博碩士論文 984201035 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:10 、訪客IP:52.14.27.122
姓名 洪婉茹(Wan-ru Hung)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 教材在電腦輔助教學對學習成果的影響
(The Effects of Learning Materials on Learning Outcomes in the Computer-Based Learning)
相關論文
★ 工作滿足、領導行為、工作特性與人格特質對離職傾向之探討-以超大型會計師事務所審計人員為例★ 以組織診斷模型診斷企業組織層級架構-以某公司為例
★ 科技產業組織診斷與分析之研究-以Q公司為例★ 製造業推行六標準差的成功關鍵因素探討
★ 高職辦理輪調式建教班對學校經營績效之評估-以北區私立高職為例★ 本國商業銀行經營績效之探討-資料包絡分析法之應用
★ 台灣中小企業 創業動機與創業績效關係之研究★ 員工當責與真誠領導之關聯性-以心理賦權與團隊凝聚力為中介變數
★ 以個人與環境適配為關鍵中介探討特定品牌領導對員工品牌權益之影響★ 道德感讓你買更多綠色產品?從消費者產品知覺價格及品質角度來探討—以綠色程度做調節
★ 線上品牌社群該如何提升與粉絲的價值共創?以線上品牌社群活動與線下實體活動為中介變數探討★ 農業創新服務模式之商業模式研究-以蜂巢數據科技有限公司為例
★ 燈⽕闌珊處的求職旅程:如何透 過⼯作價值觀、雇主吸引⼒、激 勵因⼦為求職者點亮路徑★ 購買意願的幕後功臣:Instagram大小網紅的 自我揭露對消費者自我一致性與感知真實的影響
★ 中小企業之組織診斷與分析-以A公司為例★ 高科技產業人力資源發展與組織績效之研究-以新竹科學園區為例
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   [檢視]  [下載]
  1. 本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
  2. 已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的,進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
  3. 請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定,切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送,以免觸法。

摘要(中) 由於近年來電腦技術持續的創新與開發,改變了與傳統教學方法不同的教材呈現方
式。例如,許多大學的班級近年來採取傳統式面對對教學並輔以投影片教材的方式,來輔助整個教學的進行。除了投影片的興起外,動畫在近年來也被運用在教學上,並且被視為一個可以帶給學生很大幫助的教學媒介(de Freitas, 2006)。有鑑於此,本研究探討學習者對於不同教材呈現方式(投影片與動畫人物)的認知對於其學習結果的影響。本研究是以實驗設計的方式進行,實驗對象為亞洲大學的學生,並透過隨機分配將其分成兩組:投影片組與動畫人物組。實驗結束後,分別從 81 位投影片組學生與 49 位動畫人物組學生回收問卷。本研究符合先前文獻所提出的信效度標準。在描述性統計的部分,是為了要進一步了解實驗對象的背景佈。此外,在路徑分析與變異數分析的部分,乃用來檢驗整體研究模型與比較兩組間各個變數的差異。在 0.05 的顯著水準下,心流經驗與學習滿意度、學習動機與學習結果並無顯著正相關;從 MANOVA 結果中指出在社會知覺與喚醒情緒在兩組間具有顯著差異,又以投影片所得之結果較高。
摘要(英) Innovative techniques make the present learning instructional materials different from the traditional classroom. Computer-based learning has become more and more popular in the higher education. For example, many classes in colleges have been taught in traditional way and accompanied by PowerPoint recently. Besides PowerPoint, avatars are new-developed instructional materials for supporting educational activities, and were regarded as a helpful medium for education (de Freitas, 2006). Thus, this paper explores and discusses the relationship between learners’ perception towards different types of learning materials (human-like avatar and PowerPoint) and their learning outcomes. An experimental design was used and participants who were students in Asia University were randomly assigned to two treatment groups: Students of the class with human-like avatar or students of the class with PowerPoint. A questionnaire was used to collect data from 81 students in the class with human-like avatar and 49 students in the class with PowerPoint. Pilot test data for the achievement test yielded acceptable reliability and validity. Descriptive statistics was conducted to understand the distribution of participants’ backgrounds; furthermore, path analysis was used to analyze the model and MANOVA was for comparing the difference of each variable in the two classes. At a 0.05 level of significance, the results indicated that there were not sufficient evidence to prove significant relationship between flow and satisfaction or motivation and learning outcomes. From the result of MANOVA, the mean score of the PowerPoint class was higher than the avatar one in socialness perception, arousal
and motivation.
