決策難易度對決策後偏好態度影響之研究

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：27

、訪客IP：3.141.32.252

姓名

吳昀達(Yun-Da Wu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

企業管理學系

論文名稱

決策難易度對決策後偏好態度影響之研究
(Study on post-choice favorable attitude following easy and difficult decisions)

相關論文

★ 網頁背景圖片對消費者產品偏好的影響	★ 組合商品的定價模式對消費者的滿意度與價值知覺
★ KTV消費型態與消費者類型之關聯	★ 蘋果沉浸度研究
★ 女性業務人員的配飾、妝容、上衣對業務職能特質知覺之影響	★ 男性業務人員服飾配件對職能特質知覺之影響
★ 個人辦公桌擺設對員工工作投入與專業職能知覺之影響	★ 飯店房間內擺設對消費者知覺與金錢價值之影響 --- 以人格特質為干擾變數
★ 療癒著色本對情緒轉換與風險偏好的影響	★ 名片設計對業務人員的職能特質與工作績效之知覺影響
★ 美語補習班的創新服務	★ 台灣工具機製造商之策略構面、組織構面及財務績效之關係研究：五大廠商之個案分析
★ 服務花朵的創新與競爭優勢:以五家牙科診所的個案分析	★ 反向策略之廣告效果研究
★ 不同性刺激形式所引發的性幻想程度對廣告效果之影響	★ 情緒在消費者決策行為中的影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

商品市場上充斥著各種方案選擇，在方案間的比較中，有些可以高下立判，讓人快速地做出決策，有些則是吸引力相當，讓人在選擇時猶豫不決，產生決策困難。
本研究探討決策難易度(簡單決策/困難決策)以及困難決策類型(兩好屬性策/兩壞屬性決策/一好一壞屬性決策)對於消費者的決策後偏好態度的影響，並且加入涉入、自我監控、認知需要和產品型態四個干擾變數，來衡量對決策後偏好態度的影響。本研究採用實驗研究法進行實驗；共有兩個實驗，透過紙本問卷進行測驗，樣本以中央大學和南開科技大學的學生為主，有效問卷為280份。研究結果顯示：
1. 困難決策下之決策後偏好態度，在遭遇負面攻擊後下降程度相當高，顯示其較簡單決策下不具持久性。
2. 困難決策類型對於決策後偏好態度會產生差異之影響。
3. 在困難決策下，高涉入消費者的決策後偏好態度，在遭遇負面攻擊後下降程度相當高，顯示其較簡單決策下不具持久性。
4. 在實體產品消費決策下，簡單決策與困難決策之決策後偏好態度無顯著差異；在服務消費決策下，簡單決策與困難決策之決策後偏好態度存在顯著差異。

摘要(英)

Consumers often face situations of free choice among multiple options in consuming market. When the options are similarly attractive, they can experience difficulty in resolving their preferences to arrive at a purchasing decision. In these contexts, how do consumers react to different decisions between similarly appealing options? The study tries to discuss the effect on post-choice favorable attitude of easy and difficult decisions and three types of difficult decisions, which is choosing greater goods, choosing lesser evils and choosing attribute-conflicts trade-offs . We also adopt involvement, self-monitoring, need for cognition and product form as moderating variables to test the implications for post-choice favorable attitude. The study involves two experiments and the participants were asked to fill out paper-based questionnaire. The main subjects are students of National Central University and Nan Kai University of Technology. The results indicate that:
1. Following difficult decision, the post-choice favorable attitude is exceptionally fragile, collapsing easily against even minor attack. The durability of post-choice favorable attitude following difficult decisions is inferior to easy decisions.
2. The types of difficult decisions will lead to different post-choice favorable attitude.
3. Heightened involvement in difficult decisions increases the vulnerability of post-choice favorable attitude to subsequent attack.
4. In terms of service-consuming decision, post-choice favorable attitude of easy decision is distinct from difficult decision. However, it has no difference between these two decisions in tangible product-consuming.

關鍵字(中)

★ 偏好態度
★ 決策難易度
★ 困難決策
★ 簡單決策

關鍵字(英)

★ similarly attractive
★ favorable attitude
★ difficult decision
★ easy decision

論文目次

第一章緒論........................................................ 1
第一節研究背景與動機 ............................................. 1
第二節研究目的與問題 ............................................. 3
第三節研究流程 ............................................ 4
第二章文獻探討 .................................................. 5
第一節決策難易度 ............................................. 6
第二節涉入 ............................................. 8
第三節自我監控 ............................................. 14
第四節認知需要 ............................................. 15
第五節產品型態 ............................................. 17
第六節決策後偏好態度 ............................................. 18
第三章研究方法 .................................................. 22
第一節研究架構 ............................................. 22
第二節研究假設 ............................................. 23
第三節變數的操作性定義與衡量方法 ........................... 28
第四節前測實驗 ............................................. 32
第五節研究方法 ............................................. 36
第四章資料分析 .................................................. 41
第一節樣本結構 ............................................. 41
第二節信度分析 ............................................. 42
第三節假設驗證 ............................................. 46
第五章研究結論與建議 ............................................ 65
第一節研究結論................................................ 65
第二節研究結果討論............................................ 67
第三節研究限制與問題.......................................... 68
第四節建議後續研究發展........................................ 69
參考文獻 ......................................................... 70
附錄........................................................ 75
附錄一：正式問卷一　..............................................75
附錄二：正式問卷二　..............................................86

