摘要(英) |
In recent years, governments have been devoting to the development of public transportation systemsforenergy-saving and carbon-reduction.In remote areas where the demand for a public transportation system is not high, if a traditional bus at fixedfrequency and routeis still adopted, the bus company may experience financial loss; if service is curtailed,it will further reduce the willingness of people to take the bus. At present, although many governments subsidize bus companies, their service performance continues to lack improvement,creating a vicious cyclein the operating environment.
In order to solvethe difficulties of public transportation service in remote areas, a new business model must be developed. This research focuses on a project of Taoyuan County Government, adopting the “Demand Responsive Transit System, DRTS”, which has been used for many years overseas, and using Taoyuan County, Fu-Hsing Townshipas the research subject to perform the case study. DRTS is a para-public transportationsystem combining traditional bus as well as taxi service that can offer users greater convenience and door to door service with more flexibility and competitiveness. One of thsuccessful keyof DRTS is the reasonable fare,which is highly acceptableto the people. Since there is no practical example to refer to at present, the determination of farecan refer to the willingness to pay on the part of local residents. The use of this principle and a questionnaire to analyze the willingness of local residents to pay for DRTS can provide suggestions for setting the fare of the DRTS in the future.
This research collected 551 effective questionnaires.In order to estimate the willingnessto pay of local resident, this study constructed aWTP Model, in which Contingent Valuation Method and MultipleRegression Analysis Method are used. The results showed that age, profession, average monthly income, frequency of travelling by bus, and travel distance all affect the willingness to pay.Having calculated the willingness to pay for different distances in Fu-Hsing Township, the results show the following figures:NTD 14 for a minimum distance of 0.8 km and NTD 154 for the maximum distance of 61 km.
For easy application, the study refers to the “REPORT ON THE SURVEY OF FAMILYINCOME AND EXPENDITURE, 2009” prepared by the DGBAS, to explore the determination of fare, as well as to analyze the relationships of subsidy versus fare, and the ratio of transport expense against income per household per year versus fare.
|
參考文獻 |
1.交通部運輸研究所,需求反應式公共運輸系統之整合研究,民國98年12月。
2.桃園縣政府主計處網站,http://baso.tycg.gov.tw/site/bureau_index.aspx?site_id=033。
3.桃園縣政府交通局,98年發展桃園縣需求反應運輸服務計畫,民國99年11月。
4.Frank Spielberg,Richard H. P.,“Demand Responsive/ADA Traveler Responsive to Transportation System Changes,”Transportation Research Board,Washington,D.C,2004.
5.Koffman,D.,“Operational Experiences with Flexible Transit Services,”Transportation Research Board, Washington,USA,2004.
6.Li Y., Wang J., Chen J. and Cassidy M., “Design of a Demand-Responsive Transit System,” California PATH Working Paper, 2007.
7.Palmer K., Dessouky M., Zhou Z., “ Factors Influencing Productivity and Operating Cost of Demand Responsive Transit,” California PATH Research Report, 2008.
8.Yim Y. B. and Khattak A. J., “Traveler Response to Innovative Personalized Demand-Responsive Transit in the San Francisco Bay Area,” California PATH Working Paper, 2003.
9.Yim Y. B. and Khattak A. J., “Personalized Demand Responsive Transit Systems,” California Partners for Advanced Transit and Highways (PATH), University of California, Berkeley, 2000.
10.Anspacher D., Khattak A. J. and Yim Y.,“Demand-Responsive Transit Shuttles: Who Will Use Them?” California PATH Working Paper, 2004.
11.Cayford R. and Yim Y.B.Y., “Personalized Demand-Responsive Transit Service,” California PATH Research Report, 2004.
12.Dessouky M. M., Ordoñez F. and Quadrifoglio L., “Productivity and Cost-effectiveness of Demand Responsive Transit Systems,” California PATH Research Report, 2005.
13.Dessouky M., Palmer K. and Abdelmaguid T., “Benchmarking Best Practices of Demand Responsive Transit Systems,” California PATH Research Report, 2003.
14.Richard weiner, Integration of Paratransit and Fixed-Route Transit Services, Transportation Research Board, Washington, D.C, 2008.
15.Washington State Department of Transportation,Washington Transportation Plan Update Transit Operators Committee, Washington, D.C, 2004.
16.KFH Group, “Guidebook for Measuring, Assessing, and Improving Performance of Demand-Response Transportation,” Transportation Research Board, Washington, USA, 2008.
17.Ambrosino G., Nelson J. D. and Romanazzo, M.,“Demand Responsive Transport Services: Towards the Flexible Mobility Agency,” ENEA, 2004.
18.European Union, “Rural Transport Services Handbook,” European Union, 2002.
