以事件相關腦電位探討細節性與概要性記憶的提取導向

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：100

、訪客IP：3.149.253.73

姓名

蔡幸吟(Hsing-yin Tsai) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

認知與神經科學研究所

論文名稱

以事件相關腦電位探討細節性與概要性記憶的提取導向
(non)

相關論文

★ 意旁結合度、意旁表意透明度對中文閱讀的影響	★ 以行為及事件相關電位探討中文雙字詞的記憶聯結錯誤
★ 項目指示遺忘效果的行為與事件相關電位研究	★ 項目指示遺忘作業中記憶登錄及提取歷程的行為及事件相關腦電位研究
★ 以語意促發作業探討項目指示遺忘中線索對於記憶登錄歷程影響之行為及事件相關腦電位研究	★ 特定與非特定來源記憶提取的行為及事件相關腦電位
★ 以行為及事件相關腦電位探討處理層次與聯結性登錄方式對記憶連結錯誤之影響	★ 中文字詞辨識的語音運作單位
★ 由語意透明度所引發的再認記憶鏡像效應：行為與事件相關腦電位研究	★ 登錄作業對於中文雙字詞語意透明度在再認記憶中所引發鏡像效應之影響：行為及事件相關腦電位實驗
★ 以行為及事件相關腦電位實驗探討前瞻記憶線索出現機率對於前瞻干擾效果的影響	★ 以跨顱電刺激與事件相關腦電位探討左側後頂葉腦區於再認記憶中所扮演之角色
★ 測驗表現回饋對測驗效應之調控的行為與事件相關腦電位研究	★ 以非侵入式腦刺激探討左後側頂葉與情節記憶提取之因果關係
★ 中文假字形聲限制高低對於試誤與無誤學習之影響的行為與事件相關腦電位研究	★ 情緒入碼情境對於記憶登錄與提取中的控制歷程之影響

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

當欲提取的記憶性質不同時，記憶者會對線索做不同的處理以達到最佳的提取效果，這樣的處理歷程稱為記憶提取導向(retrieval orientation)。過去探討細節性（專一性）記憶以及概要性（一般性）記憶之間記憶提取導向的研究多使用富含視覺線索的圖片做為材料，並發現在提取細節性與概要性記憶時，於前額葉處會誘發不同的腦波。本研究目的在於探討除去了圖片豐富的視覺線索後，是否依舊能夠觀察到提取細節性記憶或概要性記憶時存在有記憶提取導向的效果。實驗中使用分組過的中文雙字詞配對來建立語意之間的連結，在每一輪的學習階段受試者會學習三個列表，每個列表包含相同語意連結的16組雙字詞配對（如：體–和藹, 電視–粗暴, 媒體–冷漠, 電視–冷靜…等屬於一個列表；保母–廟會, 保母–夜市, 嬰兒–人群, 嬰兒–舞獅…等屬於另一個列表）。學習之後的測驗階段搭配腦電波的測量，並區分為細節測驗與概要測驗兩種測驗類型：在要求提取細節性記憶的測驗中，受試者被要求對與學習階段完全相同的雙字詞配對回答是；在要求提取概要性記憶的測驗中，則只要出現的中文雙字詞配對之間，語意連結與學習階段相同即可回答是。實驗一的測驗中採用「肯定是/不肯定是/不肯定否/肯定否」的按鍵判斷，實驗二的測驗中去除了信心判斷，受試者僅做「是/否」的按鍵反應。腦電波結果顯示在前額中央及偏左側處，觀察到細節測驗中腦波較概要測驗更為正走向的記憶提取導向效果，此結果顯示提取細節性或概要性記憶時的記憶提取導向，不僅是當材料包含視覺性線索時有效，使用文字材料將線索集中在概念層面時，依舊可以觀察到記憶提取導向的效果。

摘要(英)

Previous studies of retrieval orientation using picture stimuli found that the event-related potentials (ERPs) elicited in retrieving specific (verbatim) information are more positive going than that in retrieving general (gist) information over the frontal scalp region. To test whether the neural mechanisms underlying this retrieval orientation effect are also involved in retrieving conceptual information, the current experiments used semantically related words as materials. At study, participants were presented with lists of Chinese word pairs formed by pairing one of two associated words with different associates of another concept (e.g., 媒體–和藹, 電視–粗暴, 媒體–冷漠, 電視–冷靜, etc., in one list; 保母–廟會, 保母–夜市, 嬰兒–人群, 嬰兒–舞獅, etc., in another list). At test, participants were presented with old pairs (e.g., 媒體–和藹), intra rearranged pairs (re-pairing study pairs belonging to the same study list, e.g., 嬰兒-廟會), inter rearranged pairs (re-pairing study pairs belonging to different study lists, e.g., 電視-夜市), old-new pairs (an old word paired with a new word, e.g., 保母-書套) and new-new pairs (word pair formed by two new words, e.g., 算盤-冰糖). They were asked to respond ‘old’ to old pairs and intra rearranged pairs in the gist test conditions but only respond ‘old’ to old pairs in the verbatim test conditions. ERPs were acquired during test phases. By comparing ERPs elicited by correct rejected new-new pairs in verbatim and gist memory tests, there was a similar pattern that the signal in verbatim test condition were more positive going at frontal region. The result showed that retrieval orientation between specific and general memory retrieval not only exists when retrieval processes were depended on perceptual information but also when depended on conceptual information.

