DC 欄位 |
值 |
語言 |
DC.contributor | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
DC.creator | 呂盈秀 | zh_TW |
DC.creator | Ying-hsiu LU | en_US |
dc.date.accessioned | 2013-6-18T07:39:07Z | |
dc.date.available | 2013-6-18T07:39:07Z | |
dc.date.issued | 2013 | |
dc.identifier.uri | http://ir.lib.ncu.edu.tw:444/thesis/view_etd.asp?URN=981204008 | |
dc.contributor.department | 哲學研究所 | zh_TW |
DC.description | 國立中央大學 | zh_TW |
DC.description | National Central University | en_US |
dc.description.abstract | 本文主要探討家務勞動問題,家務勞動自工業革命、資本主義興起之後,成為一種私有的勞動,與市場中的雇傭勞動形成對立。這樣的劃分也伴隨著一種性別分工的現象,男性最主要的責任在於從事雇傭勞動以維持家計,女性則負擔家務勞動。女性在這樣的背景之下從事家務勞動,被貼上了被丈夫供養、不事生產的標籤,遭受到了經濟的剝削,以及文化上不被認可。
女性主義者們對於家務勞動的議題,分別運用了馬克思主義和父權體制來解釋,女性在資本主義制度下為何受經濟壓迫;以及父權體制如何造成性別壓迫,使女性在文化上遭受錯誤認可。
而本文的文章脈絡,是以經濟面向去討論家務勞動的議題,嘗試由經濟的角度解釋家務勞動的議題,並且納入性別文化上的觀點,最後證明,要解決家務勞動,經濟改革具有優先性,但文化上的變革也不可少。 | zh_TW |
dc.description.abstract | The domestic labor issue, since its emergence in the 1960s, has posed a series of fundamental challenges to Marxism’s sole focus on class oppression. Feminists, especially Radical feminists, accuse of Marxist feminism explaining away the oppression of woman in terms of class analysis, and thus overlooking patriarchy as the root cause of women’s oppression. On the other hand, Socialist feminism tries to reconcile Radical feminism and Marxist feminism by positing social structure as capitalist patriarchy. In this thesis, I have stated in detail the debate among feminists and defended Marxist feminism. | en_US |
DC.subject | 家務勞動 | zh_TW |
DC.subject | 馬克思主義 | zh_TW |
DC.subject | 馬克思主義女性主義 | zh_TW |
DC.subject | 社會主義女性主義 | zh_TW |
DC.subject | domestic labor | en_US |
DC.subject | Marxism | en_US |
DC.subject | Marxist Feminism | en_US |
DC.subject | socialist feminism | en_US |
DC.title | 論資本主義之下的家務勞動──馬克思主義與女性主義的觀點和爭論 | zh_TW |
dc.language.iso | zh-TW | zh-TW |
DC.type | 博碩士論文 | zh_TW |
DC.type | thesis | en_US |
DC.publisher | National Central University | en_US |