探討影響台灣產業能源轉型的關鍵因子： 以印刷電路板產業為例

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：16

、訪客IP：3.144.212.165

姓名

許燕福(Yen-Fu Hsu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

工業管理研究所

論文名稱

探討影響台灣產業能源轉型的關鍵因子：以印刷電路板產業為例
(Exploring Key Factors Influencing the Energy Transition in Taiwan′s Industrial Sector: A Case Study of the Printed Circuit Board Industry")

相關論文

★ 半導體化學材料銷售策略分析-以跨國B化工公司為例	★ TFT-LCD CELL製程P檢點燈不良解析流程改善之關聯法則應用
★ 金融風暴時期因應長鞭效應的策略 –以X公司為例	★ 勞動生產力目標訂定之研究-DEA 資料包絡法應用
★ 應用田口方法導入低溫超薄ITO透明導電膜於電容式觸控面板之研究	★ 多階不等效平行機台排程與訂單決策
★ 多準則決策之應用-以雷射半導體產業為例	★ 專案管理模式進行品管圈活動-以半導體機台保養測機流程改善為例
★ 應用e8D降低不合格品之效益分析-以快速消費品製造為例	★ 供應商評選模式之建構-以塑膠射出成型機製造為例
★ 應用協同規劃預測補貨於伺服器備品存貨改善之研究－以Q代工公司為例	★ 船用五金拋光作業之生產規劃
★ 以SCOR模型探討汽車安全輔助系統供應鏈-以A公司採購作業改善為例	★ 研發補助計畫執行成效評估之研究以「工業基礎技術專案計畫」為例
★ 運用生態效益發展永續之耳機產業	★ 失效模式設計審查(DRBFM)之應用-以筆記型電腦為例

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

至系統瀏覽論文 (2029-4-1以後開放)

摘要(中)

聯合國17項永續發展目標自2015年9月發佈以來，已成為國際永續議題的共通語言，許多企業越來越重視環境、社會與公司治理、風險管理與資訊揭露，透過永續經營管理，和環境與社會共存共榮。目前台灣上市公司企業社會責任報告書資訊揭露的數量與品質，均有顯著提升，此反映出政府對於企業經營是否具備環境保護、社會關懷、公司治理等層面相當的重視，也反映出國內政治對於國際政經情勢的應對。有鑑於台灣的能源與電力的消費易受國內外經濟發展、景氣、消費結構改變，以及氣候變遷的影響，因此台灣能源政策在力求以再生能源作為發電主軸的脈絡下，除了再生能源推動所需要面臨的多元問題外，如土地開發、法規設計、環境保護、以及產業發展外，如何啟動穩定的電力供應措施實為台灣能源政策必須持續關注以及彈性化調整的議題。據此，本研究以印刷電路板產業為研究標的，討論政府再生能源政策對其影響與應對策略的可能導向。本研究運用三回合的德爾菲法專家訪談，採取半結構式深度訪談台灣印刷電路板相關企業之管理階層及實務專家，並採用紮根理論分析訪談內容，剝絲抽檢最終萃取出台灣能源轉型對印刷電路板產業影響的關鍵因子，受訪專家贊同再生能源的可選擇性、再生能源開發的成本是政府再生能源政策規模性影響印刷電路板事業體的關鍵要素，而策略聯盟的建立、制度性補助、閒置空間開放使用、綠電市場透明化、新綠能研發技術相關投入是台灣印刷電路板事業體可採取的關鍵回應策略。
本研究認為台灣印刷電路板產業在產品製造歷程中，目前已採取了相對綠色環保的製程，但是針對利用何種能源來啟動這些製程細節仍是印刷電路板事業體持續必須面對的難題。因此需要政府制訂與執行專門的再生能源政策的支持，而政府的再生能源政策的轉變與合乎需求的程度，也需要印刷電路板產業本身透過其對再生能源需求量能所促發的新能源技術開發歷程來刺激與建立。

摘要(英)

