股權分置對中國上市公司現金股利發放之影響

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：64

、訪客IP：3.138.69.216

姓名

鐘巧玲(Chiao-ling Chung) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系在職專班

論文名稱

股權分置對中國上市公司現金股利發放之影響
(The Impacts of Split-share Structure Reform On Cash Dividends:Evidence from Chinese Listed Companies)

相關論文

★ 所有權結構與政治連結對股利政策之影響—以中國國有企業為例	★ 董監事最低持股成數規定之研究
★ 合格境外機構投資人制度對投資/現金流量敏感度之影響	★ 從股票價格區間探討股票買回活動之資訊內涵
★ 跨境上市對於企業負債比率的影響：以中國跨港上市公司為例	★ 家族集團之盈餘管理行為
★ 股權結構與投資效率:中國上市公司之多重大股東實證研究	★ 股權分置改革對中國上市公司現金持有的影響
★ 手機按鍵生命週期探討企業轉型之路	★ 制度改革對於關係人交易的影響
★ 伊斯蘭教義、公司治理與營運資金管理對公司價值影響之研究—以印尼上市公司為例	★ 股利宣告對股價超常報酬的影響-以台灣集團與非集團上市公司為例
★ 公司規模、股價、益本比、淨值市價比與股票超常報酬關係之實證研究	★ 台灣股票上市公司營運資金管理相關議題之實證研究
★ 我國財務危機上市公司股權結構之探討	★ 過度反應假說在台灣股票市場之實證研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

現金股利為檢視企業績效重要衡量指標之一，而企業績效又與公司治理及股權結構密不可分。一般研究僅針對中國大陸迥異於其它國家的股權結構，或由政府主導企業的控制權所造成的代理問題，然而2005年實施「股權分置」改革後，降低了非流通股與政府持股比例，對現金股利所帶來的影響，卻乏人研究。本研究旨在探討股權分置改革對中國上市公司現金股利發放是否產生影響，並輔以有關公司治理因素之董事會規模、外部董事比例、董事長是否兼任總經理，以及有關股權結構因素之國家持股比例、法人持股比例等方面，來做更進一步探討。本研究以2001年至2010年中國在上海與深圳交易所上市之公司，共選取2322間上市公司為研究樣本，經由Mean-Whitney U差異檢定，與Panel Least Squares迴歸模型分析後，研究結果如下：1. 股權分置改革後現金股利殖利率下降，顯示企業保留現金意願提高。 2. 董事會規模與現金股利殖利率具有顯著正相關。 3. 沒有証據顯示外部董事與現金股利殖利率具有顯著正相關。 4. 當董事長兼任總經理時，與現金股利殖利率呈顯著負相關。 5. 流通股股數的增加，使市場處於多頭的情況，無法顯示出股東對現金股利的偏好，故沒有証據顯示政府持股比例與現金股利殖利率具有顯著正相關。 6. 沒有証據顯示法人持股比例與現金股利殖利率具有顯著正相關。

摘要(英)

Cash dividend is an important index in evaluating corporate performance. Moreover, corporate performance is strongly related to corporate governance and ownership structure. Generally, most of the studies focus on the agency problems arising from the specific type of Chinese firms’ ownership structure which is dominated by the state. However, the split-share structure reform in 2005 decreased the ratio of nontradable shares and state ownership but the research about how this reform affects the firms’ dividend policy is rare. The purpose of this study is to discuss whether the spilt-share structure reform has impacts on cash dividends of a Chinese listed corporation. We also take the elements of corporate governance including board size, percentage of outside directors, CEO duality, and elements of ownership structure including the percentage of government and legal shareholdings into our study. The sample consists of 2,322 listed companies which were listed in Shanghai and Shenzhen stock markets during 2001 to 2010. We use Mean-Whitney U Test and Panel Least Squares Regression to analyze the data. The results show that: 1. the cash dividend yield has been decreased after the split-share structure reform implying that corporations are prone to retain earnings; 2. board size has positive impacts on cash dividend yield; 3. there is no evidence to support that outside directors have positive impacts on cash dividend yield; 4. CEO duality has negative impacts on cash dividend yield; 5. there is no evidence to support that the state ownership has positive impacts on cash dividend yield; 6. There is no evidence to support that the percentage of legal person ownership has positive impacts to cash dividend yield.

