廣告訴求方式與來源可信度對於綠色產品廣告效果之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：84

、訪客IP：3.147.65.47

姓名

黃騰翰(Teng-han Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

廣告訴求方式與來源可信度對於綠色產品廣告效果之影響
(The influence of advertising appeals and source credibility on green product advertisements.)

相關論文

★ 半導體二手設備之行銷策略－以應用材料公司為例	★ 從創新擴散角度探討新科技技術行銷策略之影響 —以全球資訊大廠推廣Web Services為例
★ 企業多角化經營策略之研究 ─以某機構拓展資訊應用服務市場為例	★ 汽車產業網站行銷之應用與效益探討研究－以N品牌為例
★ 系統整合業轉型策略之探討--以A公司為例	★ 顧客關係管理系統導入之研究－以A、B公司為例
★ 策略聯盟個案分析－以台灣光碟機廠商為例	★ 資訊教育訓練機構的轉型策略 —以某資訊教育機構為例
★ 組織文化及組織承諾對組織變革影響之研究－以外商銀行與本國銀行資訊部門為例	★ 高階資訊教育市場行銷策略與會員制度之研究-資訊教育產業為例
★ 探討平衡計分卡在售前技術支援部門績效管理的運用 - 以外商資訊科技公司為例	★ 軟體行銷策略與競爭優勢分析－以全球二家資訊大廠為例
★ 綠色供應鏈管理研究-以Ａ公司為例	★ 企業專案管理系統 - 提升專案即時資訊透通性及其效益分析
★ 金融軟體專案管理導入國際專案管理師（PMP）專案管理機制之效益分析	★ 企業轉型與其資源基礎之關係研究及轉型策略之發展-以M公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

綠色風潮的興起，已在近年來的消費市場造成一定的影響，許多廠商趨之若鶩的推出新產品，綠色產品的廣告更是一波接一波的對消費者放送，不論是強調節能、省電、無汙染，或是任何愛地球的宣言，目的皆是為了打動消費者的心，進而增加廠商的獲利。
然而，當民眾在觀看這些綠色產品的廣告時，企業採行的廣告訴求是否能確實打動消費者的心呢？Kotler（1995）認為，廣告訴求應思索對目標顧客所重視之訊息，才能藉此了解顧客願意購買之主因。而且對於綠色產品的介紹和推廣，勢必得說服消費者此產品所能為地球、為環境帶來之幫助和效益，那麼廣告中所使用的支持數據或相關推薦內容，是否能被顧客所接納和採信呢？許多研究皆證實，當訊息具有來源可信度時，即可有效提升產品的說服效果與產品價值，更可能改變消費者對產品的態度與行為（Petty & Cacioppo, 1981; Ohanian, 1990; Bohner et al., 2002; Reimer et al., 2005.）。而目前在綠色產品廣告的相關研究中，對於探討廣告訴求與來源可信度之研究是相對匱乏的，因此，本研究透過相關文獻回顧，針對綠色產品廣告，探討在不同廣告訴求（感性訴求和理性訴求）與不同來源可信度（高來源可信度和低來源可信度）之下，廣告內容是如何影響消費者對於綠色產品的態度、感受，以及後續的消費行為。
本研究主要操弄廣告訴求與來源可信度為兩個自變項，探討對廣告效果（廣告態度、品牌態度與購買意願）之影響；此外，更進一步嘗試在綠色產品廣告中加入產品涉入程度（高涉入與低涉入）作為干擾變數，檢測產品涉入程度之差異是否會對廣告效果產生影響。本研究採實驗設計方式，總共兩個實驗，皆為2*2的實驗設計，透過分派受測者至不同情境的環境中觀看不同的廣告內容，經實驗人員說明與觀看後即進行問卷填答。本研究運用SPSS 17.0與其他統計軟體加以分析研究資料與假說驗證。
研究結果顯示：(1) 具感性訴求的綠色產品廣告效果優於具理性訴求之廣告效果；(2) 具高來源可信度的綠色產品廣告效果優於具低來源可信度之廣告效果；(3) 當產品涉入程度高時，具理性訴求的綠色產品廣告效果優於具感性訴求之廣告效果；反之，當產品涉入程度低時，具感性訴求的綠色產品廣告效果優於具理性訴求之廣告效果；(4) 不論產品涉入程度高或低，具高來源可信度的綠色產品廣告效果皆優於具低來源可信度之廣告效果。

