高階經理團隊多元性與企業績效之關聯─以公司治理模式為調節變項

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：94

、訪客IP：3.145.91.111

姓名

王玉慧(Yu-huei Wang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

高階經理團隊多元性與企業績效之關聯─以公司治理模式為調節變項
(The Relationship between Top Management Team Diversity and Corporate Performance: The Moderating Role of Corporate Governance Model)

相關論文

★ 業務主管領導力對部屬招募行為之影響-以S壽險公司為例	★ 人力精簡對企業績效的影響–以產業特性為調節變項
★ 經理人超額薪酬、經理人異動與公司績效之關係	★ 人口老化對企業之影響與因應對策-以傳統產業為例
★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸探討企業績效、公司治理與經理人異動之關聯性	★ 護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響
★ 運用存活分析探討高科技產業招募者人格特質與離職風險之關聯性-以A公司為例	★ 金融電子化對台灣銀行業組織績效及人力彈性影響之探討
★ 人力資源部門角色與功能轉變之個案研究	★ 高階主管薪酬級距與公司績效之關聯性分析
★ 人力招募政策及主管領導風格對新進人員晉升與離職傾向之影響-以房仲業S公司為例	★ 影響台灣勞工赴海外就業的決定性因素
★ 董事會特性對企業績效之影響-以人力資本為調節變項	★ 董事會異質性之決定因素
★ 公司治理結構與就業調整	★ 總經理雙元性、股權集中度、人力資本與組織績效

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

本研究以2010年底資產總額達兩百億台幣的台灣上市公司之高階經理團隊為研究對象，試圖探討「高階經理團隊成員組成多元性」、「企業績效」與「公司治理模式」之間的關係。資料來源取自公開資訊觀測站上各公司之年報與台灣經濟新報，以因素分析、多元迴歸分析等統計方法進行假設的檢定。
本研究將高階經理團隊多元性分為性別、任期、持股比率、學歷地區、教育程度、經驗與背景及在外兼職數多元性。研究結果顯示，七個多元變項多元程度與企業績效之間皆未存在一顯著的正向線性關係。反而在性別比率、總持股比率、學歷地區、學歷程度與在外兼職數五個變項上發現一雙面刃效果，即在適當的多元程度範圍內可為企業帶來較高的經營績效，然而過高的高階經理團隊多元程度將可能造成團隊成員間決策意見上的衝突，企業績效下滑。
公司治理模式上以CEO雙元性與家族控制程度作為代理理論下治理模式的代理變項。研究結果顯示，CEO雙元性對高階經理團隊多元性與企業績效有一負向的調節效果，顯示在CEO兼任董事長權力集中的情況下，將對高階經理團隊成員間信任感的建立造成負面影響。在缺乏信任感與互動的情況下，將不利於組織成員間資訊交換的行為；家族控制程度則無顯著影響。最後則針對本研究結果提出人力資源管理活動安排及公司治理模式採用上之建議。

摘要(英)

The purpose of this study is to examine the relationship between top management team (TMT) diversity and firm performance. We also discuss the moderating role of CEO duality and family control, which are proxy for the firm’s adoption of corporate governance system, on the relationship between TMT diversity and firm performance. We analyze data from 103 companies whose assets are up to NT$ 200 billion on 2010.
In this study, we definite seven TMT diversity variables from corporate annual report: gender, tenure, total shareholding, educational area, educational level, educational background, and the number of current post held concurrently in other companies. Our results reveal an inverted U-shape curvilinear relationship between five diversity variables (gender, total shareholding, educational area, educational level, and the number of current post held concurrently in other companies) and firm performance, and suggest the existence of optimal TMT diversity.
We find that CEO duality has a negative moderating effect on the relationship between TMT diversity and firm performance. When CEO and board chairperson are held simultaneously by one person, he or she is powerful. CEO duality has a negative effect on building trust within TMT members and then they are unwilling to exchange information. Family control, however, has no significant effect on the relationship between TMT diversity and firm performance. Finally, we give some suggestions on human resource management practices and the use of the model of corporate governance.

關鍵字(中)

★ 公司治理模式
★ 企業績效
★ 高階經理團隊多元性

關鍵字(英)

★ model of corporate governance
★ corporate performance
★ TMT diversity

論文目次

中文摘要 i
英文摘要 ii
目錄 iii
圖目錄 v
表目錄 vi
第壹章緒論 1
第一節研究背景 1
第二節研究動機與目的 1
第三節本文架構 2
第貳章文獻回顧與假說建立 3
第一節高階經理團隊多元性與企業績效之關聯 3
第二節公司治理模式的調節效果 6
第三節治理模式的代理變項 8
第參章研究方法 12
第一節研究架構與研究假設 12
第二節研究樣本 13
第三節研究變項與衡量工具 15
第四節研究方法 20
第肆章研究結果與討論 21
第一節基本統計量 21
第二節迴歸結果 22
第伍章結論與建議 37
第一節研究結論與發現 37
第二節管理意涵 39
第三節研究限制 40
第四節未來研究建議 41
參考文獻 43