關鍵字(中)

★ 公司治理
★ 股權結構
★ 股權分置
★ 現金股利

關鍵字(英)

★ Ownership Structure
★ Cash Dividend
★ Spilt-share Structure Reform
★ Corporate Governance

論文目次

摘要 v
Abstract vi
誌謝辭 vii
目錄 viii
表目錄 ix
一、緒論 1
1-1 研究動機與目的 1
1-2 研究架構 3
二、文獻探討與研究假說 4
2-1 股利政策相關文獻 4
2-1-1 代理問題 5
2-2 董事會特徵與現金股利 6
2-2-1 董事會規模 7
2-2-2 外部董事 8
2-2-3 董事長兼任總經理 10
2-3 大股東與現金股利 10
2-3-1 國家持股 11
2-3-2 法人持股 13
2-4 中國特殊之股權結構與股權分置改革 16
2-4-1 私有化國營企業 17
三、研究設計與方法 18
3-1 樣本篩選與資料來源 18
3-2 主要變數之衡量 18
3-2-1 現金股利變數 19
3-2-2 自變數 19
3-3 其它控制變數 21
3-4 迴歸分析 22
四、實證結果與分析 24
4-1 敘述性統計與相關係數分析 24
4-1-1 敘述性統計分析 25
4-1-2 相關係數矩陣 27
4-2 實證迴歸分析 29
4-2-1 現金股利變數 29
4-2-2 公司治理變數 29
4-2-3 股權結構變數 30
4-2-4 其它控制變數 31
4-3 穩健性測試 34
五、結論與建議 35
5-1 結論 35
5-2 建議 37
參考文獻 38

