實體銀行轉換至網路銀行使用意圖之影響---以社會影響為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：26

、訪客IP：3.143.205.27

姓名

陳俊彣(JIUN WEN) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

資訊管理學系

論文名稱

實體銀行轉換至網路銀行使用意圖之影響---以社會影響為例
(no)

相關論文

★ 半導體二手設備之行銷策略－以應用材料公司為例	★ 從創新擴散角度探討新科技技術行銷策略之影響 —以全球資訊大廠推廣Web Services為例
★ 企業多角化經營策略之研究 ─以某機構拓展資訊應用服務市場為例	★ 汽車產業網站行銷之應用與效益探討研究－以N品牌為例
★ 系統整合業轉型策略之探討--以A公司為例	★ 顧客關係管理系統導入之研究－以A、B公司為例
★ 策略聯盟個案分析－以台灣光碟機廠商為例	★ 資訊教育訓練機構的轉型策略 —以某資訊教育機構為例
★ 組織文化及組織承諾對組織變革影響之研究－以外商銀行與本國銀行資訊部門為例	★ 高階資訊教育市場行銷策略與會員制度之研究-資訊教育產業為例
★ 探討平衡計分卡在售前技術支援部門績效管理的運用 - 以外商資訊科技公司為例	★ 軟體行銷策略與競爭優勢分析－以全球二家資訊大廠為例
★ 綠色供應鏈管理研究-以Ａ公司為例	★ 企業專案管理系統 - 提升專案即時資訊透通性及其效益分析
★ 金融軟體專案管理導入國際專案管理師（PMP）專案管理機制之效益分析	★ 企業轉型與其資源基礎之關係研究及轉型策略之發展-以M公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

隨著網路的普及化以及網路基礎建設的完善發展，銀行業者皆提供線上以及實體的服務。台灣自2000年金融改革開放以後，網路銀行普及率逐漸的增加，但消費者依然習慣前往實體銀行進行交易或因網路詐騙等因素減少對網路銀行的使用。根據此現象，本研究欲探討究竟何種因素會影響消費者從實體銀行轉換至網路銀行的使用意圖。
本研究採用抵制力與推動力為主要影響網路銀行使用意圖的架構，抵制力是指使用者拒絕接受或拒絕使用網路銀行，當中所包含的因素為認知風險(Perceived Risk) 與習慣實體接觸(Offline Habit)，認知風險是指消費者進行購買決策時，所意識到可能遭遇之風險；習慣實體接觸是指習慣於實體銀行的服務。在推動力是指使用者會願意接受或願意使用，當中所包含的因素為創新採用(Innovativeness) 與相對利益(Relative Benefit)，創新採用是指個人接受創新產品的程度，相對利益是指提供比之前產品或服務更好的優勢或福利。最後則加入社會影響探討，社會影響是指個人受到外部壓力或他人建議認知，進而影響個人的行為意願。
本研究選擇上班族為主要研究對象，原因為上班族具有固定的收入以及穩定的經濟能力，能真實反映社會的需求。本研究透過紙本問卷以及網路問卷為媒介，共回收有效問卷274份。最後得到分析的實證結果為(1) 抵制力:「認知風險與實體習慣接觸」對消費者從實體銀行轉換至網路銀行有直接且負面顯著的影響；(2) 推動力：「創新採用與相對利益」對消費者從實體銀行轉換至網路銀行有直接且正面顯著的影響；(3) 社會影響對消費者從實體銀行轉換至網路銀行有直接且正面顯著的影響；(4) 在相對利益與認知風險對網路銀行的使用意圖影響中，社會影響會增加影響的強度，具有調節(干擾)效果。

摘要(英)

