博碩士論文 994201041 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:6 、訪客IP:18.216.145.175
姓名 吳承良(Cheng-liang Wu)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 企業管理學系
論文名稱 探討從眾行為、凝聚力與科技接受度對虛擬社群 的使用意圖影響──以Facebook使用為例
(A study combining with conformity、cohesiveness and TAM to the influence of virtual community using intension──example of Facebook )
相關論文
★ 二氧化鈦技術生命週期之研究★ 整體後勤業參與同步工程於產品開發績效關係之研究—以中科院為例
★ 筆記型電腦之IFA/PIFA天線技術生命週期分析★ 國籍航空公司經營績效分析-以資料包絡分析方法分析
★ 從專利分析看3D IC技術與市場發展★ 影響企業導入電子發票系統成效之因素探討
★ 影響企業導入數位學習成功因素之探討-以個案公司為例★ 產品生命週期管理系統導入成功要素之探討--以S科技公司為例--
★ 組織創新能力影響因素研究★ 製 造 業 閒 置 資 產 轉 售 平 台 製造業閒置資產轉售平台-以廣達電腦股份有限公司為例
★ 供應商先行者優勢探討-以宸鴻科技為例★ 團隊領導者創新特質與開放式創新專案關係之研究
★ 從商業生態系統談樞紐者策略-以Apple 與Nokia 為例★ 個人電腦的競爭與發展策略-以台灣電子產業為例
★ 應用兩階段資料包絡分析法評估高級職業學校之經營績效★ ERP導入的促進因素:使用者觀點
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)
摘要(中) 虛擬社群已成為現代人網路社交的重要媒介,在虛擬社群上使用者可以藉由各式各樣的功能與程式、管理個人檔案等等,在網路世界裡與人互動,能找到與彼此興趣相近的人們,凝聚成具有友好關係的團體,隨著長時間使用而形成各自的虛擬社群文化。根據調查,相當知名的虛擬社群網站─Facebook於2012年八月將突破10億的全球註冊使用人口,如此龐大的使用熱潮勢必有其吸引使用者的特性值得深入研究。
於是本研究欲找出影響虛擬社群使用者行為的關鍵因素探討。根據過去的文獻可以發現,可以用科技接受度模式來探討使用者對虛擬社群接受度的影響,此外,使用者會受到朋友圈是否使用此虛擬社群網站,進而影響接受度,因此本研究舉出「資訊性影響」與「規範性影響」進行探討。在臉書強大的功能中,其中一項功能為「社團」,社團裡的成員大多與現實生活圈雷同,探討成員之間的人際吸引力與歸屬感是否對態度或意圖造成影響。本研究設計網路問卷對經常使用虛擬社群的人口進行調查,共收回426份有效問卷,在經過統計軟體Statistica6.0進行各變數之間因果關係的分析後發現,在科技接受度模式下知覺有用性與使用意圖、知覺易用與知覺有用性有正向影響關係,但知覺易用性對使用意圖無正向關係。此外在從眾行為影響方面,規範性影響對知覺有用性、資訊性影響對知覺有用與知覺易用性都有正向的影響關係。在凝聚力方面,歸屬感對虛擬社群使用意圖有正向影響,但人際吸引力對使用意圖則無正向影響。期望本研究結果能對虛擬社群開發業者有幫助,設計出更符合使用者需求的功能或程式。
摘要(英) Virtual community has become a widely used online social communication tool. Online users can find others who have similar interest in virtual community and form harmonious online virtual groups. As time goes by, online virtual groups each become distinctive online culture. Based on a survey, a well-known social website ─ Facebook will gather more than 10 billion population to join.
So this study wants to figure out the key influence for those virtual community users. According to the past references, researchers can use technology acceptance model (TAM) to study influence for virtual community user’’s acceptances. Besides, user’’s real society friendship has influence on user behavior. That is, this study includes conformity variables (informative and normative influence) to discuss the social outward influence. Among numerous functions, one of those is virtual group and group members are almost the same as real society friendship. So this study includes cohesiveness (interpersonal attraction and belongingness) to discuss the emotional aspect on user’s virtual community participation.
