博碩士論文 106187002 詳細資訊




以作者查詢圖書館館藏 以作者查詢臺灣博碩士 以作者查詢全國書目 勘誤回報 、線上人數:17 、訪客IP:3.17.165.235
姓名 林耀梅(Yao-Mei Lin)  查詢紙本館藏   畢業系所 學習與教學研究所
論文名稱 學術韌性學生的感知教學實踐、幸福感及素養表現之相關研究
(A study on the relationship of perceived teaching practice, students’ well-being and literacy performance of academic resilient students)
相關論文
★ 以眼動型態探討背景知識對詞彙辨識的影響★ 合作寫作對於國小學童科學概念學習之影響
★ 影響國小學童家長送子女參加課後補習之相關因素研究---以桃園縣中壢市為例★ 國小學童圖文閱讀的理解策略
★ 幼童敘說書面故事之後設認知表現★ 新移民家庭子女口語敘說能力之發展
★ 圖文提示對學童閱讀科學說明文記憶與理解之影響★ 識字教學法與口語詞彙能力對新移民女性中文識字學習之影響
★ 先備知識對於不同閱讀能力的學童在閱讀歷程中自我提問的影響★ Exploring Computer-based Nature Science Instruction Based on the Cognitive Load Theory: Spatial Contiguity Effect, and Effects of Prior Knowledge on Performance Assessments
★ 教師示範與文本提示對國小學童自我解釋與閱讀理解表現之影響★ 國小學童之工作記憶能力對於閱讀理解監控表現的影響
★ 成人與幼童的言談行為分析:比較電子書與紙本書親子共讀的情境★ 探討幼兒的早期書寫表現及其影響因素
★ 探究教師閱讀教學自我效能與閱讀自我調整教學信念及實踐之關係★ 探討閱讀能力與文本架構對於國小學童使用理解策略的影響
檔案 [Endnote RIS 格式]    [Bibtex 格式]    [相關文章]   [文章引用]   [完整記錄]   [館藏目錄]   至系統瀏覽論文 (2025-2-1以後開放)
摘要(中) 本研究以Bronfenbrenner (1979)的生態系統理論為基礎,探究臺灣地區學生幸福感(微系統)、感知教學實踐(中系統)與其素養表現關係,並將時間維度列入考慮,進行兩屆的國際學生能力評量計畫(Programme for International Student Assessment, PISA)資料分析。首先,進行經濟社會和文化地位 (Economic, Social, and Cultural Status, ESCS)弱勢學生的中介變項探究,本研究發現家庭ESCS透過教師支持、課堂氛圍、父母支持、喜愛該學科,可以影響科學和閱讀素養表現。其次,兩屆解釋力分析顯示:學術韌性學生往往是預期自己能完成大學以上教育、感知較佳課堂氛圍和較多的教師支持,同時也感受較多父母支持和較多競爭的弱勢ESCS學生。PISA 2018新增的項目:具有成長思維、比較害怕失敗也具顯著的解釋力。最後,進行學術韌性與學術非韌性學生之比較發現:學術 韌性學生在課堂氛圍、教師支持、父母支持、喜愛該學科皆呈現顯著高於非學術韌性學生。ESCS弱勢群體學生在2018年皆感受到較高的父母情感支持,較低的歸屬感。本研究依據研究結果提出建議與未來研究之參考。
摘要(英) Based on Bronfenbrenner’s (1979) Ecological Systems Theory, this study explored the relationship among Taiwanese students’ well-being (Microsystem), perceived teaching practice (Mesosystem) and their literacy performance. And taking the Chronosystem into account, the study also conducted cross-cycle comparisons of data from the Program for International Student Assessment (PISA) 2015 and 2018. First, the analysis of mediating variables on Economic, Social, and Cultural Status (ESCS) disadvantaged students suggested that there are mediated factors between family ESCS and both science and reading literacy performance through teacher support, disciplinary climate, parental support, and enjoy subjects, which has a partial mediating effect. Secondly, logistic regression analysis showed that: academic resilient students are often disadvantaged ESCS students who expect to complete university education, perceive better disciplinary climate and more teacher support, and also feel more parental support and more competition. Having a growth mindset and being more afraid of failure (newly added items in PISA 2018) also have significant explanatory power. Finally, conducting a comparison of academically resilient and academically non-resilient students found that academic resilient students have significantly higher performance than non-academic resilient students in disciplinary climate, teacher support, parental support, and enjoy subjects. All the ESCS disadvantaged students felt higher parental emotional support and lower sense of belonging in 2018. Based on the research results, this study puts forward suggestions and references for future research.
