| dc.description.abstract | Rubber products are widely used in daily life and are an important daily necessities indispensable in modern life. Its related industries are also one of Taiwan′s key development projects. However, the rubber manufacturing process is different from the general manufacturing process. The raw materials used are diverse and the product items are also different. Therefore, the staff will be exposed to various chemicals during the entire rubber manufacturing process. The working environment is not only easy to hide chemicals. In addition to hazards such as odor, high heat, dust and noise, high-horsepower rollers, rolling machines and other mechanical equipment are often installed. If workers are accidentally involved in operations, they may cause major occupational disasters. In view of this, in order to reduce the potential risks of working in the rubber industry, it is necessary to understand the hazards of rubber in the manufacturing process. This research is based on the ＂ISO 45001 Occupational Safety and Health Management System Specification＂, and conducted hazard identification and risk assessment for the five units of the manufacturing process of the case factory, namely Manufacturing One, Manufacturing Two, Manufacturing Three, Manufacturing Four, and Public Works. The risk score is based on severity × probability of harm × control effect = risk score (S × P × C = R). According to the statistical data of this research, unacceptable risk (level II ~ V, 101 points or more), there are 11 items in the first manufacturing One (31%), manufacturing Two has 2 items (5.5%), and manufacturing Three has 2 items. (5.5%), manufacturing four has 4 items (11%), public works has 17 items (47%), a total of 36 items (100%); acceptable risk (level I, 100 points or less) Manufacturing One has 4 items (15%), Manufacturing Two has 8 items (30%), Manufacturing Three has 6 items (22%), manufacturing four has 6 items(22%), public works has 3items (11%), total 27 items (100%). According to the results of the hazard identification risk assessment and analysis, the hazard risk type score of each department′s process is the highest (scores in order): The hazard risk value of ＂being caught＂ in the first class of manufacturing is 770 points (31.5%), the risk value of ＂electric shock＂ hazard in the public works class is 648 points (26.5%), and the risk of ＂being caught in the second class＂ is 648 points (26.5%). The ＂clamp＂ hazard risk value is 395 points (16.2%), the high temperature burn hazard risk value of the manufacturing class 3 is 360 points (14.7%), and the ＂noise＂ hazard risk value of the manufacturing class 4 is 270 points (11.1%). This study compared the types of occupational disasters that occurred in the ＂108 Years of Labor Inspection Statistics Annual Report＂ of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration of the Ministry of Labor. The results presented by the research are consistent, but after in-depth research and discussion, it is found that the health hazards of the health risk assessment, such as dust, chemicals, human factors, and other health hazards, may be underestimated. You can refer to the working environment for this hazard in the future. Monitoring plan, chemical safety data sheet (SDS) and other related materials, and then do further evaluation research and discussion. In addition, this research suggests that unacceptable risk projects should be considered in the priority order of elimination, replacement, engineering control, management control, and personal protective equipment, and effective risk reduction control measures should be taken based on factors such as existing technical capabilities and available resources. After the control measures are confirmed, relevant personnel should be assigned responsible for planning and implementation, and their implementation status should be tracked regularly; for the control measures that are expected to be taken to reduce risks, the residual risks after control should be evaluated, and their applicability and effectiveness should be reviewed after completion. It is confirmed that the risk can be reduced to the expected effect; for those who cannot achieve the expected effect, it should be corrected in due course, and other effective control measures should be taken when necessary. The results of this study will not only help improve the effectiveness of the case factory in implementing the risk assessment of the occupational safety and health management system, but also hope to be helpful to the rubber industry. | en_US |