三篇能源經濟的應用

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：30

、訪客IP：52.15.59.163

姓名

卓金和(Chin-ho Cho) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

經濟學系

論文名稱

三篇能源經濟的應用
(Three Essays on Energy Economic)

相關論文

★ 我國LED照明產業技術進步之研究:可計算一般均衡模型之應用	★ 亞洲國家石油消費之實證研究
★ 1999-2010年影響臺灣家庭貧窮現象之因素	★ 台灣區域GDP估計與都會區發展研究
★ 從產業關聯表檢視美國再工業化成效	★ 從產業關聯表檢視中國大陸進口替代之情形
★ 事業廢棄物清除處理之分析：綠色國民所得帳與CGE模型之應用	★ 空氣污染防制政策與綠色國民所得之一般均衡分析
★ 台灣水污染防治效果的一般均衡分析	★ 開放體系下之資本移動性與貨幣政策目標效果
★ 解構證券交易所成功要素--跨國性研究，兼論台灣與香港證交所之競爭	★ 臺指期貨選擇權套利效率性之研究
★ 制度與經濟成長	★ 公共資本與台灣經濟成長
★ 台灣領先指標對景氣循環預測能力的探討	★ 國外波動對台灣經濟的影響：動態隨機一般均衡模型之應用

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

石油是全世界最重要的能源之一，然而在這幾年石油價格波動的十分明顯，特別在1970年代以後。舉例來說，在2008年六月，石油價格暴漲至每桶133.93美元。因此許多學者也提出解釋和討論。因此在本文中，我們也利用許多不同的面向來觀察石油需求、石油價格以及對於環境的影響。
首先在第二節我們嘗試利用追蹤資料(Panel data)單根、共整合分析檢定1971-2005年亞洲國家的石油需求。為什麼要探討亞洲地區呢?原因是因為根據International Energy Agency (IEA) 預測2008到2030年世界的能源需求將增加45%，其中絕大部份的需求都是來自於亞洲地區，因此研究亞洲的能源需求是有其必要性。在我們的實証結果發現在所得彈性的部份，亞洲的所得彈性高於其他地區，可見未來石油價格上升將會造成亞洲國家急速通貨膨脹。另外在價格彈性的部份，所有的國家價格彈性都非常無彈性，代表未來石油價格上升並不會造成石油消費減少，反而只會造成急速通貨膨脹。因此相較於其他地區，亞洲地區未來將面臨較嚴重的通貨膨脹問題。而其中再生能源可以幫助抑制石油消費增加。
在第三節我們為了觀察在供需均衡下，石油價格以及溫度之間的關係，本篇文章我們首先利用empirical mode decomposition (EMD) approach將石油價格進行分解並將趨勢刪除。此外，為了避免變數之間階次不同而造成分配的不收斂，我們將利用autoregressive distributed lag (ARDL) framework來觀察變數之間的關係。最後我們利用Hansen(1996, 1997, 2000)所提出的門檻檢定來觀察石油價格以及全球溫度的關係。在我們的實證結果中發現，當全球溫度低於門檻值時，全球溫度的上升將舒緩石油價格的上漲。但當全球溫度高於門檻值時，全球暖化將無法抑制石油價格波動。
在第四節中這我們嘗試利用追蹤資料(Panel data)單根、共整合分析檢定OECD22個國家中二氧化碳和所得之間的關係，換句話說就是檢定環境庫茲耐曲線(Environmental Kuznets Curve)是否存在。當環境庫茲耐曲線成立時，環境汙染的問題將會隨著所得增加而獲得改善。另外為了檢驗其他溫室氣體是否也符合環境庫茲耐曲線，我們考慮Total greenhouse gas (TGHG), methane(CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O)三個變數。我們的實證結果發現能源使用仍然是造成二氧化碳排放的主因。另外在環境庫茲耐曲線的部分我們發現在傳統的二氧化碳以及TGHG, CH4 and N2O環境汙染以及所得呈現二次式的關係。所以根據我們的實證結果可以發現，OECD國家在利用panel的估計方式時所得以及汙染呈現二次式的關係。但當估計的方式是個別國家時，大部分的國家呈現不符合環境庫茲耐曲線。

摘要(英)