關鍵字(中) ★ 學生幸福感
★ 學術韌性學生
★ 感知教學實踐
★ 素養表現
關鍵字(英) ★ student well-being
★ academic resilient students
★ perceived teaching practice
★ literacy performance
論文目次 第一章 緒論 1
第一節 研究背景與動機 1
第二節 研究目的 7
第三節 名詞解釋 8
第二章 文獻探討 10
第一節 理論架構 10
第二節 學術韌性 14
第三節 學生幸福感 29
第四節 教學實踐 43
第三章 研究設計與方法 54
第一節 PISA評估設計架構 54
第二節 研究對象 58
第三節 研究方法 61
第四節 研究工具 65
第五節 研究流程 71
第六節 資料處理與分析 74
第四章 結果分析與討論 77
第一節ESCS透過感知教學實踐變項對素養表現之中介效果 78
第二節ESCS透過學生幸福感變項對素養表現之中介效果 98
第三節 學生的樣本特徵對學術韌性學生的解釋力 111
第四節 感知教學實踐變項對學術韌性學生的解釋力 116
第五節 學生幸福感變項對學術韌性學生的解釋力 123
第六節 ESCS弱勢群體學術韌性學生和非學術韌性學生之學生幸福感和感知教學實踐之跨組、跨屆比較 130
第五章 結論與建議 136
第一節 結論 136
第二節 對學術韌性學生感知教學實踐和學生幸福感的建議 139
第三節 研究限制 140
第四節 未來研究之可行方向 142
參考文獻 143
附錄一 158
參考文獻 王麗雲(2017)。科技部人文社會科學研究中心 「教育學門熱門及前瞻學術研究議題調查」結案報告。
沈暉智、林明仁(2019)。論家戶所得與資產對子女教育之影響---以 1993--1995出生世代及其父母稅務資料為例。經濟論文叢刊, 47(3),393-453。
李哲迪(2016)。運用國際調查教育資料庫跨屆比較分析之技術建議。臺灣教育評論月刊, 5(7),19-23。
吳佳樺、楊旻婕(2017)。培育學生成長思維之教學策略。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(6),163-166。
林立敏、白曉珊、郭伯臣、劉育隆(2007)。數位個別指導教材研發與適性補救教學模式之研究-以國小五年級數學 “因數與倍數” 單元為例。網際網路技術學刊,8(2),191-197。
林俊瑩、黃毅志(2008)。影響臺灣地區學生學業成就的可能機制:結構方程模式的探究。臺灣教育社會學研究,8(1),45-88。
凃金堂(2020)。SPSS 與量化研究。臺北市:五南。
阮孝齊(2019)。我國都會區弱勢學生學校歸屬感評估工具發展之研究。國家教育研究院整合研究計畫案(NAER- 108-12-C-2-02-00-1-02)。新北市:國家教育研究院。
張芳全(2017)。幸福感與學習成就之跨國分析。教育研究與發展期刊,13(3),31-65。
張芳全(2021)。家庭社經地位與閱讀學習成就關聯:多重中介變項探究。 學校行政,136,201-228。
張淳熙、陳柏熹(2022)。成長思維、成就目標與閱讀素養表現相關因素之探討:以PISA 2018臺灣資料為例。測驗學刊,69 (2),83 -113。
張國祥(2010)。澳門在PISA 2003 數學素養測試計畫中學校歸屬感相關議題之詳盡分析。 課程與教學, 13(1),95-115。
曾愛愛(2022)。成長型思維的價值與實踐:當代教育的新趨勢。學校行政雙月刊,140,122-142。
陳寬裕(2018)。結構方程模型分析實務:SPSS與SmartPLS的運用。臺北市:五南。
曾瓊禛、洪儷瑜(2020)。學習障礙大學生韌性發展歷程探究。特殊教育研究學刊,45(2),61-88。
報導者(2018)。【教育能翻轉人生嗎──高教的反向重分配現象】。取自https://www.twreporter.org/a/education-opportunity-inequality-across-income
楊忠祥、陳鈺芳 (2013)。如何從學術論文之統計量數計算效果量: 以 Cohen d, η 2 與 ω 2 為例。臺灣運動心理學報,13(2),75-90。
劉育春、陳柏霖、洪兆祥(2017)。以數學學業復原力為調節角色:國中生數學考試焦慮與數學學業成就之關係。課程與教學,20(4),151-176。
劉潔玲(2009)。香港中學生在國際學生評估計畫的閱讀表現對語文課程改革的啟示。教育科學研究期刊,54(2),85-105。
蔡麗珠(2011)。海外中文教學實踐與反思-以韓國全州大學初級中文班為例。台灣華語文教學,(11),82-90。