摘要(英)

The recent trend towards being “green” has had certain undeniable effects upon the consumer market, with many companies rapidly introducing new “green” products. Consumers are constantly exposed to more and more advertisements for these items. Such ads stress how the product will save energy, use low amounts of power, or not produce pollution. Although the ads used this or any other appeal to the consumer to “love the planet”, their real goal is to emotionally move a consumer into buying the product, thereby increasing the company’s revenue.
Thus, does the sight of advertisements for green products, and appeals made by the companies really influence consumers to purchase them? Kotler (1995) believes that in order to understand what factors would cause a consumer to purchase a product, companies should consider what their target demographic wants. In order to successfully promote a Green product, the advertisements must explain how this product would benefit the Earth and the environment. It must convince potential buyers that this information is accurate and trustworthy, that the claims and supporting data used in the advertisement can really be accepted and believed by consumers. Many studies done on this subject have come to the conclusion that, if the data or figures comes from a trusted, reliable source, they do increase the perceived trustworthiness and value of said product, and can change how consumers view and feel about the product（Petty & Cacioppo, 1981; Ohanian, 1990; Bohner et al., 2002; Reimer et al., 2005.） So far, in the literature related to the subject of green product advertisements, there has been insufficient research conducted on the accuracy and trustability of the information source on data included in these advertisements. Thus, in this study, through a review of related documents, we attempt to discover, what the effects of different types of advertisement appeals (Emotional or Rational) and the credibility of different information sources (High and Low) are under various conditions, as well as what effects the advertisement contents for a green product have upon how the consumer’s views and reactions to this product and his or her subsequent purchasing behavior.
This study primarily manipulates the two variables, the advertising appeal and source credibility, in order to explore the effects of various types of advertising (advertising attitude, brand attitude, purchase intention). In addition, we add different levels of product involvement (high and low) to the green product advertisement as an interference variable in order to discover if differing amounts of product involvement in the advertisement has any influence on the ad’s effectiveness. The experimental
design is as follows: there are a total of two experiments, each being a 2*2 experimental design. Test subjects were assigned to different environments and then exposed to advertisements before researchers offered an explanation and they were given a questionnaire to record their responses. The SPSS 17.0 and other statistical software were employed to analyze the research data and test the hypothesis.
Research findings are as follows: (1) green products advertisements that make emotional appeals have a stronger effect than those that appeal to rational. (2) Advertisements with information from more reliable sources are more effective than those with unreliable information. (3) When product involvement is high, advertisements appealing to rational have a greater effect than those making emotional appeals. On the other hand, when the product involvement is low, advertisements making emotional appeals are more effective than those making rational ones. (4) Regardless of the amount of product involvement, high or low, advertisements with more trustable information sources had a larger effect than those without.

關鍵字(中)

★ 廣告訴求
★ 來源可信度
★ 產品涉入
★ 廣告效果

關鍵字(英)

★ advertising appeal
★ source credibility
★ product involvement
★ advertising effects

