| dc.description.abstract | With technology developments, competitors have improved their products to meet customer needs, so that companies have to go through life cycle tests such as rising, peak, plateau, and low tide periods. Some companies utilize mergers and acquisitions to obtain complementary or overlapping technologies. In order to break through growth from a stable period, and then create a situation of comeback victory.
It is challenging to assess whether the intangible assets acquired by the company through mergers and acquisitions are complementary or overlapping technologies using indirect assessment or patent number analysis. This research takes the most representative passive component of mergers and acquisitions in recent years - Yageo Co., Ltd. as a case study. The target, and according to the staged mergers and acquisitions of the case companies, the ceramic components and magnetic materials department of Philips in 2000, Huaya Electronics Co., Ltd. and Chenyuan Technology Co., Ltd. in 2008, Pusi Electronics Co., Ltd. in 2018, KEMET in 2020, etc. Compare the patented technologies one by one before and after mergers and acquisitions, in order to judge whether Yageo′s acquisition of intangible assets in stages is complementary or overlapping technical results. | en_US |