關鍵字(中)

★ 情節記憶
★ 事件相關腦電位
★ 記憶提取導向

關鍵字(英)

論文目次

目錄
第一章緒論 1
1.1影響記憶提取的四大要素 2
1.2記憶提取導向之研究 3
1.3記憶提取導向與模糊痕跡理論之相關實驗 7
第二章與記憶研究相關之事件相關腦電位 10
2.1中額葉新舊效果 11
2.2頂葉新舊效果 11
2.3右側額葉新舊效果 12
2.4小結 14
第三章研究目的與方法 15
第四章實驗一 19
4.1實驗方法 20
4.2實驗結果 26
4.2.1行為資料 26
4.2.2 ERP資料 29
4.3討論 33
第五章實驗二 37
5.1實驗方法 37
5.2實驗結果 38
5.2.1行為資料 38
5.2.2 ERP資料 39
5.3討論 43
第六章綜合討論 49
參考文獻 54
附錄 59
圖目錄
圖1.1：Ranganath and Paller(1999)實驗示意圖……………………………7
圖1.2：Ecker and Zimmer(2009)材料示意圖…………………………………8
圖3.1：Cheng and Rugg(2010)材料示意圖……………………………………16
圖4.1：實驗一材料示意圖………………………………………………………22
圖4.2：實驗一流程示意圖………………………………………………………24
圖4.3：實驗一各反應類別之反應比例（長條圖）……………………………27
圖4.4：實驗一細節測驗下新舊效果之腦波……………………………………30
圖4.5：實驗一概要測驗下新舊效果之腦波……………………………………30
圖4.6：實驗一記憶提取導向之腦波……………………………………………32
圖4.7：實驗一挑選後11位受試者記憶提取導向之腦波 ……………………35
圖5.1：實驗二各反應類別之反應比例…………………………………………39
圖5.2：實驗二細節測驗下新舊效果之腦波……………………………………40
圖5.3：實驗二概要測驗下新舊效果之腦波……………………………………40
圖5.4：實驗二記憶提取導向之腦波……………………………………………44
圖5.5：實驗二挑選後11位受試者記憶提取導向之腦波 ……………………44
表目錄
表4.1：細節與概要測驗下各種配對之作答…………………………………24
表4.1：實驗一各反應類別之反應比例………………………………………28
表4.2：實驗一各反應類別之反應時間………………………………………28
表5.1：實驗二各反應類別之反應時間………………………………………39