關鍵字(中) ★ 電腦輔助教學
★ 投影片
★ 動畫人物
關鍵字(英) ★ PowerPoint
★ Avatar
★ Computer-based learning
論文目次 中文摘要 .................................................. i
ABSTRACT ......................................... ii
CONTENTS ........................................ iii
LIST OF FIGURES ......................................... vi
LIST OF TABLES ........................................ vii
Chapter 1 Introduction ............................. 1
1.1 Background ..................................... 1
1.2 Motivation of the Study ........................ 2
1.3 Purpose of the Study ........................... 3
1.4 Research Process ............................... 4
Chapter 2 Literature Review ........................ 6
2.1 E-learning ..................................... 6
2.1.1 Development of E-learning ..................... 6
2.1.2 Definition of E-learning ...................... 7
2.1.3 Varieties of e-Learning ....................... 9
2.1.4 Benefits and Drawbacks of E-learning ......... 10
2.1.5 E-learning Versus Traditional Learning ....... 11
2.2 Social Response Theory ........................ 12
2.3 Social Information Processing Theory .......... 13
2.4 Arousal and Pleasure .......................... 14
2.5 Flow .......................................... 15
2.6 Satisfaction .................................. 17
2.7 Motivation .................................... 18
2.8 Learning Outcomes ............................. 20
Chapter 3 Methodology ............................. 23
3.1 Research Model ................................ 23
3.2 Hypothesis .................................... 24
3.3 Variables and Operational Definitions ......... 27
3.4 Participants, System, Experimental Design and
Questionnaire ................................. 35
3.5 Data Analysis ................................. 39
Chapter 4 Research Results ........................ 41
4.1 Descriptive Statistics ........................ 41
4.1.1 Participants ................................. 41
4.1.2 Variables .................................... 43
4.2 Reliability ................................... 46
4.3 Validity ...................................... 47
4.4 Test of the Proposed Model .................... 51
4.4.1 Preliminary Fit Criteria ..................... 51
4.4.2 Overall Model Fit ............................ 53
4.4.3 Hypotheses Testing- Path Analysis ............ 54
4.4.4 Multivariate Analysis of Variance (MANOVA) ... 58
Chapter 5 Conclusion .............................. 63
5.1 Review of Research Findings ................... 63
5.1.1 Results for Hypotheses ....................... 63
5.1.2 Results for Difference between Two Learning
Materials .................................... 66
5.2 Applications of the Study ..................... 66
5.3 Limitations of the Study and Suggestions for
Future Research ............................... 67
REFERENCE ............................................... 69
Appendix A .............................................. 80
參考文獻 Ahmad, R., Edwards, R., & Tomkinson, B. (2006). The use of WebCT in distance learning course in University of Manchester. The Turkish Online Journal of Distance
Education, 7.
Ai-Lim Lee, E., Wong, K. W., & Fung, C. C. (2010). How does desktop virtual reality
enhance learning outcomes? A structural equation modeling approach. Computers & Education.
Akkoyunlu, B. (2001). Educational technology in Turkey: Past, present and future.
Educational Media International, 39(2), 165-174.
Allan, J. (1996). Learning outcomes in higher education. Studies in Higher Education, 21(1), 93-108.
Allison, T., Puce, A., & McCarthy, G. (2000). Social perception from visual cues: role of the STS region. Trends in cognitive sciences, 4(7), 267-278.
Ally, M. (2004). Foundations of educational theory for online learning. Theory and practice of online learning, 3-31.
Amaral, L., & Leal, D. (2006). From classroom teaching to e-learning: the way for a strong definition.
Ames, C. (1990). Motivation: What teachers need to know. The Teachers College Record, 91(3), 409-421.
Ames, C., & Archer, J. (1988). Achievement goals in the classroom: Students’ learning strategies and motivation processes. Journal of educational psychology, 80(3), 260-267.
Anderson, T., & Elloumi, F. (2004). Theory and practice of online learning. Athabasca University Athabasca, Canada.
Antonacci, D., DiBartolo, S., Edwards, N., Fritch, K., McMullen, B. & Murch-Shafer, R. (2008). The Power of Virtual Worlds in Education: A Second Life Primer and Resource for Exploring the Potential of Virtual Worlds to Impact Teaching and Learning: July.
Assor, A., Kaplan, H., Kanat-Maymon, Y., & Roth, G. (2005). Directly controlling teacher behaviors as predictors of poor motivation and engagement in girls and boys: The role of anger and anxiety. Learning and Instruction, 15(5), 397-413.
Baker, E., & Mayer, R. E. (1999). Computer-based assessment of problem solving.
Computers in Human Behavior, 15(3-4), 269-282.
Baldwin, M. W. (1992). Relational schemas and the processing of social information. Psychological Bulletin, 112(3), 461.
Baldwin, T. T., Magjuka, R. J., & Loher, B. T. (1991). The perils of participation: Effects of choice of training on trainee motivation and learning. Personnel Psychology, 44(1), 51-65.
Barkoukis, V., Hagger, M. S., Lambropoulos, G., & Tsorbatzoudis, H. (2010). Extending the trans contextual model in physical education and leisure time contexts: Examining the role of basic psychological need satisfaction. British Journal of Educational Psychology, 80(4), 647-670.
Bekele, T. A. (2010). Motivation and Satisfaction in Internet-Supported Learning Environments: A Review. 13(2), 116-127.
Bekele, T. A., & Menchaca, M. P. (2008). Research on interested-supported learning. Quarterly review of distance education, 9(4), 373.
Berger, C. (1993). Kano's methods for understanding customer-defined quality. Center for Quality of Management Journal, 2(4), 3-36.
Beyerlein, S., Davis, D., Apple, D., & Crest, P. (2004). Learning outcomes. Faculty Guidebook, 199-202.
Bidarra, J., & Martins, O. (2010). Exploratory Learning with Geodromo: Design of Emotional and Cognitive Factors Within an Educational Cross-Media Experience. Journal of Research on Technology in Education, 43(2), 171-183.
Bigne, J. E., Andreu, L., & Gnoth, J. (2005). The theme park experience: An analysis of pleasure, arousal and satisfaction. Tourism Management, 26(6), 833-844.
Bye, D., Pushkar, D., & Conway, M. (2007). Motivation, interest, and positive affect in
traditional and nontraditional undergraduate students. Adult Education Quarterly, 57(2), 141.
Chen, H., Wigand, R. T., & Nilan, M. S. (1999). Optimal experience of Web activities.
Computers in Human Behavior, 15(5), 585-608.
