參考文獻 |
王瓊珠(2004)。故事結構教學與分享閱讀。台北:心理。
吳訓生(2002)。國小高、低閱讀理解能力學生閱讀理解策略之比較研究。特殊教育學報,16,65-104。
林寶貴、錡寶香(2002)。中文閱讀理解測驗。台北市:教育部特殊教育工作小組。
曾彥翰、蔡昆瀛(2007)。文章結構教學對增進國小聽覺障礙學生說明文閱讀理解成效之研究。特殊教育研究學刊,32(2),67-91。
張菀真、辜玉旻(2011) 國小高、低閱讀能力學童圖文閱讀的理解策略。臺北市立教育大學學報,42(2),93-122。
教育部(2014)。教育部推廣閱讀情形報告。取自 http://www.ey.gov.tw/Upload/RelFile/26/716421/02簡報檔_教育部閱讀推動情形報告(院會報告)103_0311ok.pdf
教育部(2015)。課文本位閱讀理解教學。取自 http://140.127.56.86/pair_System/Search_index.aspx?PN=PlanInfo
Afflerbach, P. P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge on expert readers′ main idea construction strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(1), 31-46.
Afflerbach, P. (1990). The influence of prior knowledge and text genre on readers′ prediction strategies. Journal of Literacy Research, 22(2), 131-148.
Armbruster, B. B., Anderson, T. H., & Ostertag, J. (1987). Does text structure/summarization instruction facilitate learning from expository text? Reading Research Quarterly, 22(3), 331-346.
August, D. L., Flavell, J. H., & Clift, R. (1984). Comparison of comprehension monitoring of skilled and less skilled readers. Reading Research Quarterly, 20(1), 39-53.
Baker, L., & Anderson, R. I. (1982). Effects of inconsistent information on text processing: Evidence for comprehension monitoring. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(2),281-294.
Bakken, J. P., Mastropieri, M. A., & Scruggs, T. E. (1997). Reading comprehension of expository science material and students with learning disabilities: A comparison of strategies. Journal of Special Education, 31(3), 300-324
Beck, I. L., & McKeown, M. G. (2001). Text talk: Capturing the benefits of read-aloud experiences for young children. The Reading Teacher, 55(1), 10-20.
Best, R. M., Floyd, R. G., & Mcnamara, D. S. (2008). Differential competencies contributing to children′s comprehension of narrative and expository texts. Reading Psychology, 29(2), 137-164.
Bransford, J. D., & Johnson, M. K. (1972). Contextual prerequisites for understanding: Some investigations of comprehension and recall. Journal of Verbal Learning and Verbal Behavior, 11(6), 717-726.
Bråten, I. (1993). Cognitive strategies: A multi-componential conception of strategy use and strategy instruction. Scandinavian Journal of Educational Research, 37(3), 217–242
Bråten, I., & Anmarkrud, Ø. (2013). Does naturally occurring comprehension strategies instruction make a difference when students read expository text? Journal of Research in Reading, 36(1), 42-57.
Bråten, I., & Strømsø, H. I. (2003). A longitudinal think-aloud study of spontaneous strategic processing during the reading of multiple expository texts. Reading and Writing, 16(3), 195-218.
Bryant, D. P., Ugel, N., Thompson, S., & Hamff, A. (1999). Instructional strategies for content-area reading instruction. Intervention in School and Clinic, 34(5), 293-302.
Dewitz, P., & Dewitz, P. K. (2003). They can read the words, but they can′t understand: Refining comprehension assessment. The Reading Teacher, 56(5), 422-435.
Duke, N. K., & Pearson, P. D. (2002). Effective practices for developing reading comprehension. In A. E. Farstrup & S. J. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (pp. 205–242). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Dymock, S. (2007). Comprehension strategy instruction: Teaching narrative text structure awareness. The Reading Teacher, 61(2), 161-167.
Englert, C. S., & Hiebert, E. H. (1984). Children′s developing awareness of text structures in expository materials. Journal of Educational Psychology, 76(1), 65-74.
Englert, C. S., & Thomas, C. C. (1987). Sensitivity to text structure in reading and writing: A comparison between learning disabled and non-learning disabled students. Learning Disability Quarterly, 10(2), 93-105.
Garner, R., & McCaleb, J. L. (1985). Effects of text manipulations on quality of written summaries. Contemporary Educational Psychology, 10(2), 139-149.