With the popularization of the Internet and improvement in network infrastructure, many companies now offer an entire online service to reduce their operating cost. Meanwhile, online banking services are being widely adapted by the banking industries. Although various banks have introduced online banking to the market, most consumers still prefer using offline services. The reasons are believed to be that consumers are worried about their personal information being stolen by hackers, and the transactions being insecure. In this study, we propose to investigate the factors that affect user’s behavioral intention to shift from offline to online banking.
Through the lens of the valence framework, the objective of this research is to explore the motivators and inhibitors embedded in the offline and the online channel that influence users’ intention to transfer usage from the offline to the online channel. The inhibitor indicates the refusals of online banking utilization, consisting of perceived risk and offline habit, with perceived risk referring to the uncertainty that consumers face when they cannot foresee the consequences of their online transaction, and offline habits pertaining to the continuous use of offline banking services. Besides, the motivator indicates consumers’ willingness to use the product or services, which contains innovativeness and relative benefit. Different personal innovativeness can lead to different intentions in the adoption of an innovative technology. Relative benefit is used to indicate the degree to which online services are perceived to be better than offline ones. Last, social influences are discussed as the second component of the model, which are defined in this study as the perceived pressures of consumers from social networks on the adoption of the innovation.
In this study, a sample of EMBA students was used, as they represent a crowd with the stable income and financial demand. The data collection was conducted using the online and offline surveys. After eliminating surveys with incomplete and invalid answers, 274 valid questionnaires were collected. Last, according to the empirical results, (1) it was found that perceived risk and offline habit have a significantly negative effect on the intention to transfer usage. (2) Personal innovativeness and relative benefit have a significantly positive effect on the intention to transfer usage. (3) Social influences have a significantly positive effect on the intention to transfer usage. (4) The moderating effect of social influences is also examined. The results indicate that social influences has a moderating effect on the relationship between relative benefit/perceived risk and the intention to transfer usage.

關鍵字(中)

★ 創新採用
★ 認知風險
★ 社會影響
★ 相對利益

關鍵字(英)

★ Innovativeness
★ Perceived risk
★ Social influences
★ Relative benefit

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景與動機 1
第二節研究目的 5
第三節研究流程 6
第二章文獻探討 7
第一節抵制力與推動力 7
第二節網路銀行 9
第四節認知風險 14
第五節習慣實體接觸 19
第六節創新採用 21
第六節相對利益 28
第七節社會影響 31
第三章研究方法 34
第一節研究架構 34
第二節研究假說 35
第三節變數定義與衡量 39
第四節研究設計 43
第四章研究結果分析與討論 47
第一節前測分析 47
第二節樣本資料的敘述性 49
第三節問卷量表之信效度分析 52
第四節假設檢定與路徑分析 54
第五節樣本差異分析 61
第五章結論與建議 64
第一節研究結論 64
第二節管理意涵 70
第三節研究限制 73
第四節後續研究建議 75
參考文獻 77
中文文獻： 77
英文文獻： 77
網路部份： 85
附件 86

