| dc.description.abstract | At present, public projects comply with the ＂Key Points for Public Works Construction Quality Management stipulated by the Public Works Committee of the Executive Yuan＂. For projects of more than NT$50 million and less than NT$200 million, at least one construction supervisor must be stationed. Therefore, supervision of small and medium-sized cases is required. The manufacturing unit usually dispatches only one supervisor to the site to perform supervision and inspection work. When a manufacturer′s major poor construction quality occurs during abnormal construction periods, the owner will require the construction supervisor to take responsibility for quality management, construction site management, and occupational safety and health management. Based on the actual situation of a general-sized construction site, the manpower cannot be used for shifts, which is obviously insufficient. The staffing needs to be expanded to cope with the rotation of construction supervision and inspection operations between the manufacturer′s normal working hours and abnormal periods. According to ＂Article 63, Paragraph 2 of the Government Procurement Act＂, it only stipulates the liability of one party for errors, misrepresentations or mismanagement, resulting in damage to the other party. In practice, there is no specific provision for the identification of false supervision during abnormal construction periods.
This study mainly relies on the ＂Judicial Yuan Judgment System Judgment Inquiry＂, ＂Resolutions of the Interior Ministry Architect Disciplinary Review Committee of the Ministry of the Interior and Land Management Bureau＂, and ＂Executive Yuan Public Works Committee′s Procurement Dispute Resolution Progress Inquiry System＂ Search relevant cases to clarify the quality control responsibilities and penalties that supervision units should bear during abnormal construction periods. Through an expert questionnaire survey, we obtained the industry’s true views on supervision manpower, supervision responsibilities, supervision fee payment, and the identification of false supervision during abnormal construction periods. It is hoped that the above-mentioned review recommendations will be incorporated into laws and contracts, so that currently unclear regulations and contract terms can be revised more clearly through the review. | en_US |