高階主管接任：內部升遷或外部空降之決定因素

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：18

、訪客IP：3.144.139.162

姓名

朱芸婷(Yun-ting Chu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

人力資源管理研究所

論文名稱

高階主管接任：內部升遷或外部空降之決定因素

相關論文

★ 業務主管領導力對部屬招募行為之影響-以S壽險公司為例	★ 人力精簡對企業績效的影響–以產業特性為調節變項
★ 經理人超額薪酬、經理人異動與公司績效之關係	★ 人口老化對企業之影響與因應對策-以傳統產業為例
★ 運用羅吉斯迴歸探討企業績效、公司治理與經理人異動之關聯性	★ 護理人員組織承諾與專業承諾對離職傾向與離業傾向的影響
★ 運用存活分析探討高科技產業招募者人格特質與離職風險之關聯性-以A公司為例	★ 金融電子化對台灣銀行業組織績效及人力彈性影響之探討
★ 人力資源部門角色與功能轉變之個案研究	★ 高階主管薪酬級距與公司績效之關聯性分析
★ 人力招募政策及主管領導風格對新進人員晉升與離職傾向之影響-以房仲業S公司為例	★ 影響台灣勞工赴海外就業的決定性因素
★ 董事會特性對企業績效之影響-以人力資本為調節變項	★ 董事會異質性之決定因素
★ 公司治理結構與就業調整	★ 總經理雙元性、股權集中度、人力資本與組織績效

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

高階經理人遴選議題往往是各大媒體、報章雜誌爭相報導的新聞，企業更對處理高階經理的異動事宜更為謹慎。本研究期望從策略的選擇角度來探討在什麼樣的因素與條件下，企業會傾向選擇內部升遷或外部空降。希望當企業有高階職位出缺時，可提供給企業主做為預測的模式，以供其作為外聘或內升參考之重要準則。
本研究透過羅吉斯迴歸，探討探討高階主管接任來源與組織績效、公司規模、前任去留、工作特性、家族性、研發密集度、企業未來成長機會及最終控制者控制持股間之關係。研究樣本包括民國98年至102年的台灣電子產業上市公司共137家企業，208起異動事件。實證結果發現，高階主管接任來源與工作特性及企業未來成長機會呈現顯著正相關，即當高階主管接任活動為總經理職務、企業未來成長機會愈高時，發生外部空降的機率較高；並與公司前一年 ROE、集團控制型態、研發密集度呈顯著負相關。

摘要(英)

Top manager appointment is always the issue of interest to mass media, including TV news, newspapers and magazines. Toward the changes of top management, enterprises have particularly held a prudent attitude. This study intends to investigate the factors and conditions under which an enterprise would appoint internal or external candidate as its top manager. The research results are anticipated to serve as the reference of major criteria for appointing external manager or internal employee to take over the top management position.
This research adopts logistic regression to analyze the relationships between top management succession source, firm performance, firm size, former manager’s disposition, work characteristics, corporate culture, R&D intensity, opportunity of enterprise’s future growth and the ultimate controller′s shareholding. The research samples include 137 listed companies of electronics industry in Taiwan from 2009 to 2013, with 208 changes in the firms. The results show that the top management succession source has a positive correlation with work characteristics and opportunity of enterprise’s future growth, which means that the higher the opportunity that the top manager takes over the position of general manager, or that the enterprise sees future growth, the more the probability of external succession. In addition, top management succession source holds a negative correlation with the ROE of previous year, corporate control structure as well as R&D intensity.

關鍵字(中)

★ 高階主管接任
★ 研發密集度
★ 成長機會
★ 公司績效

關鍵字(英)

★ Top management successions
★ R&D intensity
★ growth opportunities
★ firm performance

論文目次

中文摘要 III
英文摘要 IV
誌謝 V
目錄 VI
表目錄 VII
一、研究動機與目的 1
二、文獻探討與假說 4
2-1 企業過去績效與接任人來源之關聯 4
2-2 企業規模與接任人來源之關聯 6
2-3 舊任者去留與接任人來源之關聯 7
2-4 工作性質與接任人來源之關聯 8
2-5 企業的家族性與接任人之關聯 10
2-6 其他決定因素 11
2-6-1 研發密集度 11
2-6-2 企業未來成長機會 13
2-6-3 最終控制者控制持股 14
三、研究方法 15
3-1 研究架構 15
3-2 樣本來源 15
3-3 變數衡量與定義 16
3-4 羅吉斯迴歸 19
四、實證結果與分析 21
4-1 敘述性統計與相關係數分析 21
4-2 羅吉斯迴歸分析 27
4-3 研究結果與討論 29
五、結論與建議 32
5-1 研究結論與管理意涵 32
5-2 研究限制與建議 34
六、參考文獻 35