參考文獻

一、中文部分
1. 林豪傑 (2005)。CEO權力支配性、高階人力資源管理系統、高階經營團隊社會凝合、競爭行為與組織績效之關係。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。
2. 柯元達 (2008)。CEO轉換型領導與權力支配性對組織績效的影響：高階經理團隊社會資本的中介效果。國立中山大學人力資源管理研究所博士論文。
3. 蘇怡方 (2010)。家族成員角色鑲嵌與分子企業的代理問題：台灣金融業家族集團之觀察。2010 TOPCO崇越論文大賞。
二、英文部分
1. Adams, R.B. and Ferreira, D. (2009). Woman in the boardroom and their impact on governance and performance. Journal of Financial Economics, 94, 291-309.
2. Agresti, A., and Agresti, B.F. (1978). Statistical analysis of qualitative variation, Sociological Methodology, 9, 204-237.
3. Ancona, D.G. and Caldwell, D.F. (1992). Demography and design: predictors of new product team performance. Organization Science, 3(3), 321-341.
4. Anderson, R. C., D. Reeb. (2003). Founding-family ownership and ﬁrm performance: Evidence from the S&P 500. J. Finance, 58(2), 1301–1328.
5. Bantel K. A. and Jackson S. E. (1989). Top management and innovations in banking: does the composition of the top team make a difference? Strategic Management Journal, 10, Special Issue, 107–24.
6. Benston, G. (1985). The self-serving management hypothesis: some evidence. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 7, 67-84.
7. Bishop, J. W., Scott, K. D., and Burroughs, S. M. (2000). Support, commitment, and employee outcomes in a team environment. Journal of Management, 88(6), 1113-1132.
8. Blau, P.M. (1977). Inequality and heterogeneity: A primitive theory of social structure, United State: Free Press.
9. Carpenter, M. A. (2002). The implications of strategy and social context for the relationship between top management team heterogeneity and firm performance. Strategic Management Journal, 23, 275–84.
10. Carpenter, M. A. and Fredrickson, J. W. (2001). Top management teams, global strategic posture, and the moderating role of uncertainty. Academy of management Journal, 44, 533–45.
11. Certo, S. T., Lester, R. H., Dalton, C. M. and Dalton, D. R. (2006). Top management teams, strategy and financial performance: a meta-analytic examination. Journal of Management Studies, 43, 813–39.
12. Chang, S., W. Wu and Y. Wong. 2009. Family control and stock market reactions to innovation announcements. British Journal of Management, 10, 1-18.
13. Chen, C. J. P. and B. Jaggi (2000), “Association between Independent Non-Executive Directors, Family Control and Financial Disclosures in Hong Kong,” Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 19, 285-310.
14. Chung, K.H. and Pruitt, S.W. (1994). A simple approximation of Tobin’s q, Financial Management, 23(3), 70-74.
15. Claessens, S., S. Djankov, J. Fan, and L. Lang. 2002. Disentangling the incentives and entrenchment effects of large shareholdings. Journal of Finance, 57, 2741-2771.
16. Claessens, Stijn D. and S. Djankov, and Larry H. P. Lang (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of Financial Economics, 58, 81-112.
17. Davidson, W. N., Jiraporn, P., Kim, Y. S., and Nemec, C. (2004). Earnings management following duality-creating successions: Ethnostatistics, impression management, and agency theory. Academy of Management Journal, 47, 267–275.
18. De Brabander, B. and Edstrom, A. (1977). Successful information system development projects. Management Science, 24, 191–98.
19. DeFond, M. L. and C. W. Park (1997). Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23, 115-139.
20. Dezso, C.L. and Ross, D.G. (2008). Girl power: female participant in top management and firm performance, Robert H. Smith School, Research Paper No. RHS 06-104.
21. Eisenhardt, K. M. and Schoonhoven, C. B. (1990). Organizational growth: linking founding team, strategy, environment, and growth among U.S. semiconductor ventures (1978–1988). Administrative Science Quarterly, 35, 504–29.
22. Erhardt, N.L., Werbel, J., Sharder, C.B., (2003). Board of director diversity and firm financial performance, Corporate Governance: An International Perspective, 11, 102-111.
23. Fama, E. F. and Jensen, M. C. (1983). Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics, XXVI, 301-325.
24. Finkelstein, S. and Hambrick, D. C. (1996). Strategic Leadership: Top Executives and Their Effects on Organizations. St Paul, MN: South-Western College Publisher.
25. Frink, D.D., Robinson, R.K., Reithel, B., Arthur, M.M., Ammeter, A.P., Ferris, G.R., Kaplan, D.M., and Morrisette, H.S. (2003). Gender demography and organization performance: a two-study investigation with convergence. Group and Organization Management, 28(1), 127-147.
26. Fukuyama, F. (1995). Trust. New York: Free Press.
27. Gambetta, F. (1988). Trust: Making and breaking co-operative relations, New York: Basil Blackwell.