Crude oil is the one of the most important energy resources in the world and its prices have fluctuated widely, especially since the early 1980s. However, the higher oil price will exert upward pressure on the inflation rate in the world and thereby damage the global economy. Thus, in this paper we investigate the oil demand, oil price as well as environment Kuznets curve. In chapter 2, we attempt to use panel fully-modified OLS approach to example the crude oil demand in Asian countries over the period 1971-2005. The empirical results support that in comparison with OECD countries, GDP still plays an important role in explaining the demand for crude oil in Asian countries. In terms of price elasticity show that raising the oil price due to oil depletion in the future will not easily reduce oil consumption and will only result in extreme inflation. Moreover, we found that renewable energy has effect in terms of reducing oil consumption in Asian countries. In chapter 3, we have attempted to examine the relationships among the crude oil price, global activities index, global temperature as well as the exchange rate over the period from January 1982 to December 2009, using the EMD, ARDL and threshold regression approach. The results indicate that the long-run elasticity of the oil price in relation to global activities is found to be 0.398, which is lower than the finding of He et al. (2010). These results are possibly due to recent improvements in technology that have led to a reduction in demand for crude oil as global activities increase. Furthermore, we have found that global warming will help to reduce the oil price as the global temperature remains below the threshold value. However, after it exceeds the threshold value, as the global temperature continues to rise, it will have no effect in terms of reducing the oil price. In chapter 3, we attempt to use panel unit root and panel cointegration tests as well as the fully-modified OLS approach to examine the relationships among carbon dioxide (CO2) emissions, energy use and GDP for 22 OECD countries (Annex II Parties) over the 1971-2000 period. Furthermore, in order to investigate these results for other direct greenhouse gases (GHGs), we have estimated the Environmental Kuznets Curve (EKC) hypothesis by using the total greenhouse gas (TGHG), methane (CH4) and nitrous oxide (N2O). The empirical results support that energy use still plays an important role in explaining the GHG emissions for OECD countries. In terms of the EKC hypothesis, the results showed that a quadratic relationship was found to exist in the long run. Thus, other countries could learn from the developed countries in this regard and try to smooth the EKC curve at relatively less cost.

關鍵字(中)

★ 石油價格
★ 追蹤資料
★ 門檻迴歸
★ 石油需求

關鍵字(英)

★ threshold regression
★ EKC curve
★ oil price
★ Oil demand

論文目次

Chapter 1: Introduction………………………………………………...1
Chapter 2: Oil demand and energy security in Asian countries……..3
I. Introduction………………………………………………………………………3
II. Crude oil consumption…………………………………...………….……….......5
III. Literature survey…………………………………………………………….……6
IV. Data……………………………………………………………………………..12
V. Methodology……………………………………………………………………13
VI. Empirical results………………………………………………………………...15
VII. Conclusion………………………………………………………………………19
References…………………………………………………………………………....21
Chapter 3: The Effect of Global Activities and Warming on Oil Price…………………………………………………………………….24
I. Introduction……………………………………………………………………..24
II. Model and data………………………………………………………………….29
III. Methodology……………………………………………………………………30
IV. Empirical results………………………………………………………………...33
V. Conclusion………………………………………………………………………37
References……………………………………………………………………………39
Chapter 4: Environment Kuznets curve for GHG emissions: A panel cointegration analysis for OECD countries…………………………..43
I. Introduction………………………………………………………………...…...43
II. Literature survey………………………………………………………………...44
III. Data……………………………………………………………………………..51
IV. Methodology……………………………………………………………………52
V. Empirical results………………………………………………………………...53
VI. Conclusion………………………………………………………………………57
References……………………………………………………………………………59
Chapter 5: Conclusion…………………………………………………62