參考文獻

中文文獻：
張春興，1991， “現代心理學”，初版，東華書局。
蔡璞1、蔡青姿2，(2006). 「網路購物在知覺風險模式之建構」，國立虎尾科技大學企管系1、國立中正大學企管系2，國立虎尾科技大學學報，第25卷第3期，pp. 31-44.
英文文獻：
Aarts, H., Verplanken, B., & Van Knippenberg, A. (1998). Predicting behavior from actions in the past: Repeated decision making or a matter of habit. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 28(15), 1355-1374.
Agarwal, R., & Karahanna, E. (2000). Time flieswhen you’re having fun: Cognitive absorption and beliefs about information technology usage. MIS Quarterly, 24(4), 665–694.
Agarwal, R., & Prasad, J. (1998). A conceptual and operational definition of Personal innovativeness in the domain of information technology. Information Systems Research, 9(2), 204–215.
Aiken, M. and Hage, J. (1996) “Organizational Alienation: A Comparative Analysis”,American Sociological Review, Vol. 31, No. 4, pp. 497-507.
Aldas-Manzano, J., Lassala-Navarre, C., Ruiz-Mafe, C., & Sanz-Blas, S. (2009).The role of consumer innovativeness and perceived risk in online banking usage. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(1), 53-75.
Anderson, James C., Thomson, B. L. and Wymstra F. (2000), “Combining Value and price to make purchase decisions in business markets,” International Journal of Research in Marketing, 17, pp.307-329.
B. Verplanken., H. Aarts., A. Knippenberg., A. Moonen. (1998). Habit versus planned behavior: A Field Experiment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 111-128.
Barach, J.A. (1969), “Advdertising Effective and Risk in The Consumer Decision Process",Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 6, Iss. 3, pp. 314-320.
Batz, F. J., Peters, K. J. and Janssen, W. (1999),“The influence of technology characteristics on the rate and speed of adoption," Agricultural Economics, 21, pp. 121-130.
Bauer, R. A., Consumer Behavior as Risk Taking, Risk Taking and Information Handling in Consumer Behavior, Harvard University Press, 1967.
Bauer, R.A. (1960).Consumer behavior as risk taking. In dynamic marketing for a changing world ,Chicago: American Marketing Association.
Belanger, F. & Carter, L. (2008). Trust and risk in e-government adoption. Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 17, pp. 165-176.
Bhattancherjee, A. (2000), “Acceptance of E-Commerce Service: The Case of Electronic Brokerages,” IEEE Transactions on Systems, Man, and Cybernetics- Part A: Systems and Humans, Vol. 30, No. 4, pp. 411-420.
Bhimani, A. (1996). Securing the commercial Internet. Communications of the ACM, 39(6), 29–35.
Black, N. J., Lockett, A., Winklhofer, H., & Ennew, C. (2001). The adoption of Internet financial services: A qualitative study. International Journal of Retail and Distribution Management, 29(8), 390-398.
Boer, H. and During, W. E. (2001), “Innovation, what innovation? A comparison between product process and organizational innovation,” Int. J. Technology Management, 22, 1/2/3, pp.83-107.
Boyle, P., and Halfacree, K. (1999), Migration and Gender in the Developed World, New York: Longman.
Bradford, M. (2001), “The Implementation of Enterprise Resource Planning: An Innovation Diffusion Approach,” unpublished Ph.D. dissertation, University of Tennessee.
Castaneda, J. A., Munoz-Leiva, F., & Luque, T. (2007). Web Acceptance Model (WAM): Moderating effects of user experience. Information and Management, 44(4), 384-396.
Chen, S, W. (2011). A study of customers’ intention to use internet banking: An Intergrated Model. Bai-conference (2011).
Citrin, A. V., Sprott, D. E., Silverman, S. N., & Stem, D. E. (2000). Adoption of internet shopping: The role of consumer innovativeness. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 100(7), 294-3000.
Cockburn, C., & Wilson, T. D. (1996). Business use of the world-wide web. International Journal of Information management, 16(2), 82-102.
Cox, D. F., 1967, Risk taking and information handling in consumer behavior(Boston: Harvard University).
Cox, D.F., and Rich, S.U. “Perceived Risk and Consumer Decision-Making-The Case of the Telephone Shopping,” Journal of Marketing Research (1:4), 1964,pp. 32-39.
Crespo, A. H., & Bosque, I. R. D. (2008). The effect of innovativeness on the adoptionof B2C e-commerce: A model based on the Theory of Planned Behaviour.Computersin Human Behavior, 24(6), 2830–2847.
Cunningham, S. M., 1967, The Major Dimensions of Perceived Risk, In D.F.Cox(ED.), Risk Taking and Information Handing in Consumer Behavior, Boston: Harvard University Press, 82-108).書
