技術創新的管理：理性觀點之實證研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：46

、訪客IP：3.135.249.11

姓名

張珈進(Chia-chin Chang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

技術創新的管理：理性觀點之實證研究
(Management of technological innovation: an empirical study from the rational perspective)

相關論文

★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究	★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例
★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析	★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析－以資料包絡分析方法分析
★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展	★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討
★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例	★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例--
★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究	★ 製造業閒置資產轉售平台製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例
★ 供應商先行者優勢探討-以宸鴻科技為例	★ 團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究
★ 從商業生態系統談樞紐者策略-以Apple 與Nokia 為例	★ 個人電腦的競爭與發展策略-以台灣電子產業為例
★ 應用兩階段資料包絡分析法評估高級職業學校之經營績效	★ ERP導入的促進因素:使用者觀點

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

技術創新的管理為企業組織追求卓越、維持競爭優勢的重要途徑之一。許多研究觀點如體制觀點、潮流觀點、文化觀點及理性觀點等陸續被提出以探討組織採行管理創新的過程機制及行為目的。依據Birkinshaw等人(2008)對管理創新觀點的整合性研究指出，理性觀點對於組織採行管理創新行為的目的詮釋得最為合宜且融合了組織決策者的角色。根據理性觀點，管理創新活動的導入是由欲使其組織運作更有效能的內部個體所主導，進而求取活動執行的正當性；此外，在技術創新的早期研究中認為創新活動是藉由市場拉力(Market pull)或技術推力(Technology push)其中一種力量所致，然至今日，多數學者已認同創新活動的產生應是兩者相互作用的連續過程。因此，本研究延續學者觀點，分別由技術推力與市場拉力兩個程序進行實證，探討技術創新的管理機制。
(1)技術推力：就技術面而言，因應技術的快速變遷與產業競爭，企業產生了對新技術的強大需求，進而不斷以各種技術獲取(technology acquisition)方式來獲取其所需的技術資源，維持競爭優勢。故本研究以LED產業為例，從快速跟隨者角度分析組織所擁有的技術能力對其技術獲取模式選擇的影響；(2)市場拉力：就需求面而言，技術本身具有的獨特屬性(technological attributes)提升了消費者採用的可能性，造就其技術市場潛能，進而引發企業對此技術商品化後的報酬期待，促成此技術的商業化(technology commercialization)。因此，本研究以太陽能和LED兩大產業為調查對象檢驗技術市場潛能本身的中介(mediating)效果以及環境因素於技術市場潛能和技術商業化間的調節效果，以瞭解企業管理者如何因應外在市場需求尋求創新的解答。
研究發現：(1)技術推動(technology-push)部分，企業對外進行技術獲取時，當其本身擁有較高的研發或製造互補能力時，會選擇高資源承諾的技術獲取模式，使合作過程中夥伴關係維持長久並獲取較高的學習效果；但當跟隨者企業擁有較高的創新能力時，則會選擇低資源承諾的獲取模式以降低共享資源的付出，防止獨特創新能力外洩；此外，(2)市場拉力(market-pull)的研究發現外在環境的趨勢要求，對技術市場潛能與技術商業化的關係上具有顯著的正向調節效果；研究也指出，技術屬性在技術市場潛能的中介作用下對其商業化影響有顯著效果。
藉由上述科技業公司於技術商業化與技術獲取模式上的實證分析，本研究將有助於以理性觀點思維瞭解組織採行技術創新管理行為的目的因素並解析現今科技業於對其技術能力在管理創新上可能的過程機制。此外，本研究也對於彌補管理創新理性觀點於產業實證分析上不足，做出進一步的貢獻。

摘要(英)