論文目次

中文摘要......................................................................................................................... i
英文摘要........................................................................................................................ ii
致謝............................................................................................................................... iv
目錄................................................................................................................................ v
表目錄.......................................................................................................................... vii
圖目錄........................................................................................................................... ix
第一章緒論
第一節研究背景與動機 .......................................................................................... 1
第二節研究問題與目的 .......................................................................................... 2
第三節研究流程 ...................................................................................................... 3
第二章文獻探討
第一節綠色產品 ...................................................................................................... 4
第二節廣告效果 ...................................................................................................... 8
第三節廣告訴求 .................................................................................................... 16
第四節來源可信度 ................................................................................................ 22
第五節產品涉入 .................................................................................................... 27
第三章研究方法
第一節研究架構 .................................................................................................... 33
第二節研究假說 .................................................................................................... 37
第三節研究變數的操作型定義與衡量 ................................................................ 43
第四節實驗設計 .................................................................................................... 46
第五節問卷設計 .................................................................................................... 49
第六節資料分析方法 ............................................................................................ 52
第四章研究結果
第一節前測分析 .................................................................................................... 54
第二節樣本結構分析 ............................................................................................ 57
第三節信度及效度分析 ........................................................................................ 60
第四節研究假說檢定 ............................................................................................ 64
第五節假說實證結果 ............................................................................................ 77
第五章研究結論與建議
第一節研究結論 .................................................................................................... 78
第二節管理意涵 .................................................................................................... 82
第三節研究限制 .................................................................................................... 84
第四節後續研究建議 ............................................................................................ 86
參考文獻...................................................................................................................... 88
中文部分 .................................................................................................................. 88
英文部分 .................................................................................................................. 89
附件.............................................................................................................................. 92