參考文獻

Al-faris, A.F., 1997. Demand for oil products in the GCC countries. Energy Policy 25, 55-61.
Altinay, G., 2007. Short-run and long-run elasticities of import demand for crude oil in Turkey. Energy Policy 35, 5829-5835.
Bentzen, J., Engsted, T., 2001. A revival of the autoregressive distributed lag model in estimating energy demand relationships. Energy 26, 45-55.
Bhattacharyya, S.C., Blake, A., 2009. Domestic demand for petroleum products in MENA countries. Energy Policy 37, 1552-1560.
Breitung, J., 2000. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Baltagi, B.H. (Ed.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 161-177.
British Petroleum, 2008. BP Statistical Review of World Energy 2008. BP Global (http://www.bp.com/sectiongenericarticle.do?categoryId=9023753&contentId=7044109), accessed on 20 January 2009.
Cooper, J.C.B., 2003. Price elasticity of demand for crude oil: estimates for 23 countries. OPEC Review 27, 1-8.
Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A., 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregression time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 427-432.
Galindo, L.M., 2005. Short-run and long-run demand for energy in Mexico: a cointegration approach. Energy Policy 33, 1179-1185.
Gately, D., Huntington, H.G., 2002. The asymmetric effects of changes in price and income on energy and oil demand. The Energy Journal 23, 19-55.
Ghosh, S., 2009. Import demand of crude oil and economic growth: evidence from India. Energy Policy 37, 699-702.
Ghouri, S.S., 2001. Oil demand in North America: 1980-2020. OPEC Review 25, 339-355.
Hughes, J.E., Knittel, C.R., Sperling, D., 2008. Evidence of a shift in the short-run price elasticity of gasoline demand. Energy Journal 29, 93-114.
IEA, 2008. World Energy Outlook 2008, Paris.
Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115, 53-74.
Krichene, N., 2002. World crude oil and natural gas: a demand and supply model. Energy Economics 24, 557-576.
Krichene, N., 2005. A simultaneous equations model for world crude oil and natural gas markets. International Monetary Fund. IMF Working Paper WP/05/32. Washington, DC.
Levin, A., Lin, C.F., Chu, C., 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108, 1-24.
Narayan, P.K., Smyth, R., 2007. A panel cointegration analysis of the demand for oil in the Middle East. Energy Policy 35, 6258-6265.
Narayan, P.K., Smyth, R., Prasad, A., 2007. Electricity consumption in G7 countries: a panel cointegration analysis of residential demand elasticities. Energy Policy 35, 4485-4494.
Narayan, P.K., Wong, P., 2009. A panel data analysis of the determinants of oil consumption: the case of Australia. Applied Energy 86, 2771-2775.
Pedroni, P., 2000. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Oxford Bulletin of Economics and Statistics 61, 653-670.
Pedroni, P., 2001. Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics 15, 93-130.
Pedroni, P., 2004. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis: new results. Econometric Theory 20, 597-627.
Pesaran, M.H., Smith, R., Akiyama, T., 1998. Energy demand in Asian economies. Oxford University Press, Oxford.
REN 21, Renewable energy policy network for the 21st century, Renewables global status report. 2009 Update, REN21 Secretariat, Paris (2009)
Sadorsky, P., 2009. Renewable energy consumption and income in emerging economies. Energy Policy 37, 4021-4028.
Vita, G.D., Endresen, K., Hunt, L.C., 2006. An empirical analysis of energy demand in Namibia. Energy Policy 34, 3447-3463.
Adelman, M. A., Watkins, G. C., 2005. U.S. oil and natural gas reserve prices, 1982-2003. Energy Economics 27: 553-571.
Altinay, G., 2007. Short-run and long-run elasticities of import demand for crude oil in Turkey. Energy Policy 35: 5829-5835.
Amato, A. D, Ruth, M., Kirshen, P., Horwitz, J., 2005. Regional energy demand responses to climate change: Methodology and application to the Commonwealth of Massachusetts. Climatic Change 71: 175-201.
Bessec, M., Fouquau, J., 2008. The non-linear link between electricity consumption and temperature in Europe: A threshold panel approach. Energy Economics 30: 2705-2721.
Bigano, A., Bosello, F., Marano, G., 2006. Energy demand and temperature: A dynamic panel analysis. FEEM Nota Di Lavoro.
Bloomberg, S. B., Harris, E. S., 1995. The commodity-consumer price connection: Fact or fable? Fed. Reserve Board N.Y. Econ. Policy Rev. October, 20-38.
