參考文獻 |
References
1. Stinear, C.M., et al., The PREP algorithm predicts potential for upper limb recovery after stroke. Brain, 2012. 135(Pt 8): p. 2527-35.
2. Barak, S. and P.W. Duncan, Issues in selecting outcome measures to assess functional recovery after stroke. NeuroRx, 2006. 3(4): p. 505-24.
3. Burke Quinlan, E., et al., Neural function, injury, and stroke subtype predict treatment gains after stroke. Ann Neurol, 2015. 77(1): p. 132-45.
4. Bergner, M. and M.L. Rothman, Health status measures: an overview and guide for selection. Annu Rev Public Health, 1987. 8: p. 191-210.
5. Chambers, L.W., Physical and emotional function of primary care patients: scientific requirements for the measurement of functional health status. JAMA, 1983. 249(24): p. 3353-5.
6. Kirwan, J.R., Minimum clinically important difference: the crock of gold at the end of the rainbow? J Rheumatol, 2001. 28(2): p. 439-44.
7. Hays, R.D. and J.M. Woolley, The concept of clinically meaningful difference in health-related quality-of-life research. How meaningful is it? Pharmacoeconomics, 2000. 18(5): p. 419-23.
8. Bellamy, N., et al., Towards a definition of "difference" in osteoarthritis. J Rheumatol, 2001. 28(2): p. 427-30.
9. Kirshner, B. and G. Guyatt, A methodological framework for assessing health indices. J Chronic Dis, 1985. 38(1): p. 27-36.
10. Lundquist, C.B. and T. Maribo, The Fugl-Meyer assessment of the upper extremity: reliability, responsiveness and validity of the Danish version. Disabil Rehabil, 2016: p. 1-6.
11. Moseley, A.M. and M.C. Yap, Interrater reliability of the TEMPA for the measurement of upper limb function in adults with traumatic brain injury. J Head Trauma Rehabil, 2003. 18(6): p. 526-31.
12. Morris, D.M., et al., The reliability of the wolf motor function test for assessing upper extremity function after stroke. Arch Phys Med Rehabil, 2001. 82(6): p. 750-5.
13. Duncan, P.W., et al., Measurement of motor recovery after stroke. Outcome assessment and sample size requirements. Stroke, 1992. 23(8): p. 1084-9.
14. Loewen, S.C. and B.A. Anderson, Predictors of stroke outcome using objective measurement scales. Stroke, 1990. 21(1): p. 78-81.
15. Wade, D.T., V.A. Wood, and R.L. Hewer, Recovery after stroke--the first 3 months. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry, 1985. 48(1): p. 7-13.
16. Kinsella, G. and B. Ford, Acute recovery from patterns in stroke patients: neuropsychological factors. Med J Aust, 1980. 2(12): p. 663-6.
17. Koh, C.L., et al., Predicting recovery of voluntary upper extremity movement in subacute stroke patients with severe upper extremity paresis. PLoS One, 2015. 10(5): p. e0126857.
18. Khan, M., et al., Predictors of Outcome following Stroke due to Isolated M2 Occlusions. Cerebrovasc Dis Extra, 2014. 4(1): p. 52-60.
19. Lee, S.Y., et al., Prediction of good functional recovery after stroke based on combined motor and somatosensory evoked potential findings. J Rehabil Med, 2010. 42(1): p. 16-20.
20. Denti, L., M. Agosti, and M. Franceschini, Outcome predictors of rehabilitation for first stroke in the elderly. European journal of physical and rehabilitation medicine, 2008. 44(1): p. 3-11.
21. Rehme, A.K., et al., Individual prediction of chronic motor outcome in the acute post-stroke stage: Behavioral parameters versus functional imaging. Hum Brain Mapp, 2015. 36(11): p. 4553-65.
22. Richiardi, J., et al., Classifying minimally disabled multiple sclerosis patients from resting state functional connectivity. Neuroimage, 2012. 62(3): p. 2021-2033.
23. Shen, H., et al., Discriminative analysis of resting-state functional connectivity patterns of schizophrenia using low dimensional embedding of fMRI. Neuroimage, 2010. 49(4): p. 3110-3121.
24. Wee, C.-Y., et al., Identification of MCI individuals using structural and functional connectivity networks. Neuroimage, 2012. 59(3): p. 2045-2056.