Damanpir, F. and Gopalakrishnan, S., (1998), “Theories of organizational structure and innovation adoption: the role of environmental change,” Journal of Engineering and Technology Management, 15, pp. 1-24.
Damanpir, F. and Gopalakrishnan, S., (2000), “The impact of organizational context on innovation adoption incommercial banks,” Engineering Management, IEEE Transactions on, 47(1), pp. 14-25.
Damanpour, F. (1996), “Bureaucracy and innovation revisited: Effects of contingency factors, industrial sectors, and innovation characteristics,” The Journal of High Technology Management Research, 7, (2), pp. 149-173.
Davis, F.D. (1989), “Perceived usefulness, perceived ease of use, and user acceptance of information technologies,” MIS Quarterly 13(3), pp. 319-341.
Dowling, G. R, (1986). “Perceived Risk: The Concept and its Measurement.”Psychology and Marketing, Vol.3, pp. 193-210.
Dunphy, J.(1995)”Knowledge Management: What every information Professional should know”Information Management Journal, 34(3), pp.10-16.
Eilkie, W. L., & Pessemier, E. A. (1973). Issues in marketing’s use of multiattribute attitude models. Journal of Marketing Research, 10(4), 428–441.
Esmaili, E., Desa, M. I., Moradi, H., & Hemmati, A. 2011. The role of trust and other behavioral intention determinants on intention toward using Internet banking.
International Journal of Innovation, Management and Technology, 2(1): 95-100.
Featherman, M.S., and Pavlou, P.A. “Predicting e-services Adoption: A perceived Risk Facets Perspective,” International Journal of Human-Computer Studies (59), 2003, pp. 451-474.
Fishbein, M., and Ajzen, I. (1975). Belief, attitude, intention, and behavior: An introduction to theory and research. MA: Addison-Wesly.
Fiske, S. T., and Taylor, S. E. (1991). Social Cognition. New York: McGraw-Hill. (書)
Garbarino, E., & Strahilevitz, M. (2004). Gender differences in the perceived risk of buying online and the effects of receiving a site recommendation. Journal of Business Research, 57(7), 768-775.
Gatignon, H., & Robertson, T. S. (1985). A propositional inventory for new diffusion research. Journal of Consumer Research, 11(4), 849-867.
Gefen, D. (2003). TAM or just plain habit: A look at experienced online shoppers. Journal of End User Computing, 15(3), 1-13.
Goldsmith, R. E., & Hofacker, C. F. (1991). Measuring consumer innovativeness. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 19(3), 209-221.
Goodwin, N. R. (1996). Economic meanings of trust and responsibility. Ann Arbor, MI:The University of Michigan Press.
Grover, V. and Goslar, M.D. (1983) “The Initiation, Adoption and Implementation of Telecommunications Technologies in U.S.,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 10(1), Summer, pp.41-163.
Gu, J., Lee, S., & Suh, Y. (2009). Determinants of Behavioral intention to mobile banking. Expert systems with Applications, 36(9), 11605-11616.
Guariglia, A., & Rossi, M. (2002). Consumption, habit formation, and Precautionary saving:Evidence from the British Household Panel Survey. Oxford Economic Papers, 54(1), 1–19.
Harrington, J., & Hess, G. (1996). A spatial theory of positive and negative campaigning. Games and Economic Behavior, 17(2), 209–229.
Hong, S. J., & Tam, K. Y. (2006). Understanding the adoption of multipurpose information appliances: The case of mobile data services. Information Systems Research, 17(2), 162-179.
Hsu, C. L., and Lu, H. P., 2004, “Why do People Play On-Line Games? An Extended TAM with Social Influences and Flow Experience”, Information & Management, Vol.41, No.7, pp.853-868.
Jackson B. A. (1998).“Technology acquisition by terrorist groups: Threat Assessment informed by lessons from private sector technology adoption.”Studies in Conflict &Terrorism, 24, 183-213.
Jackson, J. A. (1986), Migration, London and New York: Longman.
Jensen R.(2003), “Innovative leadership: First-mover advantages in new product adoption,” Economic Theory, 21, pp. 97-116.
Jocoby, I., & Kaplan, L. (1972). “The Components of Perceived Risk,” In M.Venkatesan (ED.), Proceedings, 3rd Annual Conference, Chicago: Association for Consumer Research,pp. 382-393.
Joseph, B., & Vyas, S. J. (1984). Concurrent validity of a measure of Innovative cognitive style. Journal of the Academy of Marketing Science, 12(2), 159–175.
