股權結構與負債比率之實證研究-以中國上市公司為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：23

、訪客IP：18.189.186.95

姓名

李權峰(Chuan-feng Lee) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系在職專班

論文名稱

股權結構與負債比率之實證研究-以中國上市公司為例
(The Relationship between Ownership Structure and Debt Ratio–Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies)

相關論文

★ 股權分置對中國上市公司現金股利發放之影響	★ 所有權結構與政治連結對股利政策之影響—以中國國有企業為例
★ 董監事最低持股成數規定之研究	★ 合格境外機構投資人制度對投資/現金流量敏感度之影響
★ 從股票價格區間探討股票買回活動之資訊內涵	★ 跨境上市對於企業負債比率的影響：以中國跨港上市公司為例
★ 家族集團之盈餘管理行為	★ 股權結構與投資效率:中國上市公司之多重大股東實證研究
★ 股權分置改革對中國上市公司現金持有的影響	★ 手機按鍵生命週期探討企業轉型之路
★ 制度改革對於關係人交易的影響	★ 伊斯蘭教義、公司治理與營運資金管理對公司價值影響之研究—以印尼上市公司為例
★ 股利宣告對股價超常報酬的影響-以台灣集團與非集團上市公司為例	★ 公司規模、股價、益本比、淨值市價比與股票超常報酬關係之實證研究
★ 台灣股票上市公司營運資金管理相關議題之實證研究	★ 我國財務危機上市公司股權結構之探討

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究主要目的為探討中國上市企業的股權結構與負債比率的相關性，樣本取樣於中國2001年到2009年間之上海及深圳的上市企業，從中國國內機構投資人持股比率、外部董事比例、董事會規模、內部人持股比率等因素，與長期負債比率進行分析。本研究發現，中國國內機構投資人持股比率與長期負債比率具有顯著的負相關；外部董事比例與長期負債比率則具有顯著的正相關；而董事會規模與長期負債比率具有顯著的正相關；至於內部人持股比率則與長期負債比率具有顯著的負相關。

摘要(英)

This study examines the relationship between the ownership structure and the debt ratio of Chinese listed firms.We select the Chinese firms listed on Shanghai and Shenzhen exchanges ranging from 2001 to 2009 as the sample and proceed with the analysis based on the institutional ownership, the proportion of outside directors, board size, insider ownership and the debt ratio.We find that the ownership of domestic institutions has significantly negative relationship with long-term debt ratio; the proportion of outside directors is significantly and positively associated with long-term debt ratio; as for the insider ownership, it has significantly negative relationship with long-term debt ratio as well.

關鍵字(中)

★ 負債結構
★ 機構投資人
★ 外部董事
★ 長期負債比率

關鍵字(英)

★ Long-Term Debt Ratio
★ Outside Directors
★ Institutional Investor
★ Capital Structure

論文目次

目錄
頁次
中文摘要 ……………………………………………………… i
英文摘要 ……………………………………………………… ii
目錄 …………………………………………………… iii
圖目錄 ……………………………………………………… v
表目錄 ……………………………………………………… vi
壹、緒論 ……………………………………………………… 1
貳、文獻探討與假說建立 ………………………………… 3
1 代理問題與負債比率之關係 3
2 機構投資人持股比率與負債比率之關係 ………………….… 4
3 外部董事比例與負債比率之關係 ……………… 6
4 董事會規模與負債比率之關係 ……………… 7
5 內部人持股比率與負債比率之關係 ……………… 8
參、研究設計與方法 …………………………………………… 10
1 資料來源 …………………………………………… 11
2 變數定義 …………………………………………… 11
3 實證模式 …………………………………………… 14
肆、實證結果與分析 …………………………………………… 16
1 敘述統計 …………………………………………… 16
2 迴歸分析 …………………………………………… 17
3 穩健性檢定 …………………………………………… 19
伍、結論 ……………………………………………… 20
1 研究結論 ……………………………………………… 20
2 相關建議 ……………………………………………… 21
3 研究限制及研究建議 …………………………………… 21
參考文獻 ……………………………………………… 22
圖目錄
頁次
圖1 論文架構 ………………… 2
圖2 研究架構 ………………… 10
表目錄
頁次
表1 變數之定義 ………………… 15
表2 敘述統計結果 ………………… 16
表3 負債比率之迴歸分析 ………………… 18
表4 負債比率之穩健性分析 ………………… 19
表5 結論總表 ………………… 20

