行為表現-以WAR解析美國職棒大聯盟為例
★ 國中生該怎麼補最有效?以分量迴歸看補習對成績的影響	★ 多元入學管道與在校成績之關係-以國立中央大學為例
★ 選課行為與學業表現-以國立中央大學為例	★ 性別薪資差異：以台灣博士為例
★ 薪資表現、行業別選擇與學院別之關聯性研究—以臺灣高等教育為例	★ 探討離婚之因素-以台灣為例
★ 內外控信念及自我效能對學測表現的影響-以中大壢中為例	★ 影響客家學童客語能力之因素探討
★ 以數值模擬探討貨幣政策獨立性	★ 影響國小生英語成就之因素 —以新竹縣某小學為例
★ 轉系對在學成績和畢業一年薪資的影響—以國立中央大學為例	★ 起始薪資與薪資發展的關係

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

在經濟學領域裡,新古典理論認為廠商為求利潤極大,廠商將所付給員工的薪資等於員工的邊際生產力,而邊際生產力指的是在其他條件不變下每增加一個單位要素投入所增加的產量。經濟學家相信個人的教育、工作經驗等是個人生產力的重要決定因素,而近年的研究 (如:Heckman等 (2006))則顯示人格特質等因素對工作表現與薪資也有影響。囿於早期台灣沒有涵蓋薪資、教育、工作經驗與人格特質等綜合性資料庫,相關的實證研究實屬缺乏。所幸 ,2005年華人家庭動態資料庫的問卷設計了關於人格特質的問項,使得探究人格特質對薪資的台灣實證影響成為可能。故本文利用華人家庭動態資料庫中的資料,分析在台灣個人的人格在薪資決定的重要性。根據文獻,此研究可能隱含內生性問題與樣本選擇問題,因此分析時我們會修正並觀察變化。實證結果顯示,單考慮內生性問題下,人格特質對薪資影響只有在男性顯著,但若我們同時對考慮內生性和樣本選擇的問題進行修正後 ,不論是男性或女性,人格特質對薪資都具有顯著性的影響且存在性別差異性。

摘要(英)

In economics, Neoclassical theory predicts that a profit-maximizing firm will pay workers a wage equivalent to their marginal product. Marginal productivity measures the extra output produced by one more unit of an input (for instance, the difference in output when a firm’s labour is increased from five to six units). Economists believe a person’s education and work experience are the primary determinants of personal productivity. Recent studies (ex. Heckman et al. (2006)) emphasize the importance of personality on work performance and wage. However, there is no relevant empirical research in Taiwan. It is due to lack of an integrated dataset which includes wage, education, tenure, and personal traits. Fortunately, the 2005 PSFD (Panel Study of Family Dynamics) questionnaire covers this type of questions. This provides a ground for exploring the impact of personality on wage in Taiwan. In this paper, we use PSFD to analyze the role of personality on wage. Following literature, this study is likely to confront problems of endogeneity and sample selection. As a result, we will take these problems into account. The empirical results show
that if we only consider the endogeneity problem, personality traits is a significant factor on wage determination for men. If we consider both endogeneity and
sample selection problems, personality traits have significant impact on wage for both male and female.

關鍵字(中)

★ 人格特質
★ 薪資差異

關鍵字(英)

★ wages
★ Personality

論文目次

1緒論 1
1.1研究動機與目的 ...................................... 1
1.2研究方法 ............................................ 3
1.3研究架構 ............................................ 3
2文獻回顧 4
2.1人格特質理論 ........................................ 4
2.2人格特質的重要性 .................................... 5
2.3人格特質對薪資的影響 ................................ 8
2.4本章小結 ............................................11
3計量方法及模型架構 12
3.1模型架構 ............................................12
3.2模型的潛在問題 ......................................13
3.2.1內生性問題與解決方法 ..............................13
3.2.2樣本選擇問題與解決方法 ............................15
3.3本章小結 ............................................16
4資料來源及變數說明 17
4.1資料來源 ............................................17
4.2資料處理 ............................................18
4.3變數說明 ............................................19
5實證結果分析 23
5.1未分性別之實證結果 ..................................23
5.1.1自我評價的影響 ....................................23
5.1.2處理內生性問題 ....................................24
5.1.3樣本選擇 ..........................................24
5.2探討性別差異 ........................................27
5.3本章小結 ............................................28
6結論與未來建議 32
6.1結論 ................................................32
6.2未來研究建議 ........................................33
A外生人格變數 41
B羅斯伯自尊感指標 Rosenberg Self-esteem Scale 44
C以與家人情感為工具變數 46

