參考文獻 |
Acur, N., Kandemir, D., de Weerd-Nederhof, P. C., & Song, M. (2010). Exploring the Impact of Technological Competence Development on Speed and NPD Program Performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 27(6), 915-929.
Amason, A. C., Thompson, K. R., Hochwarter, W. A., & Harrison, A. W. (1995). Conflict – An Important Dimension in Successful Management Teams.Organizational Dynamics, 24(2), 20-35.
Bagozzi, Richard P, & Yi, Youjae. (1988). On the evaluation of structural equation models. Journal of the academy of marketing science, 16(1), 74-94.
Baron, R. M., & Kenny, D. A. (1986). The moderator-mediator variable distinction in social psychological research: Conceptual, strategic, and statistical considerations. . Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 51, 1173-1182.
Baumeister, R. F., Bratslavsky, E., Muraven, M., & Tice, D. M. (1998). Ego depletion: Is the active self a limited resource? Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 74(5), 1252-1265.
Bentler, Peter M. (1992). On the fit of models to covariances and methodology to the Bulletin. Psychological bulletin, 112(3), 400.
Boulding, K. E. (1963). Conflict and Defense. New York: Harper and Row.
Byrne, B. M. (1998). Structural equation modeling with LISREL, PRELIS, and SIMPLIS: Basic concepts, applications, and programming: Psychology Press.
Chandy, R. K., & Tellis, G. J. (2000). The incumbent′s curse? Incumbency, size, and radical product innovation. Journal of Marketing, 64(3), 1-17.
Chin, Wynne W, & Todd, Peter A. (1995). On the use, usefulness, and ease of use of structural equation modeling in MIS research: a note of caution. MIS quarterly, 237-246.
Dacin, M. T., Ventresca, M. J., & Beal, B. D. (1999). The embeddedness of organizations: Dialogue & directions. Journal of Management, 25(3), 317-356.
De Dreu, C. K. W. (2006). When too little or too much hurts: Evidence for a curvilinear relationship between task conflict and innovation in teams. Journal of Management, 32(1), 83-107.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & Weingart, L. R. (2003). Task versus relationship conflict, team performance, and team member satisfaction: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 88(4), 741-749.
De Dreu, C. K. W., & West, M. A. (2001). Minority dissent and team innovation: The importance of participation in decision making. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86(6), 1191-1201.
de Wit, F. R. C., Greer, L. L., & Jehn, K. A. (2012). The Paradox of Intragroup Conflict: A Meta-Analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 97(2), 360-390.
Dougherty, D. (1992). Interpretive Barriers to Successful Product Innovation in Large Firms.Organization Science, 3(2), 179-202.
Farh, J. L., Lee, C., & Farh, C. I. C. (2010). Task Conflict and Team Creativity: A Question of How Much and When. Journal of Applied Psychology, 95(6), 1173-1180.
Gatignon, H., & Xuereb, J. M. (1997). Strategic orientation of the firm and new product performance. Journal of Marketing Research, 34(1), 77-90.
Granovetter, M. (1985). Economic action and social structure: The problem of embeddedness. American Journal of Sociology, 91(3), 481-510.
Guetzkow, H., & Gyr, J. (1954). An Analysis of Conflict in Decision-Making Groups. Human Relations, 7, 367-382.
Hair, Joseph F, Anderson, Rolph E, Tatham, Ronlad L, & Black, William C. (1998). Multivariate data analysis, 5th. NY: Prentice Hall International.
Heide, J. B., & Miner, A. S. (1992). The Shadow of The Future – Effects of Anticipated Interaction and Frequency of Contact on Buyer-Seller Cooperation.Academy of Management Journal, 35(2), 265-291.
Hinds, P. J., & Bailey, D. E. (2003). Out of sight, out of sync: Understanding conflict in distributed teams. Organization Science, 14(6), 615-632.
Hinds, P. J., & Mortensen, M. (2005). Understanding conflict in geographically distributed teams: The moderating effects of shared identity, shared context, and spontaneous communication. Organization Science, 16(3), 290-307.
Hu, Li-tze, & Bentler, Peter M. (1998). Fit indices in covariance structure modeling: Sensitivity to underparameterized model misspecification. Psychological methods, 3, 424-453.