25. Zeng, L.-L., et al., Identifying major depression using whole-brain functional connectivity: a multivariate pattern analysis. Brain, 2012: p. aws059.
26. Rehme, A., et al., Identifying Neuroimaging Markers of Motor Disability in Acute Stroke by Machine Learning Techniques. Cerebral Cortex, 2014: p. bhu100.
27. Richiardi, J., et al., Classifying minimally disabled multiple sclerosis patients from resting state functional connectivity. Neuroimage, 2012. 62(3): p. 2021-33.
28. Shen, H., et al., Discriminative analysis of resting-state functional connectivity patterns of schizophrenia using low dimensional embedding of fMRI. Neuroimage, 2010. 49(4): p. 3110-21.
29. Finnigan, S.P., et al., Quantitative EEG indices of sub-acute ischaemic stroke correlate with clinical outcomes. Clinical neurophysiology, 2007. 118(11): p. 2525-2532.
30. Sainio, K., et al., Visual and spectral EEG analysis in the evaluation of the outcome in patients with ischemic brain infarction. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 1983. 56(2): p. 117-124.
31. Cillessen, J., et al., Electroencephalography improves the prediction of functional outcome in the acute stage of cerebral ischemia. Stroke, 1994. 25(10): p. 1968-1972.
32. Szelies, B., et al., Prognostic relevance of quantitative topographical EEG in patients with poststroke aphasia. Brain and language, 2002. 82(1): p. 87-94.
33. Cuspineda, E., et al., Predicting outcome in acute stroke: a comparison between QEEG and the Canadian Neurological Scale. Clinical EEG (electroencephalography), 2003. 34(1): p. 1-4.
34. Finnigan, S.P., et al., Correlation of Quantitative EEG in Acute Ischemic Stroke With 30-Day NIHSS Score Comparison With Diffusion and Perfusion MRI. Stroke, 2004. 35(4): p. 899-903.
35. van Putten, M.J., et al., A brain symmetry index (BSI) for online EEG monitoring in carotid endarterectomy. Clinical neurophysiology, 2004. 115(5): p. 1189-1194.
36. Nagata, K., et al., Electroencephalographic correlates of blood flow and oxygen metabolism provided by positron emission tomography in patients with cerebral infarction. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 1989. 72(1): p. 16-30.
37. Sheorajpanday, R.V., et al., Additional value of quantitative EEG in acute anterior circulation syndrome of presumed ischemic origin. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2010. 121(10): p. 1719-1725.
38. Cuspineda, E., et al., QEEG prognostic value in acute stroke. Clinical EEG and neuroscience, 2007. 38(3): p. 155-160.
39. Burghaus, L., et al., Early electroencephalography in acute ischemic stroke: Prediction of a malignant course? Clinical neurology and neurosurgery, 2007. 109(1): p. 45-49.
40. Tecchio, F., et al., Outcome prediction in acute monohemispheric stroke via magnetoencephalography. Journal of neurology, 2007. 254(3): p. 296-305.
41. Leon-Carrion, J., et al., Delta–alpha ratio correlates with level of recovery after neurorehabilitation in patients with acquired brain injury. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2009. 120(6): p. 1039-1045.
42. Sheorajpanday, R.V., et al., Quantitative EEG in ischemic stroke: Correlation with functional status after 6months. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2011. 122(5): p. 874-883.
43. Sheorajpanday, R.V., et al., Quantitative EEG in ischemic stroke: correlation with infarct volume and functional status in posterior circulation and lacunar syndromes. Clinical Neurophysiology, 2011. 122(5): p. 884-890.
44. Friston, K.J., Functional and effective connectivity in neuroimaging: a synthesis. Human brain mapping, 1994. 2(1-2): p. 56-78.
45. Aertsen, A. and H. Preissl, Dynamics of activity and connectivity in physiological neuronal networks. Nonlinear dynamics and neuronal networks, 1991. 2: p. 281-301.
46. Chen, C., S.J. Kiebel, and K.J. Friston, Dynamic causal modelling of induced responses. Neuroimage, 2008. 41(4): p. 1293-1312.
47. Grefkes, C., et al., Cortical connectivity after subcortical stroke assessed with functional magnetic resonance imaging. Annals of neurology, 2008. 63(2): p. 236-246.
