| DC 欄位 |
值 |
語言 |
| DC.contributor | 光電科學與工程學系 | zh_TW |
| DC.creator | 黃昭準 | zh_TW |
| DC.creator | Chao-Chun Huang | en_US |
| dc.date.accessioned | 2003-7-9T07:39:07Z | |
| dc.date.available | 2003-7-9T07:39:07Z | |
| dc.date.issued | 2003 | |
| dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:444/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=90226018 | |
| dc.contributor.department | 光電科學與工程學系 | zh_TW |
| DC.description | 國立中央大學 | zh_TW |
| DC.description | National Central University | en_US |
| dc.description.abstract | 生物感測技術(biosensing technology)是泛指對生物樣本中的微量化學、生物分子濃度或分子間反應進行檢測分析。光學生物感測器因為具高敏感度、快速檢測的優點，近年來被積極採用於生物感測的研究中，而全反射受挫法(Attenuated Total Reflection, ATR)與反射式干涉光譜法(Reflectometry Interference Spectroscopy, RIFS)就是其中的兩種。
本論文是以全反射受挫與反射式干涉光譜法在實驗及理論上比較對streptavidin分子在polystyrene膜表面結合(adsorption) 之反應，作一個定性的分析，並比較其優缺點。 | zh_TW |
| dc.description.abstract | Optical biosensing has the advantages of high sensitivity, convenience, sensing real-time and fast detection. Attenuated Total Reflection (ATR) and Reflectometry Interference Spectroscopy (RIFS) are both optical sensors and were applied well in biosensing technology.
In this paper, we compare ATR with RIFS by sensing the adsorption of streptavidin on the polystyrene film surface. The advantages and disadvantages of ATR and RIFS were also discussed. | en_US |
| DC.subject | 反射式干涉光譜 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | 表面電漿 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | 全反射受挫 | zh_TW |
| DC.subject | ATR | en_US |
| DC.subject | Inteference | en_US |
| DC.subject | surface plasmon | en_US |
| DC.subject | RIFS | en_US |
| DC.title | 比較全反射受挫法與反射式干涉光譜法在生物感測上之應用 | zh_TW |
| dc.language.iso | zh-TW | zh-TW |
| DC.title | Comparison between ATR and RIFS in biosensing application | en_US |
| DC.type | 博碩士論文 | zh_TW |
| DC.type | thesis | en_US |
| DC.publisher | National Central University | en_US |