Management of technological innovation is among the important methods employed by entrepreneurial organizations to pursue outstanding, sustainable competitive advantages. Numerous perspectives, such as institutional and cultural perspectives, have been suggested continually to investigate the process mechanisms and behavioral goals of organizations that adopt management innovation. The integrated research of Birkinshaw et al. (2008) on management innovation perspectives indicates that, in management innovation, the rational perspective provides the most appropriate explanation for the behavioral goals of organizations that adopt management innovation, merging the roles of agents within the organization. According to the rational perspective, management innovations are introduced by internal individuals who seek to improve the efficiency and effectiveness of an organization. In addition, while prior literature of innovation had recognized that innovation is triggered by either market-pull or technology-push, to date, many scholars have argued that that innovation process is the interaction of market-pull and technology-push force. Therefore, extending scholars’ perspective, this study integrates two possible trigger mechanisms for technological innovation behavior, technology push and market pull.
(1)Technology-push: investigates business managers who adopt corresponding technology acquisition plans after examining their internal technological capability. For this part of the research, we use the LED industry as an example. This study analyzes the influence organizations’ technological capability has on their technology acquisition choices from the perspective of fast-follower businesses to understand how managers search for innovation in resource capabilities. (2)Market-pull: researches the influence of business managers’ personal desires on implementing technology commercialization using the solar power and LED industries as the targets of investigation. This study examines the moderating effect of external environmental factors on market potential and the probability of technology commercialization, and the mediating effect of the technology market’s potential to understand how business managers respond to a market environment seeking innovation.
The results are as follows: (1) according to the analysis on the technology acquisition model, fast-followers opt for the acquisition models demanding high resource commitments when a fast-follower firm has highly R&D capabilities or complementary manufacturing capabilities in their cooperation, since the cooperation makes the partnerships last longer and improves learning efficiency of fast-followers. However, if fast-followers own superior innovative capabilities, they choose the acquisition model demanding low resource commitments, so as to reduce the contributions of shared resources and prevent possible leakage of unique innovative capabilities. (2) Based on the analysis of technology commercialization, this paper finds that environmental factor shows significant and positive moderating effect on technology market potentials and technology commercialization. Meanwhile, technological attributes has significant influence on technology commercialization under the mediating effects of technology market potential.
Through empirical analysis of the technology commercialization and technology acquisition styles of technology companies, this study enhances understanding of the behavioral goals and characteristics of organizations that adopt technological innovation management from a rational perspective to analyze the process mechanisms of the current technology industry to determine its technological capability for management innovation. Additionally, this study also contributes to existing research by resolving the insufficient empirical analysis of rational perspectives of industry management innovations.

關鍵字(中)

★ 市場潛能
★ 技術商業化
★ 技術獲取
★ 綠色科技
★ 技術創新

關鍵字(英)

★ Market potential
★ Green technology
★ Technology acquisition
★ Technology commercialization
★ Technological innovation

論文目次

TABLE OF CONTENTS
ABSTRACT (Chinese) .........................i
ABSTRACT .................................iii
ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS .........................vi
TABLE OF CONTENTS .........................vii
LIST OF FIGURES .........................ix
LIST OF TABLES .........................x
1. Introduction .........................1
2. Literature review and theoretical background...9
2.1 Management innovation.........................9
2.2 Technology acquisition........................13
2.3 Technology commercialization..................20
3. Research methodology...........................23
3.1 Regression analysis...........................23
3.2 Multiple logistic regression..................24
4. Hypotheses development and empirical results...26
4.1 Approach 1: Technology-push...................26
4.1.1 Sampling....................................26
4.1.2 Hypotheses development......................27
4.1.3 Variables measurement ......................37
4.1.4 Empirical results...........................38
4.2 Approach 2: Market-pull .......................45
4.2.1 Sampling....................................45
4.2.2 Hypotheses development......................47
4.2.3 Variables measure...........................55
4.2.4 Empirical results...........................57
5. Conclusion.....................................63
5.1 Conclusions and implications..................63
5.2 Limitations and suggestions for future research.72
References.........................................74