Gersten, R., Fuchs, L. S., Williams, J. P., & Baker, S. (2001). Teaching reading comprehension strategies to students with learning disabilities: A review of research. Review of Educational Research, 71(2), 279-320.
Graesser, A. C., McNamara, D. S., & Kulikowich, J. M. (2011). Coh-Metrix providing multilevel analyses of text characteristics. Educational Researcher, 40(5), 223-234.
Graesser, A. C., Singer, M., & Trabasso, T. (1994). Constructing inferences during narrative text comprehension. Psychological Review, 101(3), 371.
Gurney, D., Gersten, R., Dimino, J., & Carnine, D. (1990). Story grammar Effective literature instruction for high school students with learning disabilities. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 23(6), 335-342.
Hock, M., & Mellard, D. (2005). Reading comprehension strategies for adult literacy outcomes. Journal of Adolescent & Adult Literacy, 49(3), 192-200.
Johnston, P. H., & Winograd, P. N. (1985). Passive failure in reading. Journal of Literacy Research, 17(4), 279-301.
Jonassen, D. H., & Hernandez-Serrano, J. (2002). Case-based reasoning and instructional design: Using stories to support problem solving. Educational Technology Research and Development, 50(2), 65-77.
Kamberelis, G., & Bovino, T. D. (1999). Cultural artifacts as scaffolds for genre development. Reading Research Quarterly, 34(2), 138–170.
Kendeou, P., Muis, K. R., & Fulton, S. (2011). Reader and text factors in reading comprehension processes. Journal of Research in Reading, 34(4), 365-383.
Kendeou, P., & Van Den Broek, P. (2005). The Effects of Readers′ Misconceptions on Comprehension of Scientific Text. Journal of Educational Psychology, 97(2), 235.
Kendeou, P., & Van den Broek, P. (2007). The effects of prior knowledge and text structure on comprehension processes during reading of scientific texts. Memory & cognition, 35(7), 1567-1577.
King, A. (1992). Comparison of self-questioning, summarizing, and note taking-review as strategies for learning from lectures. American Educational Research Journal, 29(2), 303-323.
Kintsch, W., Mandel, T. S., & Kozminsky, E. (1997). Summarizing scrambled stories. Memory and Cognition, 5(5), 547-552.
Kletzien, S. B. (1991). Strategy use by good and poor comprehenders reading expository text of differing levels. Reading Research Quarterly, 26(1),67-86.
Kolić-Vehovec, S., & Bajšanski, I. (2006). Metacognitive strategies and reading comprehension in elementary-school students. European Journal of Psychology of Education, 21(4), 439-451.
Lau, K. L. (2006). Reading strategy use between Chinese good and poor readers: a think‐aloud study. Journal of Research in Reading, 29(4), 383-399.
Law, Y. K. (2008). Chinese children‘s constructive activity and text comprehension. Journal of Research in Reading, 31(4), 379-403.
Long, S. A., Winograd, P. N., & Bridge, C. A. (1989). The effects of reader and text characteristics on imagery reported during and after reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(3),353-372.
McGee, L. M. (1982). Awareness of text structure: Effects on children′s recall of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 17(4),581-590.
Meyer, B. J., Brandt, D. M., & Bluth, G. J. (1980). Use of top-level structure in text: Key for reading comprehension of ninth-grade students. Reading Research Quarterly, 16(1),72-103.
Meyer, B. J., & Rice, G. E. (1984). The structure of text. Handbook Of Reading Research, 1, 319-351.
Oakhill, J., Hartt, J., & Samols, D. (2005). Levels of comprehension monitoring and working memory in good and poor comprehenders. Reading and Writing, 18(7-9), 657-686.
Palincsar, A. S., Magnussen, S. J., Pesko, S., & Hamlin, M. (2005). Attending to the nature of subject matter in text comprehension. In S. G. Paris & S. A. Stahl (Eds.), Children’s reading comprehension and assessment (pp. 257–278). Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pressley, M., Johnson, C. J., Symons, S., McGoldrick, J. A., & Kurita, J. A. (1989). Strategies that improve children′s memory and comprehension of text. The Elementary School Journal, 90(1), 3-32.
Pressley, M. (2000). What should comprehension instruction be the instruction of? In M. L. Kamil, P. B. Mosenthal, P. D. Pearson, & R. Barr(Eds.), Handbook of reading research, Vol. 3 (pp. 545-561) Mahwah, NJ: Erlbaum.