This study designs online survey and gathers 426 effective data. By the analysis of Statistica6.0 software, this study finds under TAM framework, perceived ease of use to perceived usefulness, perceived usefulness to intention have positive influence. However, perceived ease of use doesn’t have positive impact on intension. As for conformity, normative influence to perceived usefulness, informational influence to perceived usefulness and perceived ease of use, all three hypotheses have positive influence. As for cohesiveness, interpersonal attraction to intension doesn’t have positive influence. However, belongingness to intention has positive influence. At the end, this study expects the result can contribute to the virtual community developers.
關鍵字(中) ★ 凝聚力
★ 從眾行為
★ 科技接受度模式
★ 虛擬社群
關鍵字(英) ★ cohesiveness
★ conformity
★ technology acceptance model
★ virtual community
論文目次 中文摘要................................................................III
英文摘要.................................................................IV
誌謝辭....................................................................V
目錄.....................................................................VI
圖目錄..................................................................VII
表目錄.................................................................VIII
第一章 緒論..............................................................1
第一節 研究背景與研究動機..........................................1
第二節 研究目的....................................................4
第三節 研究流程....................................................5
第二章 文獻探討..........................................................6
第一節 虛擬社群....................................................6
第二節 科技接受度模式.............................................10
第三節 從眾行為...................................................14
第四節 凝聚力.....................................................17
第三章 研究方法.........................................................20
第一節 研究架構...................................................20
第二節 研究對象與資料蒐集.........................................21
第三節 研究假設...................................................21
第四節 變數定義與衡量.............................................25
第五節 問卷設計...................................................29
第六節 資料分析方法...............................................29
第四章 資料分析.........................................................32
第一節 敘述性統計分析.............................................32
第二節 信度分析...................................................34
第三節 效度分析...................................................36
第四節 模型配適度與結構方程式(SEM)分析...........................40
第五節 研究假說的驗證.............................................42
第五章 結論與建議.......................................................46
第一節 研究結論...................................................46
第二節 管理意涵...................................................49
第三節 研究限制...................................................51
第四節 後續研究建議...............................................52
參考文獻.................................................................53
附錄 研究問卷............................................................64
參考文獻 中文文獻
陳順宇(2005).多變量分析(四版).台北市:華泰書局出版。
英文文獻
Asch, SE (1952). Social psychology. New York: Prentice-Hall, 1952.
Ajzen, I., “From Intentions to Actions: A Theory of Planned Behavior, Action-Control: From Cognition to Behavior.” Heidelberg: Springer.(1985)
Ajzen, I., 1991, The theory of planned behavior. Organ. Behavior & Human Decision Processes. 50, p.179-211.
Allen, V. L. (1965). Situational factors in conformity. In L. Berkowitz(Ed.), Advances
in experimental social psychology(Vol.2,pp.133-175). New York:Academic Press.
Acquisti, A. and Gross, R. (2006). Imagined communities: Awareness, information
sharing, and privacy on the Facebook. In Proceedings of Privacy Enhancing TechnologiesSymposium, pp. 36-58.
Ahmed Y. Mahfouz, Andreas G. Philaretou, Antonis Theocharous(2008). Virtual social interactions: Evolutionary,social psychological and technological perspectives. Computers in Human Behavior 24, 3014–3026
Bearden, William 0. and Michael J. Etzel (1982), "Refer-ence Group Influence on Product and Brand Purchase Decisions," Journal of Consumer Research, 9 (September), 183-194.
Burnkrant, Robert E. and Alain Cousineau (1975), "Infor-mational and Normative Social Influence in Buyer Behavior," Journal of Consumer Research, 2 (Decem-ber), 206-215.
Bender, Thomas (1978), “Community and Social Change in America,” New Brunswick, NJ: Rutgers University Press.
Ba, S. (2001), Establishing online trust through a community responsibility
system, Decision Support System, 31.(3),323-336.
Burge, E. J. and J. M. Roberts, Classrooms with a difference: Facilitating learning on the information highway, Montreal: Cheneliere/McGraw-Hill, 1998.
Burke, K. and L. Chidambaram, “How much bandwidth is enough? A longitudinal examination of media characteristics and group outcomes,” MIS Quarterly, 23, 4,1999, pp. 557-580.
Balasubramanian, S. and Mahajan, V.(2001), The economic leverage of the virtual community, International Journal of Electronic commerce,5(3),103-138.