參考文獻

Abrahamson, E. and L. Rosenkopf., 1993. Institutional and competitive bandwagons: Using mathematical-modeling as a tool to explore innovation diffusion, Academy of Management Review, 18(3), 487–517.
Abrahamson, E. 1996. Management fashion. Academy of Management Review, 21, 254–285.
Abrahamson, E. 1997. The emergence and prevalence of employee management rhetorics: The effects of long waves, labor unions, and turnover, 1875 to 1992. Academy of Management Journal, 40, 491–533.
Adner, R. and P. Zemsky., 2006. A demand based perspective on sustainable competitive advantage, Strategic Management Journal, 27, 215-239.
Al-Gahtani, S. S., 2003. Computer technology adoption in Saudi Arabia: Correlates of perceived innovation attributes’, Information Technology for Development, 10(1), 57-69.
Ambec, S. and P. Lanoie., 2008. Does it pay to be green? A systematic overview, The Academy of Management Perspectives (formerly The Academy of Management Executive)(AMP), 22(4), 45-62.
Anand, J., Delios, A., 2002. Absolute and relative resources as determinants of international acquisitions. Strategic Management Journal. 23, 119-134.
Arora, S. and S. Gangopadhyay. 1995. Toward a theoretical model of voluntary overcompliance, Journal of Economic Behavior and Organization, 28(3), 289-309.
Arrow, K.: 1962, Economic welfare and the allocation of resources for invention. In the rate and direction of inventive activity: Economic and social factors, (Nelson RR. Princeton University Press: Princeton, NJ), pp. 165–180.
Awerbuch, S., 2000. Investing in photovoltaics: Risk, accounting and the value of new technology, Energy Policy, 28(14), 1023-1035.
Bailey, J. P., 1998. Electronic commerce: prices and consumer issues for three products: books, compact discs, and software. Organisation for Economic Co-operation and Development, OCDE/GD (98). 4.
Balachandra, P., H. S. Kristle Nathan and B. S. Reddy., 2010. Commercialization of sustainable energy technologies, Renewable Energy 35(8), 1842-1851
Bandarian, R., R. R. C. de America, L. y el Caribe and E. y Portugal., 2007. Evaluation of commercial potential of a new technology at the early stage of development with fuzzy logic, Journal of Technology Management and Innovation, 2(4), 73-85.
Bansal, P. and K. Roth., 2000. Why companies go green: A model of ecological responsiveness, Academy of Management Journal, 43(4), 717-736.
Bantel, K. A. and S. E. Jackson., 1989. Top management and innovations in banking: Does the composition of the top team make a difference?, Strategic Management Journal, Summer Special Issue, 10, 107–124.
Baron, R. M. and D. A. Kenny. 1986. The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations, Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51(6), 1173-1182.
Benders, J., and van Veen, K. 2001. Whats in a fashion? Interpretative viability and management fashions. Organization, 8, 33–53.
Birkinshaw, J., G. Hamel, and M. J. Mol. 2008. Management innovation. The Academy of Management Review (AMR), 33(4), 825-45.
Borys, B., and Jemison, D. B., 1989. Hybrid arrangements as strategic alliances: Theoretical issues in organizational combinations. The Academy of Management Review. 14, 234-249.
Brem, A. and K. I. Voigt. 2009. Integration of market pull and technology push in the corporate front end and innovation management--Insights from the German software industry. Technovation, 29(5), 351-67.
Brockner, J., 1992. The escalation of commitment to a failing course of action: toward theoretical progress. Academy of Management Review. 17 (1), 39–61.
Brouthers, K. D., 2002. Institutional, cultural and transaction cost influences on entry mode choice and performance. Journal of International Business Studies. 33, 203-221.
Carlson, R. C. and D. Rafinejad. 2008, Modeling sustainability in product development and commercialization, Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society, 28(6), 478-485.
Caves, R. E., et al., 1983. The imperfect market for technology licenses*. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics. 45, 249-267.