28. Glick, W.H., Miller, C.C., Huber, G.P. (1993). The impact of upper- echelon diversity on organizational performance. In Huber, G.P., Glick, W.H. (2003), Organizational change and redesign: Ideas and insights for improving performance, New York: Oxford University Press.
29. Goyal, V. K. and Park, C. W. (2002). Board leadership structure and CEO turnover. Journal of Corporate Finance, 8, 49-66.
30. Greening, D.W. and Johnson, R.A. (1997). Managing industrial and environmental crisis: the role of heterogeneous top management teams. Business Society, 36(4), 334-361.
31. Haleblian, J. and Finkelstein, S. (1993). Top management team size, CEO dominance, and ﬁrm performance: the moderating roles of environmental turbulence and discretion. Academy of Management Journal, 36, 844–863.
32. Hambrick, D. C. (1994). Top management groups: a conceptual integration and reconsideration of the team label’. In Staw, B. M. and Cummings, L. L. (Eds), Organizational Behavior. Greenwich, CT: JAI Press, 16, 171–214.
33. Hambrick, D. C., Cho, T. S. and Chen, M. J. (1996). The inﬂuence of top management team heterogeneity on ﬁrms’ competitive moves. Administrative Science Quarterly, 41, 659–84.
34. Hambrick, D. C. and Mason, P. A. (1984). Upper echelons: the organization as a reflection of its top managers. Academy of Management Review, 9, 193–206.
35. James, H. S., (2006). Family Capitalism. Belknap Press of Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
36. Jaw, Y. L. and Lin, W. T. (2009). Corporate elite characteristics and ﬁrm’s internationalization: CEO-level and TMT-level roles. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 20, 220–33.
37. Jensen, M. C. (1993). The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems. Journal of Finance, 48, 831-880.
38. Jensen, M. C. and Meckling, W. H. (1976). Theory of the firm: Managerial behavior, agency costs and ownership structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3, 305-360.
39. Johnson, R. A., Hoskisson, R. E. and Hitt, M. A. (1993). Board of director involvement in restructuring: the effects of board versus managerial controls and characteristics. Strategic Management Journal, 14, Special Issue, 33–50.
40. Kang, E. and Zardkoohi, A. (2005). Board leadership structure and firm performance. Corporate Governance: An International Review, 11, 189-205.
41. Kellermanns, F. W. and Floyd, S. (2005). Strategic consensus and constructive confrontation: unifying forces in the resource accumulation process. In Floyd, S. W., Ross, J., Jacobs, C. and Kellermanns, F. W. (Eds), Innovating Strategy Process. Oxford: Blackwell, 149–62.
42. Kiefer, S. (2005). Top management team diversity and firm performance, Germany: University of Konstanz.
43. Kisfalvi, V. and Pitcher, P. (2003). Doing what feels right: the inﬂuence of CEO character and emotions on top management team dynamics. Journal of Management Inquiry, 12, 42–66.
44. Klein, K.J. and Harrison, D.A. (2007). On the Diversity of Diversity: Tidy Logic, Messier Realities, Academy of Management Perspectives, 21:4, 26-33.
45. Klimoski, R. J. and Karol, B. L. (1976). The impact of trust on creative problem solving groups. Journal of Applied Psychology, 61, 630-633.
46. Knight, D., Pearce, C. L., Smith, K. G., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., Smith, K. A. and Flood, P. (1999). Top management team diversity, group process, and strategic consensus. Strategic Management Journal, 20, 445–65.
47. La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silames, A. Shleifer, and R. Vishny (1998). Law and finance. Journal of Political Economy, 106, 1103-1155.
48. Lawrence, B. S. (1997). The black box of organizational demography. Organization Science, 8, 1–22.
49. Lindenberg, Eric and Stephen Ross, (1981). Tobin’s Q ratio and industrial organization. Journal of Business, 54, 1-32.
50. Ling, Y., Simsek, Z., Lubatkin, M. H. and Veiga, J. F. (2008). Transformational leadership’s role in promoting corporate entrepreneurship: examining the CEO–TMT interface. Academy of Management Journal, 51, 557–76.
51. Lubatkin, M. H., Y. Ling, W. Schulze (2007). An organizational justice-based view of self-control and agency costs in family firms. J. Management Stud., 44, 955-971.
52. Marimuthu,M. and Kolandaisamy, I. (2009). Can demographic diversity in top management team contribute for greater financial performance? An empirical discussion. The Journal of International Social Research 2.
53. Miller, D., I. Le Breton-Miller. (2005). Managing for the Long Run: Lessons in Competitive Advantage from Great Family Businesses. Harvard Business School Press, Boston.
