博碩士論文 89425018 完整後設資料紀錄

DC 欄位 語言
DC.contributor財務金融學系zh_TW
DC.creator蔣自強zh_TW
DC.creatorTzu-Chiang Chiangen_US
dc.date.accessioned2002-7-17T07:39:07Z
dc.date.available2002-7-17T07:39:07Z
dc.date.issued2002
dc.identifier.urihttp://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:444/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=89425018
dc.contributor.department財務金融學系zh_TW
DC.description國立中央大學zh_TW
DC.descriptionNational Central Universityen_US
dc.description.abstract摘 要 本論文主要探討摩台指期貨與台指期貨避險效率的比較,實證上發現摩台指期貨市場因台指期貨推出,進而促進市場深化,避險效率逐漸增加,此外,亦發現在實證期間台指期貨的避險效率較摩台指為佳;若考慮降稅的效果,發現雖然降低交易稅可以提高交易量,促進交易意願,但不影響避險效率;另外,實證發現估計期的長短並不影響避險的效率,而避險效率似乎隨避險期間增加而提高。zh_TW
dc.description.abstractAbstract This paper compared the hedging effectiveness of index futures traded in TAIFEX and SGXTW traded in SGX. First the hedging effectiveness of TAIEX value weighted index hedged with SGXTW before and after FITX offered by TAIFEX was compared. Second, the hedging effectiveness of TAIEX value weighted index hedged with SGXTW and FITX were compared. The possible reasons that FITX outperformed SGXTW may be due to the contract specification and local market advantages. Third, the impact to hedging effectiveness of trading- tax-reduction was also compared. It seems no impact due to the reduction. The result was similar to the finding in 2000 by Kavussanos and Nomikos. Forth, the relation between estimation period and hedge period was discussed. The hedging effectiveness does not appear to be related to estimation period length and tends to increased as the hedging horizon increased.en_US
DC.subject避險zh_TW
DC.subject效率zh_TW
DC.subjecteffectivenessen_US
DC.subjecthedgeen_US
DC.title指數期貨避險效率之比較:台灣與新加坡指數期貨市場之實證zh_TW
dc.language.isozh-TWzh-TW
DC.titleHedging Effectiveness Comparison: Evidence From Taiwan and Singapore Index Futures Marketen_US
DC.type博碩士論文zh_TW
DC.typethesisen_US
DC.publisherNational Central Universityen_US

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明