Since the release of the United Nations′ 17 Sustainable Development Goals in September 2015, they have become a universal language for international sustainability issues. Many companies are increasingly prioritizing environmental, social, and corporate governance considerations, as well as risk management and information disclosure. Through sustainable business management, coexistence and prosperity between the environment and society are sought. Currently, the quantity and quality of information disclosure in Corporate Social Responsibility (CSR) reports by listed companies in Taiwan have significantly improved. This reflects the government′s considerable emphasis on whether businesses possess environmental protection, social care, and corporate governance aspects in their operations. It also reflects the domestic political response to international political and economic situations.
Given that Taiwan′s energy and electricity consumption are susceptible to domestic and international economic development, economic conditions, changes in consumption structure, and the impacts of climate change, Taiwan′s energy policy strives to focus on renewable energy as the mainstay of power generation. In addition to the diverse challenges faced in promoting renewable energy, such as land development, regulatory design, environmental protection, and industrial development, initiating stable measures for electricity supply is a crucial and continuously adjustable issue for Taiwan′s energy policy.
In light of this, this study focuses on the printed circuit board industry and discusses the potential implications of the government′s renewable energy policy on this industry, as well as possible response strategies. The research employs three rounds of Delphi method expert interviews, conducting semi-structured in-depth interviews with management-level professionals and industry experts in Taiwan′s printed circuit board-related enterprises. Grounded theory analysis is used to extract key factors affecting the printed circuit board industry in Taiwan due to the impact of energy transition, as agreed upon by the interviewed experts.
The study highlights the selectivity of renewable energy and the cost of renewable energy development as critical factors influencing the scale of the government′s renewable energy policy on printed circuit board businesses. Additionally, establishing strategic alliances, utilizing idle spaces, transparentizing the green energy market, and investing in new green energy R&D technology are identified as key response strategies that printed circuit board businesses in Taiwan can adopt.

The study concludes that, although the printed circuit board industry in Taiwan has adopted relatively environmentally friendly processes in its manufacturing, the challenge lies in determining which energy sources to use for initiating these processes. Therefore, there is a need for government support in formulating and implementing dedicated renewable energy policies. The transformation of the government′s renewable energy policy and its alignment with the industry′s demands also require the printed circuit board industry to stimulate and establish new energy technology development processes through its demand for renewable energy."

關鍵字(中)

★ 永續
★ 再生能源
★ 能源政策
★ 印刷電路板產業
★ 德爾菲專家訪談

關鍵字(英)

★ Sustainability
★ Renewable Energy
★ Energy Policy
★ Printed Circuit Board Industry
★ Delphi Interview

論文目次

目錄
中文摘要 i
Abstract ii
誌謝 iv
目錄 v
圖目錄 vii
表目錄 viii
第一章緒論 1
第一節研究背景 1
第二節研究動機 4
第三節研究目的 7
第四節研究流程 7
第二章文獻回顧 9
第一節永續發展與再生能源 9
第二節台灣高科技產業/電子業 13
第三節印刷電路板產業 14
第三章研究方法 17
第一節研究架構 17
第二節參與專家 20
第三節資料蒐集流程 20
第四章研究分析 24
第一回合訪談分析 24
第二回合訪談分析 51
第三回合訪談分析 54
第五章研究結論與研究建議 60
第一節結論 60
第二節研究限制與後續研究建議 62
參考文獻 64
附錄一 A訪談者第二回合訪談 70
附錄二 B訪談者第二回合訪談 72
附錄三 C訪談者第二回合訪談 74
附錄四 D訪談者第二回合訪談 76
附錄五 E訪談者第二回合訪談 78
附錄六 F訪談者第二回合訪談 80
附錄七A訪談者第三回合訪談 82
附錄八 B訪談者第三回合訪談 83
附錄九 C訪談者第三回合訪談 84
附錄十 D訪談者第三回合訪談 85
附錄十一 E訪談者第三回合訪談 86
附錄十二 F訪談者第三回合訪談 87