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and post-adoption beliefs.MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183-213.
Karahanna, E., Straub, D. W., & Chervany, N. L. (1999). Information Technology adoption across time: A cross-sectional comparison of pre-adoption and postadoption beliefs. MIS Quarterly, 23(2), 183–213.
Kim, D.J., Ferrin, D. L., & Rao, H. R. (2008). A trust-based consumer decision-making model in electronic commerce. The role of trust, perceived risk, and their antecedents. Decision support Systems, 44(2), 544-564.
Klöckner, C.A., Matthies, E., and Hunecke, M. (2003). “Problems of Operationalizing Habits and Integrating Habits in the Normative Decision-Making Model,” Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 33(2), pp. 396-417.
Lederer, A. L., Maupin, D. J., Sena, M. P. and Zhuang, Y.(2000), “The technology acceptance model and the World Wide Web,” Decision Support System, 29, pp. 269-282.
Lee, M. (2009). Factors influencing the adoption of internet banking: An integration of TAM and TPB with perceived risk and perceived benefit. Electronic Commerce Research and Applications, 8(3), 130-141.
Lekvall, P., & Wahlbin, C. (1973). A study of some assumptions underlying innovation diffusion functions. Swedish Journal of Economy, 75, 362-377.
Limayem, M., Hirt, S. G. & Cheung, C. M. K. (2007). How habit limits the predictive power of intention: The case of information systems continuance. MIS Quarterly, 31(4), 705- 737.
Lindbladh, E., and Lyttkens, C. H. (2002). “Habit Versus Choice: The Process of Decision-Making in Health-Related Behaviour,” Social Science and Medicine, (55)3, pp. 451-465.
Louis, M. R., & Sutton, R. I. (1991). Switching cognitive gears: From habits of mind to active thinking. Human Relations, 44(1), 55–76.
Lu, J., Liu, C., Yu, C. S., and Wang, K., 2008, “Determinants of Accepting Wireless Mobile Data Services in China”, Information & Management, Vol.45, pp.52–64.
Lu, J., Yao, J., & Yu, C. (2005). Personal innovativeness, social influences and adoption of wireless Internet services via mobile technology. The Journal of Strategic Information Systems, 14(3), 245–268.
Lu. Y., Cao.Y., Wang, B., &Yang, S. (2011). A study on factors that affect user’s behavioral intention to transfer usage from the offline to the online channel. Conputers in Human Behavior, (27), 355-364.
McDade, S. R. , Oliva, T. A. and Pirsch, J. A. (2002), “The organizational adoption of high- technology product “for use” Effects of size, preferences, and radicalness of impact. Industrial Marketing Management, 31, pp. 441-456.
Mehrtens , J., Cragg , P. B. and Milla, A. M. (2001), “A Model of Internet Adoption by SMEs.”Information & Management, 39, pp.165-176.
Midgley, D. F. ,& Dowling, G. R. (1978). Innovativeness: The concept and its measurement. Journal of Consumer Research, 4(4), 229-242.
Min, H. and Galle, W. P. (2003), “E-purchasing: profiles of adopters and nonadopters,” Industrial Marketing Management, 32, pp. 227-233.
Orbell, S., Blair, C., Sherlock, K., & Conner, M. (2001). The theory of planned behavior and ecstasy use: Roles for habit and perceived control over taking versus obtaining substances. Journal of Applied Social Pyschology, 31(1), 31-47.
Ouellete, J. A., & Wood, W. (1998). Habit and intention in everyday life: The multiple processes by which past behavior predicts future behavior. Psychological Bulletin, 124(1), 54-74.
Pavlou, P. A. (2003). Consumer acceptance of electronic commerce: Integrating trust and risk with the technology acceptance model. International Journal of Electronic Commerce, 7(3), 101–134.
Perry,M. & Hamm,B.C.(1969), “Canonical Analysis of relations between Socioeconomic risk and personal influence in purchase decisions.” Journal of Marketing Research,6(3)pp. 351-354.
Peter, J. P., & Tarpey, L. X. Sr., (1975). A comparative analysis of three consumer decision strategies. Journal of Consumer Research, 2(1), 29–37.
Peter, J. Paul. And Lawrence X. Tarpey (1975). A Comparative Analysis of Three Consumer Decision Strategies. Journal of Consumer Research 2, 29-37.
Polasik, M., & Wisniewski, T. P. (2009). Empirical analysis of internet banking adoption in Poland. International Journal of Bank Marketing, 27(1), 32-52.
Polites, G. L. (2005). Counterintentional habits as an inhibitor of technology acceptance. In Proceedings of the 2005 southern association for information systems conference.
