在少量多樣化的供應型態下供應商管理與績效的評估—以D 公司為研究對象

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：66

、訪客IP：18.225.56.78

姓名

黃士政(Shih-cheng Huang) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

高階主管企管碩士班

論文名稱

在少量多樣化的供應型態下供應商管理與績效的評估—以D 公司為研究對象

相關論文

★ 內衣業標準工時設定之實務研究	★ 派工法則於縮短DRAM 廠生產週期時間之探討—以A公司導入自動化派工系統為例
★ 企業如何在TQM、TPM及TP等管理模式下運用6 Sigma管理系統之探討—以某日系家電製造公司為例	★ 台灣TFT LCD產業發展及競爭力分析
★ 印刷電路板產業之外包程度與競爭力分析—以個案H公司為例	★ 原料藥廠運籌管理的改善方案與執行績效 -以A公司為例
★ 條碼技術於生產管理的改善應用-以某輕金屬產業公司為例	★ TFT-LCD對膠帶產業未來發展的探討--以膠帶業A公司為探究對象
★ 物流中心揀貨作業改善－以A公司為研究對象	★ 國內上市企業導入ERP系統前後績效評估－以D供應商之ERP系統為例
★ RFID的技術、發展、導入與物流的管理應用	★ 台灣資訊產業兩岸分工經營模式發展探討-以A公司為例
★ 以平衡計分卡探討衛星定位計程車業之經營策略-以A公司為例	★ 自行車業導入豐田生產方式之個案研究
★ 印刷電路板(PCB)多聯板報廢移植探討-以A科技公司為例	★ 台灣電弧爐鋼鐵產業之策略分析-以A公司為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 ( 永不開放)

摘要(中)

近年來受到金融風暴的環境衝擊下，企業經營環境受到嚴峻的考驗，為了追求毛利及企業永續經營，對供應商的依存性也越來越高，企業不再與眾多供應商進行低價策略，而是選擇適合的供應商進行夥伴策略，供應商協同設計與製造模式讓企業的產品開發時程能夠縮減，及材料成本的降低，進而讓產品更具有市場競爭力。
本研究主要的目的在探討少量多樣化的供應商管理與績效評估模式的作法，從經濟學與工廠效益評估的角度，工廠的生產採用少樣多量化是最能發揮效益的。但放眼市場產品，只有原料及終端熱銷產品（如:手機/平板/NB筆電等等），有機會做到少樣多量化。工廠的生產效益也隨著科技技術的精實，讓產品生產速度與品質提升，許多工廠都面臨到一兩天就需要換機種生產，甚至只能生產幾個小時。倘若是標案生產模式，它的生產數量更像多樣少量的特定生產模式，無法大量排線生產，其作業物流需要更有彈性的運作，方能維繫公司的永續經營與成長。對供應鏈而言，除非標準件生產和模組化生產，讓零件與製程變異簡單化。少量多樣化的零組件生產模式造成各階段的生產困擾，卻仍使用著大量生產模式的供應商績效管理模式。
加上標案式的接單生產工廠，其少量多樣化的供應鏈管理，無法利用計劃性生產做為產能調配，又無大量採購的優勢（Buying Power），供應鏈管理的困難程度更較一般消費性電子產品生產工廠為艱困，更需要運用有效的管理模式，來創造出供應商管理績效與價值。藉由以下幾項研究議題來改善少量多樣化的供應商績效：
 如何進行供應商績效評估之研究
 如何進行少量多樣化供應商管理模式研究
 如何對少量多樣化供應商管理做法研究
本研究根據供應商管理與績效評估實務的架構，提出了供應商績效評估量化指標，讓企業在設計績效指標能快速、精準、客觀的選擇評估指標。對其導入過程、供應商管理運作模式及建構供應商管理機制，應可作為日後相關產業廠商導入與建構供應商管理與績效評估的實務運作參考之用。

摘要(英)