Chandler, A. D. 1962. Strategy and structure: Chapters in the history of the industrial enterprise. Cambridge, MA, MIT Press.
Chen, H., Hu, M. Y., 2002. An analysis of determinants of entry mode and its impact on performance. International Business Review. 11, 193-210.
Chen, Y., Puttitanun, T., 2005. Intellectual property rights and innovation in developing countries. Journal of Development Economics. 78, 474-493.
Chen, C. and C. Watanabe. 2006. Diffusion, substitution and competition dynamism inside the ICT market: The case of Japan, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 73(6), 731-759.
Chen, Y. S. 2008. The driver of green innovation and green image–Green core competence, Journal of Business Ethics, 81(3), 531-543.
Chidamber, S. R. and H. B. Kon. 1994. A research retrospective of innovation inception and success: the technology-push, demand-pull question. International Journal of Technology Management, 9(1), 94-112.
Clark, T. 2004. The fashion of management fashion: A surge too far? Organization, 11, 297–306.
Cho, D. H., Yu, P. I., 2000. Influential factors in the choice of technology acquisition mode: an empirical analysis of small and medium size firms in the Korean telecommunication industry. Technovation. 20, 691-704.
Cohen, W. M., Levinthal, D. A., 1990. Absorptive capacity: a new perspective on learning and innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly. 35.
Contractor, F. J. and W. Ra. 2002. How knowledge attributes influence alliance governance choices: A theory development note, Journal of International Management 8(1), 11-27.
Cooper, R. G. and U. De Brentani., 1984. Criteria for screening new industrial products, Industrial Marketing Management, 13(3), 149-156.
Damanpour, F. 1987. The adoption of technological, administrative, and ancillary innovations: Impact of organizational factors. Journal of Management, 13, 675–688.
DesJardins, J.: 1998, Corporate environmental responsibility, Journal of Business Ethics, 17(8), 825-838.
Dosi, C. and M. Moretto., 1997. Pollution accumulation and firm incentives to accelerate technological change under uncertain private benefits, Environmental and Resource Economics, 10(3), 285-300.
Dougherty, D. and C. Hardy., 1996. Sustained product innovation in large, mature organizations: overcoming innovation-to-organization problems, Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1120–1153.
Edquist, C., 1997, Systems of innovation: technologies, institutions, and organizations, (Routledge, London)
Ernst, H., 2001. Patent applications and subsequent changes of performance: evidence from time-series cross-section analyses on the firm level. Research Policy. 30, 143-157.
Ford, D., 1988. Develop your technology strategy. Long Range Planning. 21, 85-95.
Fraj-Andres, E., E. Martinez-Salinas and J. Matute-Vallejo., 2009. A Multidimensional Approach to the Influence of Environmental Marketing and Orientation on the Firms Organizational Performance, Journal of Business Ethics, 88(2), 263-286.
Frazier, P. A., Tix, A. P. and Barron, K. E. 2004. Testing moderator and mediator effects in counseling psychology research. Journal of Counseling Psychology. 51, 115-134.
Gallouj, F., and Weinstein, O. 1997. Innovation in services. Research Policy, 26, 537–555.
Georgantzas, N. C., and Shapiro, H. J. 1993. Viable theoretical forms of synchronous production innovation. Journal of Operations Management, 11, 161–183.
Gill, J., and Whittle, S. 1993. Management by panacea: Accounting for transience. Journal of Management Studies, 30, 281–295.
Guille´n, M. F. 1994. Models of management: Work, authority, and organization in a comparative perspective. Chicago, University of Chicago Press.
Guler, I., Guille´n, M. F., and MacPherson, J. M. 2002. Global competition, institutions, and the diffusion of organizational practices: The international spread of ISO 9000 quality certificates. Administrative Science Quarterly, 47, 207–232.
Hamel, G. 1998. Strategy innovation and the quest for value. Sloan Management Review, 39(2) , 7–14.
Hargrave, T., and Van de Ven, A. 2006. A collective action model of institutional innovation. Academy of Management Review, 31, 864–888.
