| 摘要(英) |
This study employs case study method to investigate the implementation of budget management system in a global company’s headquarter in Taiwan. Inside the study, the current budgeting practices of the case company was compared with the changes arising from the implementation of budget management system and has probed for the project management issues encountered during the system implementation process. Besides, what has been learned from the implementation experiences are summarized as well for similar systems implementation reference in the future.
The case company focuses on the importance of the budget planning and management and would like to implement a scientific, advanced, standard and quality budget management system with considering budget information access rights, efficiency and stability to achieve the rationality and effectiveness of budgetary resources usage and allocation. This study has found that the new budget system implementation project scope has been affected, demand changes could not be managed, new budget system did not go-live on time and project quality is not as expected since the organization of the case company changes frequently in response to global competition policy adjustments.
It is concluded that the main reasons for the budget management system implementation project failure are as following: the project demands are not clearly defined, key users do not fully involve throughout the system implementation, the consultants do not own enough global organization planning experiences, the consultant project manager changes, project budget is insufficient, user requirements complexity is wrongly assessed, project time management is poor, project delivery documents are not confirmed well and the entire project risk is not carefully evaluated.
Based on the findings, this study provides suggestions for companies that plan to implement the budget management system. The suggestions include: enhancing user participation, emphasizing the importance of project management, and providing ample resources during implementation.
|
| 參考文獻 |
中文部份
1.王慶富 (1996)，專案管理，台北：聯經出版社。
2.方泰樟 (1997)，專案管理：軟體發展階段之文件規範探討，國立中山大學資訊管理研究所未出版碩士論文，1997年6月。
3.林東清 (2004)，資訊管理－E化企業的核心競爭能力，台北：智勝出版社。
4.吳琮璠 (1997)，會計資訊系統與電腦審計，台北：智勝出版社。
5.吳琮璠 (2002)，會計財務資訊系統，台北：智勝出版社。
6.許光華、何文榮 (1998)，專案管理-理論與實務，台北：華泰書局。
7.張玲星、顏河清 (2006)，「電腦過程參與成員認知差異之研究--以科技框架分析」，資訊管理展望，第八卷第一期，第27-44頁，2006年3月。
8.張紹勳 (2000)，研究方法，台中：滄海書局。
9.黃俊英 (2003)，企業研究方法，台北：東華書局。
10.謝清佳、吳琮璠 (1998)，資訊管理理論與實務，台北：智勝出版社。
英文部份
1.Chenhall, R. H. and Morris, D. (1986), “The Impact of Structure, Environment, and Interdependence on the Perceived Usefulness of Management Accounting Systems”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 61, No. 1, pp. 16-35.
2.Cleland, D. I. and King, W. R. (1983), Systems Analysis and Project Management, New York: McGraw-Hill.
3.DeLone, W. H. and Mclean, E. R. (1992), “Information Systems Success: the Quest for the Dependent Variable”, Information Systems Research, Vol. 3, No. 1, pp. 60-95.
4.Francis, H. and Rafi, A. (2004), “Development of the SMART Project Planning Framework”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 22, No. 6, pp. 499-510.
5.Hamilton, S. and Chervany, N. L. (1981), “Evaluating Information System Effectiveness – Part I: Comparing Evaluation Approaches”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 5, No. 3, pp. 55-69.
6.Henry, J. W. and Stone, R. W. (1995), “Computer Self-Efficacy and Outcome Expectancy: the Effects on the End-User’s Job Satisfaction”, Computer Personnel, Vol. 16, No. 4, pp. 15-33.
7.Kenis, I. (1979), “Effects of Budgetary Goal Characteristics on Managerial Attitudes and Performance”, The Accounting Review, Vol. 54, No. 4, pp. 707-721.
8.Kerzner, H. (1979), Project Management: A Systems Approach to Planning, Scheduling and Controlling, Ohio: Van Nostrand Reinhold.
9.Kwon, T. and Zmud, R. (1987), Unifying the Fragmented Models of Information Systems Implementation. In R. Boland JR & R. Hirschheim (Eds.), Critical Issues in Information Systems Research, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
10.Meredith, J.R. and Mantel, S.I. (1989), Project Management, New York: John Wiley and Sons.
11.Morris, P. (1994), The Management of Projects, London: Thomas Telford.
12.Nolan, R. L. (1979), “Managing the Crises in Data Processing”, Harvard Business Review, Vol. 57, No. 2, pp. 115-126.
13.Project Management Institute (2004), A Guide to the Project Management Body of Knowledge: PMBOK Guide, Pennsylvania: Project Management Institute.
14.Simons, R. (1992), “The Strategy of Control”, CA Magazine, Vol. 125, No. 3, pp. 44-50.
15.Welsch, Glenn A. (1976), Budgeting: Profit Planning and Control, 4th ed., New Jersey: Prentice-Hall.
16.White, D. and Fortune, J. (2002), “Current Practice in Project Management - an Empirical Study”, International Journal of Project Management, Vol. 20, No. 1, pp. 1-11.
17.Wight, O.W. (1981), MRP II: Unlocking America’s Productivity Potential, Boston: CBI Publishing.
18.Wixom, B. H. and Watson, H. J. (2001), “An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting Data Warehousing Success”, MIS Quarterly, Vol. 25, No. 1, pp. 17-41.
19.Yin, R. K. (1994), Case Study Research: Design and Methods, London: Sage Publications.
網路部份
1.MBA智庫百科 (2011a)，全面預算管理，2011/04/02取自http://doc.mbalib.com/view/6c7da901b5337f1bc396c7d8ed6e6726.html
2.MBA智庫百科 (2011b)，企業預算控制系統，2011/03/25取自http://doc.mbalib.com/view/08bbb72f7f3b550858f22049e2ebb5fa.html
|
[Endnote RIS 格式]
[相關文章]
[文章引用]
[完整記錄]
[館藏目錄]
至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
plurk
funp
live
udn
HD
myshare
netvibes
friend
youpush
delicious
baidu
Google bookmarks
del.icio.us
hemidemi
facebook
twitter
google
reddit