54. Miller, D., I. Breton-Miller, R. Lester, and A. Cammella Jr. 2007. Are family firms really superior performers?. Journal of Corporate Finance, 13, 829-858.
55. Miller, T. and Triana, M. (2009). Demographic diversity in the boardroom: mediators of the board diversity-firm performance relationship, Journal of Management Studies, 46: 5, 755-782.
56. Mintzberg, H., Ahlstrand, B., and Lampel, J. (2009). Strategy safari. United kingdom: pearson education limited.
57. Montoya-Weiss, M. M. and Massey, A. P. (2001). Getting it together temporal coordination and conflict management in global virtual teams. Academy of Management Journal, 44(6), 1251-1262.
58. Morck, Randall, Andrei Shleifer and Robert W. Vishny, (1988). Management ownership and market valuation: An empirical analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 293-315.
59. Morgan, R.M. and Hunt, S.D. (1994), The commitment-trust theory of relationship marketing, Journal of Marketing, 58, 20-38.
60. Nahapiet, J. and Ghoshal. S. (1998) Social capital, intellectual capital and the organizational advantage. Academy of Management Review, 23, 242-266.
61. Nuesch, S. (2009). Are demographic diversity effects spurious? Economic analysis and policy, 39(3), 379-388.
62. Olson, B. J., Parayitam, S. and Bao, Y. (2007). Strategic decision making: the effects of cognitive diversity, conflict, and trust on decision outcomes. Journal of Management, 33, 196–222.
63. Peterson, R. S., Martorana, P. V., Smith, D. B. and Owens, P. D. (2003). The impact of chief executive ofﬁcer personality on top management team dynamics: one mechanism by which leadership affects organizational performance. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88, 795–808.
64. Pfeffer, J. (1983). Organizational demography. In B.M. Staw and L.L. Cummings (Eds.), Research in Organizational Behavior, (pp. 5: 299-357). Greenwich, CT: JAI Press.
65. Pi, L. and Timme, S. G. (1993). Corporate control and bank efficiency. Journal of Banking and Finance, 17, 515-530.
66. Qureshi, I., et al., (2009). Understanding online customer repurchasing intention and the mediating role of trust: an empirical investigation in two developed countries. European Journal of Information Systems, 18, 205–222.
67. Rechner, P. L., and D. R. Dalton. (1991). CEO duality and organizational performance: A longitudinal analysis. Strategic Management Journal, 12, 155-160.
68. Rhoades, D. L., Rechner, P. L., and Sundaramurthy, C. (2001). A meta-analysis of board leadership structure and financial performance: are two heads better than one? Corporate Governance: An International Review, 9, 311-319.
69. Ridings, C.M., Gefen, D., and Arinze, B. (2002). Some antecedents and eﬀects of trust in virtual communities. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 11, 271–295.
70. Simons, T., Pelled, L. H. and Smith, K. A. (1999). Making use of difference: diversity, debate, and decision comprehensiveness in top management teams. Academy of Management Journal, 42, 662–73.
71. Smith, K. G., Smith, K. A., Olian, J. D., Sims, H. P., O’Brannon, D. P. and Scully, J. A. (1994). Top management team demography and process: the role of social integration and communication. Administrative Science Quarterly, 39, 412–38.
72. Talke, K., Salomo, S., and Rost, k. (2010). How top management team diversity affects innovativeness and performance via the strategic choice to focus on innovation fields. Research Policy, 39, 907-918.
73. Tihanyi, L., Ellstrand, A. E., Daily, C. M. and Dalton, D. R. (2000). Composition of the top management team and firm international diversification. Journal of Management, 26, 1157–77.
74. Walton, R. E., (1980). Establishing and maintaining high-commitment work systems. In J. R. Kimberly, R. H. Miles, & Associates (Eds.), The organizational life cycle: Issues in the creation, transformation, and decline of organizations: 208-290. San Francisco: Jossey Bass.
75. Ward, J. L. (2004). Perpetuating the Family Business: 50 Lessons Learned from Long Lasting, Successful Families in Business. Family Enterprise Publishers, Marietta, GA.
76. Wiersema, M. F. and Bantel, K. A. (1992). Top management team demography and corporate strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 35, 91–121.
77. Wilson, P. A. (1995). The effects of politics and power on the organizational commitment of federal executives. Journal of Management, 21, 101-118.
78. Wiwattanakantang, Y. (1999). An empirical study on the determinants of the capital structure of Thai firms. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 7, 371-403.

指導教授

陳明園(Ming-yuan Chen)

審核日期

2012-6-11

推文