參考文獻

參考文獻
1.工商時報(2023)。台電：綠電價高者得但不會買不到。民國112年7月1日取自https://www.ctee.com.tw/news/20230607700032-430104
2.王京明(2019)。該反省與調整的政府能源政策。經濟前瞻，181，72-80。
3.王京明(2020)。用電大戶綠能義務履行的機制探討。經濟前瞻，189，91-96。
4.公視新聞網(2023)。金融業攜手工研院合作減碳專家：綠電恐不夠買。民國112年9月20取自https://news.pts.org.tw/article/654739
5.施沛宏(2023)。2023年全球再生能源現況報告。3。
6.柯瓊鳳、馮雅玲(2019)。企業社會責任、公司治理與環保違規事件之關聯性研究。東吳經濟商學學報，99，57-90。
7.殷康妍(2018)。企業社會責任的實踐與價值：以中日韓重工企業為個案研究。台灣師範大學，台北市。
8.翁子育(2020)。國營企業綠色能源轉型管理議題：以台灣電力公司為例。成功大學，台南市。
9.徐恩仲(2021)。台灣電路板產業智慧製造藍圖介紹。台灣經濟研究月刊，44(4)，97-104。
10.財訊(2022)。Apple承諾使用100%再生能源！當整條供應鏈都實現了RE100，然後呢？民國112年5月20日取自https://www.wealth.com.tw/articles/530618d2-39fc-42c7-8ce4-ff7fbda84c18
11.敖家綱、薛翔之(2019)。台灣典範企業如何推展循環經濟作法及商業模式。經濟前瞻，184，17-22。
12.陳麗卿(2020)。強化 ESG 風險管理重視永續發展。證券服務，676，6-9。
13.陳冠婷、陳彥豪、尤晴韻、馬雲琭、左峻德(2021)。台灣再生能源憑證市場與發展趨勢介紹。台灣經濟研究月刊，44(3)，75-82。
14.陳相如、陳鏡如(2019)。以自我調節理論分析中年就業者的有效求職自我調節策略。中華輔導與諮商學報，55，123-160。
15.陳珮華 (2008)。線上德爾菲系統於技術前瞻之研究。7-8。
16.張宜慶（1998）。電腦網路德菲研究系統之建構及其可行性研究。國立交通大學傳播研究所碩士論文。
17.張書瑋(2021)。ESG企業永續報告書準備好了嗎？會計研究月刊，422，66-74。
18.張心怡、馮瑞鶯、曾仁美(2018)。兒童身體虐待倖存者之療癒歷程：破土而生、迂迴成長。護理雜誌，65(3)，47-57。
19.黃正忠、林泉興、許資宜(2018)。永續指數與 ESG 揭露的風向球。證券服務，665，15-17。
20.電路板協會(2022)。台灣PCB產銷調查及營運報告分析
民國112年3月20日取自https://www.tpca.org.tw/Knowledge/Detail?id=507&itemid=8&mid=252#
21.經濟部能源局(2018)。中華民國107年能源統計手冊修訂版。經濟部能源局。
22.經濟部能源局(2020)。能源轉型白皮書核定本。經濟部能源局。
23.經濟部(2022)。經濟成長力道強 2025年再生能源裝置量目標不變。新聞與公告，民國112年5月20取自https://www.moea.gov.tw/Mns/populace/news/News.aspx?kind=9&menu_id=22333&news_id=98419
24.數位時代(2023)。綠電占比仍不到1成！能源轉型進程慢郎中，全台缺電、
隱憂怎麼醫？民國112年11月20日取自 0https://www.bnext.com.tw/article/77344/electricity-renewable-energy?
25.環境資訊中心(2023)。民國112年5月20日取自
https://e-info.org.tw/node/236096
26.謝依紋(2021)。公司治理3.0-永續發展藍圖，擘劃企業未來永續發展。內部稽核，112，4-11。
27.瞿宛文(2012)。電子業之後台灣有什麼？天下雜誌，196。民國112年5月20日取自https://www.cw. com.tw/article/5035377
28.譚明哲(2020)。台灣電子代工廠醫療器材市場進入策略之研究。政治大學，台北市。
29.蘇立基(2020)。台電社會責任之研究：以減碳為例。中國文化大學，台北市。
30.Abbas, J. (2020). Impact of total quality management on corporate green performance through the mediating role of corporate social responsibility. Journal of Cleaner Production, 242, 118458.
31.Abbas, J., & Sağsan, M. (2019). Impact of knowledge management practices on green innovation and corporate sustainable development: a structural analysis. Journal of Cleaner Production, 229, 611-620.
32.Ashrafi, M., Adams, M., Walker, T. R., & Magnan, G. (2018). How corporate social responsibility can be integrated into corporate sustainability: a theoretical review of their relationships. International Journal of Sustainable Development & World Ecology, 25(8), 672-682.
33.Charmaz, K., & Belgrave, L. L. (2019). Thinking about data with grounded theory. Qualitative Inquiry, 25(8), 743-753.
34.Charmaz, K., & Thornberg, R. (2021). The pursuit of quality in grounded theory. Qualitative Research in Psychology, 18(3), 305-327.
35.Ciegis, R., Ramanauskiene, J., & Martinkus, B. (2009). The concept of sustainable development and its use for sustainability scenarios. Engineering Economics, 62(2), 28-37.
36.Cooper, M., & Nguyen, Q. T. (2020). Multinational enterprises and corporate tax planning: A review of literature and suggestions for a future research agenda. International Business Review, 29(3), 101692.
37.de Oliveira Fornasier, M., Ferreira, L. V., & Tondo, A. L. (2020). The historical experience of Sullivan Principles and their importance for developing self-regulation of the conduct of corporations according to human rights. Revista de Defesa da Concorrência, 8(1), 237-258.
38.Dhar, B. K., Sarkar, S. M., & Ayittey, F. K. (2022). Impact of social responsibility disclosure between implementation of green accounting and sustainable development: a study on heavily polluting companies in Bangladesh. Corporate Social Responsibility and Environmental Management, 29(1), 71-78.
39.Eaves, Y. D. (2001). A synthesis technique for grounded theory data analysis. Journal of advanced nursing, 35(5), 654-663.