Chen, S. S., 2010. Do higher oil prices push the stock market into bear territory? Energy Economics 32: 490-495.
Chen, S. S., Chen, H. C., 2007. Oil prices and real exchange rates. Energy Economics 29: 390-404.
El-Sharif, I., Brown, D., Burton, B., Nixon, B., Russell, A., 2005. Evidence on the nature and extent of the relationship between oil prices and equity values in the UK. Energy Economics 27: 819-830.
Florides, G. A., Kalogirou, S. A., Tassou, S. A., Wrobel, L. C., 2000. Modelling of the modern houses of Cyprus and energy consumption analysis. Energy 25: 915-937.
Gately, D., Huntington, H. G., 2002. The asymmetric effects of changes in price and income on energy and oil demand. The Energy Journal 23: 19-55.
Ghosh, S., 2009. Import demand of crude oil and economic growth: Evidence from India. Energy Policy 37: 699-702.
Ghouri, S. S., 2001. Oil demand in North America: 1980-2020. OPEC Review 25: 339-355.
Hamilton, J., 2009. Causes and consequences of the oil shock of 2007-08. Presented at the Brookings Panel on Economic Activity. April.
Hansen, B. E., 2000. Sampling splitting and threshold estimation. Econometrica 68:575-603.
Hansen, B. E., 1997. Inference in TAR models. Studies in Nonlinear Dynamics and
Econometrics 2: 1-14.
Hansen, B. E., 1996. Inference when a nuisance parameter is not identified under the null hypothesis. Econometrica 64: 413-430.
He, Y., Wang, S., Lai, K. K., 2010. Global economic activity and crude oil prices: A cointegration analysis. Energy Economics 32: 868-876.
Huang, B. N., Hwang, M. J., Peng, H. P., 2005. The asymmetry of the impact of oil price shocks on economic activities: An application of the multivariate threshold model. Energy Economics 27: 445-476.
Huang, B. N., Yang, C. W., Hwang, M. J., 2009. The dynamics of a nonlinear relationship between crude oil spot and futures prices: A multivariate threshold regression approach. Energy Economics 31: 91-98.
Huang, NE., Shen, Z., Long, S. R., 1998. The empirical mode decomposition and the Hilbert spectrum for nonlinear and nonstationary time series analysis. Process of the Royal Society of London A 454: 903-995.
Hunt, L. C., Judge, G., Ninomiya, Y., 2003. Modelling Underlying Energy Demand Trends. Surrey Energy Economics Discussion paper Series.
Krichene, N., 2002. World crude oil and natural gas: A demand and supply model. Energy Economics 24: 557-576.
Krichene, N., 2005. A simultaneous equations model for world crude oil and natural gas markets. WP/05/32, International Monetary Fund.
Krichene, N., 2006. World crude oil markets: Monetary policy and the recent oil shock. Tech. Rep. WP/06/62, International Monetary Fund.
Kilian, L., 2008. Not all oil price shocks are alike: Disentangling demand and supply shocks in the crude oil market. Forthcoming in American Economic Review.
Laurenceson, J., Chai, C. H., 2003. Financial Reform and Economic Development in China. Cheltenham, UK, Edward Elgar.
Mirasgedis, S., Sarafidis, Y., Georgopoulou, E., Lalas, D. P., Moschovits, M., Karagiannis, F., Papakonstantinou, D., 2004. Models for mid-term electricity demand forecasting incorporating weather influences. Energy 31: 208-227.
Narayan, P. K., Smyth, R., 2007. A panel cointegration analysis of the demand for oil in the Middle East. Energy Policy 35: 6258-6265.
Petrick, S., Rehdanz, K., Tol, R. S. J., (2010). The Impact of Temperature Changes on Residential Energy Consumption. Kiel Working Paper No. 1618.
Pesaran, M. H., Shin, Y., Smith, R. J., 2001. Bounds testing approaches to the analysis of level relationships. Journal of Applied Econometrics 16: 289-326.
Postali, F. A. S., Picchetti, P., 2006. Geometric Brownian motion and structural breaks in oil prices: A quantitative analysis. Energy Economics 28: 506-522.
Radchenko, S., 2005. Oil price volatility and the asymmetric response of gasoline prices to oil price increases and decreases. Energy Economics 27: 708-730.
Regnier, E., 2007. Oil and energy price volatility. Energy Economics 29: 405-427.
Vaage, K., 2000. Heating technology and energy use: a discrete / continuous choice approach to Norwegian household energy demand. Energy Economics 22: 649-666.
Weron, R., 2000. Energy price risk management. Physica A 285: 127-134.
Wirl, F., 2008. Why do oil prices jump (or fall)? Economic Policy 36: 1029-1043.
Yousefi, A., Wirjanto, T. S., 2004. The empirical role of the exchange rate on the crude-oil price formation. Energy Economics 26: 783-799.