Boyd, Danah M., and Nicole B. Ellison (2007). Social Network Sites: Definition, History,and Scholarship. Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13 (1), October[http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/boyd.ellison.html]
Bressler, S. E., & Grantham, C. E. (2000). Communities of commerce. New York: McGraw-Hill
Brinberg, David and Linda Plimpton (1986), "Self-Moni-toring and Product Conspicuousness on Reference Group Influence," in Advances in Consumer Research, Vol. 13, ed. Richard J. Lutz, Provo, UT: Association for Consumer Research, 297-300.
Bond, R., & Smith, P. B. (1996). Culture and conformity: A meta-analysis of studies using Asch’s (1952b, 1956) line judgment task. Psychological Bulletin, 119, 111–137
Bollen, K. A. & Hoyle, R. H. (1990). "Perceived Cohesion: A Conceptual and Empirical Examination," Social Forces, 69(2), pp. 479-504.
Bromberg, H. (1996). Are MUDs communities? Identity, belonging and conscious-ness in virtual worlds. In R. Shields (Ed.), Culture of internet: Virtual spaces, real histories, living bodies (pp. 143–152). London: Sage Press.
Bakardjieva, M. (2003) Virtual Togetherness: an Every-day Life Perspective, Media, Culture & Society, 25, 3, 291-313.
Bargh, J.A.; McKenna, K.; and Fitzsimons, G.M. Can you see the real me? Activation and expression of the “true self” on the Internet. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 1 (2002), 33–49.
Bordia, P. Face to face versus computer-mediated communication: A synthesis of the experimental literature. Journal of Business Communication,34, 1 (1997), 99–120.
Crutchfield, R. S. (1955). Conformity and character. American Psychologist, 10,
191–198.
Carron, A. V., "Cohesiveness in Sport Group: interpretations and considerations", Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, pp. 123-138, 1982.
Cohen, A. P., The symbolic construction of community, Chichester, UK: Ellis Horwood, 1985.
Campbell, J. D and Fairey, P.J.(1989). “Informational and Normative Routes
to Conformity: The Effect of Faction Size as a Function of Norm Extremity and Attention to the Stimulus,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(3), pp. 315-324.
Cartwright, D., & Zander, A., Group dynamics: Research and theory, Harper & Row,
New York, 1968.
Chidambaram, L., “Relational development in computer-supported groups,” MIS Quarterly, 20, 2, 1996, pp. 143-165.
Cinnirella, M., & Green, B. (2007). Does ‘cyber-conformity’ vary cross-culturally
Exploring the effect of culture and communication medium on social conformity. Computers in Human Behavior, 23, 2011–2025.
Chen, I. Y. L., Chen, N.-S., & Kinshuk. (2009). Examining the factors influencing participants’ knowledge sharing behavior in virtual learning communities.Educational Technology & Society, 12(1), 134–148.
Cheung, C. M. K., & Lee, M. K. O. (2009). Understanding the sustainability of a virtual community: Model development and empirical test. Journal of Information Science, 35(3), 279-298.
Christy M.K. Cheung , Pui-Yee Chiu , Matthew K.O. Lee(2011). Online social networks: Why do students use facebook?. Computers in Human Behavior 27 (2011) 1337–1343
Chin-Lung Hsu, Judy Chuan-Chuan Lin(2008). Acceptance of blog usage: The roles of technology acceptance,social influence and knowledge sharing motivation. Information & Management 45, 65–74
Davis, F.D., 1989, Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, & user acceptance of information technology. MIS Quarterly, 13, p.319-340.
David, O. S., Jonathan, L. F. and A. P. Letitia, Social Psychology, Los Angels: University of California, 1986.
Dwyer, C., Hiltz, S. R. and Passerini, K. (2007). Trust and privacy concern within
Social networking sites : A comparison of Facebook and MySpace.Proceedings of the Thirteenth Americas Conference on Information Systems,Keystone, Colorado, August.
DeLone, W.H., McLean, E.R., 1992. Information systems success: the quest for the dependent variable.Information Systems Research 3 (1), 60–95.
Deutsch, Morton and Harold B. Gerard (1955), "A Study of Normative and Informational Influence Upon Indi-vidual Judgment," Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 51 (November), 629-636.