19.香港特別行政區政府運輸署網站,http://www.td.gov.hk/tc/transport_in_hong_kong/public_transport/minibuses/index.html。
20.桃園縣政府交通局,桃園縣捷運通車後公車路網調整計畫,民國100年2月。
21.桃園縣政府交通局網站,http://traffic.tycg.gov.tw/wel_news.asp。
22.郎慧珠、何俊傑、劉錦添:假設市場評價法在健康經濟學之應用。取自http://qolce.ntumc.org/pdf/book/chap06.doc.民國90年。
23.吳健生,蕭羽媛,「存活分析法應用於機車紅燈熄火行為之研究」,國立中央大學土木系研究所碩士論文,民國98年6月。
24.陳冠融,「以使用者付費意願評估自然遊憩資源之效益」,逢甲大學土地管理研究所碩士論文,民國90年。
25.楊欣薇,「台南市歷史文化園區經濟效益評估之研究-WTP及WTW之比較應用」,長榮大學土地管理與開發學系研究所碩士論文,民國91年。
26.周京弘,「高速鐵路台北-台中暨台北-高雄路段通車效益評估」,國立台灣大學農業經濟學研究所碩士論文,民國94年1月。
27.Randall A., Ives B. and Eastman C., “Bidding Games for Valuation of Aesthetic Environmental Improvements,” Journal of Environmental Economics and Management , Vol.1, pp.132-149,1974.
28.全國博碩士論文資訊網,http://ndltd.ncl.edu.tw/cgi-bin/gs32/gsweb.cgi/login?o=dwebmge&cache=1302011226218。
29.陳鵬升,「社區居民為地方公共財捐獻意願的探討--以新增設一所國民中學為例」,國立成功大學都市計畫學系研究所碩士論文,民國86年。
30.劉錦添,「淡水河水質改善的經濟效益評估:封閉是假設市場評價法之應用」。經濟論文,18(2): 99~128,民國79年。
31.林建信,「奧萬大森林遊樂區遊客付費行為之研究」,企業管理系碩士論文,民國87年。
32.黃惠如,「小琉球發展休閒遊憩活動之潛力與效益評估」,國立海洋大學應用經濟研究所碩士論文,民國92年。
33.丘世宗,「都市林遊憩效益之研究-以屏東市中山公園為例」,屏東科技大學森林系研究所碩士論文,民國91年。
34.王景哲,「土壤及地下水污染整治效益的經濟評價」,國立台北大學資源管理研究所在職專班碩士論文,民國90年。
35.葉寶文,「風險性之行為決策分析與其願付價值之研究」,東吳大學經濟學系博士論文,民國90年。
36.傅祖壇、周濟,「乘坐高速鐵路之支付意願及時間價值-假設評估法之應用」,經濟論文叢刊,第23輯,第3期,民國85年9月。
37.沈珍珍,「臺灣賞鯨豚活動之遊憩效益評估」,國立海洋大學應用經濟研究所碩士論文,民國91年。
38.趙得榮,「公共工程計畫之經濟效益評估」,國立交通大學土木工程系研究所碩士論文,民國87年。
39.鄭凱倫,「台灣地區農業用水者之水權願付價格研究-假設評估法之應用」,台灣大學農業經濟學研究所碩士論文,民國85年7月。
40.沈美惠,「垃圾污染減量的效益評估:條件評估法的應用」,逢甲大學會計與財稅研究所碩士論文,民國93年1月。
41.陳信甫,「遊憩效益評估法之應用與比較─以綠島為例」,文化大學觀光事業學系碩士論文,民國83年。
42.陳凱俐、陳子英,「自然保護區之生態及經濟評估:以宜蘭縣蘭陽溪口為例」。行政院國科會專題研究計畫報告,民國85年。
43.孫金華、江福松、施淵源、劉振鄉,「臺灣東北角磯釣願付價值之分析」,農業經濟半年刊,74: 63~87,民國92年。
44.陸地,「遊客對國立自然科學博物館植物園導覽解說人員需求與付費意願之研究」,朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系研究所碩士論文,民國94年12月。
45.李香玉、朱瑞淵,「達娜依谷自然生態公園遊憩資源效益評估之研究」,朝陽科技大學休閒事業管理系研究所碩士論文,民國93年6月。
46.陳順宇,迴歸分析 : SPSS.STATISTICA軟體操作,民國98年。
47.黃文隆,黃龍編,迴歸分析,民國94年。
48.陳順宇,迴歸分析,民國89年。
49.黃登源,應用迴歸分析,民國88年。
50.吳宗正,迴歸分析 : 理論與應用,民國76年。
51.吳明隆,SPSS操作與應用 : 變異數分析實務,民國96年。
52.林震岩,多變量分析 : SPSS的操作與應用,民國95年。
53.吳明隆,SPSS統計應用學習實務 :問卷分析與應用統計,民國95年。
54.黃俊英,多變量分析,民國87年。
55.曾國雄,多變量解析與其應用,民國80年。
56.陳正昌等,多變量分析方法 : 統計軟體應用,民國98年。
57.林眞眞、鄒幼涵,迴歸分析,民國89年。
58.陳順宇,迴歸分析 : SPSS.STATISTICA軟體操作,民國98年。
59.陳順宇,多變量分析,民國95年。
60.行政院主計處,「九十八年家庭收支調查報告」,民國99年10月
|