Poon, W. C. (2008). Users’ adoption of e-banking services: The Malaysian perspective. Journal of Business and Industrial Marketing, 23(1), 59-69.
Premkumar , G. and Roberts , M. (1999), “Adoption of new information technologies in rural small business,” The International Journal of Management Science, 27, pp.467-484.
Quelch, J. A., & Klein, L.R. (1996). The Internet and International Marketing. Sloan Management Review, 37(3), 60-75.
Rogers, E.V., (1971), Diffusion of Innovations, 2nd Edition, the Free Press, New York.
Rogers, E.V., (1983), Diffusion of Innovations, 3rd Edition, the Free Press, New York.
Rogers, E.V., (1995), Diffusion of Innovations, 4th Edition, the Free Press, New York.
Rogers, E.V., (2003), Diffusion of Innovations, 5th Edition, the Free Press, New York.
Ronis, D. L., Yates, J. F. and Kirscht, J. P. (1989) Attitudes,decisions, and habits as determinants of repeated behavior.In Pratkanis, A. R., Breckler, S. J. and Greenwald, A. G. (eds), Attitude Structure and Function. Erlbaum, Hillsdale, NJ.
Roselius, T.（1971）, “consumer rankings of risk reduction methods”, Journal of Marketing, Vol.35（Jan）, pp.56-61.
Slkye , C. V., Lou , H. and Day , J. (2002), “The Impact of Perceived Innovation Characteristics on Intention to Use Groupware,” Information Resource, Management Journal, 15, (1), pp.5-12.
Sneddon,Mark.(1997), ”Cyberbanking:Remote Banking Using the Internet”, Australian Business Law Review, 25(1),pp.64-67.
Spence, H. E., J. F. Engel, R. D. Blackwell (1970) ,”Perceived Risk In Mail-Order and Retail Store Buying”, Journal of Marketing Research, Vol. 7, Iss. 3, pp. 364-369.
Stephen, P. R. (2006). Organization Behavior, 11th ed.
Swaminathan V, Lepkowska-White E, Rao BP. (1999) Browsers or buyers incyberspace? An investigation of factors influencing likelihood of electronic exchange. J Comput-Mediat Commun;5 [December].Availab
Tan, M., Teo, T. S. H. (2000), “ Factors Influencing the Adoption of Internet Banking. Journal of the Association for Information Systems, 1(5), pp. 1-42.
Tang , S.-M. (2000), “An impact factor model of Intranet adoption: an exploratory and empirical research,” The Journal of Systems and Software, 51, pp. 157-173.
Taylor, S., & Todd, P. (1995). Understanding information technology usage: A test of competing models. Information Systems Research, 6(2), 144–176.
Thong , J. Y.L. (1999), “An integrated model of information systems adoption In small business,” Journal of Management Information Systems, 15, No.4, pp.187-214.
To, P. L., Liao, C. C., Chiang, C. J., Shih, M. L., and Chang, C. Y., 2008, “An Empirical Investigation of the Factors Affecting the Adoption of Instant Messaging in Organizations”, Computer Standards & Interfaces, Vol.30, No.3, pp.148-156.
Venkatesh, V., Morris, M. G., Davis, G. B., & Davis, F. D. (2003). User acceptance of information technology: Toward a unified view. MIS Quarterly, 27(3), 425–478.
Verplanken, B., Aarts, H., Knippenberg, A., & Moonen, A. (1998). Habit Versus planned behavior: A field experiment. British Journal of Social Psychology, 37(1), 111–128.
Vollink , T. M. and Midden , C. J. H. (2002), “Innovating diffusion of innovation” theory: Innovation characteristics and the intension of utility companies to adopt energy conservation interventions. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 22, pp. 333-344.
Wolfe, R.A. (1994), “Organizational Innovation: Review, Critique and Suggested Research Directions”, Journal of Management Studies, 31, (3), pp.405-443.
Wood, W., Quinn, J. M., and Kashy, D. A. (2002). “Habits in Everyday Life: Thought, Emotion, and Action,” Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 83(6), pp. 1281- 1297.
Yang, S., Lu, Y., S.Gupta., Cao, Y., Zhang, R. (2012). Mobile payment services adoption across time: An empirical study of the effects of behavioral beliefs, social influences, and personal traits. Computer in Human Behavior 28 (2012), pp. 129-142.
網路部份：
商業週刊-商業週刊數位學院 http://www.businessweekly.com.tw/e-academy/index.php
2010聯合國電信聯盟 http://www.gvm.com.tw/Boardcontent_18242.html
Internet World Stats 2012 http://www.internetworldstats.com/stats.htm
台灣網路資訊中心-台灣寬頻網路使用調查：
http://www.twnic.net.tw/download/200307/200307index.shtml
美國市調機構comScore http://www.bnext.com.tw/article/view/cid/0/id/23118
創市際市場研究顧問公司http://www.insightxplorer.com/index.html
Consult顧問公司— http://www.consult.com

指導教授

李小梅(Shau-Mei Li)

審核日期

2012-7-11

推文