摘要(英) |
With the analysis of the import and export trade data between Taiwan and New Zealand, the present study aims to discuss the effects on the industry and the policies on its trade diversion effect after ANZTEC worked out on Dec., 1st, 2013.
The data resource of the present study is from the Global Trade Atlas, an online trade data system of the world’s merchandise trade statistics. The period of the data selected for the analysis is from Jan., 2008 to Feb., 2015, total 86 months. The data, classified with HS Code, was analyzed via T-Test, Time Series Forecasting, and other methods.
The results showed that after ANZTEC worked out, the film, TV, and music industry were potential but not profitable, the steel industry was greatly beneficial, and finally, the export of other industries such as generally increased but their import of NZ decreased. To conclude, metal product manufacturing (excluding mechanic equipment), food processing industry, and furniture manufacturing were the potential export industries from Taiwan to New Zealand.
|
參考文獻 |
[1]Anderson J. & Wincoop E., 2001, Gravity with Gravitas:A Solution to the Border Puzzle, National Bureau of Economic Research, pp. 1-37.
[2]Anderson, J. E., & Van Wincoop, E., 2004, Trade costs, Massachusetts Avenue: National Bureau of Economic Research, Working Paper 10480.
[3]Balassa, B., 2013, The Theory of Economic Integration(Routledge Revivals), Routledge, p. 2.
[4]Bergstrand, J. H., 1985, The Gravity Equation in International Trade: Some Microeconomic Foundations and Empirical Evidence, The Review of Economics and Statistics, pp. 474-481.
[5]Goode, W., 2007, Dictionary of Trade Policy Terms, Cambridge: UK: Cambridge University Press..
[6]Harikumar, M. A., 2014, Changing Phases of the India′s International Trade before and after Liberalization Period, International Journal of Application or Innovation in Engineering & Management (IJAIEM), 3(3), pp. 72-76.
[7]Islam, M. S., & Chowdhury, I. U. A., 2012, An Evaluation of the Trade Relations of Bangladesh with ASEAN: Justification of Being a Future Member, European Journal of Business and Management, 4(8), pp. 202-211.
[8]Islam, M. S., & Khanam, R. T., 2014, Trade Performance of Bangladesh with East: An Evaluative Study, Asian Journal of Management Sciences & Education, 10, 3(4), pp. 1-18.
[9]Kanaka, S., & Chinadurai, M., 2012, A Study of Comparative Advantage of Indian Agricultural Exports, Journal of Management and Science, 9, 2(3), pp. 1-9.
[10]Singh, M. & Kumar, N., 2014-2015, Impact of WTO on Indo-Russian Trade Performance since Russian Entry in WTO, International Journal of Management and Commerce Innovations, 2(2), pp. 509-517.
[11]Plummer, M. G., Cheong, D. & Hamanaka, S., 2010, Methodology for Impact Assessment of Free Trade Agreements, Asian Development Bank, pp. 7-96.
[12]Ricardo, D., 1817, Principles of Political Economy and Taxation 3ed., Everyman Library, pp. 261-275.
[13]Baldwin, R. E. 1997, The Causes of Regionalism, The World Economy, pp. 865-888.
[14]Richardson, M., 1993, Endogenous Protection and Trade Diversion. Journal of International Economics, Issue 34, pp. 309-324.
[15]Smith, A. 1776, An Inquiry into the Nature And Causes of the Wealth of Nations, London: A. Strahan . pp. 287-294.
[16]Sullivan, A., & Sheffrin, S. M., 2003, Economics: Principles in action, Prenticce Hall, p. 453.
[17]Viner, J., 1950, The Economics of Customs Unions, Chapter IV, New York: Carnegie Endowment for International Peace, pp. 41-81.
[18]Winters, A. L, 1991, International Economics, Volume IV, Routledge, pp. 528.
[19]World Trade Organization. Scope of RTAs. 2015年5月20日,取自 https://www.wto.org/english/tratop_e/region_e/scope_rta_e.htm。
[20]江啟臣,WTO杜哈回合談判復談及其對台灣之重要性,臺灣經濟研究月刊,第30卷第3期,6-7頁,2007年。
[21]吳佳勳和徐世勳,「臺紐自由貿易協定」的洽簽對臺、紐、澳經濟影響之一般均衡分析,臺灣經濟預測與政策,第35卷第1期,1-39頁,2004年。
[22]洪德欽,區域經濟整合與GATT/WTO,臺大法學論叢,第29卷第4期,209-257頁,2000年。
[23]張文朗,貿易創造與貿易轉移論的再思考,世界經濟研究,第2冊,61-64頁,1996年。
[24]張彬和張澍,美國在NAFTA 中的貿易創造與貿易轉移: 1994~ 2003,世界經濟, 第 8 冊,11-21頁,2005年。
[25]蕭振寰,台灣加入GATT/WTO的歷史回顧,臺灣國際法季刊,第2卷第2期, 323-386頁,2005年6月。
|