參考文獻

一、中文部份
1. 王慶福、洪光遠、程淑華、王郁茗，2006。社會心理學:Social Psychology 6/E （作者：Brehm、Kassin、Fein）。台北：雙葉書廊
2. 吳宗祐 (2003)。工作中的情緒勞動：概念發展、相關變項、心理歷程議題探討。國立台灣大學心理學研究所博士論文。
3. 林建煌，2008。行銷管理，四版，台北：華泰文化事業有限公司。
4. 林建煌，2010。消費者行為，三版，台北：華泰文化事業有限公司。
5. 高泉豐，1994。認知需求的概念與測量，中華心理學刊，36(1)，1-20。
6. 陳皎眉、王叢桂、孫蒨如，2006。社會心理學，二版，台北：雙葉書廊
二、英文部份
Bearden, William O., Richard G. Netmeyer, and Mary F. Mobley (1993),
Handbook of Marketing Scales: Multi-Item Measures for Marketing and Consumer Behavior Research, Newbury Park: Sage. 133.
Browne, B. A., and D. O. Kaldenberg. (1997), Conceptualizing Self-monitoring:
Links to Materialism and Product Involvement, Journal of Consumer Marketing, 14 (1), 31-44.
Cohen, A. R., E. Stotland, & D. M. Wolfe (1955), “An Experimental Investigation of
Need for Cognition,” Journal of Abnormal and Social Psychology, Vol. 51, pp. 291-294.
Cohen, Joel B. and Marvin E. Goldberg (1970), “The Dissonance Model in
Post-decision Product Evaluation,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 7 (August), 315-321
Cooper, J. and Brehm, J. W. (1971), “Prechoice Awareness of Relative Deprivation as
a Determinant of Cognitive Dissonance,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 7, 571-581
Cummings, William H. and M. Venkatesh (1976), “Cognitive Dissonance and
Consumer Behavior : A Rreview of the Evidence,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 13 (August), 303-30
Curtis P. Haugtvedt（1992）, “Need fo Cognition and Advertising: Understanding the
Role of Personality Variables in Consumer Behavior,” Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1（March）, 239-260.
Elkin, R. A. and Leippe, M. R. (1986) “Psychological Arousal, Dissonance, and
Attitude Change: Evidence for a Dissonance Arousal Link and a “Don’t Remind Me” Effect,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 55-56
Engel, J. F. (1963), “Are Automobile Purchaser Dissonant Consumers?” Journal of
Marketing, Vol.27, pp.55–58
Festinger, Leon. A Theory of Cognitive Dissonance. Stanford,
CA: Stanford University Press, 1957.
Greenwald, Anthony G. and David L. Ronis. "Twenty Years of Cognitive Dissonance: Case Study of the Evolution of a Theory." Psychological Review 85 (January) (1978): 53-57.
Harmon-Jones, Eddie. "A Cognitive Dissonance Theory Perspective on Persuasion."
In The Persuasion Handbook: Developments in Theory and Practice, edited by James P. Dillard and and Michael Pfau. 99-116. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 2002.
Harmon-Jones, Eddie and Cindy Harmon-Jones. "Testingthe Action-Based Model of Cognitive Dissonance: The Effect of Action Orientation on Postdecisional Attitudes." Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin 28 (June) (2002): 711-23.
Harmon-Jones, Eddie, David M. Amodio, and Cindy Harmon-Jones. "Action-Based Model of Dissonance: A Review, Integration, and Expansion of Conceptions of Cognitive Conflict." In Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, edited by Mark P. Zanna. 119-66. New York: Academic Press, 2009.
Haugtvedt, C. P., R. E. Petty, and J. T. Cacioppo, 1992. Need for Cognition and Advertising: Understanding the Role of Personality Variables in Consumer Behavior. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 1(3): 239-260.
Hunt, Shelby D. (1970), “Post-transaction Communications and Dissonance
Reduction,” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 34 (July), 46-51.
Houston and Rothschild（1978）.Conceptual and Methodological Perspective
in Ivolvement, in Research Fornters in Marketing:Dialogues and Directions, ed. S. Jain. Chicago, IL: American Marketing Assocatin, pp. 184－187.
Kapferer, Jean-Noel, and Gilles Laurent (1993), “Further Evidence on the Consumer Profile: Five Antecedents of Involvement,” Psychology and Marketing, Vol.10, 347-355.
Knox, R. E. and Inkster, J. A. (1968), “Postdecision Dissonance at Post Time,”
Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 38, 751-763
Krugman, H. E. (1965), “The Impact of Television Advertising: Learning Without
Involvement,” Public Opinion Quarterly, Vol.29, 349-356.
Kurt Lewin,1951,"Field theory in social science: selected theoretical papers" :
Harpers Publishers,Edited Dorwin Cartwright.
Lee, Hyu-Hye (2000), “Antecedents and Consequences of Apparel Involvement:
A Multi-attribute Model,” Iowa State University.
Lee, M. & Mittal, B.（1989）, A Casual Model of Consumer Involvement, Journal of
