摘要(英) |
As technology advances at a fast pace, consumers have higher demands for information products, which has impacted the vigorous development of the software industry and driven hardware manufacturers to achieve technological breakthroughs. However, due to insufficient research achievements and brain drain, the information service industry in Taiwan mostly relies on foreign hardware and software companies. This has resulted in the emergence of value-added distributors and resellers. Resellers have to stay professional and maintain a good relationship with existing customers, while building trust among their downstream and upstream partners. Intangible products, such as knowledge and services, will be sold in the future. Opportunities of new generation software development are emerging with a huge demand for new generation software, plus the increased demand for information systems which evolve from enterprise packages and internal information systems to comprehensive system integrated information services, etc. At this time, it is beneficial for Taiwanese companies to gain insight into how to take control of their own resources and capabilities, plan and develop adequate information services and business strategies, and actively promote quality products as well as improve service quality to maintain market competitiveness.
This Study discusses the conflicts and challenges of Company A in the case from the viewpoint of the distributor. It investigates into how to utilize the Group’s resources to allocate the organizational resources timely and appropriately, and combine them with the strength of distributors and customers to develop a continuously profitable model for sustainable company operations. Although Company A is recognized in the industry and has entered its mature stage, its customers have increased demands for information services. The overall competition in the industry is still fierce, so information service companies are difficult to operate. Therefore, companies must continuously review their capabilities and resources, and understand the landscape and dynamic development of the industry to correct, adjust, and develop appropriate information service strategies. Companies must continuously discover important advantageous factors and revenue streams to effectively reduce various competition and increase their profits.
This Study mainly discusses the marketing strategies of the information service industry and the development direction in the future. It uses the case study method and takes Company A as an example. Through qualitative research, analysis and recommendations are put forth to assist domestic information service companies in their marketing strategies. Effective recommendations about marketing strategies will be provided by collecting related market data and SWOT analysis.
|
參考文獻 |
一.中文文獻
1. 工作大贏家 (2006),資訊服務業範疇,矽緯資訊出版。
2. 台灣就業通 (2017),台灣資訊服務業概況及技術應用趨勢,台灣就業通出版.
3. 司徒達賢 (2005),策略管理新論:觀念架構與分析方法。台北:智勝文化。
4. 行政院主計處,中華民國行業標準分類,2015年12月22日,https://www.dgbas.gov.tw
5. 行政院勞委會職訓局(2006),數位內容,工作大贏家,2006年11月號,第6-9頁,台北:行政院勞工委員會職業訓練局。
6. 余朝權 (2015),產業競爭分析專論,台灣五南圖書出版股份有限公司。
7. 吳文雄 (2014),資訊服務業全球行銷策略分析–以委外服務產業為例,國立台北大學經營管理系高階主管專班碩士論文,台北。
8. 周維忠、童啟晟、陳凱迪、劉家委 (2017),2017資訊服務暨軟體年鑑,第13-18、34-43、143-152頁,資策會產業情報研究所出版。
9. 洪誌宏 (2012),國際資訊服務業廠商與當地經銷商之售後服務競爭之研究 ,國立成功大學工業與資訊管理研究所,台南。
10. 徐作聖、陳仁帥 (2012),產業分析,台北:全華科技圖書公司。
11. 翁偉修 (2013),巨量資料風潮下的軟體市場趨勢與機會,第8-22頁,資策會產業情報研究所出版。
12. 袁國光 (2007),軟體行銷策略與競爭優勢分析-以全球二家資訊大廠為例,國立中央大學資訊管理研究所碩士論文,桃園
13. 張昭宣 (2009),資訊系統整合業者行銷通路策略之研究,國立中央大學工業管理研究所,台北。
14. 許長田 (2005),策略管理,新文京出版社。
15. 陳向明 (2002),社會科學質的研究,台北:五南出版社。
16. 陳伯瑋 (2010),在雲端運算環境下資訊服務業經營策略之研究-以系統整合業為個案,銘傳大學經濟學研究所,台北。
17. 陳凱迪;簡祐延;李易鴻 (2016),2016資訊產業年鑑-資訊服務暨軟體篇,資策會產業情報研究所出版。
18. 游明德 (2016),台灣資訊服務競爭力研究以Porter鑽石模式實證,大同大學事業經營研究所,台北。
19. 黃子芸 (2016),資訊服務系統整合業者雲端運算策略之研究,臺灣科技大學管理研究所,台北。
20. 黃鈺如 (2015),自有品牌行銷策略之探討-以電腦週邊產品A 公司為例,國立中央大學企業管理系高階主管專班碩士論文,桃園
21. 經濟部技術處 (2017),2017/2018產業技術白皮書,台經院出版。
22. 詹伊正 (2015),資訊服務代理商之競爭策略與商業模式分析:以臺灣S公司為例,國立師範大學管理學院高階經理人企業管理系碩士論文,台北。
23. 簡春安、鄒平儀 (1998),社會工作研究法,台北:巨流。
二、英文文獻
1. Aaker, D. A. (1984). Strategic Market Management. N.Y.: John Wiley & Sons Co.
2. Aaker, D. A. (1991). Managing The Most Important Asset: Brand Equity. Strategy & Leadership, 56-57.
3. Ansoff, H. I. (1965). Corporate strategy, New York: McGraw-Hill.
4. Barney, D. F. (1991). Time Paths in the Diffusion of Product Innovation. London: Macmillan.
5. Etzel, M. J., Walker,B.J. and Stanton,W.J. (2004). Marketing (13th Ed.).
Boston: McGraw-Hill Irwin.
6. Fahey, L. & V. K. Narayanan, (1986). Macroenvironmental analysis for strategy management. West, St. Paul, MN.
7. Gartner, “Gartner Says Global IT Spending to Grow 3.2 Percent in 2019,” at Fairmont San Francisco, Press Release, Inc., 2018 [Online],
https://www.gartner.com/en/newsroom/press-releases/2018-10-17-gartner-says-global-it-spending-to-grow-3-2-percent-in-2019
8. Grant, R.M. (1991). ” The resource-base theory of competitive advantage: Implications for strategy formulation”. California Management Review 33(3):114-135.
9. Hamel, G, (2000). Leading the Revolution, Harvard Business School Press,
pp. 61-113.
10. Kotler, P. (1984). Marketing Management Analysis, Planning and Control, 5th ed. Englewood Cliff, NJ: Printice-Hall, Inc.
11. Kotler, P. (2000). Marketing Management: Analysis, Planning, Implementation and Control, Millennium ed., International Series in Marketing, Prentice-Hall, Englewood Cliffs, NJ.
12. Maggard, J.P. (1976). "Positioning revisited". Journal of Marketing, Vol. 40,(January), pp. 63-66.
13. McCarthy, (1960) E.J., Basic Marketing: A Managerial Approach Irwin, Homewood,Ill.
14. Porter, M. E. (1980). Competitive Strategy: Techniques for Analyzing Industries and Competitors. New York: Free Press.
15. Porter, M.E., (1985) The Competitive Advantage: Creating and Sustaining Superior Performance, The Free Press: New York.
16. Prahalad, C. K. & Hamel, G.(1990), ” The Core Competence of Corporation”, Harvard Business Review, Vol.68, no.3, pp.79-91.
17. Weihrich, H. (1982). The Tows Matrix – a Tool for Situational Analysis, Long Range Planning, April (60).
|