參考文獻

中文部分
丁源宏，1999，「不同媒介特性,廣告訴求與產品涉入度對廣告效果影響之探討-比較平面媒體與網際網路」，國立中山大學傳播管理學系碩士論文。
于寧，1998，「德國藍天使標章歡慶成立20 週年」，第 14 期。
王瀅潔，2009，「論點品質、訊息來源專業性與訊息相關性對廣告態度與行為意圖之影響」，傳播管理學研究所碩士論文。
江孟能，2006，「產品涉入程度對廣告代言人可信度與消費者購買意願間關係之干擾效應－以華人地區房屋與洗髮精市場為例」，未出版碩士論文，大葉大學，彰化縣。
朱曉幸，1997，「理性及感性訴求方式在不同產品涉入程度下的比較廣告效果」，交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
行政院環境保護署，2002，Green Consumer Guide: 綠色消費指南2003，頁2-3。
宋偉航（譯），1995，Sadgrove, K.（著），「綠色經理人手冊」，第一版，台北：天下文化公司。
李坤遠，1996，「訊息涉入、廣告主可信度、廣告訴求方式與廣告溝通效果關係之研究」，交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
徐達光，2003，「消費者心理學：消費者行為的科學研究」，第一版，台北：東華書局。
涂克明，2006，「品牌概念形象與廣告訴求方式對廣告效果之影響－涉入程度之干擾效果」，未出版之碩士論文，私立真理大學管理科學研究所，台北縣。
祝鳳岡，1996，「廣告理性訴求策略之策略分析」，廣告學研究，第八版，頁1-16。
張春興，1986，「心理學」，台北：東華書局。
張植芳，2007，「產品特性、涉入程度與購買目的對規範性評估與購買意圖之影響－以消費性電子產品為例」，國立成功大學高階管理碩士在職專班碩士論文。
陳姿伶，2005，「全民英檢對高中職應用外語科學生學習態度與學習行為之研究」，國立彰化師範大學工業教育與技術學系碩士論文。
陳政憲，2009，「連結效果及訊息來源可信度對廣告效果的影響」，國立高雄應用科技大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
陳逸帆，2003，「理性、感性廣告訴求下轉換意願影響因素之探討」，輔仁大學管理學研究所。
陳裕仁，2004，「名人代言人與產品相關度之研究」，輔仁大學大眾傳播學研究所碩士論文。
童曉君，1999，「廣告訴求、廣告代言人、自我監控程度、消費者與代言人之人格一致性對廣告效果的影響」，元智大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
許瓊文，1998，「網際網路標題廣告設計上的變化對廣告效果之探討」，國立彰化師範大學商業教育學系碩士論文。
黃論語，1997，「WWW 超媒體特性對網路行銷廣告效果之研究」，長庚大學管理科學系碩士論文。
汪昀蓁，2009，「網路口碑訊息訴求方式與訊息來源可信度對品牌態度之影響」，2009聯合研討會(JCMS)，頁99。
劉若蘭，2001，「訊息訴求、訊息正反性、訊息來源可信度，與消費者認知需求對廣告效果之影響」，成功大學企業管理研究所碩士論文。
劉倉賓，1998，「產品廣告訴求、涉入程度及高、低自我監控對廣告效果的影響」，交通大學管理科學研究所碩士論文。
蕭伊君，2010，「來源國形象、企業形象對購買意願之影響」，國立東華大學國際企業研究所碩士論文。
賴明伸，2001，「日本環保標章計畫執行現況」，環保標章簡訊，第23期。
詹雅婷，2010，「代言人可信度對品牌形象與購買意願影響之研究－以產品涉入程度為干擾變數」，虎尾科技大學經營管理研究所碩士論文。
英文部分
Aaker, D. A. and Norris, D., 1982, “Characteristic of TV commercials perceived as informative,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 2, No. 22, pp. 61-70.
Allport, G., 1935, “Handbook of Social Psychology Attitudes Worchester,” MA: Clark University, Vol. l, No. 2, pp. 798-844.
Arjun, C. and Morris, B. H., 1999, “The Chain of Effects from Brand Trust and Brand Affect to Brand Performance: The Role of Brand Loyalty,” Journal of Marketing, Vol.65, pp. 81-93.
Bauer, R. A. and Stephen A. G., 1968, “Advertising in America Consumer View,” Boston, MA: Harvard University.
Belch, G. E., and Belch, M. A., 1998, “Advertising and Promotion: an Integrated Marketing Communications Perspective,” Singapore：McGraw-Hill.
Berkman, H. W. and C. Gilson, 1987, “Consumer Behavior concepts and strategies,” 3rd, ed, Boston: Kent Publishing Co.
Blackwell, R. D., Engel, J. F., and Miniard, P. W., 1995, “Consumer Behavior,” 8th, ed., pp.361-401, New York: The Drydden.
Bohner, G., Einwiller, S., Herb, H. P. and Siebler, F., 2003, “When Small Means Comfortable: Relations Between Product Attributes in Two-Sided Advertising,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, Vol. 13, No. 4, pp. 454-463.
Brooker, G. W., Jr., 1981, “A Comparison of the Persuasive Effects of Mild Humor and Mild Fear Appeals,” Journal of Advertising, Vol. 10, No. 4, pp. 29-41.
Bruce A. H., Jane M. N., Rajesh V. M., and Malcolm C. S., 2009, “Effects of age, need for cognition, and affective intensity on advertising effectiveness,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 12-17.
Celsi, R. L. and Olson, J. C., 1988, “The Role of Involvement in Attention and Comprehension Processes”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 15, No. 2, pp.210-224.
Chandy, R. K., Tellis, G. J., Macinnis, D. J. and Thaivanich, P., 2001, “What to Say When: Advertising Appeals in Evolving Markets,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 38, No. 4, pp. 399-414.
Chen, F. P. and Leu, J. D., 2009, “Product Involvement in the Link between Skepticism toward Advertising and Ad Effects,” Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 153-159.