Economic Psychology, Vol. 10, pp. 363-389.
Lennox, R.D., & Wolfe, R.N. (1984), “Revision of the Self-Monitoring
Scale,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 46, 1349-1364.
Lieberman, Matthew D., Kevin N. Ochsner, Daniel T. Gilbert, and
Daniel L. Schacter (2001), “Do Amnesics Exhibit Cognitive Dissonance Reduction? The Role of Explicit Memory and Attention in Attitude Change,” Psychological Science, 12 (March), 135–40.
Litt, A. and Tormala, L. (2010), “Fragile Enhancement of Attitude and Intensions
Following Difficult Decisions,” Journal of Consumer Research, 37(December), 584-598
Losch, M. E. and Cacioppo, J. T. (1990) “Cognitive Dissonance May Enhance
Sympathetic Tonus, But Attitudes are Changed to Reduce Negative Affect Rather Than Arousal,” Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 26, 289-304
Mantel, Susan Powell ＆ Frank R. Kardes (1999), The Role of Direction of
Comparison, Attribute-based Processing, and Attitude-based Processing in Consumer Preference.” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.25, 335-352.
McQuarrie, Edward F., and J. Michael Munson (1986), “The Zaichkowsky Personal
Involvement Inventory: Modification and Extension,” In Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.14, Paul Anderson and Melanie Wallendorf (eds.), Provo, UT: The Association for Consumer Research, 36-40.
Menasco, Michael B. and Del. I. Hawkins (1978), “A field Test of the Relationship
between Cognitive Dissonance and State Anxiety,” Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 15 (November), 650-655
Mitchell, A. A. (1979), “Involvement: A Potentially Important Mediator of
Consumer Behavior,” In W. L. Wilkie (Ed.), Advances in Consumer Research, Vol.6, Ann Arbor, MI: Association for Consumer Research. 191-196.
M. Snyder. (1974).The Self-monitoring of Expressive Behavior,Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Vol. 30, pp. 526-537.
Oshikawa, Sadaomi (1969), “Can Cognitive Dissonance Theory Explain Consumer
Behavior?” Journal of Marketing, Vol. 33 (October), 44-48.
Petty, Cacioppo & Schumann., (1983), “Central and Peripheral Routes to
Advertising Effectiveness: The Moderating Role of Involvement,” Journal of Consumer Research, 10 (September), 135-146.
Petty, Richard E. and John T. Cacioppo (1982), “The Need for Cognition,” Journal of
Personality and Social Psychology, 42, 116-131.
Regan, D. T. and Kilduff, M. (1988), “Optimism about Elections: Dissonance
Reduction at the Ballot Box,” Political Psychology, 17, 101-107
R. Kahn and D. Katz, 1960,”Leadership Practices in Relation to Productiveity and
Morale,” D. Cartwright and A. Zander (eds.),Group Dynamics: Research and Theory, 2nd ed. Elmsford, NY : Row, Paterson,.
Scher, S. and Cooper, J. (1989) “Motivational Basis of Dissonance: The Singular Role
of Behavioral Consequences,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 56, 899-906
Schiffman, L. G. & Kanuk, L. L.（2000）, Consumer Behavior, 7th ed., Prentice
Hall International, Inc.
Sherif, Muzafer and Hadley Cantril (1947), “The Psychology of Ego-Involvement,”
Social Attitudes and Identifications, New York: John Wiley and Sons, Inc.
Shultz, Thomas R. and Mark R. Lepper (1996), “Cognitive Dissonance
Reduction as Constraint Satisfaction,” Psychological
Review, 103 (April), 219–40.
Swinyard, W. R.（1993）, The Effects of Mood, Involvement, and Quality of Store
Experience on Shopping Intentions,Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 20, No. 2, pp. 271-280.
Traylor, Mark B. and W. Benoy Joseph (1984), “Measuring Consumer
Involvement in Products,” Psychology and Marketing, Vol.1, 65-77.
Taylor, Mark B. and W. Benoy Joseph (1985), “Measuring Consumer
Involvement Profiles,“ Journal of Marketing research, Vol.22, 41-53.
Tsiros, Michael and Vikas Mittal (2000), “Regret: A Model of Its Antecedents and
Consequences in Consumer Decision Making,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol. 26 (March), 401-417
Wicklund, Robert A. and Jack W. Brehm. Perspectives on Cognitive Dissonance. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum, 1976.
Zaichkowsky, Judith Lynne (1985), “Measuring the Involvement Construct,” Journal of Consumer Research, Vol.12, 341-352
Zeithaml, V. A. (1988) "Consumer perceptions of price, quality, and value: A means-end model and synthesis of evidence" Journal of Marketing, 52(July), 2,22.

指導教授

林建煌(Chien-Huang Lin)

審核日期

2012-7-25

推文