| dc.description.abstract | To develop the policy of economics for the next generation, Germany government published the industry 4.0 guild with enterprise and non-governmental organization. To the path to industry 4.0, company needed to perform digital transformation. The dilemmas were company didn’t know the goal or the strategy were correct or not. Even if company wasn’t know the benefit and the expense. Most important was company can’t measure the capability of industry 4.0 by itself. Therefore, company need to measure the capability of industry 4.0 by itself and then compare the current situation with goal that company know which dimensions should be improved. This study is based on the results of a study conducted by Puchan, Krischke and Jun-Der Leu on 01/01/2019. The questionnaire of the survey on the current status of Industry 4.0 in Taiwan′s regional manufacturing industry was published in Magazine, Issue 665, September 16, 2012. The maturity level of industry 4.0 were combined with five dimensions：strategy, organization, digital connection, digital service and digital factory. Our study defined strategy and organization as digital management aspect and defined digital connection, digital service and digital factory as digital engineering aspect. The financial performance aspect included gross margin, capital productivity and output per capital. Three assumptions are made in this study. The study used the structural equation model (SEM) method to analyze how the digital management aspect and digital engineering aspect affect financial performance aspect. There are three Hypothesis in this study. The results of the study show that Hypothesis 1 and 3 are valid. Assumption 2 does not hold. If company always improved the machine or software in the factory that can’t be build up the financial performance, company should be considered the strategy and organization such as reinforce or participation. | en_US |