對IBM_VDRAS四維變分資料同化系統的改進以及在探討複雜地形上劇烈降雨過程的應用:北台灣午後對流個案分析

以作者查詢圖書館館藏

、以作者查詢臺灣博碩士

、以作者查詢全國書目

、勘誤回報

、線上人數：42

、訪客IP：18.227.48.102

姓名

吳英璋(Ying-Jhang Wu) 查詢紙本館藏

畢業系所

大氣科學學系

論文名稱

對IBM_VDRAS四維變分資料同化系統的改進以及在探討複雜地形上劇烈降雨過程的應用:北台灣午後對流個案分析
(The improvement of a 4DVar data assimilation system (IBM_VDRAS) and its applications in analyzing heavy rainfall processes over complex terrain: A case study in Northern Taiwan)

相關論文

★ 單雷達風場反演—【移動坐標法】的特性分析與應用	★ 由都卜勒風場反演熱動力場的新方法 ——TAMEX IOP#2颮線個案應用分析
★ 利用VAD技術及回波保守方程反演渦度場	★ 利用單都卜勒雷達反演三維風場之研究─以數值模式資料驗證
★ 在地形上由都卜勒風場反演熱動力場	★ 利用Extended-GBVTD方法反求非軸對稱颱風（颶風）風場結構
★ 同化雷達資料對數值預報影響之研究	★ 使用系集卡曼濾波器同化都卜勒雷達資料之研究
★ 以3DVAR同化都卜勒雷達觀測及反演資料對於數值模擬結果的影響	★ 台灣北部初秋豪雨個案之降雨特性研究
★ 同化都卜勒雷達資料改善模式預報之研究	★ 2008年台灣西南部地區TRMM降雨雷達與七股雷達回波觀測比較分析及降雨估計應用研究
★ 使用四維變分同化都卜勒雷達資料以改進短期定量降雨預報	★ 同化多部都卜勒雷達資料以提升降水預報能力之研究-2008 SoWMEX IOP8個案分析
★ 結合VDRAS、WRF與雷達網聯資料，以檢視對台灣地區短期降水預報改善之成效	★ 結合都卜勒雷達觀測及反演氣象變數與COSMIC RO資料以改進模式預報之可行性研究

檔案

[Endnote RIS 格式]

[Bibtex 格式]

[相關文章]

[文章引用]

[完整記錄]

[館藏目錄]

[檢視]

[下載]

本電子論文使用權限為同意立即開放。
已達開放權限電子全文僅授權使用者為學術研究之目的，進行個人非營利性質之檢索、閱讀、列印。
請遵守中華民國著作權法之相關規定，切勿任意重製、散佈、改作、轉貼、播送，以免觸法。

摘要(中)

台灣擁有複雜地形使得預報對流初始、發展、增強及傳遞是更具有挑戰性，本篇研究選擇2014年8月19日北台灣夏季午後對流個案，分析方法分為兩部分。第一部分為地面測站資料分析，第二部分使用最新研發的四維變分都卜勒雷達資料同化系統(IBM_VDRAS)，其運用沉浸邊界法(Immersed Boundary Method)，因此具有解析地形的能力，並且能同化雷達及地面觀測資料，產出每17.5分鐘更新的完整三維高時空解析分析場，本研究共產生8個分析場來分析。
在對流產生降雨前，地面測站資料可分析出水平輻合帶由山區往平地移動，溫度場顯示對流蒸發冷卻效應，降雨觀測可看出被地形隔離的兩個降雨帶。從IBM_VDRAS分析場可以看出，此降雨事件主要是由兩個獨立對流胞成長開始，其中一個對流胞的外流邊界與另一個對流胞合併，使得後者增強，並且往台北市移動，產生80mm的觀測雨量。從近地表輻合和相對溼度場顯示，外流邊界的合併提供動力輻合增強，以及平流潮濕的環境有利對流發展。之後進行移除地形及地面資料同化變數的敏感度實驗，探討地形及同化變數對於定量降水預報的影響。結果顯示，雪山山脈在此事件中扮演的角色為阻礙外流邊界向南傳遞，而陽明山及林口台地增加外流邊界移動速度，此外，同化地面風場可修正地面風速偏差量及地表輻合帶強度並改善地量降水預報結果。

摘要(英)