With the aggravation of global financial storm in recent years, the business environment of enterprise is undergoing a severe challenge. In the pursuit of gross profit and sustainable operation, enterprise’s dependency on suppliers is getting much higher than the past. They began to choose suitable suppliers for partnership strategy instead of low-price strategy with the mode of collaborative design and manufacture, which helps the enterprises to shorten their products development schedule and lower down the material cost. And then to enhance the market competitiveness greatly.
The main purpose of this study aims at exploring the method of supplier management and performance evaluation of low volume but with great variety production models, which can bring out the best possible results from the perspective of economics and factory benefit assessment. But when we take a broad view of market products, only the raw materials and the end hot-sale products (such as mobile phone, tablet, NB laptops, etc.), have the opportunity to do the model of low volume with great variety. With the accelerated development of technology, the production efficiency has been enhancing day after day, meanwhile the production speed and products quality are promoted as well. Many factories are confronted with the faster and shorter production lead time- from one or two days even to few hours. If bidding model, the production quantity is more like the low volume and great variety production model instead of the mass production. Such model requests more flexibility on the logistics that can help enterprise’s sustainable operation and continuous growth. For supply chain, the standard component and modularization production can only simplify the variation of component and procedure. The low volume quantity and great variety production model caused many problems during the stages of production, but most of factories still use the model of supplier performance management of mass production to manage factories activities.
Combining with the bidding and build-to-order production model, the low volume and great variety production model of supply chain management cannot be used either to plan production for capacity allocation or to have the large number of purchase advantages (Buying Power), which all made the difficulties of supply chain management harder than general consumer electronics products factories’. Therefore, it is more important to use the effective management mode to create the higher supplier management performance and value. The following research topics aim at to improve the low volume and great variety production model of supplier performance:
 How to carry out the research on assessment of supplier performance
 How to study the low volume and great variety model of supplier management
 How to research on the low volume and great variety model of supplier management practices How to research on the low volume and great variety model of supplier management practices
This research is based on the structure of supplier management and performance evaluation practices, and put forward the quantitative indicators of supplier performance evaluation for enterprise to design and select performance indicators promptly, accurately and objectively. For the implement process and supplier management operation model as well as the supplier management mechanism construction, this research as the reference, can truly help the related industries and manufacturers to import and construct the supplier management and performance evaluation practices.

關鍵字(中)

★ 供應鏈
★ 供應商選擇
★ 供應商績效評估
★ 少量多樣化供應商管理

關鍵字(英)

★ Supply chain
★ supplier selection
★ supplier performance evaluation
★ low volume and great variety model of supplier management

論文目次

第一章緒論 1
1.1 前言 1
1.2 研究動機 3
1.3 研究目的 4
1.4 研究範圍 5
1.5 論文架構 5
第二章文獻探討 8
2.1供應商的定義 8
2.1.1 何謂供應鏈 8
2.1.2 供應商的定義 11
2.2 供應商選擇 14
2.3供應商績效評估方法 18
第三章個案公司介紹 21
3.1 個案公司簡介 21
3.2 D公司對供應商的態度 23
3.3 研究對象之產品模式結構與特色 23
3.4 個案對供應商績效評估模式及困擾 25
第四章少量多樣化之供應商管理與績效評估 28
4.1 個案如何進行供應商績效評估之研究 28
4.2個案如何進行少量多樣化供應商管理模式研究 32
4.3個案公司對少量多樣化供應商管理做法研究 39
4.3.1 同步化工程 39
4.3.2 少量多樣化與大量化生產差異做法探討 44
第五章結論與後續研究 50
5.1 結論與建議 50
5.2 研究限制與未來研究 55
5.3 研究貢獻 55
參考文獻 56