Zhang, X., Lai, K. K., Wang, S. Y., 2008. A new approach for crude oil price analysis based on empirical mode decomposition. Energy Economics 30: 905-918.
Zhang, X., Yu, L., Wang, S. Y., Lai, K. K., 2009. Estimating the impact of extreme events on crude oil price: An EMD-based event analysis method. Energy Economics 31: 768-778.
Akbostanci, E., Turut-Asik, S., Tunc, G.I., 2009. The relationship between income and environment in Turkey: Is there an environmental Kuznets curve? Energy Policy 37, 861-867.
Ang, J.B., 2007. CO2 emissions, energy consumption, and output in France. Energy Policy 35, 4772-4778.
Apergis, N., Payne, J.E., 2009. CO2 emissions, energy usage, and output in Central America. Energy Policy 37, 3282-3286.
Breitung, J., 2000. The local power of some unit root tests for panel data. In: Baltagi, B.H. (Ed.), Nonstationary Panels, Panel Cointegration and Dynamic Panels. Elsevier, Amsterdam, pp. 161-177.
Cole, M.A., 2004. Trade, the pollution haven hypothesis and the environmental Kuznets curve: examining the linkages. Ecological Economics 48, 71-81.
Dickey, D.A., Fuller, W.A., 1979. Distribution of the estimators for autoregression time series with a unit root. Journal of the American Statistical Association 74, 427-432.
Esmaeili, A., Abdollahzadeh, N., 2009. Oil exploitation and the environmental Kuznets curve. Energy Policy 37, 371-374.
Galeotti, M., Lanza, A., Pauli, F., 2006. Reassessing the environmental Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A robustness exercise. Ecological Economics 57, 152-163.
Grossman, G.M., Krueger, A.B., 1995. Economic growth and the environment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics 110, 353-377.
Halicioglu, F., 2009. An econometric study of CO2 emissions, energy consumption, income and foreign trade in Turkey. Energy Policy 37, 1156-1164.
Halkos, G.E., Tsionas, E.G., 2001. Environmental Kuznets curves: Bayesian evidence from switching regime models. Energy Economics 23, 191-210.
Harbaugh, W.T., Levinson, A., Wilson, D.M., 2002. Re-examining the empirical evidence for an environmental Kuznets curve. The Review of Economics and Statistics 84, 541-551.
Heerink, N., Mulatu, A., Bulte, E., 2001. Income inequality and the environment: aggregation bias in environmental Kuznets curves. Ecological Economics 38, 359-367.
Huang, W.M., Lee, G.W.M., Wu, C.C., 2008. GHG emissions, GDP growth and the Kyoto Protocol: A revisit of the Environmental Kuznets Curve hypothesis. Energy Policy 36, 239-247.
Im, K.S., Pesaran, M.H., Shin, Y., 2003. Testing for unit roots in heterogeneous panels. Journal of Econometrics 115, 53-74.
Inmaculada, M.Z., Aurelia, B.M., 2004. Pooled mean group estimation of an environmental Kuznets curve for CO2. Economics Letters 82, 121-126.
Jalil, A., Mahmud, S.F., 2009. Environment Kuznets curve for CO2 emissions: A cointegration analysis for China. Energy Policy, forthcoming.
Kristrom, B., Lundgren, T., 2005. Swedish CO2 emissions 1900-2010: an exploratory note. Energy Policy 33, 1223-1230.
Levin, A., Lin, C.F., Chu, C., 2002. Unit root tests in panel data: asymptotic and finite-sample properties. Journal of Econometrics 108, 1-24.
Lise, W., 2006. Decomposition of CO2 emissions over 1980–2003. Energy Policy 34, 1841-1852.
Luzzati, T., Orsini, M., 2009. Investigating the energy-environmental Kuznets curve. Energy 34, 291-300.
Pedroni, P., 2000. Critical values for cointegration tests in heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics 61, 653-670.
Pedroni, P., 2001. Fully modified OLS for heterogeneous cointegrated panels. Advances in Econometrics 15, 93-130.
Pedroni, P., 2004. Panel cointegration: asymptotic and finite sample properties of pooled time series tests with an application to the PPP hypothesis: new results. Econometric Theory 20, 597-627.
Perman, R., Stern, D., 2003. Evidence from panel unit root and cointegration tests that the environmental Kuznets curve does not exist. The Australian Journal of Agricultural and Resource Economics 47, 325-347.
Stern, D.I., Common, M.S.,2001. Is there an environmental Kuznets curve for sulfur?. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management 41, 162-178.
United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change, 2008. GHG Data. Climate Change Secretariat, Bonn, Germany.
World Bank, 1992. World Bank Development Report 1992. Oxford University Press, New York.

指導教授

楊浩彥、朱雲鵬
(Hao-Yen Yang、Yun-Peng Chu)

審核日期

2011-7-22

推文