參考文獻

方嘉麟、許崇源、敬雪芳、馬碩遠、林俊宏（民國96）。家族企業控股型態對公司治理及組織文化影響之研究。行政院國家科學委員會補助專題研究計畫成果報告（編號：NSC94-2414-H-004-048-）
台灣立報（民國102年4月22日）。左右看：傳賢不傳子【新聞群組】。取自https://tw.news.yahoo.com/左右看-傳賢不傳子-160958030--finance.html
我是角色有限公司（民國100年3月28日）。慧眼獨具的獵頭經理人【部落格文字資料】。取自http://blog.udn.com/StunnahTaiwan/4867314
林欣美、郭麗華、蘇迺惠（2008）。國際化程度、董事會結構、精練法人監督對盈餘管理之影響：以台灣資訊電子業爲例。臺大管理論叢, 19(1), 157-186.
胡詩珮（民國93年）台灣上市公司盈餘分配權對策略與績效關係之研究─ 結構方程模式 (SEM) 之應用（碩士論文）。取自中央大學博碩士論文系統。
翁淑育（民國89年）。台灣上市公司股權結構，核心代理問題與公司價值之研究（未出版之碩士論文）。私立輔仁大學金融研究所。
孫倩玉（民國94年）。升遷與離職傾向關係之研究（碩士論文）。取自中國文化大學博碩士論文系統。
黃德舜（民國87年）。企業財務分析：企業價值的創造及評估。台北：華泰文化事業股份有限公司。
黃瓊嬅（民國96年)。員工情緒穩定性與升遷關係之研究（碩士論文）。取自中國文化大學博碩士論文系統。
華人家族企業聯盟(民國102年)。華人家族企業報告。取自http://cfbglobal.org/component/k2/item/86-2013-12-04-01-32-06
劉俊良（民國102年1月16日）。人力資源規劃與人才招募－乃企業組織經營之匙【部落格文字資料】。取自http://www.cpc.tw/consultancy/article/329
賴逢輝（民國82年）。人力資源規劃-利用序列控制和穩態控制導入升遷模式（碩士論文）。取自中原大學博碩士論文系統。
陳曉天（民國89年）。員工組織社會化程度與升遷關係之研究。
陳麗娟（民國93年）。董事會組成、股權結構、關係人交易與企業績效關係之研究— 以紡織業及電子業為實証（未出版之碩士論文）。取自國立成功大學博碩士論文系統。
陳靜香（民國94年）。公司經營績效、所有權結構與總經理酬勞間之內生性關係（碩士論文）。取自國立中山大學財務管理學系研究所碩士論文。
國家科學委員會。全國科技動態調查。取自https://ap0512.most.gov.tw/WAS2/technology/AsTechnologyStatisticsList.aspx