潘玉龍(2017)。翻轉課堂融入體育教學對學習態度及學習成效之研究。臺灣教育評論月刊,6(10),103-109。
駱明慶(2002)。誰是臺大學生?性別,省籍與城鄉差異。經濟論文叢刊,30(1),113-147。
蔡宗倫、陳美如(2022)。運用適性教學輔助平臺融入數學教學提升自我調整學習能力與學習成效之研究。中等教育,73(2),35-54。
鄭明長(2019)。害怕失敗對高中生學習涉入的影響:毅力的調節效果(E10416) 【原始數據】。取自中央研究院人文社會科學研究中心調查研究專題中心學 術調查研究資料庫。doi:10.6141/TW-SRDA-E10416-1
Agasisti, T., & Longobardi, S. (2014). Inequality in education: Can Italian disadvantaged students close the gap? Journal of Behavioral and Experimental Economics, 52(C), 8-20.
Agasisti, T., & Longobardi, S. (2017). Equality of educational opportunities, schools’ characteristics and resilient students: An empirical study of EU-15 countries using OECD-PISA 2009 data. An International and Interdisciplinary Journal for Quality-of-Life Measurement, 134(3), 917-953.
Anderson, D. L., & Graham, A. P. (2016). Improving student wellbeing: Having a say at school. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 27(3), 348-366.
Arens, A. K., Morin, A. J., & Watermann, R. (2015). Relations between classroom disciplinary problems and student motivation: Achievement as a potential mediator?. Learning and Instruction, 39, 184-193.
Bandura, A. (1991). Social cognitive theory of self-regulation. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 50(2), 248-287.
Bandura, A. (1992). Exercise of personal agency through the self-efficacy mechanism. In R. Schwarzer (Ed.), Self-efficacy: Thought control of action (pp. 3-38). Washington, DC: Hemisphere.
Bazán-Ramírez, A., Montes-Iturrizaga, I., & Castro-Paniagua, W. (2022). Household Possessions and Parental Support in Mexican Students with High Scientific Competencies in PISA 2015. European Journal of Educational Research, 11(1), 259-272.
Ben-Arieh, A. (2008). The child indicators movement: Past, present, and future. Child Indicators Research, 1(1), 3-16.
Berk, L. E. (2000). Ecological systems theory. Child development (5th ed. ed., pp. 23-38). Allyn and Bacon.
Bethmann, D., & Rudolf, R. (2021). The paradox of wealthy nations’ unhappy adolescents (No. 2101). Institute of Economic Research, Korea University.