參考文獻

中文部分
1. Edward H. Frazella著，何應欽編審(2008/12)，物流與供應鏈管理理論與實務，初版，麥格羅希爾。
2. William J. Stevenson 著，何應欽翻譯，(2010/01)，作業管理，第十版，滄海書局，台中市。
3. 周建佑，(2012)，背光模組產業的協同設計與供應，中央大學管理學院高階主管企管碩士班碩士論文。
4. 莊宏健，(2008)，供應鏈品管機制之研究 — 以台達電光先纖通訊事業部之上由供應鏈為例，中央大學企業管理學系碩士論文。
5. 黃智偉，(2000)，供應鏈管理下供應商選擇評估之研究 — 以台灣地區中衛體系之汽、機車、電腦資訊業為例，雲林科技大學工業工程與管理研究所碩士論文。
6. 程韵婷，2008，從供應商觀點探討供應商發展活動對公司的影響—以台灣汽車產業為例，國立清華大學工業工程與管理學系碩士論文。
7. 錢鑄鈞，(2000)，運用AHP法建構策略性合夥關係之供應商評選模式，輔仁大學管理研究所碩士論文
8. 羅政鈞，(2012)，應用SCOR模型規劃筆電供應鏈以因應中國產業西移趨勢，中央大學管理學院高階主管企管碩士班碩士論文。
9. 蘇雄義與蔡信傑, (2006),物流與供應鏈管理人才職能需求調查與職能落差分析之研究，東吳大學企業管理學系
英文部分
1. Anderson, E. L. Jr., 1994, Evaluate Critical Suppliers, Purchasing, Vol. 117, No. 1, July. pp. 53-56.
2. Barbarosoglu, G., & Yazgac, T., 1997, An Application of the Analytic Hierarchy Process to the Supplier Selection Problem, Production and Inventory management Journal, pp. 14-21.
3. Baily, P., & Farmer, D., 1982, Purchasing Principles and Management, London: Pitman Purchasing Inc.
4. Ballou, R. H., Gilbert S. M., & Mukherjee, A., (2000). New managerial challenges from supply chain opportunities, Industrial Marketing Management, 29,. Pp. 7-18.
5. Choi, T.Y, Hartley, J.L., 1996 , An explortation of supplier selection practices across the supplier chain, Journal of Operations Management, Vol. 14, pp. 333-343.
6. Carter, R., 1995, The Seven Cs of Effective Supplier Evaluation, Purchasing and Supply Management, Apr., pp. 44-45
7. Dickson, Gray W., 1966, An Analysis of Supplier Selection System and Decision, Journal of Purchasing, Vol. 2, No. 1. pp. 5-17
8. Duran S, David Simchi-Levi, T. Liu, & Swann JL, (2008), Operations Research Letters.
9. Goffin, K., Szwejczewski M., & C. New, 1997, Managing Supplier: When Fewer Can Mean More, International Journal of Physical Distribution and Logistics Management, Vol. 27, No. 7, pp. 422-436.
10. Handfield, R. B., Kannan, V. R., & Tan, K. C., 1998, Supplier Chain Management: Supplier Performance and Firm Performance, International Journal of Purchasing and Material Management, 34(3), pp. 2-9.
11. Lehmann, D.R., & O’Shaughnessy, J., 1974, Difference in Attribute Importance for Different Industrial Product, Journal of Marketing, Vol. 38, pp. 36-42.
12. Leavy, B., 1994, Two Strategic Perspectives on the Buyer-Supplier Relationship, Production and Inventory management Journal, 35(2). pp.48.
13. Kaufman, A., Wood, C.H., & Theyel, G., 2000, Collaboration and Technology Linkages: A Strategic Supplier Typology, Strategic Management Journal, Vol. 21, No. 6, pp. 649-663.
14. Lambert, DM, & Cooper ,MC, (2000) , Industrial marketing management New managerial challenges from sup.
15. Miller, J.G., Meyer, A.D., & Nakane, J., 1992, Benchmarking Global Manufacturing-Understanding International Suppliers, Customers, and Competitors, Irwin,.
16. Patton, W. E., 1996, Use of Human Models in Industrial Buyers, Industrial Marking Management, Vol. 25, pp. 135-139.
17. Ross David F. (1997), Competing through Supply Chain Management: Creating Market-Winning Strategies Through Supply Chain Partnerships, London: Chapman & Hall.
18. Thomas, D.J. & Griffin, P.M., 1996. Coordinated Supply Chain management, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 94. No.1, pp. 1-15.
19. Weber, C.A., Current J. R., & Benton, W.C., 1991, Vendor Selection Criteria and Methods, European Journal of Operational Research, Vol. 50, No. 1, pp. 2-18
網站部分
1. Marketwatch 網站(2012) , http://www.marketwatch.com/investing/Stock/AAPL/financials
2. Cnyes 網站(2013), http://www.cnyes.com/usastock/techchart/AAPL.html

指導教授

何應欽

審核日期

2013-6-7

推文