40.Grover, P., Kar, A. K., & Ilavarasan, P. V. (2019). Impact of corporate social responsibility on reputation: insights from tweets on sustainable development goals by CEOs. International Journal of Information Management, 48, 39-52.
41.Halme, M., & Korpela, M. (2014). Responsible innovation toward sustainable development in small and medium‐sized enterprises: a resource perspective. Business Strategy and the Environment, 23(8), 547-566.
42.He, L., Zhang, L., Zhong, Z., Wang, D., & Wang, F. (2019). Green credit, renewable energy investment and green economy development: empirical analysis based on 150 listed companies of China. Journal of Cleaner Production, 208, 363-372.
43.Ikram, M., Zhang, Q., Sroufe, R., & Shah, S. Z. A. (2020). Towards a sustainable environment: The nexus between ISO 14001, renewable energy consumption, access to electricity, agriculture and CO2 emissions in SAARC countries. Sustainable Production and Consumption, 22, 218-230.
44.Kraus, S., Rehman, S. U., & García, F. J. S. (2020). Corporate social responsibility and environmental performance: the mediating role of environmental strategy and green innovation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 160, 120262.
45.Loye, D. (1978), “The Knowledge Future: a Pasychology of Forecasting and Prophecy,” NY: John Wiley and Sons.
46.Linstone, H. A. (1978), "The Delphi Technique. In J. Fowless (Ed.)," Handbook of Futures Research. London: Greenwood Press.
47.Messenger, J. (2018). Working time and the future of work. ILO Future of Work Research Paper Series, 6(8), 33-37.
48.Murry, J.W. and Hammons, J.O. (1995), “Delphi: A Versatile Methodology for Conducting Qualitative Research,” The Review of Higher Education, Vol. 18, Issue 4, pp. 423-436.
49.Nielsen, A. E., & Thomsen, C. (2018). Reviewing corporate social responsibility communication: a legitimacy perspective. Corporate Communications: An International Journal, 23(4), 492-511.
50.Orzes, G., Moretto, A. M., Moro, M., Rossi, M., Sartor, M., Caniato, F., & Nassimbeni, G. (2020). The impact of the United Nations global compact on firm performance: a longitudinal analysis. International Journal of Production Economics, 227, 107664.
51.Rasche, A., & Esser, D. E. (2006). From stakeholder management to stakeholder accountability. Journal of Business Ethics, 65(3), 251-267.
52.RE100 (2022)。 Taiwan Market Briefing。July 13,2023 from https://www.re100.org.tw/
53.Sana, S. S. (2020). Price competition between green and non green products under corporate social responsible firm. Journal of Retailing and Consumer Services, 55, 102118.
54.Scherer, A. G., & Voegtlin, C. (2020). Corporate governance for responsible innovation: approaches to corporate governance and their implications for sustainable development. Academy of Management Perspectives, 34(2), 182-208.
55.Schlör, H., Venghaus, S., Zapp, P., Marx, J., Schreiber, A., & Hake, J. F. (2018). The energy-mineral-society nexus: a social LCA model. Applied Energy, 228, 999-1008.
56.Simmons Jr, J. M., Crittenden, V. L., & Schlegelmilch, B. B. (2018). The Global Reporting Initiative: do application levels matter? Social Responsibility Journal, 14(3), 527-541.
57.Van Zanten, J. A., & Van Tulder, R. (2018). Multinational enterprises and the Sustainable Development Goals: an institutional approach to corporate engagement. Journal of International Business Policy, 1(3), 208-233.
58.Wyszomirski, A., & Olkiewicz, M. (2020). Environmental corporate social responsibility as a tool for creating the future of environmental protection. Rocznik Ochrona Środowiska, 22, 1145-1161.
59.Xia, B., Olanipekun, A., Chen, Q., Xie, L., & Liu, Y. (2018). Conceptualising the state of the art of corporate social responsibility (CSR) in the construction industry and its nexus to sustainable development. Journal of Cleaner Production, 195, 340-353.

指導教授

王啟泰(C-T Wang)

審核日期

2024-3-26

推文