參考文獻

Azimian-Faridani, N., & Wilding, E. L. (2006). The influence of criterion shifts on electrophysiological correlates of recognition memory. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 18(7), 1075-1086.
Bridger, E. K., Herron, J. E., Elward, R. L., & Wilding, E. L. (2009). Neural correlates of individual differences in strategic retrieval processing. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 35(5), 1175-1186.
Buckner, R. L., Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D. L., Dale, A. M., Rotte, M., & Rosen, B. R. (1998a). Functional-anatomic study of episodic retrieval. II. Selective averaging of event-related fMRI trials to test the retrieval success hypothesis. Neuroimage, 7(3), 163-175.
Buckner, R. L., Koutstaal, W., Schacter, D. L., Wagnerm A. D., & Rosen, B. R. (1998b). Functional-anatomic study of episodic retrieval using fMRI: I. Retrieval effort versus retrieval success. Neuroimage, 7(3), 151-162.
Cheng, S. -K., & Rugg, M. D.（2004）. An event-related potential study of two kinds of source judgment errors. Cognitive Brain Research, 22(1), 113-127.
Cheng, S. -K., & Rugg, M. D. (2010). Event-related potential correlates of gist and verbatim encoding. International Journal of Psychophysiology, 77(2), 95-105.
Craik, F. I. M. & Lockhart, R. S. (1972). Levels of processing: A framework for memory research. Journal of Verbal Learning & Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 671-684.
Craik, F. I. M., Govoni, R., Naveh-Benjamin, M., & Anderson, N. D. (1996). The effects of divided attention on encoding and retrieval processes in human memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 125(2), 159-180.
Delorme, A. & Makeig, S. (2004). EEGLAB: an open source toolbox for analysis of single-trial EEG dynamics including independent component analysis. Journal of Neuroscience Methods, 134(1), 9-21.
Düzel, E., Yonelinas, A. P., Mangun, G. R., Heinze, H. J., & Tulving, E. (1997). Event related brain potential correlates of two states of conscious awareness in memory. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 94(11), 5973-5978.
Düzel, E., Cabeza, R., Picton, T. W., Yonelinas, A. P., Scheich,H., Heinze, H. -J., & Tulving, E.（1999）. Task-related and item-related brain processes of memory retrieval. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 96(4), 1794-1799.
Dzulkifli, M. A., Sharpe, H. L., & Wilding, E. L. (2004). Separating item-related electrophysiological indices of retrieval eﬀort and retrieval orientation. Brain and Cognition, 55(3), 433-443.
Ecker, U. K. H., & Zimmer, H. D. (2009). ERP evidence for flexible adjustment of retrieval orientation and its influence on familiarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 21(10), 1907-1919.
Groppe, D. M., Urbach, T. P., & Kutas, M. (2011). Mass univariate analysis of event-related brain potentials/fields I: A critical tutorial review. Psychophysiology. 48(12) 1711-1725.
Hayama, H. R., Johnson, J. D., & Rugg, M. D. (2008). The relationship between the right frontal old/new ERP effect and post-retrieval monitoring: specific or non-specific? Neuropsychologia, 46(5), 1211-1223.
Herron, J. E., & Rugg, M. D., (2003). Retrieval orientation and the control of recollection. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience 15(6), 843-854.
Hornberger, M., Morcom, A. M., & Rugg, M. D. (2004). Neural correlates of retrieval orientation: effects of study-test similarity. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 16(7), 1196-1210.
Kapur, S., Craik, F. I. M., Jones, C., Brown, G. M., Houle, S., & Tulving, E. (1995). Functional role of the prefrontal cortex in retrieval of memories: a PET study. Neuroreport 6(14), 1880-1884.
Morris, C. D., Bransford, J. D., & Franks, J. J. (1977). Levels of processing versus transfer appropriate processing. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 16(5), 519-533.Nyberg, L., Tulving, E., Habib, R., Nilsson, L. Kapur, S., Houle, S., Cabeza, R., & Mclntosh, A. R. (1995). Functional brain maps of retrieval mode and recovery of episodic information. Neuroreport 7(1), 249-252.
Paivio, A (1971). Imagery and verbal processes. New York: Holt, Rinehart, and Winston.
Paivio, A (1986). Mental representations: a dual coding approach. Oxford. England: Oxford University Press
Ranganath, C., & Paller, K. A. (1999). Frontal brain potentials during recognition are modulated by requirements to retrieve perceptual detail. Neuron, 22(3), 605-613.
Reyna V. F., & Brainerd C. J. (1995). Fuzzy-trace theory: An interim synthesis. Learning and Individual Differences, 7(1), 1-75.
Robb, W. G. K., & Rugg, M. D. (2002). Electrophysiological dissociation of retrieval orientation and retrieval effort. Psychonomic Bulletin and Review, 9(3), 583-589.
Roediger, H. L., M, Weldon, M. S., & Challis, B. H. (1989). Explaining dissociations between implicit and explicit measures of retention: A processing account. In H. L. Roediger, III, & E I. M. Craik (Eds.), Varieties of memory and consciousness: Essays in honour ofEndel Tulving (pp. 3--41). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Rugg, M. D., & Wilding, E. L. (2000). Retrieval processing and episodic memory. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4(3), 108-115.
Rugg, M. D., Allan, K., & Birch, C. S. (2000). Electrophysiological evidence for the modulation of retrieval orientation by depth of study processing. Journal of Cognitive Neuroscience, 12(4), 664-678.
Rugg, M.D. (2004). Retrieval processing in human memory: Electrophysiological and fMRI evidence.The Cognitive Neurosciences 3rd Ed.,727-737.
Semlitsch, H. V., Anderer, P., Schuster, P., & Presslich, O. (1986). A solution for reliable and valid reduction of ocular artifacts applied to the P300 ERP. Psychophysiology, 23(6), 695-703.
Senkfor, A. J. & Van Petten, C.(1998). Who said what? An event-related potential investigation of source and item memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24(4), 1005-1025.
Tsivilis, D., Otten L. J., & Rugg, M. (2001). Context effects on the neural correlates of recognition memory: An electrophysiological study. Neuron, 31(3), 497-505.
Tulving, E. (1983). Elements of episodic memory. Oxford, England: Oxford University Press.
Tulving, E. (1985). Memory and consciousness. Canadian Psychology, 26(1), 1-12.
Tulving, E. (2002). Episodic memory: From mind to brain. Annual Review of Psychology, 53, 1-25.
Tulving, E., & Thomson, D. M. (1973). Encoding specificity and retrieval processes in episodic memory. Psychological Review, 80(5) 352-373.
Vallesi, A., & Shallice, T. (2006). Prefrontal involvement in source memory: an electrophysiological investigation of accounts concerning confidence and accuracy. Brain Research. 1124(1), 111-125.
Wilding, E. L., & Rugg, M. D. (1996). An event-related potential study of recognition memory with and without retrieval of source. Brain, 119(3), 889-905.
胡志偉、陳貽照、張世華、宋永麒（民85）中文多義詞自由聯想常模。「中華心理學刊」，38，67-168。 (TSSCI)

指導教授

鄭仕坤(Shi-Kun Cheng)

審核日期

2013-11-12

推文