Borgonovi, F., and Pál, J. (2016). A Framework for the Analysis of Student Well-Being in the PISA 2015 Study: Being 15 In 2015, OECD Education Working Papers, No. 140. OECD Publishing.
Borich, G. D. (2014). Effective teaching methods: research-based practice (8th edition). Pearson Schweiz Ag.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1979). The ecology of human development: Experiments by nature and design. Harvard University Press.
Bronfenbrenner, U. (1989). Ecological systems theory. In R. Vasta (Ed.), Annals of child development: Six theories of child development: Revised Formulations and Current Issues, 6, 187-249.
Caldas, S. J., & Bankston, C. (1997). Effect of school population socioeconomic status on individual academic achievement. The Journal of Educational Research, 90(5), 269-277.
Caraway, K., Tucker, C. M., Reinke, W. M., & Hall, C. (2003). Self‐efficacy, goal orientation, and fear of failure as predictors of school engagement in high school students. Psychology in the Schools, 40(4), 417-427.
Cairns, D. (2019). Investigating the relationship between instructional practices and science achievement in an inquiry-based learning environment. International Journal of Science Education, 41(15), 2113-2135.
Cheema, J. R., & Kitsantas, A. (2014). Influences of disciplinary classroom climate on high school student self-efficacy and mathematics achievement: A look at gender and racial–ethnic differences. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 12(5), 1261-1279.
Cheung, K. C., Sit, P. S., Soh, K. C., Ieong, M. K., & Mak, S. K. (2014). Predicting academic resilience with reading engagement and demographic variables: Comparing Shanghai, Hong Kong, Korea, and Singapore from the PISA perspective. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 23(4), 895-909.
Cheung, K. C. (2017). The effects of resilience in learning variables on mathematical literacy performance: A study of learning characteristics of the academic resilient and advantaged low achievers in Shanghai, Singapore, Hong Kong, Taiwan and Korea. Educational Psychology, 37(8), 965-982.
Chi, S., Liu, X., Wang, Z., & Won Han, S. (2018). Moderation of the effects of scientific inquiry activities on low SES students’ PISA 2015 science achievement by school teacher support and disciplinary climate in science classroom across gender. International Journal of Science Education, 40(11), 1284-1304.
Clavel, J. G., García Crespo, F. J., & Sanz San Miguel, L. (2021). Rising above their circumstances: what makes some disadvantaged East and South-East Asian students perform far better in science than their background predicts?. Asia Pacific Journal of Education, 1-16.
Cohen, J (1988).Statistical power analysis for the behavioral sciences. 2nd edition. Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.
Conroy, D. E. (2001). Fear of failure: An exemplar for social development research in sport. Quest, 53(2), 165-183.
Conroy, D. E. (2003). Representational models associated with fear of failure in adolescents and young adults. Journal of Personality, 71(5), 757-784.
Coombes, L., Appleton, J. V., Allen, D., & Yerrell, P. (2013). Emotional Health and Well‐being in Schools: Involving young people. Children & Society, 27(3), 220-232.
Cortina, K. S., Arel, S., & Smith-Darden, J. P. (2017). School belonging in different cultures: The effects of individualism and power distance. Frontiers in Education, 2, 56-68.
Covington, M. V., & Omelich, C. L. (1979). Effort: The double-edged sword in school achievement. Journal of Educational Psychology, 71(2), 169-182.
Cox, M. J., & Paley, B. (2003). Understanding families as systems. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 12(5), 193-196.
DADANDI, P. U., & Dadandi, I. (2021). The Relationships Among Teachers’ Behaviours That Encourage Students’ Reading Engagement, Reading Enjoyment, Reading Self-Efficacy and Reading Success. Participatory Educational Research, 9(3), 98-110.
