博碩士論文 981204003 完整後設資料紀錄

DC 欄位	值	語言
DC.contributor	哲學研究所	zh_TW
DC.creator	林恩志	zh_TW
DC.creator	En-chih Lin	en_US
dc.date.accessioned	2012-7-7T07:39:07Z
dc.date.available	2012-7-7T07:39:07Z
dc.date.issued	2012
dc.identifier.uri	http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:444/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=981204003
dc.contributor.department	哲學研究所	zh_TW
DC.description	國立中央大學	zh_TW
DC.description	National Central University	en_US
dc.description.abstract	本篇論文的主旨在於否證「強義人類中心主義」與「非人類中心主義」，並且指出，相較於前二者，「弱義人類中心主義」才是一套較為完善的環境倫理學系統。 　　本篇論文由 Norton 的人類中心主義理論作為參考系，涵蓋了以下的重點：(1) 人類中心主義的定義：由諸多歧異的字詞與諸學者的定義，釐清三種不同的人類中心主義；(2) 「強義人類中心主義」的理論錯誤之處：由非人類中心主義學者的理論來否證「強義人類中心主義」；(3) 「非人類中心主義的理論」錯誤之處：指出非人類中心主義理論與其立場的錯誤之處；(4) 為何我們應該選用「弱義人類中心主義」：說明為何「弱義人類中心主義」是一套較為完善的環境倫理學。	zh_TW
dc.description.abstract	The main thrust of the thesis that is to refute “strong anthropocentrism” and “non-anthropocentrism”, and that indicate “weak anthropocentrism” is a better approach in the environmental ethic. 　　This thesis that it takes the opportunity to Norton‟s Anthropocentrism as a framework, deals with four issues. First, to define two kinds of Anthropocentrisms, I attempt to discuss the different definition between researchers. Besides, I would take the thesis of “non-anthropocentrism “ to refute “strong anthropocentrism”. Thirdly, I would point out there are some mistakes in thesis of “non-anthropocentrism “. Finally, I will explain why we should exercise “weak anthropocentrism” as a complete environmental perspective.	en_US
DC.subject	人類中心主義	zh_TW
DC.subject	物種主義	zh_TW
DC.subject	動物權	zh_TW
DC.subject	環境倫理學	zh_TW
DC.subject	anthropocentrism	en_US
DC.subject	speciesism	en_US
DC.subject	animal rights	en_US
DC.subject	environmental ethic	en_US
DC.title	人類中心主義批判研究	zh_TW
dc.language.iso	zh-TW	zh-TW
DC.title	Study of Anthropocentrism Critique	en_US
DC.type	博碩士論文	zh_TW
DC.type	thesis	en_US
DC.publisher	National Central University	en_US