參考文獻

[1] 申心吉，「中國上市公司董事會特徵與企業績效研究」，西南師範大學碩士論文，2005。
[2] 李春玲，控股股東與上市公司股利政策，高校社科文庫，人民出版社，2009。
[3] 朱德胜，基于股權結構的公司-現金股利政策研究，山東財政學院，中國財政經濟出版社，2009。
[4] 李馨蘋，莊宗憲，「公司治理機制與公司績效之實證研究」，東吳經濟商學學報，第五十七期，1-27，2007。
[5] 李馨蘋，莊宗憲，「股權結構與董事會組成對公司績效之影響」，第九屆科際整合管理研討會，195-212，2005。
[6] 吳佩蓉，「中國績效落後上市公司發放現金股利之因素：現金侵占觀點」，台灣大學碩士論文，民國99年，
[7] 徐永桂，「現金股利與股權結構之實證研究-以中國上市公司為例」，中央大學碩士論文，民國99年，。
[8] Allen, F., A. Bernardo and I. Welch, 2000. A theory of dividends based on tax clienteles, Journal of Finance 55, 2499–2536
[9] Baker, H. K., G. E. Farrelly and R. B.Edelman, 1985. Autumn, A survey of management views on dividend policy, Financial Management 14, 78–84.
[10] Baker, M., and J. Wurgler, 2000, The equity share in new issues and aggregate stock returns, Journal of Finance 55, 2219–2257
[11] Berle, A.A.,and G .C. Means, 1932. The modern corporation and private property, New York The Macmillan Company, New York , p. iii. (Reprint, Transaction Publishers, New Brunswick, NJ, 1991.)
[12] Bennedsen, M., H.C. Kongsted and K.M. Nielsen, 2008. The causal effect of board size in the performance of small and medium-sized firms, Journal of Banking & Finance 32, 1098–1109
[13] Bradford, W., C. Chen and S. Zhu., 2007. Ownership structure, control chains and cash dividend policy: Evidence from China. Working paper of California State University.
[14] Borokhovich, K.A., R. Parrino and T. Trapani, 1996. Outside Directors and CEO Selection, Journal of Financial and Quantitative Analysis 31, 337–355
[15] Cai, F. and L. Zheng, 2004. Institutional trading and stock returns. Finance Research Letters 1, 178–189
[16] Chan, K., A. J. Menkveld and Z. Yang, 2008. Information asymmetry and asset prices: evidence from the China foreign share discount, Journal of Finance 63, 159–196
[17] Chen, K. and H.Q. Yuan, 2004. Earnings management and capital resource allocation: evidence from China’’s accounting-based regulation of rights issues, The Accounting Review 79,645–665.
[18] Dalton, D. R., C. M. Daily, J.L. Johnson and A.E. Ells, 1999. Number of directors and financial performance: A meta-analysis, Academy of Management Journal, December 42(6), 674–686.
[19] DeAngelo, H., L. DeAngelo and R. M. Stulz, 2004. Dividend policy, agency costs, and earned equity, Working Paper, University of Southern California.
[20] Easterbrook, F., 1984. Two agency cost explanation of dividend, American Economic Review 74(4), 650–659.
[21] Faccio, M., L. H. P. Lang and L. Young, 2001. Dividends and expropriation, American Economic Review 91, 54–78.
[22] Fama, E. F. and K. R. French, 2001. Disappearing dividends: Changing firm characteristics or lower propensity to pay, Journal of Financial Economics 60, 3–43.
[23] Fama, E. F. and M. C. Jensen, 1983. Separation of ownership and control. Journal of Law and Economics 26, 301–325.
[24] Fan, J. P. H., T. J. Wong and T. Zhang, 2007. Politically connected CEOs, corporate governance, and Post-IPO performance of China’s newly partially privatized firms, Journal of Financial Economics 84, 330–357.
[25] Firth, M., P. M. Y. Fung and O.M. Rui, 2007. Ownership, two-tier board structure and the informativeness of earnings –Evidence from China, Journal of Accounting and Public Policy 26, 463–496.
[26] Jefferson, G. H., and T. G. Rawaski, 1994. Enterprise Reform in Chinese Industry, Journal of Economic Perspectives 8(2), 47–70.
[27] Jensen, M. C., 1986. Agency costs of free cash flow, corporate finance, and takeovers, The American, Economic Review 76, 323–329.
[28] Jensen, M. and R. Ruback, 1983. The market for corporate control: the scientific evidence, Journal of Financial Economics 11, 5-50.
[29] Jensen, M. C.,1993. The modern industrial revolution, exit, and the failure of internal control systems, Journal of Finance 48, 831-880.
[30] Jensen, M. and W. Meckling,1976, The Theory of Firm：Managerial Behavior, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure ,Journal of Financial Economics 3, 305-370
[31] Jiang, B. B., J. Laurenceson and K. K. Tang, 2008. Share reform and the performance of China’s listed companies, China Economic Review 19, 489-501.
[32] Kalay, A.,1982. The Ex-Dividend Day Behavior of Stock Prices: A Re-Examination of the Clientele Effect, Journal of Finance 37(4),1059-1070
[33] Karolyi, G. A. and L. Li, 2003. A resolution of the Chinese discount puzzle, Working paper, Ohio State University.
[34] Mak, Y. T. and Y. Li, 2001. Determinants of corporate ownership and board structure: evidence from Singapore, Journal of Corporate Finance 7, 235–256.
[35] La Porta, R., F. Lopez-de-Silanes, A. Shleifer and R. Vishny, 2000. Investor protection and corporate governance, Journal of Financial Economics 58, 3–27.