Choi, D. H., Kim, J., & Kim, S. H. (2007). ERP training with a web-based electronic learning system: The flow theory perspective. International Journal of Human-Computer
Studies, 65(3), 223-243.
Cole, R. A. (2001). Issues in Web-based pedagogy: A critical primer: Praeger Pub Text.
Collins, A., Sarkisian, N., & Winner, E. (2009). Flow and Happiness in Later Life: An Investigation into the Role of Daily and Weekly Flow Experiences. Journal of Happiness Studies, 10(6), 703-719.
Colquitt, J. A., Lepine, J. A., & Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of applied psychology, 85(5), 678-707.
Colquitt, J. A., & Simmering, M. J. (1998). Conscientiousness, goal orientation, and motivation to learn during the learning process: A longitudinal study. Journal of applied psychology, 83(4), 654.
Corno, L., & Snow, R. E. (1986). Adapting teaching to individual differences among learners. Handbook of research on teaching, 3, 605-629.
Crick, N. R., & Dodge, K. A. (1994). A review and reformulation of social information-processing mechanisms in children's social adjustment. Psychological Bulletin, 115(1), 74.
Cross, J. (2004). A History of eLearning The Future of eLearning.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1990). Flow: The psychology of optimal experience. Happer and Row, New York.
Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1997). Flow and the Psychology of Discovery and Invention. HarperPerennial, New York.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., & Rathunde, K. (1993). The measurement of flow in everyday life: toward a theory of emergent motivation.
Csikszentmihalyi, M., Rathunde, K., & Whalen, S. (1996). Talented teenagers: The roots of success and failure: Cambridge Univ Pr.
Czikszentmihalyi, M. (1975). Beyond boredom and anxiety. San Francisco. Davis, F. D., Bagozzi, R. P., & Warshaw, P. R. (1992). Extrinsic and Intrinsic Motivation to Use Computers in the Workplace1. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 22(14), 1111-1132.
Day, R. F., Shyi, G. C. W., & Wang, J. C. (2006). The effect of flash banners on multiattribute decision making: Distractor or source of arousal? Psychology and Marketing, 23(5), 369-382.
Day, T. M., Raven, M. R., & Newman, M. E. (1998). The effects of world wide web instruction and traditional instruction and learning styles on achievement and changes in student attitudes in a technical writing in agricommunication course. Journal of Agricultural Education, 39(4), 65-75.
de Freitas, S. (2007). Learning in immersive worlds. A review of game-based learning. JISC e-Learning Programme.
De Vries, J. (2004). Rapid e-learning: Groundbreaking new research. LTI Newsline. http://www. elearningmag.com/ltimagazine/article/articleDetail. jsp.
Deci, E. L., & Ryan, R. M. (1990). Intrinsic motivation and self-determination in human behavior: Plenum Press New York.
Deci, E. L., Vallerand, R. J., Pelletier, L. G., & Ryan, R. M. (1991). Motivation and education: The self-determination perspective. Educational psychologist, 26(3), 325-346.
Denzine, G. M., & Woolfolk, A. (2004). Assessment package for Woolfolk, Educational psychology: Pearson.
Donohue, T. L., & Wong, E. H. (1997). Achievement motivation and college satisfaction in traditional and nontraditional students. Education, 118(2).
Donovan, R. J., & Rossiter, J. R. (1982). Store atmosphere: an environmental psychology approach. Journal of Retailing, 58(1), 34-57.
Drucker, P. (2000). Need to know: Integrating e-learning with high velocity value chains. A Delphi Group White.
Eccles, J. S., Adler, T. F., Futterman, R., Goff, S. B., Kaczala, C. M., Meece, J. L., et al.
(1983). Expectancies, values, and academic behaviors. Achievement and achievement motives, 75-146.
Edelson, D. C. (2001). Learning-for-use: A framework for the design of technology-supported inquiry activities. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 38(3), 355-385.
Egbert, J. (2004). A study of flow theory in the foreign language classroom. Canadian Modern Language Review/La Revue canadienne des langues vivantes, 60(5), 549-586.
Elliott, K. M., & Shin, D. (2002). Student satisfaction: an alternative approach to assessing
this important concept. Journal of Higher Education Policy and Management, 24(2), 197-209.
Eom, S., Wen, H., & Ashill, N. (2006). The determinants of students' perceived learning outcomes and satisfaction in university online education: An empirical investigation. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 4(2), 215-235.
Eppler, M. A., & Harju, B. L. (1997). Achievement motivation goals in relation to academic performance in traditional and nontraditional college students. Research in Higher
Education, 38(5), 557-573.
Erdil, K. M. (2007). Student support services and student satisfaction in online education. Online Submission, 8.
Eroglu, S. A., Machleit, K. A., & Davis, L. M. (2003). Empirical testing of a model of online store atmospherics and shopper responses. Psychology and Marketing, 20(2), 139-150.
Faiola, A., & Smyslova, O. (2009). Flow experience in second Life: The impact of telepresence on human-computer interaction. Online Communities and Social Computing, 574-583.
Feldman, F. (1997). On the intrinsic value of pleasures. Ethics, 107(3), 448-466.
Feng, M. Y., & Chang, H. C. (2010). An Investigation of Student Readiness for E-learning: A Case Study of English Majors in a Technological University. Chin-Yi Journal of the Humanities and Social Sciences (1), 87-110.
Fisher, S. L., & Ford, J. K. (1998). Differential effects of learner effort and goal orientation on two learning outcomes. Personnel Psychology, 51(2), 397-420.