Pressley, M., & Afflerbach, P. (1995). Verbal Protocols Of Reading: The Nature Of Constructively Responsive Reading. Routledge.
Pressley, M. (2002a). Comprehension strategies instruction: A turn of-the-century status report. In C. C. Block & M. Pressley (Eds.), Comprehension instruction: Research-based best practices (pp. 11–27). New York: Guilford.
Pressley, M. (2002b). Metacognition and self-regulated instruction. In A. Farstrup & S. Samuels (Eds.), What research has to say about reading instruction (3rd ed.) (pp. 291–309). Newark, DE: International Reading Association.
Paris, S. G., & Myers, M. (1981). Comprehension monitoring, memory, and study strategies of good and poor readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 13(1), 5-22.
Pritchard, R. (1990). The effects of cultural schemata on reading processing strategies. Reading Research Quarterly, 25(4),273-295.
Ruffman, T. (1996). Do children understand the mind by means of simulation or a theory? Evidence from their understanding of inference. Mind & Language, 11(4), 388-414.
Sáenz, L. M., & Fuchs, L. S. (2002). Examining the reading difficulty of secondary students with learning disabilities expository versus narrative text. Remedial and Special Education, 23(1), 31-41.
Samuelstuen, M. S., & Bråten, I. (2005). Decoding, knowledge, and strategies in comprehension of expository text. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 46(2), 107-117.
Schellings, G., Aarnoutse, C., & van Leeuwe, J. (2006). Third-grader′s think-aloud protocols: Types of reading activities in reading an expository text. Learning and Instruction, 16(6), 549-568.
Strømsø, H. I., Bråten, I., & Samuelstuen, M. S. (2003). Students′ strategic use of multiple sources during expository text reading: A longitudinal think-aloud study. Cognition and Instruction, 21(2), 113-147.
Taylor, B. M. (1980). Children′s memory for expository text after reading. Reading Research Quarterly, 15(3),399-411.
Taylor, B. M., & Beach, R. W. (1984). The effects of text structure instruction on middle-grade students′ comprehension and production of expository text. Reading Research Quarterly, 19(2),134-146.
Tilstra, J., & McMaster, K. L. (2013). Cognitive processes of middle grade readers when reading expository text with an assigned goal. Learning and Individual Differences, 28, 66-74.
Trabasso, T., & Van Den Broek, P. (1985). Causal thinking and the representation of narrative events. Journal of Memory and Language, 24(5), 612-630.
Wigent, C. A. (2013). High school readers: A profile of above average readers and readers with learning disabilities reading expository text. Learning and Individual Differences, 25, 134-140.
Weaver, C. A., & Bryant, D. S. (1995). Monitoring of comprehension: The role of text difficulty in metamemory for narrative and expository text. Memory & Cognition, 23(1), 12-22.
Weaver, C. A., & Kintsch, W. (1991). Expository text. In R. Barr, M. L. Kamil, P. Mosenthal, & P. D. Pearson (Eds.), Handbook of Reading Research, 2, (pp. 230-244). White Plains, NY: Longman.
Wiley, J., Griffin, T. D., & Thiede, K. W. (2005). Putting the comprehension in metacomprehension. The Journal of General Psychology, 132(4), 408-428.
Williams, J. P. (2003). Teaching text structure to improve reading comprehension. In H. L. Swanson, K. Harris, & S. Graham (Eds.), The voice of evidence in reading research (pp. 355–382). Baltimore, MD: Brookes.
Wolman, C. (1991). Sensitivity to causal cohesion in stories by children with mild mental retardation, children with learning disabilities, and children without disabilities. Journal of Special Education, 25(2), 135-154.
Wong, B. Y., & Wilson, M. (1984). Investigating awareness of and teaching passage organization in learning disabled children. Journal of Learning Disabilities, 17(8), 477-482.
Zabrucky, K., & Moore, D. (1989). Children′s ability to use three standards to evaluate their comprehension of text. Reading Research Quarterly, 24(3), 336-352.
Zabrucky, K., & Ratner, H. H. (1989). Effects of reading ability on children′s comprehension evaluation and regulation. Journal of Literacy Research, 21(1), 69-83.
Zabrucky, K., & Ratner, H. H. (1992). Effects of passage type on comprehension monitoring and recall in good and poor readers. Journal of Literacy Research, 24(3), 373-391. |