Jehn, K. A. (1995). A Multimethod Examination of The Benefits and Detriments of Intragroup Conflict.Administrative Science Quarterly, 40(2), 256-282.
Jehn, K. A. (1997). Qualitative analysis of conflict types and dimensions in organizational groups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(3), 530-557.
Jehn, K. A., & Bendersky, C. (2003). Intragroup conflict in organizations: A contingency perspective on the conflict-outcome relationship. Research in Organizational Behavior, Vol 25, 25, 187-242.
Jehn, K. A., & Mannix, E. A. (2001). The dynamic nature of conflict: A longitudinal study of intragroup conflict and group performance. Academy of Management Journal, 44(2), 238-251.
Jehn, K. A., Northcraft, G. B., & Neale, M. A. (1999). Why differences make a difference: A field study of diversity, conflict, and performance in workgroups. Administrative Science Quarterly, 44(4), 741-763. 4
Kline, P. (1998). The new psychometrics: Science, psychology and measurement.
Korsgaard, M. A., Jeong, S. S., Mahony, D. M., & Pitariu, A. H. (2008). A Multilevel View of Intragroup Conflict. Journal of Management, 34(6), 1222-1252.
Lazzarini, S. G., Miller, G. J., & Zenger, T. R. (2008). Dealing with the Paradox of Embeddedness: The Role of Contracts and Trust in Facilitating Movement Out of Committed Relationships. Organization Science, 19(5), 709-728.
Levin, D. Z., & Cross, R. (2004). The strength of weak ties you can trust: The mediating role of trust in effective knowledge transfer. Management Science, 50(11), 1477-1490.
Lovelace, K., Shapiro, D. L., & Weingart, L. R. (2001). Maximizing cross-functional new product teams′ innovativeness and constraint adherence: A conflict communications perspective. Academy of Management Journal, 44(4), 779-793.
Matsuo, M. (2006). Customer orientation, conflict, and innovativeness in Japanese sales departments. Journal of Business Research, 59(2), 242-250.
Mayer, R. C., Davis, J. H., & Schoorman, F. D. (1995). An Integrative Model of Organizational Trust. Academy of Management Review, 20(3), 709-734.
McEvily, B., & Marcus, A. (2005). Embedded ties and the acquisition of competitive capabilities. Strategic Management Journal, 26(11), 1033-1055.
Pavlou, P. A., & El Sawy, O. A. (2011). Understanding the Elusive Black Box of Dynamic Capabilities. Decision Sciences, 42(1), 239-273.
Polanyi, K. (1957). The Great Transformation. Boston: Beacon Press
Priem, R. L., & Price, K. H. (1991). Processand Outcome Expectations For TheDialectical Inquiry, Devil Advocacy, and Consensus Techniquesof Strategic Decision-Making. Group & Organization Studies, 16(2), 206-225.
Salomo, S., Talke, K., & Strecker, N. (2008). Innovation field orientation and its effect on innovativeness and firm performance. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 25(6), 560-576.
Sekaran, Uma. (2003). Research Methods For Business 4"‘Ed: John Wiley & Sons, Inc.
Thatcher, S. M. B., Jehn, K. A., & Zanutto, E. (2003). Cracks in diversity research: The effects of diversity faultlines on conflict and performance. Group Decision and Negotiation, 12(3), 217-241.
Uzzi, B. (1996). The sources and consequences of embeddedness for the economic performance of organizations: The network effect. American Sociological Review, 61(4), 674-698.
Uzzi, B. (1997). Social structure and competition in interfirm networks: The paradox of embeddedness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 42(1), 35-67.
Vodosek, M. (2007). Intragroup conflict as a mediator between cultural diversity and work group outcomes. International Journal of Conflict Management, 18(3-4), 345-375.
Zhou, K. Z., Yim, C. K., & Tse, D. K. (2005). The effects of strategic orientations on technology- and market-based breakthrough innovations. Journal of Marketing, 69(2), 42-60.
Zukin, S., & DiMaggio, P. (1990). Structure of Capital: The Social Organization of the Economy.
|