Hitt, M.A., Dacin, M.T., Levitas, E., Arregle, J.L., and Borza, A. 2000. Partner selection in a merging and developed market context: Resource-based and organizational learning perspectives. Academy of Management Journal, 43, 449–467.
Howell, J. M., and Higgins, C. A. 1990. Champions of technological innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 317–341.
Huczynski, A. A. 1993. Explaining the succession of management fads. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 4, 443–462.
Hagedoorn, J., et al., 2004. Intellectual property rights and the governance of international R&D partnerships. Journal of International Business Studies. 36, 175-186.
Hagedoorn, J., Duysters, G., 2002. External sources of innovative capabilities: the preferences for strategic alliances or mergers and acquisitions. Journal of Management Studies. 39, 167-188.
Hansen, J. A., 1992. Innovation, firm size, and firm age. Small Business Economics. 4, 37-44.
Haour, G., 1992. Stretching the knowledge-base of the enterprise through contract research. R&D Management. 22, 177-182.
Hair, J. F., W. C. Black, B. J. Babin, R. E. Anderson and R. L. Tatham., 1998. Multivariate data analysis, (Prentice hall Upper Saddle River, NJ)
Hennart, J. F., 1988. A transaction costs theory of equity joint ventures. Strategic Management Journal. 9, 361-374.
Hobday, M., 1995. East Asian latecomer firms: learning the technology of electronics. World Development. 23, 1171-1193.
Howell, J. M. and C. A. Higgins., 1990. Champions of technological innovation, Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(2), 317–341.
Hundal, M.: 2000, Life Cycle Assessment and Design for the Environment, (Dubrovnik, Croatia)
Hung, S. W., Tang R. H. 2008, Factors affecting the choice of technology acquisition mode: An empirical analysis of the electronic firms of Japan, Korea and Taiwan, Technovation, 28 (9), 551-63.
Jones, J. C. H., et al., 2001. Patents, brand-generic competition and the pricing of ethical drugs in Canada: some empirical evidence from British Columbia, 1981-1994. Applied Economics. 33, 947-956.
Kaebernick, H., S. Kara and M. Sun., 2003, Sustainable product development and manufacturing by considering environmental requirements, Robotics and Computer-Integrated Manufacturing, 19(6), 461-468.
Kalish, S. 1985, A new product adoption model with price, advertising, and uncertainty, Management Science, 31(12), 1569-1585.
Kapferer, J. N., Gibbs, P., 1992. Strategic brand management. Kogan Page London.
Keenan, M. 2003, Identifying emerging generic technologies at the national level: The UK experience, Journal of Forecasting, 22(2-3), 129-160.
Kendall, D. L. and M. T. French., 1992, Forecasting the potential for new industrial products, Industrial Marketing Management, 20(3), 177-184.
Kengpol, A., O'Brien, C., 2001. The development of a decision support tool for the selection of advanced technology to achieve rapid product development. International Journal of Production Economics. 69, 177-191.
Kogut, B., Singh, H., 1988. The effect of national culture on the choice of entry mode. Journal of International Business Studies. 411-432.
Kossek, E. E. 1989. The acceptance of human resource innovation by multiple constituencies. Personnel Psychology, 42, 263–280.
Kraemer, H. C., Stice, E., Kazdin, A., Offord, D., and Kupfer, D. 2001. How do risk factors work together? Moderators, mediators, independent, overlapping, and proxy risk factors. American Journal of Psychiatry. 158, 848-856.
Lane, P. J., Lubatkin, M., 1998. Relative absorptive capacity and interorganizational learning. Strategic Management Journal. 19, 461-477.
Lee, M., Om, K., 1994. A conceptual framework of technological innovation management. Technovation. 14, 7-16.
Levin, R. C., A. K. Klevorick, R. R. Nelson, S. G. Winter, R. Gilbert and Z. Griliches., 1987, Appropriating the returns from industrial research and development, Brookings Papers on Economic Activity, 1987(3), 783-831.
MacDonald, G. and M. Ryall., 2004, How do value creation and competition determine whether a ﬁrm appropriates value? , Management Science, 50(10), 1319–1333.
