博碩士論文 111427020 完整後設資料紀錄

DC 欄位 語言
DC.contributor人力資源管理研究所zh_TW
DC.creator楊家綺zh_TW
DC.creatorChia-Chi Yangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2024-7-22T07:39:07Z
dc.date.available2024-7-22T07:39:07Z
dc.date.issued2024
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:444/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=111427020
dc.contributor.department人力資源管理研究所zh_TW
DC.description國立中央大學zh_TW
DC.descriptionNational Central Universityen_US
dc.description.abstractWhetstone(2002)指出,僕人式領導理論有過度理想化的傾向,而在1970年僕人式領導的概念出現以來,近50年所累積的學術文獻仍大多討論僕人式領導的有利影響,也有少數幾篇聚焦討論僕人式領導的雙面刃影響。本研究藉用悖論領導與元悖論之觀點,選擇加入與僕人式領導近乎對立、且是華人文化較為熟知的領導風格—威權式領導納入討論範疇。 本研究採用多項式回歸與反應曲面法,開創性地討論並分析當主管是否同時具備僕人式領導與威權式領導與否,或是僅採用上述單一領導風格時,這兩種迥異的領導風格將會對部屬的職涯適應力與任務性績效帶來的影響為何。經回收並採用台灣本土企業共257份主管—部屬配對問卷後,研究結果發現,當主管同時存在「僕人式—威權式」元悖論領導時,比起採用單一風格或完全不具備這兩種領導風格時,將能使其職涯適應力達到最佳的效果。此外,若僅使用僕人式領導或威權式領導風格時,兩者之間對職涯適應力的差異性並不大;若兩種風格皆不採用,則會使部屬有最低的職涯適應力效果,同時也發現職涯適應力會在「僕人式—威權式」元悖論領導與任務性績效之間存在中介效果。最後,本研究也依據上述研究結果提出討論,並提供管理上、實務上與未來學術研究上的建議。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractWhetstone(2002)pointed out that servant leadership theory tends to be overly idealized. Despite nearly 50 years of accumulated academic literature since the emergence of servant leadership concept in the 1970s, the majority of studies have focused on the beneficial effects of servant leadership, with only a few discussing its double-edged impact. Based on the perspectives of paradoxical leadership and meta-paradoxical leadership, this study chooses to include authoritarian leadership, a leadership style almost diametrically opposed to servant leadership and more familiar in Chinese culture, for discussion. Using polynomial regression and response surface methodology, this study innovatively explores and analyzes how the contrasting leadership styles of servant leadership and authoritarian leadership, or the use of either style alone, affect subordinates′ career adaptability and task performance. After collecting and analyzing data from 257 supervisor-subordinate paired questionnaires in Taiwanese local companies, the results reveal that when supervisors exhibit both servant and authoritarian leadership styles simultaneously, it leads to the optimal enhancement of subordinates′ career adaptability. Additionally, there is not a significant difference in career adaptability when only one leadership style (either servant or authoritarian) is employed. However, the absence of both leadership styles results in the lowest levels of career adaptability for subordinates. Furthermore, it is found that career adaptability mediates the relationship between servant-authoritarian leadership styles and task performance. Finally, based on these findings, this study provides discussions and practical implications for management and future academic research.en_US
DC.subject僕人式領導zh_TW
DC.subject威權式領導zh_TW
DC.subject元悖論zh_TW
DC.subject職涯適應力zh_TW
DC.subject任務性績效zh_TW
DC.subjectServant Leadershipen_US
DC.subjectAuthoritarian Leadershipen_US
DC.subjectMeta-Paradoxical Leadershipen_US
DC.subjectCareer Adaptabilityen_US
DC.subjectTask Performanceen_US
DC.title僕人與威權領導、職涯適應力以及任務性績效的關聯性—一項元悖論觀點的探討zh_TW
dc.language.isozh-TWzh-TW
DC.titleThe Relationship Between Servant Leadership, Authoritarian Leadership, Career Adaptability, and Task Performance: An Exploration of the Meta-Paradoxical Perspectiveen_US
DC.type博碩士論文zh_TW
DC.typethesisen_US
DC.publisherNational Central Universityen_US

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明