Fraenkel, J. R. & Wallen, N. E. (1993). How to design and evaluate research in education (2nd ed.). New York: McGraw-Hill.
Frankola, K. (2001). Why online learners drop out.Workforce-Costa Mesa, 80(10), 52-61.
Gard, D. E., Gard, M. G., Kring, A. M., & John, O. P. (2006). Anticipatory and consummatory components of the experience of pleasure: a scale development study.
Journal of Research in Personality, 40(6), 1086-1102.
Glynn, S. M., & Koballa Jr, T. R. (2006). Motivation to learn in college science. Handbook of college science teaching, 25!V32.
Gray, P. H., & Meister, D. B. (2004). Knowledge sourcing effectiveness. Management Science, 50(6), 821-834.
Guo, Y., Klein, B., Ro, Y., & Rossin, D. (2007). The impact of flow on learning outcomes in a graduate-level information management course. Journal of Global Business Issues, 1(2), 31-39.
Guo, Y. M., & Ro, Y. K. (2008). Capturing flow in the business classroom. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative Education, 6(2), 437-462.
Ha, Y., & Lennon, S. J. (2010). Online visual merchandising (VMD) cues and consumer pleasure and arousal: purchasing versus browsing situation. Psychology and Marketing, 27(2), 141-165.
Hall, B., & Snider, A. (1998). Glossary: The hottest buzz words in the industry. E-Schreiber, DA, & Berge, ZL.
Hamburg, I., Lindecke, C., & Thij, H. (2003). Social aspects of e-learning and blending learning methods.
Hanson, J., Millington, C., & Freewood, M. (2001). Developing a methodology for online feedback and assessment.
Harun, M. H. (2001). Integrating e-Learning into the workplace. Internet and Higher Education, 4, 301-310.
Haupt, G., & Blignaut, S. (2008). Uncovering learning outcomes: explicating obscurity in learning of aesthetics in design and technology education. International Journal of Technology and Design Education, 18(4), 361-374.
Hayashi, A., Chen, C., Ryan, T., & Wu, J. (2004). The role of social presence and moderating role of computer self efficacy in predicting the continuance usage of e-learning systems. Journal of Information Systems Education, 15, 139-154.
Hektner, J., & Csikszentmihalyi, M. (1996). A longitudinal exploration of flow and intrinsic
motivation in adolescents.
Hernon, P., & Dugan, R. E. (2003). Student learning assessment: options and resources: philadelphia, PA: middle states commission on higher education. Library & Information Science Research, 25(3), 355-357.
Higgins, E. T. (1997). Beyond pleasure and pain. American Psychologist, 52, 1280-1300.
Ho, L. A., & Kuo, T. H. (2010). How can one amplify the effect of e-learning? An examination of high-tech employees' computer attitude and flow experience. Computers in Human Behavior, 26(1), 23-31.
Hutcheson, G., & Sofroniou, N. (1999). The multivariate social scientist: Introductory statistics using generalized linear models. Sage Publications Ltd.
Imel, S. (2002). E-learning. Trends and issues Alert No. 40. Washington, DC: Office of Educational Research and Improvement.
Ishimura, I., & Kodama, M. (2009). Flow experiences in everyday activities of Japanese college students: Autotelic people and time management1. Japanese Psychological Research, 51(1), 47-54.
Iversen, S., Kupfermann, I., & Kandel, E. R. (2000). Emotional states and feelings. Kandel E.
Schwartz J, Jessell T (eds): Principles of Neural Science. New York, McGraw Hill.
Ivory, J. D., & Kalyanaraman, S. (2007). The effects of technological advancement and violent content in video games on players’ feelings of presence, involvement, physiological arousal, and aggression. Journal of Communication, 57(3), 532-555.
Kandel, E., & Kupfermann, I. (1995). Emotional states. Essentials of Neural Science and Behavior, 595-612.
Kanfer, R., & Ackerman, P. L. (1989). Motivation and cognitive abilities: an integrative aptitude-treatment interaction approach to skill acquisition. Journal of applied psychology, 74(4), 657.
Kano, N., Seraku, N., Takahashi, F., & Tsuji, S. (1984). Attractive quality and must-be quality, Hinshitsu. The Journal of the Japanese Society for Quality Control, 14(2), 39-49.
Kearsley, G., & Moore, M. (1996). Distance education. A systems view. Wadsworth Publishing Company.
Keller, J. M. (1987). The systematic process of motivational design. Performance Instruction, 26(9 10), 1-8.
Kiili, K. (2005). Content creation challenges and flow experience in educational games: The IT-Emperor case. The Internet and Higher Education, 8(3), 183-198.
Kirkpatrick, D. L. (1998). Evaluating training programs: The four levels: Berrett-Koehler.
Klein, B. D., Rossin, D., Guo, Y. M., & Ro, Y. K. (2010). An Examination of the Effects of Flow on Learning in a Graduate-Level Introductory Operations Management Course.
The Journal of Education for Business, 85(5), 292-298.
Klein, D. (1984). Depression and anhedonia. Anhedonia and affect deficit states, 1!V14.
Klein, H. J., Noe, R. A., & Wang, C. (2006). Motivation to learn and course outcomes: The impact of delivery mode, learning goal orientation, and perceived barriers and enablers. Personnel Psychology, 59(3), 665-702.
Knight, G. P., Guthrie, I. K., Page, M. C., & Fabes, R. A. (2002). Emotional arousal and
gender differences in aggression: A meta analysis. Aggressive Behavior, 28(5), 366-393.