David, B., & Turner, J. C. (1996). Studies in self-categorization and minority
conversion: Is being a member of the out-group an advantage British Journal of
Social Psychology, 35, 179–199.
Dino, A., Reysen, S., & Branscombe, N. R. (2009). Online interactions between group
members who differ in status. Journal of Language and Social Psychology, 28,85–93
Fishbein, M. & I. Ajzen , 1975, Belief, Attitude, Intention & Behavior: An Introduction to Theory & Research. Addison-Wesley, Boston, MA.
Festinger, L., Schachter, S., & Back, K., Social pressures in informal groups, Harper and Brothers, New York, 1950.
Fox, N. & Roberts, C. (1999) GPs in Cyberspace: the Sociology of ’’virtual Community’’. The Sociological Review, 47, 4, 643-671.
Gefen, D., Straub, D., 2000. The relative importance of perceived ease of use in IS adoption: a study of e-commerce adoption. Journal of the Association for Information Systems 1 (8), 1–28.
Gopi, M., and Ramayah, T., ─Applicability of Theory of Planned Behavior in Predicting Intention to Trade Online- Some Evidence from a Developing Country, International journal of Emerging Markets (2:4), 2007, pp.348-360.
Hinds, P.; Carley, K.; Krackhardt, D.; and Wholey, D. Choosing work group members: Balancing similarity, competence, and familiarity. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 81, 2 (2000), 226–251.
Horton, R. P., Buck, T., Waterson, P. E., & Clegg, C. W. (2001). Explaining intranet use
with the technology acceptance model. Journal of Information Technology, 16,
237–249.
Hoadley, C. M., Xu, H., Lee, J. J. and Rosson, M. B. (2009). Privacy as information access and illusory control: The case of the Facebook News Feed privacy outcry.
Electronic Commerce Research and Applications (9:1), pp. 50-60.
Igbaria, M., J. Iivari & H. Maragahh , 1995, Why do individuals use computer
technology? A Finnish case study. Information & Management, 29, p.227-238.
I-Fan Liu, Meng Chang Chen, Yeali S. Sun, David Wible, Chin-Hwa Kuo,2010, Extending the TAM model to explore the factors that affect Intention to Use an Online Learning Community, Computers & Education 54 (2010) 600–610
Janssen, J.; Erkens, G.; Kirschner, P.A.; and Kanselaar, G. Influence of group member familiarity on online collaborative learning. Computers in Human Behavior, 25, 1 (2009), 25–37.
Jaeki Song and Yong Jin Kim(2006). Social influence process in the acceptance of a virtual community service, Inf Syst Front (2006) 8:241–252
Johnson, M. E. and J. B. Fortman, “Internal structure of the gross cohesiveness
scale,” Small Group Behavior, 19, 1, 1988, pp. 146-152.
Johnson, D.W. & Johnson, F. P. (1997). Joining Together: Group Theory and Group
Skills, 6th ed., Allyn & Bacon.
Jae Eun Chung, Namkee Park, Hua Wang, Janet Fulk, Margaret McLaughlin(2010). Age differences in perceptions of online community participation among non-users: An extension of the Technology Acceptance Model, Computers in Human Behavior 26 (2010) 1674–1684.
Kaufman, H. F., “Toward an international conception of community,” Social Forces,38, 1, 1959, pp. 8-17.
Kiesler, C. and Kiesler, S. (1969). The role of forewarning in persuasive communications. Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, 164(68), 547-549.
Kelman, H.C.(1961). “Processes of Opinion Change,” Public Opinion Quarterly, 25, pp.57-78.
Keller, R. T., “Predictors of the performance of project groups in R&D
organizations,” Academy of Management Journal, 29, 4, 1986, pp. 715-726.
Koh, J. and Kim, Y.G.. (2004), “Knowledge sharing in virtual communities: an e-business perspective,” Expert Systems with Applications, 26 (2),pp.155-166.
Kim, J., & Park, H. S. (2011). The effect of uniform virtual appearance on conformity
intention: Social identity model of deindividuation effects and optimal distinctiveness theory. Computers in Human Behavior, 27, 1223–1230
Kraut, R., W. Schcrlis, T. Mukhopadhyay, J Manning, S.Kiesler. The HomeNet Field Trial of Residential Internet Services.Comn. of the ACM 39,12(Dec. 1996),55-63.