參考文獻

1. 王玉珍，民國91年，「股權結構、董事會組成、資本結構與企業績效關係之研究」，國立中央大學企管理研究所未出版碩士論文。
2. 林純瓊，股權結構、資本結構與經營績效— Jensen、Meckling 與 Fama 理論之驗證，中國財務學刊，第一卷，第二期 p1-15，1994
3. 林培杰，民國89年、「我國公司監控制度之研究」，私立銘傳大學法律研究所碩士論文。
4. Agrawal, A. and G. N. Mandelker, 1987, Managerial Incentives and Corporate Investment and Financial Decision, Journal of Finance 4, 823-837.
5. Agrawal, A., 1990, Large Shareholders and the Monitoring of Managers: The Case of Antitakeover Charter Amendments, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 25, 143-161.
6. Agrawal, A. and C. R. Knoeber, 1996, Firm Performance and Mechanisms to Control Agency Problems Between Managers and Shareholders, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31, 377-397.
7. Ang, J. S., R. A. Cole and J. W. Lin, 2000, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure, The Journal of Finance 55, 81-106.
8. Barnea, A., R. A. Haugen and L. W. Senbet, 1980, A Rationale for Debt Maturity Structure and Call Provisions In the Agency Theoretical Framework, Journal of Finance 35, 1223-1234.
9. Bathala, C. T., K. P. Moon, and R. P. Rao, 1994, Managerial Ownership, Debt Policy, and the Impact of Institutional Holdings: An Agency Perspective, Financial Management 23, 38-50.
10. Baysinger, B.,and Hoskisson, R. E, 1990, The Composition of Boards of Directors and Strategic Control : Effects on Corporate Strategy , Academy of Management Review, Vol. 15, No. 1, 72-87.
11. Berger, P. G., E. Ofek and D. L. Yermack, 1997, Managerial Entrenchment and Capital Structure Decisions, Journal of Finance 52, 1411-1438.
12. Chaganti, R., and F. Damanpour, 1991, Institutional Ownership, Capital Structure, and Firm Performance, Strategic Management Journal 15, 64.
13. Chen, C.R., Steiner, T.L., 1999. “Managerial ownership and agency conflicts: a non-linear simultaneous equation analysis of managerial ownership, risk taking, debt policy, and dividend policy”, The Financial Review 34, pp. 119-136.
14. Crutchley, C. E., M. R. H. Jensen, J. S. Jahera and J. E. Raymond, 1999, Agency Problems and the Simultaneity of Financial Decision Making: The Role of Institutional Ownership, International Review of Financial Analysis 8,177-197.
15. Demsetz, H., 1983, The Structure of Ownership and the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Law and Economics 26, 375-393.
16. Fama;1980, Agency Problems and the Theory of the Firm, Journal of Political Economy, 88(2), 288-307.
17. Fama, E. and M. Jensen, 1983, Separation of Ownership and Control, Journal of Law and Economics 26,301-325.
18. Friend, I. L. and H.P. Lang, 1988, An Empirical Test of the Impact of Ma nagerial Self-Interest on Corporate Capital Structure, Journal of Finance 43, 271-281.
19. Galai, D. and R. Masulis, 1976, The Option Pricing Model and the Risk Factor of Stock, Journal of Financial Economics 4, 53-81.
20. Grier P. and E. Zychowicz, 1994, Institutional Investors, Corporate Discipline, and the Role of Debt, Journal of Economics and Business 46, 1-11.
21. Harris, M. and A. Raviv, 1990, Capital Structure and the Informational Role of Debt, The Journal of Finance 2, 321-349.
22. Jensen, M. C. and W. H. Meckling, 1976, Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs, and Capital Structure, Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-360.
23. Jensen, M. C., 1986, Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance, and Takeovers, American Economic Review 76, 323-329.
24. Jensen, Gerald R., Solberg, Donald P., and Zorn, Thomas S., 1992, SimultaneousDetermination of Insider Ownership, Debt, and Dividend Policies, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 27, 247-263
25. Jensen, M. C., 1993, The Modern Industrial Revolution, Exit, and the Failure of Internal Control Systems, The Journal of Finance 3, 831-880.
26. Kim, Wi Saeng, and Eric H. Sorensen, 1986, Evidence on the impact of the Agency Costs of Debt on Corporate Debt Policy, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 21,131-144
27. Kose, J. and L. W. Senbet, 1998, Corporate Governance and Board Effectiveness, Journal of Banking & Finance 22, 371-403.
28. Lipton, M., and J. Y., Lorsch, 1992, A Modest Proposal for Improved CorporateGovernance, Business Lawyer 48, 59-77
29. Moh’d M. A., L. G. Perry and J. N. Rimbey, 1998, The Impact of Ownership Structure on Corporate Debt Policy: A Time-series Cross-sectional Analysis, The Financial Review 33, 85-98.
30. Morck, R., A. Shleifer and R. W. Vishny, 1988, Management Ownership and Marketing Valuation, Journal of Financial Economics 20, 293-315.
31. Novaes, W. and L. Zingales, 1995, Capital Structure Choice When Manager are In Control: Entrenchment versus Efficiency, Working Paper, Graduate School of Business.
32. Pound, J., 1988, Proxy Contests and the Efficiency of Shareholder Oversight, Journal of Financial and Economics 20, 237-265.
33. Salancik, G. R. and J. Pfeffer, 1980, The Effects of Ownership and Performance on Executive in U.S. Corporations, Academy of Management Journal 23, 653-664.
34. Shleifer, A. and R. W. Vishny, 1986, Large Shareholders and Corporate Control, Journal of Political Economy 3, 461-488.
35. Stearns, L. B. and M. S. Mizruchi, 1993, Board Composition and Corporate Financing: The Impact of Financial Institution Representation on Borrowing, Academy of Management Journal 36, 603-618.
36. Williamson, O. E., 1983, Organization Form, Residual Claimants, and Corporate Control, Journal of Law and Economics 26, 336-351.
37. Zahra, S. A. and J. A. Pearce, 1989, Board of Directors and Corporate Fi nancial Performance: A Review and Integrative Model, Journal of Management 15,291-334.

指導教授

洪榮華(Jung-hua Hung)

審核日期

2011-1-17

推文