參考文獻

李俊賢 (2004).經濟部加工出口區薪資所得與教育之時間序列實證研究國立中山大學.
洪英正、黃天中 (1993).心理學,桂冠圖書股份有限公司.
洪睿萍 (2001).壽險業務員人格特質、工作價值觀與工作滿意度之相關研究,高雄師範大學工業科技教育學系碩士論文.
徐西森 (1998).商業心理學,心理出版社.
陳建良與管中閔 (2006).台灣工資函數與工資性別歧視的分量迴歸分析,經濟論文, 34(4), 435–468.
齊若蘭譯 (2002).從 A到 A+,遠流出版事業股份有限公司.
賴樂山 (2004).華人人格與心理健康關係之研究探討中央大學人力資源管理研究所碩士論文.
Allport, G.W. (1961). Pattern and Growth in Personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart and Winston.
Andrisanni, P. and Nestel, G. (1976). Internal-external control as contributor to and outcome of work experience. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61(2), 156–165.
Brockner, J. (1988). Self-Esteem atWork,Mass: Lexington Books.
Barrick, M. R. and Mount, M. K. (1991). The big five personality dimensions and
job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 1–26.
Basadur, M. (1992). Managing Creativity: a Japanese model. Academy of Management Executive, 6(2), 29–41.
Behrenz, L. (2001). Who gets the job and why? An Explorative Study of Employers Recruitment Behavior. Journal of Applied Economics, 4(2), 255–278.
Bowles, S. , Gintis, H. and Osborne Groves, M. (2001). Incentive-enhancing preferences:Personality behaviour and earning. American Economic Review, 91, 155–158.
Borghans, L. , ter Weel, B. andWeiberg, B. A. (2006). People people: Social capital and the labor-market outcome of underrepresented groups. NBER Working Paper, 11985.
Cattell, R . B . (1965). The scientific analysis of personality . Baltimore : Penguin Books.
Crandall, R. (1980). The measurement of self-esteem and related constructs. in Measures of Social Psychological Attitude, 6 , 45–84.
Costa, P. T. , Jr. andMcCrae, R. R. (1985). The NEO personality inventory manual. Odessa. FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.
Duncan, G. and Morgan, J. (1981). Sense of efficacy and subsequent change in earnings. A replication. Journal of Human Resources, 16(4), 649–657.
Demo, D. H. (1985). The measurement of self-esteem refining our methods. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 1490–1502.
Dunifon, R. and Duncan, G. J. (1998). Long-run effects of motivation on labor marketsuccess. Social Psychology Quarterly, 61(1), 33–48.
Erikson, E. H. (1959). Identity and the life cycle. Psychological Issues, 50–100.
Fleming, J. S. and Courtney, B. E. (1984). The dimensionality of self-esteem a hierarchical
facet model for revised measurement scales. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 404–421.
Grossman, M. (1972). On the concept of health capital and the demand for health. Journal of Political Economy, 80, 223–255.
Goldsmith, A. H. , Veum, J. R. and Darity,W. Jr. (1996). The impact of psychological and human capital on wages. Economic inquiry, 35(4), 815–829.
Gurin, G. and Gurin, P. (1976). Personal efficacy and the ideology of individual responsibility. Economic means for human needs, social indicators of wellbeing and discontent, Survey Research Center, University of Michigan.
Hogan, R. , Hogan, J. and Roberts, B. (1995). Personality measurement and employment decisions. American Psychologist, 51(5), 469–477.
Heckman, J. J. (1979). Sample selection bias as a specification error Econometrica, 47(1), 153–161.
Heckman, J. J. and Rubinstein, Y. (2001). The importance of noncognitive skills:Lessons from the GED testing program. American Economic Review, 91(2), 145–49.
Heckman, J. J. , Stixrud, J. and Urzua, S. (2006). The effects of cognitive and noncognitive abilities on labor market outcomes and social behavior. Journal of Labor Economics, 24(3), 411–482.
Lane, R. E. (1991). The market experience. New York: CambridgeUniversity Press.
Mincer, J. (1958). Investment in Human Capital and Personal Income Distribution, Journal of Political Economy, 66, 281–302.
Mincer, J. (1970). The Distribution of Labour Incomes: A Survey with Special Reference to the Human Capital Approach, Journal of Economic Literature, 8, 1–26.
Mincer, J. (1974). Schooling, experience, and earnings. New York & London: Columbia University Press for National Bureau of Economic Research.
Mincer, J. and Ofek, H. (1982). Interrupted work career:depreciation and restoration of human capital, Journal of Human Resources, 17, 3–24.
Murnane, R. J. , Willett, J. B. , Braatz, M. J. and Duhaldeborde, Y. (2001). Do different dimensions of male high school student’s skills predict labor market
success a decade later? Evidence from the NLSY. Economics of Education Review, 20, 311–320.
Robbins, S. P. (2003). Organijzational behavior 10th ed. Upper Saddle River, NJ:Prentice Hall.
Osborne Groves, M. (2005). How important is your personality? Labor market returns to personality for women in the U.S. and U.K. Journal of Economic Psychology , 26, 827–841.
Rotter, J. B. (1966). Generalized expectancies for internal versus external control of reinforcement. Washington, DC: American Psychological Association,
80(1), 1–28.
Rosenberg, M. (1965). Society and the adolescent self-image. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
Reynolds, W. M. (1988). Measurement of Academic Self-Concept in College Students. Journal of Personality Assessment, 223–240.
Rynes, S. L. , Brown, K.G. and Colbert, A. E. (2002). Seven common misconceptions about human resource practices. Academy ofManagement Executive, 16(3), 92–103.
Silber, E. and Tippett, J. (1965). Self Esteem Clinical Assessment and Measurement Validation. Psychological Reports, 16, 1017–1071.
Spence, A. M. (1973). Job market signaling. Quarterly Journal of Economics 87, 3, 355–374.
Spector, P. E. (1982). Behavior in Organization as a Function of Employee Locus of Control. Psychological Bulletin, 91(3), 482–497.
Schmidt, F. , Ones, D. and Hunter, J. (1992). Personnel selection. Annual Review of Psychology, 43, 627–670.
Tett, R. P. , Jackson, D. N. and Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytical review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703–742.

指導教授

曹真睿(Jen - ruei Tsau)

審核日期

2010-7-19

推文