The complex terrain in Taiwan area makes it more challenging to forecast convection initiation, intensification, and propagation. In this research, the heavy rainfall event occurring on 19 August 2014 in northern Taiwan is selected. We use a newly-developed four-dimensional variational Doppler radar assimilation system (IBM_VDRAS), which is capable of simulating the topographic effect by adopting the so-called Immersed Boundary Method, and assimilating radar observations and surface station data. The products of IBM_VDRAS are a series of frequently-updated three-dimensional analysis fields over the complex terrain. In this case study, a total of eight analysis fields times are generated with a temporal interval of 17.5 min over a period of 2.5 h.
From the surface observations and the high temporal/spatial resolution analysis fields generated by IBM_VDRAS, it is found that the rainfall process started with the initiation of individual convective cells. The outflow of one of the convective cells merged with another convective system and helped to intensify the latter. The intensified major convective cell then moved into the Taipei metropolitan area and produced 80 mm of heavy precipitation within 2.5 h. The role played by the topographic forcing on the development of the convective system is investigated. A series of experiments are also designed and conducted by moving out terrain or surface assimilated variables to examine the performance of IBM_VDRAS in short-term rainfall forecasts. The result shows that SMR prevents the outflow from propagating southward, and LKHL and MTYM increase the outflow propagation speed. The surface wind assimilation improves the QPF skill by correcting the wind speed bias and controlling the magnitude of low-level convergence.

關鍵字(中)

★ 資料同化
★ 定量降雨預報
★ 敏感度測試
★ 都卜勒雷達觀測
★ 劇烈降水
★ 伴隨模式

關鍵字(英)

★ data assimilation
★ quantitative precipitation forecast
★ sensitivity test
★ Doppler radar observation
★ heavy rainfall
★ adjoint model

論文目次

Chinese Abstract I
English abstract II
Acknowledgements III
Table of Content IV
List of Tables VII
List of Figures VII
Chapter 1 Introduction 1
1.1 Background of the afternoon thunderstorm 1
1.2 Background of data assimilation 2
1.3 Research goal and outline 5
Chapter 2 Methodology: Variational Doppler Radar Analysis System 6
2.1 Mesoscale background 6
2.2 Cloud-resolving model 7
2.3 Cost function and the adjoint model 10
2.4 Surface data assimilation and Immersed Boundary Method 12
2.5 The improvement of IBM_VDRAS 13
Chapter 3 Real case overview and data processing/preparation 15
3.1 An overview of the event 15
3.2 Synoptic scale analysis 15
3.3 Data processing 16
3.3.1 Radar description and quality control (QC) 16
3.3.2 Surface station description and QC 17
3.4 Treatment of surface station analysis 17
3.5 Domain setting and experiment design 18
3.5.1 Assimilation Strategy 19
3.5.2 TEAM-R validation and station temperature verification 20
Chapter 4 Surface station and IBM_VDRAS analysis 22
4.1 Surface station analyses 22
4.2 IBM_VDRAS analyses 24
4.3 Rainfall structure analysis 26
Chapter 5 Quantitative Precipitation Forecast (QPF) and sensitivity test 28
5.1 IBM_VDRAS QPF 28
5.2 Experimental design for sensitivity test of the topographic effect 28
5.3 Results for sensitivity test of the topographic effect 29
5.4 Experimental design for sensitivity test of surface assimilation 30
5.5 Results for sensitivity test of surface assimilation 31
5.6 Fraction skill score (FSS) of QPFs 32
5.7 The rainfall mechanism illustrated by IBM_VDRAS forecast 33
5.8 Schematic diagram for the heavy rainfall event 33
Chapter 6 Summary and future work 36
6.1 Summary and conclusions 36
6.2 Future work 37
Appendix A The adjoint model and adjoint code 39
A-1 Theoretical derivation of the adjoint model 39
A-2 Practical derivation of the adjoint code 41
A-3 Derivation of the adjoint variables for diagnostic variables 46
A-4 Derivation of Immersed Boundary Method (IBM) adjoint 49
Appendix B Surface station treatment and assimilation 52
B-1 Surface observation variables 52
B-2 Observation variables transformation 52
B-3 Objective surface assimilation 54
Appendix C Immersed boundary method (IBM) 56
C-1 Identify the ghost cell 56
C-2 Finding the image point 56
C-3 Update the values of the ghost cell 57
Appendix D The improvement of IBM_VDRAS 60
D-1 Problems when lateral boundaries intersect with terrain 60
D-2 Update ghost cell value from the horizontal rather than vertical grid points 62
D-3 Modification of surface assimilation system 63
Appendix E Others 65
E-1 Radar QC 65
E-2 Surface temperature terrain-following interpolation 66
References 67
Tables 72
Figures 75