Craig, C. S. and McCann, J. M., 1978, “Assessing Communication Effects on Energy Conservation,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 5, No. 2, pp. 82-88.
Devito, J. A., 1986, “The Communication Handbook: A Dictionary,” NY: Hprper and Row.
Dodds, W. B., Kent, B. M, and Dhruv G., 1991, “The Effects of Price, Brand, and Store Information on Buyer’ Product Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 28, pp. 307-319.
D’Souza, C. and Taghian, M., 2005, “Examination of environmental beliefs and its impact on the influence of price, quality and demographic characteristics with respect to green purchase intention,” Journal of Targeting, Measurement and Analysis for Marketing, Vol. 15, pp. 69–78.
Elkington, J. and Hailes, 1993, “The Green Consumer,” Viking Penguin, USA. Inc.
Fishbein, M. and Ajzen, I., 1975, “Belief, Attitude, Intention and Behavior: An Introduction to Theory and Research Reading,” MA: Addison-Wesley: 6.
French, J. R., and Kahn, R. L. ,1962, “A programmatic approach to studying the industrial environment and mental health,” Journal of Social, Vol. 4, No. 18, pp. 1-47.
Grave, M., 1992, “The Green of Business Document: A Environmental Strategy for Micrographics,” IMC Journal, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 117-186.
Grave, M., 1992, “The Green of Business Document: A Environmental Strategy for Micrographics,” IMC Journal, Vol. 28, No. 4, pp. 117-186.
Grewal, D., Monroe, K. B. and Krishnan, R., 1998. “The effects of price comparison advertising on buyers’ perceptions of acquisition value, transaction value, and behavioral intentions,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 62, pp. 46–59.
Gunther, A.C., 1991, “What we Think Others Think—Cause and Consequence in the Third-Person Effect,” Communication Research, Vol.18, No.3, pp. 335-372.
Hotchkiss ,G. B., 1949, “Advertising Copy,” 3rd ed., New York: Harper.
Hovland, C. I. and Weiss, W., 1951, “The influence of source credibility on communication effectiveness,” Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 15, No. 4, pp. 635-650.
Hovland, C. I., Janis, I., and Kelley, H. H., 1953, “Communication and persuasion,” New Haven, Conn.: Yale University Press.
Howard, J. A., 1994, “Buyer Behavior in Marketing Strategy,” Engewood Cliffs, New Jersey：Prentice-Hall.
Howard, J. A. and Sheth, J. D., 1995, “A Theory of Buyer Behavior,” Marketing Classics: A Selection of Influential Articles, New Jersey: Prentice-Hall, Inc., pp. 137-155.
Jane M. N., Rajesh V. M., Malcolm C. S. and Bruce A. H., 2009, “Effects of age, need for cognition, and affective intensity on advertising effectiveness,” Journal of Business Research, Vol. 64, No. 1, pp. 12-17.
Jiménez, M. and Yang, C. C., 2010, "How Guilt Level Affects Green Advertising Effectiveness?" Journal of Creative Communications, Vol. 3, No. 3, pp. 231-254.
Johar, J. S. and Sirgy, M. J., 1991, “Value-Expressive Versus Utilitarian Advertising Appeals: When and Why to Use Which Appeal,” Journal of Advertising, Vol. 20, No. 3, pp. 12-23.
John V. Petrocellia, Joshua J. Clarksonb, Zakary L. Tormalac and Kristin S. Hendrix, 2010, “Perceiving Stability as a Means to Attitude Certainty: The Role of Implicit Theories of Attitudes,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 874-883.
Kawk, No-Seong and Jukes, D., 2000, “Current International Approaches to Food Claims,” Nutrition Reviews, Vol. 58, No. 12, pp. 370-377.
Kotler, P., 1991, “Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control,” 7th ed., NewJersey: Prentice-Hall.
Kotler, P., 1994, “Marketing management: analysis, planning, implementation, and control,” 8th ed., NJ：Prentice-Hall.
Kotler, P., S. H. Ang, S. M. L. and Tan C. T., 1999, “Marketing Management: an Asian Perpective,” 2nd ed., Prentice Hall.