Decristan, J., Klieme, E., Kunter, M., Hochweber, J., Büttner, G., Fauth, B., ... & Hardy, I. (2015). Embedded formative assessment and classroom process quality: How do they interact in promoting science understanding?. American Educational Research Journal, 52(6), 1133-1159.
Delle Fave, A., Brdar, I., Wissing, M. P., Araujo, U., Castro Solano, A., Freire, T., ... & Soosai-Nathan, L. (2016). Lay definitions of happiness across nations: The primacy of inner harmony and relational connectedness. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 1-23.
Diener, E. (1984). Subjective well-being. Psychological Bulletin, 95(3), 542-575.
Diener, E., & Diener, M. (1995). Cross-cultural correlates of life satisfaction and self-esteem. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 68, 653-663.
Dweck, C. (2006), Mindset, Random House.
Dweck, C. and D. Yeager (2019), “Mindsets: A View From Two Eras”, Perspectives on Psychological Science, 14(3), 481-496.
Fattore, T., Mason, J., & Watson, E. (2007). Children’s conceptualisation(s) of their well-being. Social Indicators Research, 80(1), 5-29.
Federici, R. A., & Skaalvik, E. M. (2014). Students’ perceptions of emotional and instrumental teacher support: relations with motivational and emotional responses. International Education Studies, 7(1), 21-36.
Feldman, R., & Masalha, S. (2007). The role of culture in moderating the links between early ecological risk and young children’s adaptation. Development and Psychopathology, 19(1), 1-21.
Fraser, B. J. (1989). Twenty years of classroom climate work: Progress and prospect. Journal of Curriculum Studies, 21(4), 307-327.
Fredricks, J. A., Blumenfeld, P. C., & Paris, A. H. (2004). School engagement: Potential of the concept, state of the evidence. Review of Educational Research, 74(1), 59-109.
First Meeting of the PISA 2018 National Project Managers (2016, March). PISA 2018 Integrated Design. Prague, Czech Republic. https://www.oecd.org/pisa/pisaproducts/pisa-2018-integrated-design.pdf
Govorova E, Benítez I, and Muniz J. 2020. How schools affect student well-being: a cross-cultural approach in 35 OECD Countries. Frontiers in Psychology, 11: 431.
Graham, A., Powell, M. A., & Truscott, J. (2016). Facilitating student well-being: relationships do matter. Educational Research, 58(4), 366-383.
Gutman, L. M., & Vorhaus, J. (2012). The impact of pupil behaviour and wellbeing on educational outcomes. Child Wellbeing Research Centre.1-49.
Hattie, J., & Timperley, H. (2007). The power of feedback. Review of Educational Research, 77(1), 81-112.
Hosmer, D. W., & S. Lemeshow. (2000). Applied Logistic Regression, 2nd ed. New York: Wiley.
James, A., & James, A. L. (2001). Childhood: Toward a theory of continuity and change. The Annals of the American Academy of Political and Social Science, 575(1), 25-37.
Jowkar, B., Kojuri, J., Kohoulat, N., & Hayat, A. A. (2014). Academic resilience in education: the role of achievement goal orientations. Journal of Advances in Medical Education & Professionalism, 2(1), 33-38.
Karakus, M., Courtney, M., & Aydin, H. (2022). Understanding the academic achievement of the first-and second-generation immigrant students: a multi-level analysis of PISA 2018 data. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 1-46.
Kılıç Depren, S., & Depren, Ö. (2022). Cross-cultural comparisons of the factors influencing the high reading achievement in Turkey and China: Evidence from PISA 2018. The Asia-Pacific Education Researcher, 31(4), 427-437.
Klem, A. M., & Connell, J. P. (2004). Relationships matter: Linking teacher support to student engagement and achievement. Journal of School Health, 74(7), 262-
Kline, R. B. (2005). Principles and practice of structural equation modeling. Guilford.
Kluger, A. N., & DeNisi, A. (1996). The effects of feedback interventions on performance: A historical review, a meta-analysis, and a preliminary feedback intervention theory. Psychological Bulletin, 119(2), 254-284.