Konradt, U., Filip, R., & Hoffmann, S. (2003). Flow experience and positive affect during
hypermedia learning. British Journal of Educational Technology, 34(3), 309-327.
Konradt, U., & Sulz, K. (2001). The Experience of Flow in Interacting with a Hypermedia
Learning Environment. Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia, 10(1).
Kowal, J., & Fortier, M. (2000). Testing relationships from the hierarchical model of intrinsic and extrinsic motivation using flow as a motivational consequence. Research Quarterly for Exercise and Sport, 71(2), 171-181.
Kraiger, K., Ford, J. K., & Salas, E. (1993). Application of cognitive, skill-based, and affective theories of learning outcomes to new methods of training evaluation. Journal of applied psychology, 78(2), 311.
Kramarae, C. (2001). The third shift: Citeseer.
Kruse, K. (2004). The benefits and drawbacks of e-learning.
Ku, J., Jang, H. J., Kim, K. U., Kim, J. H., Park, S. H., Lee, J. H., et al. (2005). Experimental results of affective valence and arousal to avatar's facial expressions. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 8(5), 493-503.
Kukulska-Hulme, A., & Traxler, J. (2005). Mobile learning: A handbook for educators and trainers: Psychology Press.
Kynaslahti, H. (2003). In search of elements of mobility in the context of education. Mobile learning, 41-48.
Labroo, A. A., & Rucker, D. D. (2010). The Orientation-Matching Hypothesis: An Emotion-Specificity Approach to Affect Regulation. Journal of Marketing Research, 47(5), 955-966.
Lamb, M. (2004). Integrative motivation in a globalizing world. System, 32(1), 3-19.
Lang, P. J., Bradley, M. M., & Cuthbert, B. N. (1998). Emotion, motivation, and anxiety: Brain mechanisms and psychophysiology. Biological Psychiatry, 44(12), 1248-1263.
Laroche, M., Teng, L., Michon, R., & Chebat, J. (2005). Incorporating service quality into consumer mall shopping decision making: a comparison between English and French Canadian consumers. Journal of Services Marketing, 19(3), 157-163.
Lazarus, R. S. (1991). Emotion and adaptation: Oxford University Press, USA.
Lemerise, E. A., & Arsenio, W. F. (2000). An integrated model of emotion processes and cognition in social information processing. Child Development, 71(1), 107-118.
Liao, L. F. (2006). A flow theory perspective on learner motivation and behavior in distance education. Distance Education, 27(1), 45-62.
Lim, D. H., Morris, M. L., & Kupritz, V. W. (2007). Online vs. blended learning: Differences in instructional outcomes and learner satisfaction. Journal of Asynchronous Learning
Networks, 11(2), 38-50.
Lin, C. C. (2003). A Study of Key Influential Factors on Satisfaction of E-Learning. National Kaohsiung Normal University Thesis.
Louwerse, M. M., Graesser, A. C., Lu, S., & Mitchell, H. H. (2005). Social cues in animated conversational agents. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19(6), 693-704.
Ma, B. K. C. (2006). Making the Most of PowerPoint Slides for Rapid eLearning.
Major, D. A., Turner, J. E., & Fletcher, T. D. (2006). Linking proactive personality and the Big Five to motivation to learn and development activity. Journal of applied psychology, 91(4), 927.
Mano, H., & Oliver, R. L. (1993). Assessing the dimensionality and structure of the consumption experience: evaluation, feeling, and satisfaction. The Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 451-466.
Martocchio, J. J. (1994). Effects of conceptions of ability on anxiety, self-efficacy, and learning in training. Journal of applied psychology, 79(6), 819.
Mayer, R. E., Mathias, A., & Wetzell, K. (2002). Fostering understanding of multimedia messages through pre-training: Evidence for a two-stage theory of mental model construction. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Applied, 8(3), 147.
Mayer, R. E., & Moreno, R. (2002). Animation as an aid to multimedia learning. Educational
psychology review, 14(1), 87-99.
McFarland, D., & Hamilton, D. (2005). Factors affecting student performance and satisfaction: Online versus traditional course delivery. Journal of Computer Information Systems, 46(2), 25.
McNeill, B., Bellamy, L., & Burrows, V. (1999). A quality based assessment process for student work products.Journal of engineering education, 88, 485-500.
Mehrabian, A. (1996). Pleasure-arousal-dominance: A general framework for describing and measuring individual differences in temperament. Current Psychology, 14(4), 261-292.
Menon, S., & Kahn, B. (2002). Cross-category effects of induced arousal and pleasure on the Internet shopping experience. Journal of Retailing, 78(1), 31-40.
Mickley Steinmetz, K. R., & Kensinger, E. A. (2009). The effects of valence and arousal on the neural activity leading to subsequent memory. Psychophysiology, 46(6), 1190-1199.
Middleton, J. A., & Spanias, P. A. (1999). Motivation for achievement in mathematics: Findings, generalizations, and criticisms of the research. Journal for Research in Mathematics Education, 30(1), 65-88.
Mitchell, T. R. (1982). Motivation: New directions for theory, research, and practice. The
Academy of Management Review, 7(1), 80-88.
Mohr, L. B. (1969). Determinants of innovation in organizations. The American Political Science Review, 63(1), 111-126.
Moon, Youngme (2000), Intimate Exchanges: Using Computers to Elicit Self-Disclosure from Consumers. Journal of Consumer Research, 26, 323–39.
