博碩士論文 100458011 完整後設資料紀錄

DC 欄位 語言
DC.contributor財務金融學系在職專班zh_TW
DC.creator吳秋燕zh_TW
DC.creatorChiu-Yen Wuen_US
dc.date.accessioned2013-6-28T07:39:07Z
dc.date.available2013-6-28T07:39:07Z
dc.date.issued2013
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:444/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=100458011
dc.contributor.department財務金融學系在職專班zh_TW
DC.description國立中央大學zh_TW
DC.descriptionNational Central Universityen_US
dc.description.abstract過去十年以來,赤道原則協助金融機構將專案融資對環境與社會影響程度降至最低以及有效管理,其規範版本也發布第三版。本文探討為何跨國性金融機構願意自發地採納赤道原則,甚而納入其內部風險管理流程,但卻也有金融機構不願採納,而採納之金融機構是否依赤道原則要求及所宣稱的評估流程進行准駁審理,最後將探討本地主管機關及金融機構應否重視以及採納赤道原則。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractFor ten years, the EP framework has helped ensure that the environmental and social impacts of project finance deals are minimized and managed responsibly. The Equator Principles III approved and released. My study, therefore, wants to inquire, on the one hand, why so many international financial institutions agree to enact such voluntary principles and even incorporate them into their internal risk management procedure, and on the other hand, some institutions reject them at all? Besides, do those institutions that claim to follow EPs actually apply the principles to the procedure of investment or credit checking? Afterwards, will examine the Financial Supervisory Commission and the local Taiwanese financial institutions should give weight to and adopt the Equator Principles.en_US
DC.subject赤道原則zh_TW
DC.subject專案融資zh_TW
DC.subject金融機構zh_TW
DC.subject社會責任zh_TW
DC.subjectThe Equator Principlesen_US
DC.subjectproject financingen_US
DC.subjectfinancial institutionsen_US
DC.subjectsocial responsibilityen_US
DC.title赤道原則的省思zh_TW
dc.language.isozh-TWzh-TW
DC.titleReflections on the Equator Principlesen_US
DC.type博碩士論文zh_TW
DC.typethesisen_US
DC.publisherNational Central Universityen_US

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明