Koth, C. W., Bradshaw, C. P., Leaf, P. J. (2008). A multilevel study of predictors of student perceptions of school climate: The effect of classroom-level factors. Journal of Educational Psychology, 100, 96-104.
Kumpfer, K. L. (1999). Factors and processes contributing to resilience. In: Glantz MD, Johnson JL, (editors). Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations. Kluwer Academic/Plenum Publishers; 1999. (pp. 179-224.)
Lau, K. C., & Lam, T. Y. P. (2017). Instructional practices and science performance of 10 top-performing regions in PISA 2015. International Journal of Science Education, 39(15), 2128-2149.
Lee, J. S. (2012). The effects of the teacher–student relationship and academic press on student engagement and academic performance. International Journal of Educational Research, 53, 330-340.
Liebenberg, L., Theron, L., Sanders, J., Munford, R., Van Rensburg, A., Rothmann, S., & Ungar, M. (2016). Bolstering resilience through teacher-student interaction: Lessons for school psychologists. School Psychology International, 37(2), 140-154.
Lipko-Speed, A., Dunlosky, J., & Rawson, K. A. (2014). Does testing with feedback help grade-school children learn key concepts in science?. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition, 3(3), 171-176.
Lippman, L. H, Moore, K. A., & McIntosh, H. (2011). Positive indicators of child well-being: A conceptual framework, measures and methodological issues. Applied Research Quarterly, 6, 425-449.
Liou, P. Y., & Hung, Y. C. (2015). Statistical techniques utilized in analyzing PISA and TIMSS data in science education from 1996 to 2013: A methodological review. International Journal of Science and Mathematics Education, 13(6), 1449-1468.
Liou, P. Y. (2021). Students’ attitudes toward science and science achievement: An analysis of the differential effects of science instructional practices. Journal of Research in Science Teaching, 58(3), 310-334.
Martin, A.J. (2002). Motivation and academic resilience: Developing a model of student enhancement. Australian Journal of Education, 14, 34-49.
Martin, A. J., & Marsh, H. W. (2003). Fear of failure: Friend or foe?. Australian Psychologist, 38(1), 31-38.
Martin, A. J., and Marsh, H. W. (2006). Academic resilience and its psychological and educational correlates: A construct validity approach. Psychology in the Schools, 43(3), 267-281.
Maryam, S., & Fatmawati, F. (2021). Academic Resilience and Academic Well-Being among College Student during COVID-19 Pandemic. Seminar Nasional Psychologic UM, 1(1) 90-195.
Masten, A. S. (1999). Resilience comes of age: Reflections on the past and outlook for the next generation of research. In M. D. Glantz, J. Johnson, & L. Huffman (Eds.), Resilience and development: Positive life adaptations (pp. 289-296). New York: Plenum Press.
Masten, A. S., & Obradović, J. (2006). Competence and resilience in development. Annals of the New York Academy of Sciences, 1094(1), 13-27.
Masten, A. S. (2007). Resilience in developing systems: Progress and promise as the fourth wave rises. Development and Psychopathology, 19(3), 921-930.
McLellan, R., & Steward, S. (2015). Measuring children and young people’s wellbeing in the school context. Cambridge Journal of Education, 45(3), 307-332.
Mohan, V., & Kaur, J. (2021). Assessing the Relationship between Grit and Academic Resilience among Students. Issues and Ideas in Education, 9(1), 39-47.
Ning, B., Van Damme, J., Van Den Noortgate, W., Yang, X., & Gielen, S. (2015). The influence of classroom disciplinary climate of schools on reading achievement: A cross-country comparative study. School Effectiveness and School Improvement, 26(4), 586-611.
OECD (2010). PISA in focus: How do some students overcome their socio-economic background? Paris: Author.
OECD (2011). Against the odds: disadvantaged students who succeed in school, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2013). PISA 2012 results: Excellence through equity: Giving every student the chance to succeed (Volume II). Paris.