Moon, Youngme (1998). The Effects of ‘Canned’ Personalization on Outcomes in an Interactive Marketing Situation.Working Paper No. 99-040, Harvard Business School,
Boston, MA 02163.
Movahedi, A., Sheikh, M., Bagherzadeh, F., Hemayattalab, R., & Ashayeri, H. (2007). A
practice-specificity-based model of arousal for achieving peak performance. Journal of Motor Behavior, 39(6), 457-462.
Nass, C., & Steuer, J. (1993). Voices, boxes, and sources of messages. Human Communication Research, 19(4), 504-527.
Nass, Clifford I., Youngme Moon, B. J. Fogg, Byron Reeves, & D. Christopher Dryer (1995). Can Computer Personalities Be Human Personalities?. International Journal of
Human-Computer Studies, 43, 223–239.
Nass, Clifford I.,Youngme Moon, & Nancy Green (1997). Are Computers Gender-Neutral? Gender Stereotypic Responses to Computers with Voices,” Journal of Applied Social
Psychology,27, 864–876.
Neo, M., & Neo, T. K. (2009). Engaging students in multimedia-mediated constructivist
learning!VStudents!| perceptions. Educational Technology & Society, 12(2), 254-266.
Nichols, M. (2003). A theory for eLearning. Educational Technology & Society, 6(2), 1-10.
Nikolova, I., & Collis, B. (1998). Flexible learning and design of instruction. British Journal of Educational Technology, 29(1), 59-72.
Noe, R. A. (1986). Trainees' attributes and attitudes: Neglected influences on training effectiveness. The Academy of Management Review, 11(4), 736-749.
Noe, R. A. (2000). Toward an integrative theory of training motivation: A meta-analytic path analysis of 20 years of research. Journal of applied psychology, 85(5), 678-707.
Norman, D. A. (1996). Optimal Flow. Arts Education Policy Review, 97(4), 35-38.
Novak, T., Hoffman, D., & Yung, Y. (1999). Measuring the Customer Experience in Online Environments: A Structural Modeling Approach.
Oakley, B. (2002). A virtual classroom approach to teaching circuit analysis. Education, IEEE Transactions on, 39(3), 287-296.
Oh, C. H. (2003). Information communication technology and the new university: A view on eLearning. The ANNALS of the American Academy of Political and Social Science,
585(1), 134.
Oliver, R. (1993). Cognitive, affective, and attribute bases of the satisfaction response. Journal of Consumer Research, 20(3), 418-430.
Oliver, R. L. (1989). Processing of the satisfaction response in consumption: a suggested framework and research propositions. Journal of Consumer Satisfaction, Dissatisfaction and Complaining Behavior, 2(1), 1-16.
O’Regan, K. (2003). Emotion and e-learning. Journal of Asynchronous Learning Networks, 7(3), 78-92.
Paas, F., Tuovinen, J. E., Van Merrienboer, J. J. G., & Aubteen Darabi, A. (2005). A motivational perspective on the relation between mental effort and performance: Optimizing learner involvement in instruction. Educational Technology Research and Development, 53(3), 25-34.
Palmer, S., & Holt, D. (2009). Examining student satisfaction with wholly online learning.
Journal of computer assisted learning, 25(2), 101-113.
Parducci, A. (1995). Happiness, pleasure, and judgment: The contextual theory and its applications: Lawrence Erlbaum.
Parette, J., H.P., Hourcade, J., & Blum, C. (2011). Using Animation in Microsoft PowerPoint to Enhance Engagement and Learning in Young Learners With Developmental Delay.
TEACHING Exceptional Children, 43(4), 58-67.
Paulhus, D. L., & Lim, D. T. K. (1994). Arousal and evaluative extremity in social judgments: A dynamic complexity model. European Journal of Social Psychology, 24(1), 89-99.
Pham, M. T. (1992). Effects of involvement, arousal, and pleasure on the recognition of
sponsorship stimuli. Advances in Consumer Research, 19(1), 85-93.
Piave, N. A. (2008). Rapid e-Learning, as an informal educational tool for advanced students. eLearning Papers, 7.
Piccoli, G., Ahmad, R., & Ives, B. (2001). Web-based virtual learning environments: A research framework and a preliminary assessment of effectiveness in basic IT skills training. MIS quarterly, 401-426.
Pintrich, P. R. (1988). A process oriented view of student motivation and cognition. New directions for institutional research, 57, 65-79.
Pintrich, P. R. (1989). The dynamic interplay of student motivation and cognition in the college classroom. Advances in motivation and achievement, 6, 117-160.
Pintrich, P. R., & De Groot, E. V. (1990). Motivational and self-regulated learning components of classroom academic performance. Journal of educational psychology, 82(1), 33.
Pituch, K. A., & Lee, Y. (2006). The influence of system characteristics on e-learning use. Computers & Education, 47(2), 222-244.
Quinn, C. (2000). mLearning: mobile, wireless, in-your-pocket learning. LiNE Zine.
Rashty, D. (1995). Traditional Learning vs. eLearning.
Rathunde, K. (2003). A comparison of montessori and traditional middle schools: Motivation, quality of experience, and social context. NAMTA Journal, 28(3).
Ravitz, J. (1997). Evaluating learning networks: A special challenge for web-based instruction. Web-based instruction, 361-368.
Raybould, B. (1995). Performance support engineering: An emerging development methodology for enabling organizational learning. Performance Improvement Quarterly, 8(1), 7-22.
Reeves, B., & Nass, C. (1996). How people treat computers, television, and new media like real people and places: CSLI Publications and Cambridge university press.