Mackey, A., T. B. Mackey and J. B. Barney., 2007, Corporate social responsibility and firm performance: Investor preferences and corporate strategies, Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 817-835.
Mahajan, V. and R. A. Peterson., 1978, Innovation diffusion in a dynamic potential adopter population, Management Science, 24(15), 1589-1597.
Maine, E. and E. Garnsey., 2006, Commercializing generic technology: The case of advanced materials ventures, Research Policy, 35(3), 375-393.
March, J. G., 1991. How decisions happen in organizations. Human-Computer Interaction. 6, 95-117.
Mathews, J. A., 2002. Competitive advantages of the latecomer firm: A resource-based account of industrial catch-up strategies. Asia Pacific Journal of Management. 19, 467-488.
Mathews, J. A., Cho, D. S., 1999. Combinative capabilities and organizational learning in latecomer firms: The case of the Korean semiconductor industry. Journal of World Business. 34, 139-156.
Mayer, J., 2002. 5 Globalization, technology transfer and skill accumulation in low-income countries. Globalization, Marginalization and Development. 62.
McCabe, D. 2002. Waiting for dead mens shoes: Towards a cultural understanding of management innovation. Human Relations, 55, 505–536.
McConnell, J. J., Nantell, T. J., 1985. Corporate combinations and common stock returns: The case of joint ventures. The Journal of Finance. 40, 519-536.
Moon, C. W., 1998. Technological capacity as a determinant of governance form in international strategic combinations. The Journal of High Technology Management Research. 9, 35-53.
Mowery, D. C., et al., 1998. Technological overlap and interfirm cooperation: implications for the resource-based view of the firm. Research Policy. 27, 507-523.
Nelson, R. R. 1959. The simple economics of basic scientific research, The Journal of Political Economy, 297-306.
Nerkar, A. and S. Shane., 2007. Determinants of invention commercialization: An empirical examination of academically sourced inventions, Strategic Management Journal, 28(11), 1155-1166.
Nerkar, A. A., R. G. McGrath and I. C. MacMillan., 1996. Three facets of satisfaction and their influence on the performance of innovation teams, Journal of Business Venturing, 11(3), 167–188.
Nevens, T. M., G. L. Summe and B. Uttal., 1990, Commercializing technology: What the best companies do, Harvard Business Review, 68(3), 154-163.
Noori, H., 1990. Managing the dynamics of new technology: Issues in manufacturing management. Prentice Hall.
Park, W. G., 2008. International patent protection: 1960-2005. Research Policy. 37, 761-766.
Perez-Bustamante, G. 1999, Knowledge management in agile innovative organisations, Journal of Knowledge Management, 3(1), 6-17.
Peteraf, M.A., 1993. The cornerstones of competitive advantage: a resource-based view. Strategic Management Journal 14 (3), 179–191.
Pisano, G. P. 1996. The development factory: Unlocking the potential for process innovation. Cambridge, MA, Harvard Business School Press.
Podsakoff, P. M. and D. W. Organ., 1986, Self-reports in organizational research: Problems and prospects, Journal of Management, 12(4), 531-544.
Porter, M. E., Fuller, M. B., 1986. Coalitions and global strategy. Competition in Global Industries. 1, 315–343.
Porter, M. E. and C. van der Linde., 1995, Green and com-petitive: Ending the stalemate, Harvard Business Review, 73(5), 120-134.
Rogers, E. M. 1995, Diffusion of innovations, (Free Press, New York)
Rothaermel, F. T., Boeker, W., 2008. Old technology meets new technology: complementarities, similarities, and alliance formation. Strategic Management Journal. 29, 47-77.
Schmookler, J., 1966. Invention and Economic Growth, Cambridge, Mass. Harvard University Press,
Schumpeter, J.A., 1961. Theory of Economic Development, New York, Oxford University Press.
Scott, S. G. and R. A. Bruce., 1994, Determinants of innovative behavior: a path model of individual innovation in the workplace, Academy of Management Journal, 37(3), 580–607.
Shane, S. A. 2004, Academic entrepreneurship: University spinoffs and wealth creation, (Edward Elgar Publishing, UK)