參考文獻

陳依涵，2016：發展地面資料同化方法以改善都卜勒雷達變分分析系統之分析
與預報能力。國立中央大學大氣物理所碩士論文，1–95。[Chen, Y.-H., 2016: Development of a surface assimilation scheme in a Variational Doppler Radar Analysis System for improving the model analysis and forecast skill. Master thesis, National Central University].
張少凡，2013：同化策略及冰相微物理對四維變分都卜勒雷達分析系統(VDRAS) 於定量降雨預報之影響研究。國立中央大學大氣物理所博士論文，1–81。[Chang, S.-F., 2013: The influence of assimilation strategies and ice-phase microphysics on the application of a four-dimensional Variational Doppler Radar Analysis System (VDRAS) for quantitative precipitation forecasts. Doctoral Dissertration, National Central University.]
戴聖倫，2010：使用四維變分同化都卜勒雷達資料以改進短期定量降雨預報。國立中央大學大氣物理所碩士論文，1–86。[Tai, S.-L., 2010: Improving short-term quantitaive precipitaion forecast by assimilating doppler radar observations with the four-dimensional variational technique. Master thesis, National Central University.]
周仲島、高聿正、修榮光、鍾吉俊、李宗融、郭鴻基，2016：臺北都會區豪雨型午後雷暴的觀測特徵與預報挑戰：2015年6月14日個案研究。大氣科學44(1)，57-82。[Jou, B. J.-D., Y.-C. Kao, R.-G. R. Hsiu, C.-J. U. Jung, J. R. Lee, H. C. Kuo, 2016: Observational Characteristics and Forecast Challenge of Taipei Flash Flood Afternoon Thunderstorm: Case Study of 14 June 2015. Atmospheric Science,44(1),57-82.]
繆炯恩，2017：2015年6月14日台北盆地劇烈午後雷暴個案之高解析度模究。國立臺灣大學大氣科學研究所碩士論文，1–86。[Miao, J.-E., 2017: Cell Merger and Heavy Rainfall of the Severe Afternoon Thunderstorm Event at Taipei on 14 June 2015. Master thesis, National Taiwan University.]
Barnes, S. L., 1964: A Technique for Maximizing Details in Numerical Weather Map Analysis. J. Appl. Meteor., 3, 396-409.
Byers, H. R., and R. R. Braham, 1948: Thunderstorm Structure and Circulation. J. Meteor., 5, 71-86.
Chang, S.-F., Y.-C. Liou, J. Sun, and S.-L. Tai, 2016: The Implementation of the Ice-Phase Microphysical Process into a Four-Dimensional Variational Doppler Radar Analysis System (VDRAS) and Its Impact on Parameter Retrieval and Quantitative Precipitation Nowcasting. J. Atmos. Sci., 73, 1015-1038.
Chang, S.-F., J. Sun, Y.-C. Liou, S.-L. Tai, and C.-Y. Yang, 2014: The influence of erroneous background, beam-blocking and microphysical non-linearity on the application of a four-dimensional variational Doppler radar data assimilation system for quantitative precipitation forecasts. Meteor. Appl., 21, 444-458.
Chen, X., K. Zhao, J. Sun, B. Zhou, and W.-C. Lee, 2016: Assimilating surface observations in a four-dimensional variational Doppler radar data assimilation system to improve the analysis and forecast of a squall line case. Adv. Atmos. Sci., 33, 1106-1119.
Chung, K.-S., I. Zawadzki, M. K. Yau, and L. Fillion, 2009: Short-Term Forecasting of a Midlatitude Convective Storm by the Assimilation of Single–Doppler Radar Observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 137, 4115-4135.
Crook, N. A., and J. Sun, 2002: Assimilating Radar, Surface, and Profiler Data for the Sydney 2000 Forecast Demonstration Project. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol, 19, 888-898.
Crook, N. A., and J. Sun, 2004: Analysis and Forecasting of the Low-Level Wind during the Sydney 2000 Forecast Demonstration Project. Wea. Forecasting, 19, 151-167.