Laporte, L., van Nimwegen, C., & Uyttendaele, A. J. (2010). Do people say what they
think: Social conformity behavior in varying degrees of online social presence.
In Proceedings of the 6th Nordic conference on human–computer interaction (pp.
305–314). New York, NY: ACM Press.
Lee, E.-J. (2006). When and how does depersonalization increase conformity to
group norms in computer-mediated communication? Communication Research,
33, 423–447.
Lu, C.S., K.H. Lai & T.C.E. Cheng ,2007, Application of structural equation Modeling to evaluate the intention of shippers to use Internet services in liner shipping
European Journal of Operational Research, 180(2), p.845-867.
Lascu, D. N., & Zinkhan, G. (1999). Consumer Conformity: Review and Applications
for Marketing Theory and Practice. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice ,7(3), 1-12.
Lascu, Danna-Nicoleta and Zinkhan, G.(1999). “Consumer Conformity:
Review and Applications for Marketing Theory and Practice,” Journal of
Marketing Theory and Practice, 7(3).Summer, pp.1-12.
Lord, K.R., Lee, Myung-Soo, and Choong, P.(2001). “Differences in Normative
and Informational Social Influence,” Advances in Consumer Research, 28, pp.280-285.
Levin, A., Foster, M., West, B., Nicholson, M. J., Hernandez, T., and Cukier, W. (2008).The Next Digital Divide: Online Social Network Privacy. Privacy and Cyber Crime Institute, Ryerson University.
Mayfield, R. (2005).Social networks dynamics and participatory politics.In J.Lebkowsky & M. Ratcliffe (Eds), Extreme democracy. LaVergne, Tennessee:Lightning Source Inc., 116-132.
Marjolijn L. Antheunis, Patti M. Valkenburg, Jochen Peter(2010). Getting acquainted through social network sites: Testing a model of online uncertainty reduction and social attraction. Computers in Human Behavior 26. 100–109
Napoli, L., 1998. The latest internet buzzword: community. The New York Times, December 6, 1998
Porter, C.E. & N. Donthu, 2006, Using the technology acceptance model to explain how attitudes determine Internet usage: The role of perceived access barriers & demographics. Journal of Business Research, 59(9), p.999-1007 .
Pfeffer, J. Organizations and Organization Theory, Pitman, Boston, MA, 1982.
Park, C. Whan and Parker V. Lessig (1977), "Students and Housewives: Differences in Susceptibility to Reference Group Influence," Journal of Consumer Research, 4 (September), 102-110.
Park, N., Lee, K. M., & Cheong, P. H. (2007). University instructors’ acceptance of electronic courseware: An application of the technology acceptance model.Journal of Computer-Mediated Communication, 13(1). Retrieved September 10,2009, from http://jcmc.indiana.edu/vol13/issue1/park.html.
Park, N. (2010). Adoption and use of computer-based voice over Internet protocol phone service: Toward an integrated model. Journal of Communication, 60(1),40–72.
Price, Linda L., Lawrence F. Feick, and Robin H. Higie (1987), "Preference Heterogeniety and Coorientation as Determinants of Referent Influence in the Choice of Service Providers," working paper, Department of Marketing, Katz Graduate School of Business, Univer-sity of Pittsburgh, Pittsburgh, PA 15260.
Postmes, T., Spears, R., & Lea, M. (2000). The formation of group norms in computermediated communication. Human Communication Research, 26, 341–371.
Parks,M., and K. Floyd. Making Friends in Cyberspace.J.of Computer-Mediated Communication 1, 4(Mar. 1996).
Rockett, T.L., and Okhuysen, G.A. Familiarity in groups: Exploring the relationship between inter-member familiarity and group behavior. In H. Sondak (ed.), Research on Managing Groups and Teams, vol. 4. Amsterdam:Elsevier Science, 2002, pp. 173–201.
Ross, L., Bierbrauer G. and Hoffman, S.(1976). “The Role of Attribution
Processes in Conformity and Dissent—Revisiting the Asch Situation,”
American Psychologist , 31, February, pp.148-157.
Radner, R. and Rothschild, M. "On the Alloca-tion of Effort," Journal of Economic Theory (10), 1975, pp. 358-376.