Reiser, R. A. (2001). A history of instructional design and technology: Part I: A history of
instructional media. Educational Technology Research and Development, 49(1), 53-64.
Rizzo, A., Buckwalter, J., Bowerly, T., Van Der Zaag, C., Humphrey, L., Neumann, U., et al. (2000). The virtual classroom: a virtual reality environment for the assessment and rehabilitation of attention deficits. CyberPsychology & Behavior, 3(3), 483-499.
Robbins, S. B., Lauver, K., Le, H., Davis, D., Langley, R., & Carlstrom, A. (2004). Do psychosocial and study skill factors predict college outcomes? A meta-analysis. Psychological Bulletin, 130(2), 261.
Robertson, G. G., Mackinlay, J. D., & Card, S. K. (1991). Cone trees: animated 3D visualizations of hierarchical information.
Rodriguez, M. C., Ooms, A., Montanez, M., & Yan, Y. L. (2005). Perceptions of online learning quality given comfort with technology, motivation to learn technology skills, satisfaction, & online learning experience.
Rogers, M., Economic, M. I. o. A., & Research, S. (1998). The definition and measurement of innovation: Melbourne Institute of Applied Economic and Social Research.
Rusillo, M. T. C., & Arias, P. F. C. (2004). Gender differences in academic motivation of secondary school students. Electronic Journal of Research in Educational Psychology, 2(1), 97-112.
Russell, J., & Pratt, G. (1980). A description of the affective quality attributed to environments. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38(2), 311-322.
Schunk, D. H. (1991). Self-efficacy and academic motivation. Educational psychologist, 26(3), 207-231.
Sears, A., Jacko, J. A., & Borella, M. S. (1997). Internet delay effects: how users perceive quality, organization, and ease of use of information.
Seligman, M. (2002). Authentic happiness: Using the new positive psychology to realize your potential for lasting fulfillment: Free Pr.
Sen, M. S. (2007). A Study of the Influence of e-Learning Self-Efficacy in the Acceptance of e-Learning Systems. Shu-Te University Thesis.
Seppala, P., & Alamaki, H. (2003). Mobile learning in teacher training. Journal of computer assisted learning, 19(3), 330-335.
Sergi, M. J., Rassovsky, Y., Nuechterlein, K. H., & Green, M. F. (2006). Social perception as a mediator of the influence of early visual processing on functional status in schizophrenia. American Journal of Psychiatry, 163(3), 448.
Sharma, A. P. (2008). Scope and challenges of elearning in rural areas of haryana. Journal of
Management Studies, 37.
Sherman, S. J., Judd, C. M., & Park, B. (1989). Social cognition. Annual review of psychology, 40(1), 281-326.
Shetzer, L. (1993). A social information processing model of employee participation. Organization Science, 4(2), 252-268.
Shin, N. (2006). Online learners’ flow experience: an empirical study. British Journal of Educational Technology, 37(5), 705-720.
Shneiderman, B. (1997). Designing the user interface: strategies for effective human-computer interaction: Addison-Wesley Longman Publishing Co., Inc. Boston, MA, USA.
Sidgwick, H. (1981). The methods of ethics: Hackett Publishing Company.
Simmering, M. J., Posey, C., & Piccoli, G. (2009). Computer Self Efficacy and Motivation to Learn in a Self Directed Online Course. Decision Sciences Journal of Innovative
Education, 7(1), 99-121.
Sirohi, V. (2007). E-learning: An Overview.
Sitzmann, T., Brown, K. G., Ely, K., Kraiger, K., & Wisher, R. A. (2009). A Cyclical Model
of Motivational Constructs in Web-Based Courses. Military Psychology, 21(4), 534-551.
Smith, C. A., & Ellsworth, P. C. (1985). Patterns of cognitive appraisal in emotion. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 48(4), 813.
Snyder, M., Tanke, E. D., & Berscheid, E. (2003). Social perception and interpersonal behavior: On the self-fulfilling nature of social stereotypes. Readings about the social animal, 469.
Stockley, D. (2003). E-learning Definition and Explanation. Retrieved December, 12, 2007.
Stojanovic, L., Staab, S., & Studer, R. (2001). eLearning based on the Semantic Web.
Sun, P. C., Tsai, R. J., Finger, G., Chen, Y. Y., & Yeh, D. (2008). What drives a successful e-Learning? An empirical investigation of the critical factors influencing learner satisfaction. Computers & Education, 50(4), 1183-1202.
Sundar, S. S., & Kalyanaraman, S. (2004). Arousal, memory, and impression-formation effects of animation speed in web advertising. Journal of Advertising, 33(1), 7-17.
Susskind, J. E. (2005). PowerPoint's power in the classroom: enhancing students' self-efficacy and attitudes. Computers & Education, 45(2), 203-215.
Travers, J. C. (2011). Emergent literacy skills of young children with autism: A comparison of teacher-led and computer-assisted instruction. UNIVERSITY OF NEVADA, LAS VEGAS.
Trevino, L., & Webster, J. (1992). Flow in computer-mediated communication. Communication research, 19(5), 539.
Tu, C. H., & Corry, M. (2002). eLearning communities. The Quarterly Review of Distance Education, 3(2), 207-218.
Tyan, K. J. (2003). Diffusion barriers to e-learning in corporate Taiwan: A factor analysis of practitioners' perspectives. Indiana University.
UYANGOR, S. M., & ECE, O. G. D. K. (2010). The attitudes of the prospective mathematics teachers towards instructional technological and material development course. TOJET, 9(1).