Krech, D and Crutchfield, R. S., 1984, “Theory and Problems of Social Psychology,” New York: McGraw-Hill Book Co.
Lafferty, B. A. and Goldsmith, R. E., 1999, “Corporate Credibility’s Role in Consumers’ Attitudes and Purchase Intentions When a High versus a Low Credibility Endorser is used in the Ad,” Journal of Business Research, Vol.44, pp. 109-116.
Laroche, M., Bergeron, J., and Barbaro-Forleo, G., 2001, “Targeting consumers who are willing to pay more for environmentally friendly products,” Journal of Consumer Marketing, Vol. 18, No. 6, pp. 503.
Laskey, H. A. R. J. Fox and Crask, M. R., 1995, “The Relationship between Advertising Message Strategy and Television Commercial effectiveness,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 35, No. 2, pp. 31-39.
Lavidge, R. J., 1961, “A Model for Predictive Measurements of Advertising Effectiveness,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 25, No. 6, pp. 59-62.
Lee, M. S., 1989, “A causal model of consumer involvement,” Journal of Economic Psychology, Vol. 10, No.3, pp. 363-389.
Mackenzie,S. B., Lutz, R. J., and Belch, G. E., 1983, "Attitude Toward the Ad. As a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: Determinants and Consequences," Advance in Consumer Research, Vol.10, 532-539.
Mackenzie,S. B., Lutz, R. J., and Belch, G. E., 1986, “The Role of Attitude Toward the Ad as a Mediator of Advertising Effectiveness: A test of Competing Explanations,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 23, pp. 130-143.
Mackenzie, S. and Spreng. R., 1992, "How Does Motivation Moderate the Impact of Central and Peripheral Processing on Brand Attitudes and Intentions," Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.18, 519-29.
Makeachie, W. J. and Charlotle C. Doyle, 1968, “Psychology,” Addison-Wesley Publishing Company, Inc.
Mitchell, A. A. and J. C. Olson, 1981, “Are Product Attribute Beliefs the Only Mediator of Advertising Effects on Brand Attitude?” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 18, No. 3, pp. 318-332.
Morwitz, V.G. and Schmittlein, D, 1992, “Using Segmentation to Improve Sales Forests Based on Purchase Intent: Which Intenders Actually Buy,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 29, No. 4, pp. 391-405.
Nan, X., 2009, “The Influence of Source Credibility on Attitude Certainty: Exploring the Moderating Effects of Timing of Source Identification and Individual Need for Cognition,” Psychology and Marketing, Vol. 26, No. 4, pp. 321-332.
Neal, W. D., 2000, “For Most Consumer, Loyalty isn’t Attitude,” Marketing News, Vol.10. No.7.
Nimse, p., Vijayan, A., Kumar, A. and Varadarajan, 2007, “A Review of Green Product Database,” Environment Progress, Vol. 26, No. 2, pp. 131-137.
O’Keffe, D. J., 1992, “Persuasion: Theory and research,” Newbury Park: Sage.
Ohanian, R., 1990, “Contrast and Validation of a Scale to Measure Celebrity Endorsers’ Perceived Expertise, Trustworthiness, and Attractiveness,” Journal of Advertising, Vol.19, No.3, pp. 39-52.
Ottman, J.A., 1998, “Green Marketing: Opportunity for Innovation,” 2nd ed., Chicago: NTC Business Books.
Peattie, K., 1992, “Green Marketing,” London: Pitman Publishing.
Petty, R. E. and J. T. Cacioppo, 1981, “Attitude and Persuasion: Classic and Contemporary Approaches,” Dubuque, Iowa: Wm. C. Brown Co.
Pornpitakpan, C., 2004, “The persuasiveness of source credibility: A critical review of five decades’ evidence,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, Vol. 34, pp. 243–281.
Puto, C.P., and Wells, W.D., 1984, “Informational and transformational advertising: The differential effect of time,” In advance in consumer research, pp. 638-643.