OECD (2016). PISA 2015 Results (Volume I): Excellence and Equity in Education, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2017). PISA 2015 Results (Volume V): Collaborative Problem Solving, PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
OECD (2018). Equity in education: Breaking down barriers to social mobility. OECD Publishing.
OECD (2019a). PISA 2018 assessment and analytical framework. Paris: PISA, OECD Publishing. https://doi.org/10.1787/b25efab8-en.
OECD (2019b). PISA 2018 results—Combined executive summaries, Volume I, II & III, ttps://www.oecd.org/pisa/Combined_Executive_Summaries_PISA_2018.pdf. Accessed February 10, 2020.
OECD (2019c).PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What students know and can do, PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing. 10.1787/5f07c754-en.
OECD (2019d). Released items from the PISA 2018 computer-based reading assessment. In PISA 2018 results (Volume I): what students know and can do. Paris: OECD Publishing. https://doi. org/10.1787/098bab1a-en.
OECD (2019e). The PISA target population, the PISA samples and the definition of schools: Exclusions and coverage ratios. in PISA 2018 Results (Volume I): What Students Know and Can Do, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/58eda1bc-en.
OECD (2020). PISA 2018 Results (Ausgabe VI): Are Students Ready to Thrive in an Interconnected World? PISA. Paris: OECD Publishing.
OECD (2021) Sky’s the limit: Growth mindset, students, and schools in PISA. PISA, OECD Publishing, Paris.
Oliver, M., McConney, A., & Woods-McConney, A. (2021). The efficacy of inquiry-based instruction in science: A comparative analysis of six countries using PISA 2015. Research in Science Education, 51(2), 595-616.
Olodude, I. I., Anuodo, A. O., & Owoeye, O. M. (2020). Self-efficacy as a determinant of academic resilience among postgraduate students. Ife Social Sciences Review, 28(1), 120-129.
Ömür, Ç. (2020). Relationships between Students’ Socioeconomic Status, Parental Support, Students’ Hindering, Teachers’ Hindering and Student’ Literacy Scores: PISA 2018. World Journal of Education, 10(4), 45-59.
Ormrod, J. E. (2012), Essentials of Educational Psychology: Big Ideas to Guide Effective Teaching, 3rd ed., Pearson, Boston.
Pianta, R. C., Belsky, J., Vandergrift, N., Houts, R., & Morrison, F. J. (2008). Classroom effects on children’s achievement trajectories in elementary school. American Educational Research Journal, 45(2), 365-397.
Poole, M. A., & O′Farrell, P. N. (1971). The assumptions of the linear regression model. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 145-158.
Radhamani, K., & Kalaivani, D.(2021) Academic Resilience among Students: A Review of Literature. International Journal of Research and Review, 8(6), 360-369.
Richardson, G., Neiger, B., Jensen, S., & Kumpfer, K. (1990). The resiliency model. Health Education, 21(6), 33-39.
Richardson, G. E. (2002). The metatheory of resilience and resiliency. Journal of Cclinical Psychology, 58(3), 307-321.
Ricketts, S., Engelhard, G., & Chang, M.-L. (2017). Development and Validation of a Scale to Measure Academic Resilience in Mathematics. European Journal of Psychological Assessment, 33(2), 79-86.
Rivkin, S. G., Hanushek, E. A., & Kain, J. F. (2005). Teachers, schools, and academic achievement. Econometrica, 73(2), 417-458.
Rohrer, D., Taylor, K., & Sholar, B. (2010). Tests enhance the transfer of learning. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 36(1), 233-239.
Rojas, L. F. (2015). Factors affecting academic resilience in middle school students: A case study. Gist: Education and Learning Research Journal, (11), 63-78.
Rudolf, R. (2020). Life Satisfaction among Middle School Students around the World Cross-Cultural Evidence from PISA 2018. Retrieved from https://ssrn.com/abstract=3544001
Ryff, C. D. (1989). Happiness is everything, or is it? Explorations on the meaning of psychological well-being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6), 1069-1081.