Althauser, R. P. (1989). Internal labor markets. Annual review of sociology, 143-161.
Baber, W. R., Fairfield, P. M., & Haggard, J. A. (1991). The effect of concern about reported income on discretionary spending decisions: The case of research and development. Accounting Review, 818-829.
Barclay, M. J., & Smith, C. W. (1995). The maturity structure of corporate debt.the Journal of Finance, 50(2), 609-631.
Boeker, W. (1992). Power and managerial dismissal: Scapegoating at the top. Administrative Science Quarterly, 400-421.
Boeker, W., & Goodstein, J. (1993). Performance and successor choice: The moderating effects of governance and ownership. Academy of Management Journal, 36(1), 172-186.
Brady, G. F., & Helmich, D. L. (1984). Executive succession. Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
Bradley, M., Jarrell, G. A., & Kim, E. (1984). On the existence of an optimal capital structure: Theory and evidence. The journal of Finance, 39(3), 857-878.
Cannella, A. A., & Lubatkin, M. (1993). Succession as a sociopolitical process: Internal impediments to outsider selection. Academy of Management Journal, 36(4), 763-793.
Carey, D. C., & Ogden, D. (2000). CEO succession. Oxford University Press.
Ceccagnoli, M. (2009). Appropriability, preemption, and firm performance.Strategic Management Journal, 30(1), 81-98.
Chung, K. H., & Charoenwong, C. (1991). Investment options, assets in place, and the risk of stocks. Financial Management, 21-33.
Citrin, J. M., & Ogden, D. (2010). Succeeding at succession. harvard business review, 88(11), 29-31.
Claessens, S., Djankov, S., & Lang, L. H. (2000). The separation of ownership and control in East Asian corporations. Journal of financial Economics, 58(1), 81-112.
Dalton, D. R., & Kesner, I. F. (1983). Inside/outside succession and organizational size: The pragmatics of executive replacement. Academy of Management journal, 26(4), 736-742.
Dalton, D. R., & Kesner, I. F. (1985). Organizational performance as an antecedent of inside/outside chief executive succession: An empirical assessment. Academy of management Journal, 28(4), 749-762.
Datta, D. K., & Guthrie, J. P. (1994). Executive succession: Organizational antecedents of CEO characteristics. Strategic Management Journal, 15(7), 569-577.
Datta, D. K., & Rajagopalan, N. (1998). Industry structure and CEO characteristics: An empirical study of succession events. Strategic Management Journal, 19(9), 833-852.
Denison, E. F. (1985). Trends in American economic growth, 1929-1982. Brookings Institution Press.
Eddleston, K. A., Baldridge, D. C., & Veiga, J. F. (2004). Toward modeling the predictors of managerial career success: does gender matter?. Journal of Managerial Psychology, 19(4), 360-385.
Eitzen, D. S., & Yetman, N. R. (1972). Managerial change, longevity, and organizational effectiveness. Administrative Science Quarterly, 110-116.
Friedman, S. D., & Singh, H. (1989). CEO succession and stockholder reaction: The influence of organizational context and event content. Academy of Management Journal, 32(4), 718-744.
Gilson, S. C. (1989). Management turnover and financial distress. Journal of financial Economics, 25(2), 241-262.
Goodstein, J., & Boeker, W. (1991). Turbulence at the top: A new perspective on governance structure changes and strategic change. Academy of Management Journal, 34(2), 306-330.
Grabowski, H. G., & Mueller, D. C. (1978). Industrial research and development, intangible capital stocks, and firm profit rates. The Bell Journal of Economics, 328-343.
Guthrie, J. P., & Olian, J. D. (1991). Does context affect staffing decisions? The case of general managers. Personnel Psychology, 44(2), 263-292.
Hambrick, D. C., & D′Aveni, R. A. (1992). Top team deterioration as part of the downward spiral of large corporate bankruptcies. Management Science, 38(10), 1445-1466.
Hambrick, D. C., Black, S., & Fredrickson, J. W. (1992). Executive leadership of the high technology firm: What is special about it. Advances in global high-technology management, 2, 3-18.
Harrison, J. R., Torres, D. L., & Kukalis, S. (1988). The changing of the guard: Turnover and structural change in the top-management positions. Administrative Science Quarterly, 211-232.
Helmich, D. L., & Brown, W. B. (1972). Successor type and organizational change in the corporate enterprise. Administrative Science Quarterly, 371-381.
Hermalin, B. E., & Weisbach, M. S. (1991). The effects of board composition and direct incentives on firm performance. Financial management, 101-112.
Keats, B. W., & Hitt, M. A. (1988). A causal model of linkages among environmental dimensions, macro organizational characteristics, and performance. Academy of management journal, 31(3), 570-598.
Kesner, I. F., & Sebora, T. C. (1994). Executive succession: Past, present & future. Journal of Management, 20(2), 327-372.
Kim, Y. A. N. G. M. I. N. (2002). Executive social capital and its impacts on job promotion. Academy of Management Proceedings: J1–J6.
Kosnik, R. D. (1987). Greenmail: A study of board performance in corporate governance. Administrative Science Quarterly, 163-185.