Reimer, T., Mata, R., Katsikopoulos, K., and Opwis, K., 2005, “On the interplay between heuristic and systematic processes in persuasion,” In B.G. Bara, L. Barsalou, and M. Bucciarelli (Eds.), Proceedings of the Twenty-Seventh Annual Conference of the Cognitive Science Society, pp. 1833-1838, Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum Associates.
Rokeach, M., 1973, “The Nature Of Human Values,” New York: Free Press.
Ronald, E.T., 1999, “A six-segment message strategy wheel,” Journal of Advertising Research, Vol. 39, No. 6, pp. 7-17.
Rothschild, M. L. and William, C. G., 1981, “Behavioral Learning Theory: Its Relevance to Marketing and Promotions,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 45, No. 2, pp. 70-78.
Rosnow, R. L., 1988, “Rumor as communication: a contextualist approach”, Journal of Communication, Vol. 38, No.1, pp.12-28.
Schiffman, L. G. and L. L. Kanuk (1994).Consumer Behavior: Prentice-Hall Inc.
Schulman, G. and Worrall, C., 1970, “Salience Patterns, Source Credibility and Sleeper Effect,” Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol. 34, No. 3, pp. 371-82.
Shimp, T. A., 1981, “Attitude toward the Ad as a Mediator of Consumer Brand Choice,” Journal of Advertising, Vol. 10, No. 2, pp. 9-15.
Simon, J. L., 1995, “The Management of Advertising,” pp. 39-43, Prentice Hall.
Singh, S.N. and Rothschild, M.L., 1983, “Recognition as a Measure of Learning from Television Commercials,” Journal of Marketing Research, pp. 235-248.
Singletary, M.W., 1976, “Components of Credibility of a Favorable News Source,” Journalism Quarterly, Vol. 53, No. 2, pp. 316-319.
Snyder, M. and DeBono, K. G., 1985, “Appeals to Image and Claims about Quality: Understanding the Psychology of Advertising,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 49, No. 3, pp.568.
Tali T. H. and Sam N. L. W., 2009, “The importance of product involvement for predicting advertising effectiveness among young people,” International Journal of Advertising, Vol. 28, No. 2, pp. 203–229.
Tang, E., Fryxell, G.. and Chow, S. F., 2004, “Visual and Verbal Communication in the Design of Eco-Label for Green Consumer Products,” Journal of International Consumer Marketing, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 85-105.
Taylor, V. A., Halstead, D. and Haynes, P. J., 2010, “Consumer Responses to Christian Religious Symbols in Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 79-92.
Valerie A. Taylor, Diane Halstead, and Paula J. Haynes, 2010, “Consumer Response to Christian Religious Symbols in Advertising,” Journal of Advertising, Vol. 39, No. 2, pp. 79-92.
Wells, W. D. and David P., 1996, “Consumer Behavior,” 5th , John Wiley and Sons.
West, D., 1994, “Validating a scale for the measurement of credibility: A covariance structure modeling approach,” Journalism Quarterly, Vol,71, No. 1, pp. 159-168.
Wilkie, A. D., 1986, "A Stochastic Investment Model for Actuarial Use," Transaction of the Faculty of Actuaries, Vol,39, 341-381.
Yeh, J. T. and Lin, C. L., 2010, “Measuring the Effectiveness of Advertisements Sent Via Mobile Phone: Implications of The Appeal, Endorser, and Involvement Model and Purchasing Behavior,” Social Behavior and Personality, Vol. 38, No. 2, pp. 249-256.
Zaichkowsky, Lynn, J., 1985, “Measuring the Involvement Construct”, Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 12, pp. 341-352.
Zaichkowsky, 1994, “Research Notes: The Personal Involvement Inventory: Reduction, Revision , and Application to Advertising ,” Journal of Advertising, Vol.23, No.4, pp. 59-70.
Zakary, L. T. and Joshua J. C., 2010, “Perceiving stability as a means to attitude certainty: The role of implicit theories of attitudes,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, Vol. 46, No. 6, pp. 874-883.

指導教授

李小梅(Li Shau-Mei Wang)

審核日期

2011-6-28

推文