Ryff, C. D., & Keyes, C. L. M. (1995). The structure of psychological well-being revisited. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 69(4), 719-727.
Sakiz, G., Pape, S. J., & Hoy, A. W. (2012). Does perceived teacher affective support matter for middle school students in mathematics classrooms?. Journal of School Psychology, 50(2), 235-255.
Sandoval-Hernández, A., & Białowolski, P. (2016). Factors and conditions promoting academic resilience: a TIMSS-based analysis of five Asian education systems. Asia Pacific Education Review, 17(3), 511-520.
Sirin, S. R. (2005). Socioeconomic status and academic achievement: A meta-analytic review of research. Review of Educational Research, 75(3), 417-453.
Stankov, L. (2010). Unforgiving Confucian culture: A breeding ground for high academic achievement, test anxiety and self-doubt?. Learning and Individual Differences, 20(6), 555-563.
Sortkær, B., & Reimer, D. (2016). Disciplinary climate and student achievement: Evidence from schools and classrooms. Working paper Danish School of Education, Aarhus University, 2016.
Suldo, S. M., Friedrich, A. A., White, T., Farmer, J., Minch, D., & Michalowski, J. (2009). Teacher support and adolescents′ subjective well-being: A mixed-methods investigation. School Psychology Review, 38(1), 67-85.
Tiêt, Q. Q., & Huizinga, D. (2002). Dimensions of the construct of resilience and adaptation among inner-city youth. Journal of Adolescent Research, 17(3), 260-276.
Tourón, J., Navarro-Asencio, E., Lizasoain, L., López-González, E., & García-San Pedro, M. J. (2019). How teachers’ practices and students’ attitudes towards technology affect mathematics achievement: results and insights from PISA 2012. Research Papers in Education, 34(3), 263-275.
Tusaie, K., Puskar, K., & Sereika, S. M. (2007). A predictive and moderating model of psychosocial resilience in adolescents. Journal of Nursing Scholarship, 39(1), 54-60.
Wach, F. S., Spengler, M., Gottschling, J., & Spinath, F. M. (2015). Sex differences in secondary school achievement–The contribution of self-perceived abilities and fear of failure. Learning and Instruction, 36, 104-112.
Wang, M. T., & Holcombe, R. (2010). Adolescents’ perceptions of school environment, engagement, and academic achievement in middle school. American Educational Research Journal, 47(3), 633-662.
World Health Organisation (2006). Constitution of the World Health Organisation. Basic Documents Supplement. Retrieved from http://www.who.int/governance/eb/who_ constitution_en.pdf.
Willms, D. and X. Ma (2004). School disciplinary climate: characteristics and effects on eighth grade achievement. Alberta Journal of Educational Research, 50(2), 169-188.
Yamamoto, K., H. Shin and L. Khorramdel (2019), Introduction of multistage adaptive testing design in PISA 2018.OECD Education Working Papers, No. 209, OECD Publishing, Paris, https://doi.org/10.1787/b9435d4b-en.
Ye, W., Strietholt, R., & Blömeke, S. (2021). Academic resilience: underlying norms and validity of definitions. Educational Assessment, Evaluation and Accountability, 33(1), 169-202.
Yeager, D. S., & Dweck, C. S. (2020). What can be learned from growth mindset controversies?. American Psychologist, 75(9), 1269.
指導教授 辜玉旻(Yu-Min Ku) 審核日期 2023-2-2
推文 facebook   plurk   twitter   funp   google   live   udn   HD   myshare   reddit   netvibes   friend   youpush   delicious   baidu   
網路書籤 Google bookmarks   del.icio.us   hemidemi   myshare   

若有論文相關問題,請聯絡國立中央大學圖書館推廣服務組 TEL:(03)422-7151轉57407,或E-mail聯絡  - 隱私權政策聲明