Van Nieuwenhuijzen, M., De Castro, B. O., Van der Valk, I., Wijnroks, L., Vermeer, A., & Matthys, W. (2006). Do social information processing models explain aggressive
behavior by children with mild intellectual disabilities in residential care? Journal of Intellectual Disability Research, 50(11), 801-812.
Wagner, E. (2007). Delivering on the Promise of eLearning. Adobe eLearning Solutions, retrieved on July, 7.
Wang, L. C., Baker, J., Wagner, J. A., & Wakefield, K. (2007). Can a retail web site be social? Journal of Marketing, 71(3), 143-157.
Wang, Y. S. (2003). Assessment of learner satisfaction with asynchronous electronic learning systems. Information & Management, 41(1), 75-86.
Webster, J., & Martocchio, J. (1992). Microcomputer playfulness: development of a measure with workplace implications. MIS quarterly, 201-226.
Webster, J., Trevino, L. K., & Ryan, L. (1993). The dimensionality and correlates of flow in human-computer interactions. Computers in Human Behavior, 9(4), 411-426.
Weggen, C. C. (2000). Corporate E-learning: Exploring A New Frontier. WR Hambrecht+ Co Equity Research.
Weick, K. E., & Quinn, R. E. (1999). Organizational change and development. Annual review of psychology, 50(1), 361-386.
Welsh, E. T., Wanberg, C. R., Brown, K. G., & Simmering, M. J. (2003). E learning: emerging uses, empirical results and future directions. International Journal of Training and Development, 7(4), 245-258.
Winefeld, A., Tiggeman, M., & Goldney, R. D. (1988). Psychological concomitants of satisfactory employment and unemployment in young people. Social Psychiatry and Psychiatric Epidemiology, 23(3), 149-157.
Winfrey, E. (1999). Kirkpatrick's four levels of evaluation.
Wirtz, J., Mattila, A. S., & Tan, R. L. P. (2000). The moderating role of target-arousal on the impact of affect on satisfaction--an examination in the context of service experiences. Journal of Retailing, 76(3), 347-365.
Wolters, C. A. (1998). Self-regulated learning and college students' regulation of motivation. Journal of educational psychology, 90(2), 224.
Wong, D. B. (2009). EMOTION AND THE COGNITION OF REASONS IN MORAL MOTIVATION. Philosophical Issues, 19(1), 343-367.
Wu, R., Gopnik, A., Richardson, D. C., & Kirkham, N. Z. (2010). Social Cues Support Learning about Objects from Statistics in Infancy.
Zhang, D., Zhao, J. L., Zhou, L., & Nunamaker Jr, J. F. (2004). Can e-learning replace classroom learning? Communications of the ACM, 47(5), 75-79.
Zhang, D., Zhou, L., Briggs, R. O., & Nunamaker, J. F. (2006). Instructional video in e-learning: Assessing the impact of interactive video on learning effectiveness. Information & Management, 43(1), 15-27.
Zineldin, M. (2006). The quality of health care and patient satisfaction: an exploratory investigation of the 5Qs model at some Egyptian and Jordanian medical clinics. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 19(1), 60-92.
王怡心. (2006)。 遠距化下圖書資訊之運用. 中華民國圖書館學會, 142(143), 29-31。
吳明隆. (2007)。 SPSS操作與應用:問卷統計分析實務: 台北市:知城圖書。
周文賢. (2002)。 多變量統計分析: SAS/STAT使用方法: 智勝文化。
高義展. (2010)。 應用限制理論建構適性化高雄都會區的成人數位學習系統. 城市學學刊, 1(1), 85-113。
陳順宇. (2005)。 多變量分析: 台北:華泰書局。
經濟部. (2005)。 台灣數位內容產業白皮書。
王文科(2001)。教育研究法。台北:五南。
朱瀅(2002)。實驗心理學。台北:五南。
廖婉如. (2009)。 我國1998至2007年數位學習期刊論文及其引用文獻之研究. 國立台灣大學文學院圖書資訊學習。
鄭瑞娥. (2008)。 企業員工數位學習系統接受度之研究. 國立中山大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
周秀芬(2010)。互動式線上數位教材應用於數學教學-以小學六年級數學為例。未出
版碩士,逢甲大學應用數學所,台中市
蘇于雯(2009)。動畫式數位教材教學對國小五年級學童數學學習成效之研究。未出版碩士,國立彰化師範大學資訊管理學系所,彰化縣
黃彥傑(2010)。探討紙本與數位教材無縫整合學習系統下推薦機制對學習成效之影響。未出版碩士,國立中山大學資訊管理學系研究所,高雄市
王俊仁(2009)。一個可支援動畫教學代理人導向之數位教材的學習系統對國小學童數位學習之影響。未出版碩士,亞洲大學資訊工程學系碩士在職專班,台中縣
吳曉君(2009)。「數位教材」融入數學教學對國小低年級學童解題閱讀與擬題寫作影響之研究。未出版碩士,雲林科技大學技術及職業教育研究所碩士班,雲林縣
黃英傑(2009)。資訊融入教學輔以認知師徒制對學生數學學習成效之研究-以「一元二次方程式」單元為例。未出版碩士,銘傳大學教育研究所碩士在職專班,台北市
游光昭 林坤誼 (2007)。數學、科學、科技統整課程對不同學習風格學習者在學習成效上之影響。教育研究學報,41(1), 1-16。
指導教授 李憶萱(Yi-hsuan Lee) 審核日期 2011-7-1
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明