Rheingold, H. (1993).The virtual community: homesteading on the electronic
frontier, Haper Perennial.
Rau, P.-L. P., Gao, Q. & Ding, Y. (2008). Relationship between the level of
intimacyand lurking in online social network services. Computers in Human Behavior, 24(6), 2757-2770.
Roberts, T.L., 1998. Are newsgroups virtual communities? Proceedings of CHI 98 Conference on Human,Factors in Computing Systems, pp. 360–367.
Rezabakhsh B., Bornemann D., Hansen U. and Schrader U. (2006). Consumer Power: A Comparison of the Old Economy and the Internet Economy.
Journal of Consumer Policy,spring, 3-36.
Ramayah, T., Rouibah K., Gopi, M., and Rangel, G. J., ─A Decomposed Theory of Reasoned
Action to Explain Intention to Use Internet Stock Trading among Malaysian Investors,Computers in Human Behavior (25), 2009, pp.1222-1230.
Shah, D., Schmierbach, M. Hawkins, J., Espino, R. and Donavan J. Nonrecursive Models of Internet Use and Community Engagement: Questioning whether Time Spent Online Erode Social Capital, Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 79, 4, 964-987.
Swanson, E.B., 1988, Information system implementation: Bridging the gap between
design & utilization. Homewood, IL: Irwin. (Ref. from: Extrinsic & intrinsic
motivation to use computers in workplace)
Shih, H.P., 2004, An empirical study on predicting user acceptance of e-shopping on
the Web. Information & Management, 41(3), p.351-368
Sherif, M., Sherif, C. WV (1956). An outline of social psychology. (rev. ed.) New York:Harper.
Snyder, A.F., Mischel, W. and Lott, B.E.(1960). “Value, Information, and
Conformity Behavior,” Journal of Personality, 28, pp.333-341.
Shaw, M. E., “Group composition and group cohesiveness,” Small Group
Communication, 1992, pp. 214-220.
Schein, E.H.O rganizationalPs ychology,t hirde di-tion, Prentice-Hall, EnglewoodC liffs,N J, 1980.
Schepers, J. J. L., & Wetzels, M. G. M. (2006). Technology acceptance: a meta-analytical view on subjective norm. In Proceedings of the 35th European Marketing Academy
Conference, Athens, Greece.
Spears, R., Postmes, T., Lea, M., & Wolbert, A. (2002). When are net effects gross
products? The power of influence and the influence of power in computermediated
communication. Journal of Social Issues, 58, 91–107.
Smith, C.B., M.L. McLaughlin, and K.K. Osborne.Conduct Control on Usenet. J.of Computer-Mediated Communication 2,4(March 1997).
Taylor, S. & P. Todd, 1995, “Assessing IT usage: the role of prior experience”, MIS
Quarterly, December, p.561-570.
Tonnies Ferdinand, Community & society, New Brunswick, N. J.: Transaction Books,1988.
Utpal M. Dholakia, Richard P. Bagozzia, Lisa Klein Pearo.(2004). A social influence model of consumer participation in network- and small-group-based virtual communities. Intern. J. of Research in Marketing 21, 241-263
Vroom, V.H. Work and Motivation, Wiley, New York, NY, 1964.
Venkatesan M. (1966). Experimental study of consumer behavior conformity and independence. Journal of Marketing Research, 3, 384-387.
Venkatesh, V., & Davis, F. D. (2000). A theoretical extension of the technology acceptance model: four longitudinal field studies. Management Science, 46, 186–204.
Venkatesh, V., Davis, F. D., & Morris, M. G. (2007). Dead or alive? The development,
trajectory and future of technology adoption research. Journal of the Association
for Information Systems, 8(4), 267–286.
Williams, J.M. & Hacker, C.M., “Causal Relationships Among Cohesion, Satisfaction,
and Performance in Women’’s Intercollegiate Field Hockey Teams”, Journal of Sport Psychology, 4, pp. 324-337, 1982.
Yang, H.-L., & Lai, C.-Y. (2011). Understanding knowledge-sharing behavior in Wikipedia. Behaviour & Information Technology, 30(1), 131–142.
指導教授 洪秀婉(Shiu-Wan Hung) 審核日期 2012-7-23
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明