Kotin, J., & Sharaf, M. R. (1967). Management succession and administrative style. Psychiatry, 30(3), 237-248.
Lauterbach, B., Vu, J., & Weisberg, J. (1999). Internal vs. external successions and their effect on firm performance. Human Relations, 52(12), 1485-1504.
Lauterbach, B., & Weisberg, J. (1994). Top management successions: the choice between internal and external sources. International Journal of Human Resource Management, 5(1), 51-65.
Lee, C. Y. (2010). A theory of firm growth: Learning capability, knowledge threshold, and patterns of growth. Research Policy, 39(2), 278-289.
Lev, B., & Sougiannis, T. (1996). The capitalization, amortization, and value-relevance of R&D. Journal of accounting and economics, 21(1), 107-138.
Levitas, E., & McFadyen, M. (2009). Managing liquidity in research‐intensive firms: signaling and cash flow effects of patents and alliance activities. Strategic Management Journal, 30(6), 659-678.
Lubatkin, M. H., Schulze, W. S., Ling, Y., & Dino, R. N. (2005). The effects of parental altruism on the governance of family‐managed firms. Journal of organizational behavior, 26(3), 313-330.
Mason, S. P., & Merton, R. C. (1984). The role of contingent claims analysis in corporate finance. Division of Research, Harvard Business School.
McClelland, D. C., & Burnham, D. H. (2003). Power is the great motivator. Harvard business review, 81(1), 117-126.
Michel, J. G., & Hambrick, D. C. (1992). Diversification posture and top management team characteristics. Academy of Management Journal, 35(1), 9-37.
Miller, D. (1991). Stale in the saddle: CEO tenure and the match between organization and environment. Management science, 37(1), 34-52.
Osborn, R. N., Jauch, L. R., Martin, T. N., & Glueck, W. F. (1981). The event of CEO succession, performance, and environmental conditions. Academy of Management Journal, 24(1), 183-191.

Perry, J. T., Yao, X., & Chandler, G. N. (2011). To get the best new CEO, must the old CEO go? Power distribution in external CEO successions. Managerial and Decision Economics, 32(8), 505-525.
Phelan, S. E., & Lin, Z. (2001). Promotion systems and organizational performance: A contingency model. Computational & Mathematical Organization Theory, 7(3), 207-232.
Reda, J. F., & Wert, J. A. (2013). Internal vs. External Candidates For CEO Succession. The Corporate Board, November/December.
Scherer, F. M. (1965). Firm size, market structure, opportunity, and the output of patented inventions. The American Economic Review, 1097-1125.
Schein, E. H. (1967). Organizational socialization and the profession of management. Sloan Management Review, 30.
Schwartz, K. B., & Menon, K. (1985). Executive succession in failing firms. Academy of Management Journal, 28(3), 680-686.
Vancil, R. F. (1987). Passing the baton: Managing the process of CEO succession (pp. 100-318). Boston, MA: Harvard Business School Press.
Walker, E. W., & Petty, J. W. (1978). Financial differences between large and small firms. Financial Management, 61-68.
Walsh, J. P., & Seward, J. K. (1990). On the efficiency of internal and external corporate control mechanisms. Academy of Management Review, 15(3), 421-458.
Warner, J. B., Watts, R. L., & Wruck, K. H. (1988). Stock prices and top management changes. Journal of Financial Economics, 20, 461-492.
Wasserman, N. (2003). Founder-CEO succession and the paradox of entrepreneurial success. Organization Science, 14(2), 149-172.
Weidenbaum, M., (1996). The Chinese Family Business Enterprise, California Management Review, 38(4), 141-156.
Weiner, N., & Mahoney, T. A. (1981). A model of corporate performance as a function of environmental, organizational, and leadership influences. Academy of Management Journal, 24(3), 453-470.
Woolridge, J. R., & Snow, C. C. (1990). Stock market reaction to strategic investment decisions. Strategic management journal, 11(5), 353-363.
Yeh, Y. H., Lee, T. S., & Woidtke, T. (2001). Family control and corporate governance: Evidence from Taiwan. International Review of finance, 2(1‐2), 21-48.
Yeh, Y. H., & Woidtke, T. (2005). Commitment or entrenchment?: Controlling shareholders and board composition. Journal of Banking & Finance, 29(7), 1857-1885.
Young, C. S., Tsai, L. C., & Hsieh, P. G. (2008). Voluntary appointment of independent directors in Taiwan: Motives and consequences. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 35(9‐10), 1103-1137.
Zajac, E. J., & Westphal, J. D. (1996). Who shall succeed? How CEO/board preferences and power affect the choice of new CEOs. Academy of Management Journal, 39(1), 64-90.
Zellweger, T. M., Kellermanns, F. W., Chrisman, J. J., & Chua, J. H. (2012). Family control and family firm valuation by family CEOs: The importance of intentions for transgenerational control. Organization Science, 23(3), 851-868.

指導教授

陳明園(Ming-yuan Chen)

審核日期

2015-7-22

推文