[36] Lakonishok, J. and B. Lev, 1987. Stock splits and stock dividends: why, who, and when, the Journal of Finance 62(4), 913-931.
[37] Lee, C. J. and X. Xiao, 2002. Cash dividends and large shareholders expropriation in China, Working paper.
[38] Lee, C. W. J. and X. Xiao, 2004. Tunneling dividends, Working Paper, Tulane University and Tsinghua University.
[39] Li, D. D.,1996. A theory on ambiguous property rights in transition economies: the case of the Chinese non-state sector, Journal of Comparative Economies 23, 1–19.
[40] Li, D., F. Moshirian, P. Nguyen and L. Tan, 2007. Corporate governance or globalization: What determines CEO compensation in China, Research in International Business and Finance 21, 32–49.
[41] Lintner, J.,1956. Distribution of incomes of corporations Among dividends, retained earnings, and taxes, American Economic Review 46, 97–113.
[42] Lv, C. J. and K. M. Wang, 1999. An empirical study on dividend policy of China’s listed firms, Journal of Economics Research 12, 31–39.
[43] Mak, Y. T. and Y. Li, 2001. Determinants of corporate ownership and board structure: evidence from Singapore, Journal of Corporate Finance 7, 235–256.
[44] Mayers, D., A. Shivdasani and C. W. Jr. Smith, 1997. Board composition in the insurance industry, Journal of Business 70, 33–63
[45] Mi, Z., and X. Wang, 2000. Agency cost and crisis of China’s SOE, China Economic Review 11, 297–317.
[46] Mitton, T., 2004. Corporate governance and dividend policy in emerging markets, Emerging Markets Review 5, 409–426.
[47] Nellis, J., 1999, Time to rethink privatization in transition economies? International Finance Corporation Discussion Paper Number 38.
[48] NSAAB, & CSRC.,1994. Provisional administration ways for state-owned shares in stock corporations. Beijing, China: National State-owned Assets administration Bureau and Economic structural reform commission. (in Chinese).
[49] O’Connell, V. and N. Cramer, 2010. The relationship between firm performance and board characteristics in Ireland, European Management Journal 28, 387–399.
[50] Prowse, S., 1992. The structure of corporate ownership in Japan, Journal of Finance 47(3), 1121–1140.
[51] Qi, D., W. Wu and H. Zhang, 2000. Shareholding structure and corporate performance of partially privatized firms: Evidence from listed Chinese companies, Pacific-Basin Finance Journal 8, 587–610.
[52] Qian S., and W. Tong, 2003. China Share Issue Privatization: The Extent of Its Success, Journal of Financial Economics 70(2),183–222.
[53] Rajagopalan, N. and Y. Zhang, 2008. Corporate governance reforms in China and India: Challenges and opportunities, Business Horizons 51, 55-64.
[54] Rosenstein, S., and J.G.Wyatt,1990, Outside directors, board independence and shareholder wealth, Journal of Financial Economics 26, 175-191.
[55] Rozeff, M. S., 1982. Growth, Beta and Agency Costs as Determinants of dividend payout ratios, Journal of Financial Research 3, 249–259.
[56] Sharma, V., 2011. Independent directors and the propensity to pay dividends, Journal of Corporate Finance 17, 1001–1015.
[57] Shleifer, A. and R. Vishny, 1997. A survey of corporate governance, Journal of Finance, 737–783.
[58] Su, D., 2005. Corporate finance and state enterprise reform in China, China Economic Review 16, 118–148.
[59] Wei, G., J. Z. Xiao, 2009. Equity ownership segregation, shareholder preferences, and dividend policy in China, The British Accounting Review 41, 169–183.
[60] Wei, Z., S. Wu, C. Li and W. Chen, 2011. Family control, institutional environment and cash dividend policy: Evidence from China, China Journal of Accounting Research 4, 29–46.
[61] Wang, J., 2010. A comparison of shareholder identity and governance mechanisms in the monitoring of CEOs of listed companies in China, China Economic Review 21, 24–37.
[62] Wang, X., D. Manry and S. Wanlder, 2011. The impact of government ownership on dividend policy in China, Advances in Accounting, incorporating Advances in International Accounting 27, 366-372
[63] Xu, L., 2004. Types of large shareholders, corporate governance and firm performance: evidence from China’s listed companies, working paper, Zhongshan University.
[64] Xu, X. and Y. Wang, 1999. Ownership structure and corporate governance in Chinese stock companies, China Economic Review 10, 75-98.
[65] Yermack, D., 1996. Higher market valuation of companies with a small board of directors, Journal of Financial Economics 40, 185-211
[66] Yuan H. Q., 2001. Analysis on the dividend policy of listed companies in China, The Study of Finance and Economics 27, 33-41.
[67] Zhang, H., 2008. Corporate governance and dividend policy: A comparison of Chinese firms listed in Hong Kong and in the Mainland, China Economic Review 19, 437–459.

指導教授

洪榮華(Jung-Hua Hung)

審核日期

2012-1-17

推文