Feng, Z., S. Hagos, A. K. Rowe, C. D. Burleyson, M. N. Martini, and S. P. de Szoeke, 2015: Mechanisms of convective cloud organization by cold pools over tropical warm ocean during the AMIE/DYNAMO field campaign. J. Adv. Model. Earth Syst., 7, 357-381.
Franke, R., 1982: Scattered Data Interpolation: Tests of Some Method. Math. Comput., 38, 181-200.
Friedrich, K., and Coauthors, 2016: Raindrop Size Distribution and Rain Characteristics during the 2013 Great Colorado Flood. J. Hydrometeor., 17, 53-72.
Gao, T., Y.-H. Tseng, and X.-Y. Lu, 2007: An improved hybrid Cartesian/immersed boundary method for fluid–solid flows. Int. J. Numer. Methods Fluids, 55, 1189-1211.
Gochis, D., and Coauthors, 2015: The Great Colorado Flood of September 2013. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 96, 1461-1487.
Hayden, C. M., and R. J. Purser, 1995: Recursive Filter Objective Analysis of Meteorological Fields: Applications to NESDIS Operational Processing. J. Appl. Meteor., 34, 3-15.
Hsu, S. A., E. A. Meindl, and D. B. Gilhousen, 1994: Determining the Power-Law Wind-Profile Exponent under Near-Neutral Stability Conditions at Sea. J. Appl. Meteor., 33, 757-765.
Kalnay, E., 2002: Atmospheric Modeling, Data Assimilation and Predictability. Cambridge University Press.
Kawabata, J., H. Seko, K. Saito, T. Kuroda, K. Tamiya, T. Tsuyuki, and Wakazuki, 2007: An assimilation and forecasting experiment of the Nerima heavy rainfall with a cloud-resolving nonhydrostatic 4-dimensiojnal variational data assimilation system. J. Meteor. Soc. Japan, 85, 255-276.
Kessler, E., 1969: On the Distribution and Continuity of Water Substance in Atmospheric Circulations. Meteor. Mongr., Amer. Meteor. Soc., 1-84.
Li, Y., X. Wang, and M. Xue, 2012: Assimilation of Radar Radial Velocity Data with the WRF Hybrid Ensemble–3DVAR System for the Prediction of Hurricane Ike (2008). Mon. Wea. Rev., 140, 3507-3524.
Lin, P.-F., P.-L. Chang, B. J.-D. Jou, J. W. Wilson, and R. D. Roberts, 2011: Warm season afternoon thunderstorm characteristics under weak synoptic-scale forcing over taiwan island. Wea. Forecasting, 26, 44-60.
Malkus, J. S., 1954: Some results of a trade-cumulus cloud investigation. J. Meteor., 11, 220-237.
Malkus, J. S., and H. Riehl, 1964: Cloud structure and distributions over the tropical Pacific Ocean. Tellus, 16, 275-287.
Miller, M. J., and R. P. Pearce, 1974: A three-dimensional primitive equation model of cumulonimbus convection. Q. J. R. Meteor. Soc., 100, 133-154.
Navon, I. M., X. Zou, J. Derber, and J. Sela, 1992: Variational Data Assimilation with an Adiabatic Version of the NMC Spectral Model. Mon. Wea. Rev., 120, 1433-1446.
Pan, X., X. Tian, X. Li, Z. Xie, A. Shao, and C. Lu, 2012: Assimilating Doppler radar radial velocity and reflectivity observations in the weather research and forecasting model by a proper orthogonal-decomposition-based ensemble, three-dimensional variational assimilation method. J. Geophys. Res, 117.
Simpson, J., W. L. Woodley, A. H. Miller, and G. F. Cotton, 1971: Precipitation Results of Two Randomized Pyrotechnic Cumulus Seeding Experiments. J. Appl. Meteor., 10, 526-544.
Simpson, J., T. D. Keenan, B. Ferrier, R. H. Simpson, and G. J. Holland, 1993: Cumulus mergers in the maritime continent region. Meteor Atmos. Phys., 51, 73-99.
Snyder, C., and F. Zhang, 2003: Assimilation of Simulated Doppler Radar Observations with an Ensemble Kalman Filter. Mon. Wea. Rev., 131, 1663-1677.