48. Rehme, A.K., et al., The role of the contralesional motor cortex for motor recovery in the early days after stroke assessed with longitudinal FMRI. Cerebral cortex, 2010: p. bhq140.
49. Wang, L.E., et al., Noradrenergic enhancement improves motor network connectivity in stroke patients. Annals of neurology, 2011. 69(2): p. 375-388.
50. David, O., J.M. Kilner, and K.J. Friston, Mechanisms of evoked and induced responses in MEG/EEG. Neuroimage, 2006. 31(4): p. 1580-1591.
51. Chen, C.-C., et al., A dynamic causal model for evoked and induced responses. NeuroImage, 2012. 59(1): p. 340-348.
52. Derdikman, D., et al., Imaging spatiotemporal dynamics of surround inhibition in the barrels somatosensory cortex. The Journal of neuroscience, 2003. 23(8): p. 3100-3105.
53. Andrew, C. and G. Pfurtscheller, Event-related coherence as a tool for studying dynamic interaction of brain regions. Electroencephalography and clinical neurophysiology, 1996. 98(2): p. 144-148.
54. Chen, C.-C., et al., Nonlinear coupling in the human motor system. The Journal of Neuroscience, 2010. 30(25): p. 8393-8399.
55. 涂安廷, 應用腦電圖預測中風病人復健情況;Using EEG to predict the outcome of stroke rehabilitation 2014.
56. Talelli, P., et al., Theta Burst Stimulation in the Rehabilitation of the Upper Limb A Semirandomized, Placebo-Controlled Trial in Chronic Stroke Patients. Neurorehabilitation and neural repair, 2012. 26(8): p. 976-987.
57. 林宥辰, 基於虛擬實境復健之中風後運動網路功能性重組研究; Cerebral re-organization of motor networks in response to VR based rehabilitation after stroke. 2014.
58. Le Cessie, S. and J. Van Houwelingen, Ridge estimators in logistic regression. Applied statistics, 1992: p. 191-201.
59. Schölkopf, B., et al., New support vector algorithms. Neural computation, 2000. 12(5): p. 1207-1245.
60. Quinlan, J.R., C4. 5: programs for machine learning. Vol. 1. 1993: Morgan kaufmann.
61. Quinlan, J.R., Improved use of continuous attributes in C4. 5. arXiv preprint cs/9603103, 1996.
62. John, G.H. and P. Langley. Estimating continuous distributions in Bayesian classifiers. in Proceedings of the Eleventh conference on Uncertainty in artificial intelligence. 1995. Morgan Kaufmann Publishers Inc.
63. Lowe, D.G., Distinctive image features from scale-invariant keypoints. International journal of computer vision, 2004. 60(2): p. 91-110.
64. Mikolajczyk, K. and C. Schmid, A performance evaluation of local descriptors. Pattern Analysis and Machine Intelligence, IEEE Transactions on, 2005. 27(10): p. 1615-1630.
65. Bay, H., T. Tuytelaars, and L. Van Gool, Surf: Speeded up robust features, in Computer Vision–ECCV 2006. 2006, Springer. p. 404-417.
66. Hall, M.A. and G. Holmes, Benchmarking attribute selection techniques for discrete class data mining. Knowledge and Data Engineering, IEEE Transactions on, 2003. 15(6): p. 1437-1447.
67. Kohavi, R. and G.H. John, Wrappers for feature subset selection. Artificial intelligence, 1997. 97(1): p. 273-324.
68. Cuspineda, E., et al., QEEG prognostic value in acute stroke. Clin EEG Neurosci, 2007. 38(3): p. 155-60.
69. Talelli, P., et al., Theta burst stimulation in the rehabilitation of the upper limb: a semirandomized, placebo-controlled trial in chronic stroke patients. Neurorehabil Neural Repair, 2012. 26(8): p. 976-87.
70. Restel, M., et al., Midbrain and bilateral paramedian thalamic stroke due to artery of Percheron occlusion. Neurol Neurochir Pol, 2016. 50(3): p. 180-4.
71. 呂億綸, 運用腦電波研究中風病人的復健成效與持續情形;Using EEG to evaluate the stroke rehabilitation efficacy : a longitudinal study. 2015.
72. Gola, M., et al., EEG beta band activity is related to attention and attentional deficits in the visual performance of elderly subjects. Int J Psychophysiol, 2013. 89(3): p. 334-41. |