Shin, J. S., 1996. The economics of the latecomers: catching-up, technology transfer, and institutions in Germany, Japan, and South Korea. Routledge.
Slater, S. F. and J. J. Mohr., 2006, Successful development and commercialization of technological innovation: insights based on strategy type, Journal of Product Innovation Management, 23(1), 26-33.
Sivadas, E., Dwyer, F. R., 2000. An examination of organizational factors influencing new product success in internal and alliance-based processes. The Journal of Marketing. 64, 31-49.
Stern, G. S., McCants, T. R., and Pettine, P. W. 1982. The relative contribution of controllable and uncontrollable life events to stress and illness. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 8, 140-145.
Stiglitz, J. E., 1989. Markets, market failures, and development. The American Economic Review. 79, 197-203.
Studdard, N. L. 2006, The effectiveness of entrepreneurial firms knowledge acquisition from a business incubator, International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 2, 211-225.
Tan, L. T., Hwang, A. R., 2002. Imported technology and R&D in the Taiwanese electronic industry. Review of Development Economics. 6, 77-90.
Teece, D. J. 1986, Profiting from technological innovation: implications for integration, collaboration, licensing and public policy, Research Policy, 15(6), 285–305.
Teece, D. J., 1992. Competition, cooperation, and innovation:: Organizational arrangements for regimes of rapid technological progress. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization. 18, 1-25.
Tichy, N. M., and Sandstrom, T. 1974. Organizational innovations in Sweden. Columbia Journal of World Business, 9(2), 18–28.
Tidd, J., Trewhella, M. J., 1997. Organizational and technological antecedents for knowledge acquisition and learning. R&D Management. 27, 359-375.
Tornatzky, L. G. and K. J. Klein., 1982, Innovation characteristics and adoption-implementation, IEEE Transactions on Engineering Management, 29(1), 28-45.
Tsai K. H., Wang J. C. 2008. External technology acquisition and firm performance: A longitudinal study. Journal of Business Venturing. 23 (1), 91-112.
Tsang, E. W. K., 1997. Choice of international technology transfer mode: A resource-based view. MIR: Management International Review. 151-168.
Ulku S., Toktay L. B., 2005. Yucesan E. The impact of outsourced manufacturing on timing of entry in uncertain markets. Production and Operations Management. 14 (3), 301-314.
Van De Vrande, V., W. Vanhaverbeke, G. Duysters. 2009, External technology sourcing: The effect of uncertainty on governance mode choice, Journal of Business Venturing, 24 (1), 62-80.
Wade, J. 1996, A community-level analysis of sources and rates of technological variation in the microprocessor market, Academy of Management Journal, 39(5), 1218–1244.
Wigglesworth, D. C., 1981. HRD in China. Training and Development Journal.
Williams, B. L., H. K. Suen, S. E. Rzasa, T. Heikkila and M. Pennock-Roman., 2003, Diffusion of US army chemical weapons disposal technologies: public perception of technology attributes, Journal of Environmental Planning and Management, 46(4), 499-522.
Wiser, R., Pickle, S. and C. Goldman., 1997, Renewable energy and restructuring: policy solutions for the financing dilemma, The Electricity Journal, 10(10), 65-75.
Utterback, J. M. 1994. Mastering the dynamics of innovation: How companies can seize opportunities in the face of technological change. Boston, Harvard Business School Press.
Yoshikawa, T., 2003. Technology development and acquisition strategy. International Journal of Technology Management. 25, 666-674.
Young, G. R., Bradford Jr, S., 1977. Joint ventures: planning & action. Financial Executives Research Foundation, New York.
Yu F. L. T., 2005. Technological strategies and trajectories of Hong Kong's manufacturing firms. International Journal of Technology Management. 29 (1), 21-39.
Zbaracki, M. J. 1998. The rhetoric and reality of total quality management. Administrative Science Quarterly, 43, 602–638.

指導教授

洪秀婉(Shiu-wan Hung)

審核日期

2011-10-28

推文