Sun, J., and N. A. Crook, 1997: Dynamical and Microphysical Retrieval from Doppler Radar Observations Using a Cloud Model and Its Adjoint. Part I: Model Development and Simulated Data Experiments. J. Atmos. Sci., 54, 1642-1611.
——, 1998: Dynamical and Microphysical Retrieval from Doppler Radar Observations Using a Cloud Model and Its Adjoint. Part II: Retrieval Experiments of an Observed Florida Convective Storm. J. Atmos. Sci., 55, 835-852.
——, 2001: Real-Time Low-Level Wind and Temperature Analysis Using Single WSR-88D Data. Wea. Forecasting, 16, 117-132.
Sun, J., and Y. Zhang, 2008: Analysis and Prediction of a Squall Line Observed during IHOP Using Multiple WSR-88D Observations. Mon. Wea. Rev., 136, 2364-2388.
Sun, J., and H. Wang, 2013: Radar Data Assimilation with WRF 4D-Var. Part II: Comparison with 3D-Var for a Squall Line over the U.S. Great Plains. Mon. Wea. Rev., 141, 2245-2264.
Sun, J., M. Chen, and Y. Wang, 2010: A Frequent-Updating Analysis System Based on Radar, Surface, and Mesoscale Model Data for the Beijing 2008 Forecast Demonstration Project. Wea. Forecasting, 25, 1715-1735.
Tai, S.-L., Y.-C. Liou, J. Sun, and S.-F. Chang, 2017: The Development of a Terrain-Resolving Scheme for the Forward Model and Its Adjoint in the Four-Dimensional Variational Doppler Radar Analysis System (VDRAS). Mon. Wea. Rev., 145, 289-306.
Tai, S.-L., Y.-C. Liou, J. Sun, S.-F. Chang, and M.-C. Kuo, 2011: Precipitation Forecasting Using Doppler Radar Data, a Cloud Model with Adjoint, and the Weather Research and Forecasting Model: Real Case Studies during SoWMEX in Taiwan. Wea. Forecasting, 26, 975-992.
Tao, W.-K., and J. Simpson, 1984: Cloud Interactions and Merging: Numerical Simulations. J. Atmos. Sci., 41, 2901-2917.
Tao, W.-K., and J. Simpson, 1989: A Further Study of Cumulus Interactions and Mergers: Three-Dimensional Simulations with Trajectory Analyses. J. Atmos. Sci., 46, 2974-3004.
Tong, M., and M. Xue, 2005: Ensemble Kalman Filter Assimilation of Doppler Radar Data with a Compressible Nonhydrostatic Model: OSS Experiments. Mon. Wea. Rev., 133, 1789-1807.
Tseng, Y.-H., and J. H. Ferziger, 2003: A ghost-cell immersed boundary method for flow in complex geometry. J. Comput. Phys., 192, 593-623.
Watson, A. I., and D. O. Blanchard, 1984: The Relationship between Total Area Divergence and Convective Precipitation in South Florida. Mon. Wea. Rev., 112, 673-685.
Westcott, N., 1984: A Historical Perspective on Cloud Mergers. Bull. Amer. Meteor. Soc., 65, 219-226.
Xiao, Q., and J. Sun, 2007: Multiple-Radar Data Assimilation and Short-Range Quantitative Precipitation Forecasting of a Squall Line Observed during IHOP_2002. Mon. Wea. Rev., 135, 3381-3404.
Xiao, X., J. Sun, M. Chen, X. Qie, Y. Wang, and Z. Ying, 2017: The characteristics of weakly forced mountain-to-plain precipitation systems based on radar observations and high-resolution reanalysis. J. Geophys. Res, 122, 3193-3213.
Xue, M., M. Tong, and K. K. Droegemeier, 2006: An OSSE framework based on the ensemble square root kalman filter for evaluating the impact of data from radar networks on thunderstorm analysis and forecasting. J. Atmos. Oceanic Technol., 23, 46-66.

指導教授

廖宇慶(Liou Yu-Chieng)

審核日期

2019-5-31

推文